2009 Star Trek Ships of the Line Wall Calendar

2009 Star Trek Ships of the Line Wall Calendar

2.8 5
by Paramount Pictures Corporation
     
 

Featuring fourteen pieces of Star Trek art not available anywhere else and created exclusively for this calendar, the Star Trek Ships of the Line 2009 Calendar will continue to delight and amaze fans. Displaying remarkable artistry in its unique, dramatic depictions of Star Trek's ships, this calendar is highly anticipated by Star Trek

Overview

Featuring fourteen pieces of Star Trek art not available anywhere else and created exclusively for this calendar, the Star Trek Ships of the Line 2009 Calendar will continue to delight and amaze fans. Displaying remarkable artistry in its unique, dramatic depictions of Star Trek's ships, this calendar is highly anticipated by Star Trek fans each year.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780740774270
Publisher:
Andrews McMeel Publishing
Publication date:
07/15/2008
Pages:
24
Product dimensions:
11.09(w) x 12.00(h) x 0.10(d)

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

2009 Star Trek Ships of the Line Wall Calendar 2.8 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 5 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
PatriciaSK More than 1 year ago
The pictures are fantastic but the numbers in the calendar are really hard to see.
DrMorbius More than 1 year ago
I forget the name of the style, but the calender portion of each month is not arranged traditionally, i.e. in a 'Sunday thru Saturday' grid, but starts with the 1st of the month, no matter what weekday it is, and then simply goes on for however many days "looks good" for whatever the layout of artwork is.

For instance, January starts on Thursday, Jan 1st, and the first line of the grid continues for ELEVEN days until we reach Sunday, Jan. 11th, and then the next line starts on Monday, Jan 12th.

Maybe some people like that, but I find it annoying.

Most of the artwork isn't as good as I thought it would be, either...
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago