2012 Legislative Report Card for Arizona’s Fiftieth Legislature, First Regular Session [NOOK Book]

Overview

The annual Goldwater Institute Legislative Report Card scores Arizona lawmakers on their support of principles
of limited constitutional government. Each piece of legislation is assessed in one of four categories for whether it
expands liberty consistent with the Arizona Constitution, or restricts liberty.
...
See more details below
2012 Legislative Report Card for Arizona’s Fiftieth Legislature, First Regular Session

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$0.99
BN.com price

Overview

The annual Goldwater Institute Legislative Report Card scores Arizona lawmakers on their support of principles
of limited constitutional government. Each piece of legislation is assessed in one of four categories for whether it
expands liberty consistent with the Arizona Constitution, or restricts liberty.

This report card assesses 517 votes. Average scores were 56 percent in the House and 59 percent in the Senate,
indicating that slightly more votes upheld liberty than undermined it. These scores are respectively 23 percent and
20 percent higher than the scores first reported in 2003. The increase reflects a long-term trend of improvement
in voting patterns. Education scores, in particular, were sharply higher in both major parties this year. The highest
overall score was Sen. Steve Smith’s 76 percent. Rep. Eddie Farnsworth received the highest score in the House, which
was 73 percent. These high scorers received overall grades of A-. As in 2011, not a single legislator in this year’s report
received an overall score of A or higher.

Beyond the individual legislator grades, this report card includes an assessment of each bill’s impact on the status
quo with “high impact,” “moderate impact,” and “incremental impact” categories. It reveals a significant narrowing of
the difference in voting patterns between the major political parties with respect to high-impact bills as compared to
prior years. This year the difference between the parties with regard to high impact bills was only 37 points; in 2011,
by contrast, the difference was a dramatic 71 points. No such dramatic narrowing of scores occurred with regard to
moderate or incremental impact bills.

The 2012 Legislative Report Card also compares traditionally funded and publicly funded candidates. As with all
previous years, the source of campaign funding appears to have no significant impact on voting behavior.

The report card is not an absolute measure of a legislator’s merit and does not constitute any endorsement. It is meant
to be a tool for general research and for accountability, helping voters assess the work of their elected representatives.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • BN ID: 2940014879767
  • Publisher: Goldwater Institute
  • Publication date: 8/15/2012
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • File size: 939 KB

Meet the Author

Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is Director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.

Dranias led the Goldwater Institute’s successful challenge to Arizona’s system of government campaign financing to the U.S. Supreme Court. Even before the case was accepted for review, Dranias was able to persuade the Court to intervene in lower court proceedings and block campaign subsidies from being paid to government-funded candidates during the 2010 election cycle. In addition to practicing constitutional law as a member of the Goldwater Institute’s litigation team, Dranias serves as a constitutional scholar. He has authored numerous scholarly articles dealing with a wide spectrum of issues in constitutional and regulatory policy, including the protection of free speech, the principle of state sovereignty, the reformation of excessive regulation, and the guarantee of individual liberty. His articles have been published by leading law reviews, bar journals and think tanks across the country. Dranias’ latest work is Save the Taxpayers Tens of Billions of Dollars: End Government-Sector Collective Bargaining.

Prior to joining the Goldwater Institute, Dranias was an attorney with the Institute for Justice for three years and an attorney in private practice in Chicago for eight years. In law school, Dranias served on the Loyola University Chicago Law Review, competed on Loyola’s National Labor Law Moot Court Team, and received various academic awards. He graduated cum laude from Boston University with a B.A. in Economics and Philosophy.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)