Not what it seems....
I bought this book because I was curious to see what Don Piper had to say about the afterlife. As one who has had a near death experience, I am always interested in reading other people's experiences. I've learned much about the NDE over the last ten years from the people who have actually researched them, some of whom I've met personally. I've also read quite a few near death accounts. Given what I have learned over the years, I wanted to read 90 Minutes In Heaven to see if it measured up to the research that has been done on the topic, as well as see if I could determine why this particular book is so popular. I was looking for the basic components researchers like Dr. Raymond Moody, Dr. PMH Atwater and Dr. Bruce Greyson have identified in their research over the years. I saw a few, but some major ones were missing, like the Life Review. There was no tunnel experience. There was no supernatural rescue and no realm of bewildered spirits. Toward the end of the book Don takes a swipe at other people's experiences, he says: 'Descriptions of their ordeals often seem too rehearsed and disturbingly similar, as if one person copied the story of the last.' It looks like Don doesn't believe the experiences that back up the conclusions of the research that has been established and thinks his is the only valid one, like God picked him and him only as a messenger. It may well be the experiences are similar because they are indeed near death experiences, which makes me wonder about the credibility issues this book has. It just doesn't pass muster as an NDE. Actually, Don never did get past the 'pearly gates' he reported seeing and he never got to walk the streets 'paved with gold.' His description of heaven 'albeit short' is what I'd expect to come from a clergyman. Almost all of what Don saw and experienced consisted of meeting others who were outside of the gates of heaven. Even this was repeated over and over, the same thought, just different ways to say it. Basically, his description of heaven comes from the outside of heaven, not from the inside. This is likely the reason many other reviewers think the title of the book is very misleading. I tend to agree with them. Researchers might class this experience as a 'Pleasant or heaven-like experience.' I'm not saying that I don't believe Don saw what he saw, but I am saying that his NDE isn't as descriptive as many others are and most likely was a rather basic out of body experience. There is very little information about the afterlife in this book. The lion's share of 90 Minutes In Heaven is focused on Don's recovery which I feel could have been written much better. It isn't in chronological order, which made it extremely hard for me to follow. There is a lot of repetition throughout the book, especially about the 'Ilizarov leg fixator' device. The 'poor me' and 'it's all about me' attitude throughout the book got old really fast. I'm sorry I can't recommend this book. There are other books with quite a bit more information about the afterlife in them. I'd pass on this one. David L. Oakford, author of Journey Through The World of Spirit: God, Gaia, and Guardian Angels
105 out of 132 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.