A Climate of Crisis: America in the Age of Environmentalism [NOOK Book]


A provocative history of the environmental movement in America, showing how this rise to political and social prominence produced a culture of alarmism that has often distorted the facts

Few issues today excite more passion or alarm than the specter of climate change. In A Climate of Crisis, historian Patrick Allitt shows that our present climate of crisis is far from ...
See more details below
A Climate of Crisis: America in the Age of Environmentalism

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
BN.com price


A provocative history of the environmental movement in America, showing how this rise to political and social prominence produced a culture of alarmism that has often distorted the facts

Few issues today excite more passion or alarm than the specter of climate change. In A Climate of Crisis, historian Patrick Allitt shows that our present climate of crisis is far from exceptional. Indeed, the environmental debates of the last half century are defined by exaggeration and fearmongering from all sides, often at the expense of the facts.

In a real sense, Allitt shows us, collective anxiety about widespread environmental danger began with the atomic bomb. As postwar suburbanization transformed the American landscape, more research and better tools for measurement began to reveal the consequences of economic success. A climate of anxiety became a climate of alarm, often at odds with reality. The sixties generation transformed environmentalism from a set of special interests into a mass movement. By the first Earth Day in 1970, journalists and politicians alike were urging major initiatives to remedy environmental harm. In fact, the work of the new Environmental Protection Agency and a series of clean air and water acts from a responsive Congress inaugurated a largely successful cleanup.

Political polarization around environmental questions after 1980 had consequences that we still feel today. Since then, the general polarization of American politics has mirrored that of environmental politics, as pro-environmentalists and their critics attribute to one another the worst possible motives. Environmentalists see their critics as greedy special interest groups that show no conscience as they plunder the earth while skeptics see their adversaries as enemies of economic growth whose plans stifle initiative under an avalanche of bureaucratic regulation.

There may be a germ of truth in both views, but more than a germ of falsehood too. America’s worst environmental problems have proven to be manageable; the regulations and cleanups of the last sixty years have often worked, and science and technology have continued to improve industrial efficiency. Our present situation is serious, argues Allitt, but it is far from hopeless. Sweeping and provocative, A Climate of Crisis challenges our basic assumptions about the environment, no matter where we fall along the spectrum—reminding us that the answers to our most pressing questions are sometimes found in understanding the past.

From the Trade Paperback edition.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble

History professor/author Patricia Allitt (I'm the Teacher, You're the Student; The Conservatives) sounds a hopeful chord to quiet the alarmists on both sides of the environmental wars. Citing the history of the American environmental movement, she describes the price our society has often paid for exaggeration and fear-mongering of both Earth First advocates and Global Warming deniers. A provocative account for news watchers of every persuasion.

Publishers Weekly
Emory University historian Allitt (The Conservatives) examines contemporary American environmentalism historically, from his “counter-environmentalist” and pro-industrialist stance, in order to allay fears of a real crisis. He structures his work chronologically, devoting each chapter to the conflicting issues within each established time frame. His initial chapter on the 1950s describes “nuclear anxieties” and worries about overpopulation, eventually making his way through discussions of biofuels, invasive species, and alternative energy. While Allitt claims that “America’s environmental problems have been manageable problems,” it’s difficult to assess the extent to which his claim is based on wishful thinking or just a cherry-picking of the available evidence. He also implies that environmental advocates are motivated less by scientific evidence than careerism or a desire to constrain the economy. This is most striking in his dubious discussion of anthropogenic climate change, of which he remains a skeptic. Though “he study of history shows us how bad we are at predicting the future,” that has little bearing on the fact that 97% of climate research points to human activity as the culprit, regardless of potential future outcomes. Allitt doesn’t question his own technophilia, and his belief that capitalism and technology will solve our ecological problems should be received with its own dose of skepticism. (Apr.)
From the Publisher
The Wall Street Journal:
“In recounting partisan battles, Mr. Allitt’s objectivity is refreshing…His critique of the relentless crisis mentality will lead many environmentalists to dismiss the book as anti-environmental, while anti-environmentalists will object to his conclusion that much conservation has been achieved at little cost to ordinary Americans."

The Weekly Standard: 
“A book that deserves widespread readership and course adoption…The virtue of Allitt’s history is a fresh approach to familiar themes and controversies, and from a perspective only occasionally brought to bear on the subject…He gets the larger story right…Allitt’s wide-gauge historical approach is a valuable complement to the many scientific and policy critiques that have piled up over the years.”

Martin V. Melosi, author of The Sanitary City and Precious Commodity:
“In this sweeping study, Patrick Allitt covers every conceivable major character and event in the modern ‘age of environmentalism.’ The book is grounded in intellectual history, and seeks to find balance in interpreting the role of environmental advocates and naysayers, in successes and failures of governmental regulation, in objectives and outcomes. The tone is definitely optimistic about the long view of meeting environmental challenges in the United States. At the same time, in linking past to present, Allitt offers caution about what might unfold in the days to come. Above all else, he touts the value of history in assessing America’s complex environmental legacy.”

Adam Rome, author of The Genius of Earth Day:
“I don’t agree with everything in A Climate of Crisis, but Patrick Allitt’s well-written and provocative book has given me more to think about than any other history of the U.S. environmental movement. A Climate of Crisis is both bracing and exciting.”

Kirkus Reviews
A wide-ranging history of the American environmental movement. Allitt (American History/Emory Univ.; The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History, 2009, etc.) offers a readable account that will provoke and displease many environmentalists. Few of the issues facing the nation—from overpopulation in the 1950s to air and water pollution in the '60s to genetically modified foods in the '90s to climate change today—warranted the accompanying moods of crisis, which were "usually disproportionate to the actual danger involved." Most problems were manageable, but they were exaggerated due to media sensationalism, environmental scientists seeking recognition, the needs of a growing environmental establishment and the beneficial effects of crises on environmental groups' memberships. "When the nation mobilized the political will it was effective in providing remedies," writes Allitt, celebrating actions on pesticides, toxic dumps, endangered species and other issues. However, he overlooks the fact that to mobilize political will, environmental groups had to fight for attention, waging information campaigns and sounding alarms, often in the face of strong, well-financed opposition, so that the public would eventually demand legislative action. Allitt's things-will-take-care-of-themselves view, based on sympathy with counterenvironmentalists' ideas, informs his book. He covers major individuals and controversies over six decades, showing how Aldo Leopold and Rachel Carson created constituencies for mainstream environmentalism—a mass movement by 1970—and Edward Abbey inspired activists. Highly politicized issues pitted critics, who viewed green advocates as selfish elitists, against environmentalists who saw opponents as cynical and greedy. Allitt notes Congress passed 28 major environmental laws in the decade before 1980, when President Ronald Reagan began dismantling many regulations and sparked a conservative counterenvironmentalism. Allitt dismisses the "false" claims of impending catastrophe associated with climate change, which he deems "another real but manageable problem." An optimistic book that downplays the clamorous work of environmental groups and attributes progress to the institutions of democracy and capitalism.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780698151598
  • Publisher: Penguin Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 3/20/2014
  • Series: Penguin History American Life
  • Sold by: Penguin Group
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 400
  • Sales rank: 289,231
  • File size: 8 MB

Meet the Author

Patrick Allitt is the Cahoon Family Professor of American History at Emory University, where he has taught since 1988. He was an undergraduate at Oxford and a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, and held postdoctoral fellowships at Harvard Divinity School and Princeton University. The author of six books, he is also the presenter of eight lecture series with “The Great Courses,” including “The Art of Teaching.”
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 2.5
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 19, 2014

    A Climate of Crisis By Patrick Allitt A Review Professor All

    A Climate of Crisis
    By Patrick Allitt

    A Review

    Professor Allitt has written a comprehensive history of environmentalism in the 20th and 21st Centuries. The title of the book provides a capsule of his point of view, which he states unabashedly to be that environmental concerns for global disaster have been overblown, ill-founded and regrettable. Allitt does not deny that environmental problems exist now and have been much more serious in the past. But he holds that environmental policies and regulation that threaten economic growth are, in general, unwise and counterproductive. His theme is that only wealthy countries can afford to be “green” and that underdeveloped countries must accept bad environmental practices on the road to wealth, so that they may someday achieve the relatively clean environment now experienced in the USA and Western Europe.
    In the course of some 340 pages, Allitt cites the statements, actions and experiences of what must be almost every major character on the stage of the environment – both pro and con. In prose that comes close to sneering, he discusses in detail the forecasts of worldwide doom that came from some of those concerned about overpopulation and food deficiencies, nuclear proliferation, fossil fuel depletion, endangered species, pollution, acid rain, etc. He points out that man’s ingenuity and willingness to regulate (in democratic, developed nations) mitigated the effect of those threats, when real. In discussing the undeniable success in reducing health risk by elimination of lead compounds as anti-knock additives in gasoline, Allitt denigrates the use of ethanol as a replacement by linking it exclusively to the desire for renewable energy sources. Here he is either ill-informed or blind to the real issue: the political decision to use ethanol made only from US-produced corn.
    On the other hand, the author has nothing good to say about radical anti-environmentalists such as Ronald Reagan and his appointees, who believed that environmental threats were nonsense in the first place and fought every effort that they perceived as costing private or public money. Allitt also does not downplay real environmental disasters, such as Chernobyl, Bhopal, Three Mile Island, Deepwater Horizon, and the widespread pollution of the former Soviet Union. Nor does he overlook the current rampant pollution in China and India. He strongly supports enforcement of government regulations that may prevent the errors, malfeasance and carelessness to blame for such tragedies.
    To this reader, a major fault in the book is the lack of credit given to the early, and sometimes radical, pioneers of environmentalism for mustering public and governmental support for the positive changes in American health and safety over the time since World War II. These positive changes are stated clearly as monumental. No doubt the threats those pioneers foresaw were exaggerated but their views were sincerely held. By insisting on publicizing the risks, the early environmentalists caused a groundswell of opposition to air and water pollution by callous industry and municipalities. They also generated much of the concern for food and drug safety that is embodied in the FDA. These voices of doom have been shown to be wrong in many ways but without them, we may ask if our environment would be as well off as it now is.
    There are interesting insights developed by Professor Allitt. One of these is the pseudo-religious fervor displayed by many environmentalists in their intensely secular concern for the well-being of the earth. It is, perhaps, an example that people dedicated to altruistic action need a spiritual motivation even if they deny belief in a higher power. Another insight is the “auto-reinforcing” (my term) position of groups on both sides of the environmental fence. In order to get results by lobbying or publicity, groups who promote an environmental posture require money. The sources of funding tend to demand uncompromising dedication to the position of the group, even when information is developed later that should lead to change. Yet another insight is that those in opposition to environmental reform may be characterized as either “anti” or “counter” in their positions. The “anti” group rejects just about any action to improve or protect the environment if it costs money. The “counter” group admits that environmental problems exist but wants to defer potentially costly action until the threat is fully defined. (Prof. Allitt seems to find himself in the “counter” category.)
    The later chapters of this book devote much attention to the issue of climate change or warming. And it is here that Allitt expresses a counter-environmental position most clearly. He devotes much space to the scientific arguments that deny various aspects of climate change theory but not that much to the arguments that support it. His conclusion is that climate change itself is doubtful, that man-made emissions of carbon dioxide are not significant in the atmosphere, and that even if major climate change does occur, mankind is smart and wealthy enough to roll with the punch.
    Overall, Prof. Allitt attempts to straddle the fence of environmentalism with optimism that no matter how man changes the environment of the world, mankind will not only survive but prosper. It is difficult to dispute his contention that large expenditures by wealthy nations are better directed to reducing poverty than on actions to forestall uncertain environmental calamity. But one has the uncomfortable feeling that the slant of Allitt’s writing is directed more toward book sales than the author’s convictions.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted September 29, 2014

    Over the past half-century most of the western world has cleaned

    Over the past half-century most of the western world has cleaned up its air and water while simultaneously raising the global standard of living and producing a surplus of food to feed a quadrupled population. During that same period environmental doomsayers have come and gone - all their professions of inevitable cataclysm have not come to pass. The current "hot" environmental topic of global warming is just the latest in a long list of "chicken little" crises. Ignore the hype - a prosperous, democratic world will solve any real problems that crop up. How comforting.
    That is the essence of Patrick Allitt's A Climate of Crisis - what might have been a welcome perspective on environmental history from "outside" the science community is, in the final analysis, flawed by a naive analysis of how science actually works in driving policy. Allitt dissects the history of the environmental movement (primarily after World War II) with frequent scholarly insights, covering many topics but with some emphasis on climate change. Given that the author is a historian, it is not surprising that he discusses in detail the impact of many non-scientists on the development of environmental thinking, but, to this reviewer, he tends to overstate his case. The book is so free-wheeling and rambling at times that it is bound to generate some criticism.
    Although the author protests his objectivity frequently throughout the book, he just as frequently bends a bit too far towards the "skeptical" position on environmental issues. When it comes to the late-20th-century battle over water and air pollution, he paints an over-rosy picture of the polluter's response while placing too much emphasis on the headline-grabbing antics of science superstars such as Ehrlich and Schneider. The reality was that, in the face of past environmental challenges, industry almost always had to be dragged kicking and screaming before accepting regulation and cleaning up their act. In the final analysis we cleaned up our air and water because the weight of scientific evidence was overwhelming that industrial pollution was harming the environment and deleterious to human health. That evidence was collected over decades of painstaking fieldwork. The scientists were right time and time again - disasters, for the most part, were averted. Did they sometimes overstate their case? Yes. And?
    Allitt tends toward the same bias when he discusses climate change. Most scientists working on global climate change are not making policy statements about impending doom. Nor are they all working on (admittedly theoretical) computer models of global climate. Most are collecting data with rigor and precision and attempting to construct an accurate picture of the current global climate or reconstruct the climate system of Earth past. That past climate is known beyond doubt to have been quite different from the present - our present quasi-Eden has been unusually stable and beneficent when seen in that historical perspective. Climate scientists have failed miserably in convincing the vast array of policy wonks that the global situation is grave. That does not in any way lead to the conclusion that their science is in any way wrong.
    The book is organized into 11 chapters with nearly 50 pages of notes and a detailed index. Images of some of the players in the environmental game are included, but there are no graphs or technical figures.
    Richard R. Pardi Environmental Science William Paterson University

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)