A Cruel and Shocking Act: The Secret History of the Kennedy Assassination [NOOK Book]

Overview

A groundbreaking, explosive account of the Kennedy assassination that will rewrite the history of the 20th century's most controversial murder investigation


The questions have haunted our nation for half a century: Was the President killed by a single gunman? Was Lee Harvey Oswald part of a conspiracy? Did the Warren Commission discover the whole truth of what happened on November 22, 1963?


Philip Shenon, a veteran investigative journalist ...

See more details below
A Cruel and Shocking Act: The Secret History of the Kennedy Assassination

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99
BN.com price

Overview

A groundbreaking, explosive account of the Kennedy assassination that will rewrite the history of the 20th century's most controversial murder investigation


The questions have haunted our nation for half a century: Was the President killed by a single gunman? Was Lee Harvey Oswald part of a conspiracy? Did the Warren Commission discover the whole truth of what happened on November 22, 1963?


Philip Shenon, a veteran investigative journalist who spent most of his career at The New York Times, finally provides many of the answers. Though A Cruel and Shocking Act began as Shenon's attempt to write the first insider's history of the Warren Commission, it quickly became something much larger and more important when he discovered startling information that was withheld from the Warren Commission by the CIA, FBI and others in power in Washington. Shenon shows how the commission's ten-month investigation was doomed to fail because the man leading it - Chief Justice Earl Warren - was more committed to protecting the Kennedy family than getting to the full truth about what happened on that tragic day. A taut, page-turning narrative, Shenon's book features some of the most compelling figures of the twentieth century--Bobby Kennedy, Jackie Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, J. Edgar Hoover, Chief Justice Warren, CIA spymasters Allen Dulles and Richard Helms, as well as the CIA's treacherous "molehunter," James Jesus Angleton.

Based on hundreds of interviews and unprecedented access to the surviving commission staffers and many other key players, Philip Shenon's authoritative, scrupulously researched book will forever change the way we think about the Kennedy assassination and about the deeply flawed investigation that followed.

A Washington Post Notable Nonfiction Book of 2013

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble

In his 2008 book The Commission, investigative journalist Philip Shenon gave us what remains the most authoritative look at U.S. government probes into the causes of the September 11th attacks. In A Cruel and Shocking Act, he delves into the previous hidden history of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Like its predecessor, this new book takes us into the deeply flawed inner workings of the commission charged with examining the tragedy. In this instance, however, the veteran former New York Times reporter goes even deeper, unearthing documents that the CIA, FBI, and others withheld and others that the Warren Commission simply ignored. A revelatory story bound to generate media buzz.

Publishers Weekly
11/04/2013
This sober and powerful book, in spite of its headline-grabbing subtitle, is more a secret history of the Warren Commission than a secret history of the J.F.K. assassination itself. As in his The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation, Shenon, a former New York Times reporter, affords the reader access to the behind-the-scenes deliberations and dynamics that shaped a historic inquiry into a national trauma. Positive word about Shenon’s first book prompted a prominent lawyer—who had been a young investigator on the Warren Commission—to ask Shenon to tell the story of the commission’s staff, “the then young lawyers who did the actual detective work in 1964.” The result is likely to frustrate both those who are adamant that a conspiracy was behind the killing, and those convinced that the Warren Commission got everything right. Shenon successfully portrays the unethical approach of the most prominent early conspiracy theorist, Mark Lane, and rigorously avoids speculating beyond what the evidence demonstrates. But the combination of destroyed records, unpursued investigative leads, and lies by senior government officials—“most especially at the CIA”—will leave most reasonable readers unsettled as to whether the truth has yet been discovered. Maps and photos. (Oct.)
From the Publisher
A New York Times Bestseller

"Jaw-dropping scenes involving the destruction and manipulation of evidence... A persuasive, deeply researched account… A compelling read."—The Washington Post

"A Cruel and Shocking Act has authority, is tantalizingly readable and is convincing in its claim that the Warren Commission was unable or unwilling to uncover the total truth. [Shenon’s] work, I submit, is the one to read."—The Wall Street Journal

"Engrossing reporting… [A Cruel and Shocking Act] raises significant questions."—The New York Times

"Remarkable…I’ve become convinced that, 50 years after the act, a real reporter—not some chat-room know-it-all—has through actual, on the ground, person-to-person investigation, through nonstop digging, tugging at the tangled heart of the mystery, brought us to the brink of answer. An achievement that, I believe, merits the Pulitzer Prize and the thanks of a grateful nation."—Slate.com

"[A Cruel and Shocking Act] contains a number of startling facts… [and] juicy and informative details that shed new light on the JFK investigation…. The book reveals how the investigation was immediately taken over by the very government agencies — the CIA, FBI and Secret Service — that had the most to hide when it came to the assassination…. A remarkable story."— David Talbot, Salon.com

"A judicious account of the Warren Commission, as recalled by the lawyers who did its legwork. A." Entertainment Weekly

"[A] masterful piece of modern history… A work fit to rank alongside the previous masterpiece of the murder, William Manchester's Death of A President... Gripping."—The Independent (United Kingdom)

"Magnificent… An incredible book."—Bob Schieffer, CBS News

"I love this book. It is a terrific read."—Lou Dobbs, Lou Dobbs Tonight

"Impressive… [Shenon] documents the extent to which agencies and actors in those days withheld and even destroyed information that should have gone to the Warren Commission."—Peggy Noonan, Wall Street Journal

"A Cruel and Shocking Act may be the best of the big-anniversary crop of books about the assassination – a tour de force of good reporting and excellent storytelling about an event that continues to defy clean and final resolution, 50 years later."—The Journal Gazette (Fort Wayne, Indiana)

"Valuable, smartly written."—The Cleveland Plain Dealer

"A thorough, fascinating and highly readable record of the details of the murder of John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963.... One of the more impressive offerings in the 50th-year anniversary of that watershed event."—Bookreporter.com

"Convincing… the evidence [Shenon] assembles is frightening."—The Columbus Dispatch (Columbus, OH)

"A Cruel and Shocking Act offers … fascinating detail."—St. Louis Post-Dispatch

"Sober and powerful…Shenon, a former New York Times reporter, affords the reader access to the behind-the-scenes deliberations and dynamics that shaped a historic inquiry into a national trauma."—Publishers Weekly

"Startling… Shenon has helped us get further than we’ve been before."—Kirkus Reviews

Kirkus Reviews
2013-11-08
Just in time for the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination comes this startling book, which deepens the case for conspiracy while turning some existing conspiracy theories on their heads. In 1964, the Warren Commission promulgated the lone-gunman theory of the assassination, which held that Lee Harvey Oswald had acted alone in killing the president. Former New York Times reporter Shenon, who had previously investigated the investigators in The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation (2008), writes that he was approached by a lawyer who had worked, as a young man, for the Warren Commission and who said that other once-young men had stories to tell before they passed on. Their stories are several; blended with the author's own five-year campaign of reporting and research, they do not speak well for the nation's intelligence services. (Whether things have gotten better or worse since then will be a matter of debate.) The aristocratic CIA competed with the blue-collar FBI for control of evidence and narrative; each agency had eyes on Oswald, but neither acted properly to contain him, even as Oswald, unlike other American soldiers who defected to the Soviet Union, was placed under special surveillance. Had either acted on available intelligence and arrested Oswald while he was in Mexico City in September 1963, the assassination might have been averted. As it was, writes Shenon, in Mexico, Oswald came under the sway of a woman who may have put him to work as an agent of Fidel Castro's government: "There is no absolute proof…that Silvia Duran was anyone's spy," he writes, "although there was clearly plenty of suspicion about it in 1963 and 1964." There seems to be plenty of evidence to suggest, though, that the intelligence agencies destroyed valuable documentation after the killing in a rush to cover up incompetence. The reader emerges from this complex narrative feeling that the case is not quite settled, but Shenon has helped us get further than we've been before.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781429943697
  • Publisher: Holt, Henry & Company, Inc.
  • Publication date: 10/29/2013
  • Sold by: Macmillan
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 640
  • Sales rank: 44,023
  • File size: 13 MB
  • Note: This product may take a few minutes to download.

Meet the Author

Philip Shenon, the bestselling author of The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation, was a reporter for The New York Times for more than twenty years. As a Washington correspondent for The Times, he covered the Pentagon, the Justice Department and the State Department. He lives and writes in Washington, DC.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

A Cruel and Shocking Act

The Secret History of the Kennedy Assassination


By Philip Shenon

Henry Holt and Company

Copyright © 2013 Philip Shenon
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-4299-4369-7



CHAPTER 1

THE HOME OF COMMANDER JAMES HUMES
BETHESDA, MARYLAND
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1963


Within hours of the return of the president's body to Washington, evidence about the assassination began to disappear from the government's files. Notes taken by military pathologists at the autopsy, as well as the original draft of the autopsy report, were incinerated.

Navy Commander James Humes, MD, said later he was appalled that his handling of the hospital paperwork on the night of Saturday, November 23, might be portrayed as the first act of a government-wide cover-up. Still, he admitted, he should have known better. "What happened was my decision and mine alone," he recalled. "Nobody else's."

At about eleven that night, the thirty-eight-year-old pathologist took a seat at a card table in the family room of his home in Bethesda, in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, and prepared to read through his notes from the morgue. He assumed he would be there for hours, writing and editing the final autopsy report. He had lit a fire in the fireplace, which provided some warmth on an early winter night.

The night before, he had led the three-man team of pathologists who conducted the president's autopsy at Bethesda Naval Medical Center. There had been no time during the day on Saturday to finish the paperwork, he said. So now he sat alone, hoping to find the energy to complete the report in peace. He needed to present a final copy to his colleagues for their signatures; they were under orders to deliver the report to the White House by Sunday night.

Humes was exhausted. He had managed a few hours of sleep that afternoon, but he had not slept at all Friday night. "I was in the morgue from 7:30 in the evening until 5:30 in the morning," he said later. "I never left the room."

It was on Friday afternoon, with the terrible reports still pouring in from Dallas, that Humes, Bethesda's highest-ranking pathologist, learned that he would oversee the postmortem of the president. He was told to expect the arrival of the corpse in a few hours' time. Jacqueline Kennedy had initially resisted the idea of having an autopsy; the vision of her husband's body lying on a cold, steel dissecting table seemed one more horror in a day already full of them. "It doesn't have to be done," she told the president's personal physician, Admiral George Burkley, as they flew in Air Force One from Dallas to Washington. She was sitting with the president's casket in the rear compartment of the plane. Burkley, who had proved himself a loyal and discreet friend to the Kennedy family, gently convinced her that there had to be an autopsy. She had always taken comfort from the fact that he was a fellow Roman Catholic, and an especially devout one, and at this moment she would trust his advice above almost all others'. He reminded her that her husband had been the victim of a crime and that an autopsy was a legal necessity. He offered her the choice of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington or the navy's hospital in Bethesda. The two hospitals were only eight miles apart. "Of course, the president was in the navy," Burkley reminded her.

"Of course," she said. "Bethesda."

The selection was a decision that even some navy doctors questioned. The veteran army pathologists at Walter Reed had far more experience with tracing bullet wounds than did their counterparts in the navy. (It was a simple fact that soldiers were more likely than sailors to die from gunshots.) Commander J. Thornton Boswell, another Bethesda pathologist, was assigned to assist Humes, and he thought it "foolish" to do the autopsy at the navy hospital given the other resources nearby. He thought the president's corpse should have been taken to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in downtown Washington, a Defense Department research center that handled complex medical-legal autopsies from all branches of the military. Neither Humes nor Boswell had credentials in forensic pathology, the branch of pathology that focuses on violent or unexpected deaths, so a third member was added to the team: Dr. Pierre Finck, a forensic pathologist from the Armed Forces Institute. Finck was a lieutenant colonel in the Army Medical Corps.

What might recommend Bethesda was the autopsy room itself. The whole morgue had just been renovated and outfitted with sophisticated medical and communications equipment. "We had just moved into it a couple of months before," Humes recalled. "It was all brand new." The autopsy room was spacious by the standards of military hospitals, about twenty-five by thirty feet, with a steel dissecting table fixed to the floor in the center. The room also functioned as an auditorium, with a viewing stand along one wall that allowed as many as thirty people—usually medical residents or visiting doctors—to view procedures. There was, in addition, a closed-circuit television camera so audiences across the street at the National Institutes of Health and down the road at the medical clinic at Andrews Air Force Base could observe at a distance. (Humes said later he wished someone had switched on the camera that night, to end the "ludicrous speculation" about what had gone on.) The morgue included large refrigerated closets able to store as many as six corpses, as well as a shower area for the doctors. The night of the president's autopsy, the pathologists would need every square inch of space.

The president's body arrived at about seven thirty p.m. The bronze casket was wheeled in from a loading ramp off the street. The corpse was gently removed from the casket and—after X-rays and photos of every part of the body—was placed on the autopsy table, where it would remain for most of the next ten hours. The wounds to the skull were not immediately visible since the head had been covered with sheets in Dallas. After removing the blood-soaked cloth, Humes ordered that all the sheets be laundered immediately. "We had a washing machine in the morgue, and he stuck those in," Boswell recalled. Humes worried from the start that something taken from the autopsy room would turn up as a grizzly souvenir in some rural sideshow—"he didn't want those appearing in a barn out in Kansas sometime."

The autopsy was a "three-ring circus," Boswell complained. Dozens of people—navy doctors and orderlies, X-ray technicians and medical photographers, Secret Service and FBI agents, military officers and hospital administrators—were either in the morgue or pressing at the door to be let in. The pathologists said the Secret Service agents who had accompanied the body to Bethesda, including some who had been in Dallas that day, were frantic with nervous energy. The man they had sworn to protect, even at the cost of their own lives, was dead. What were they protecting now? "Those people were in such an emotional state that they were running around like chickens with their heads off, and we understood their situation," Boswell said later.

Burkley, the president's physician, had accompanied the body to Bethesda, and initially he tried to take control of the autopsy. As a rear admiral, he would normally have been in a position to give orders to the lower-ranking navy pathologists, but his medical training was as an internist and cardiologist, and his recommendations met with angry resistance from Humes and the other pathologists. At first, Burkley tried to argue that a full autopsy was unnecessary. He said that since the presumed assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was under arrest in Dallas and there seemed little doubt about his guilt, there was no need for procedures that might severely disfigure the president's corpse. He knew the Kennedy family was weighing whether to leave the casket open for a viewing of the body before burial. Burkley wanted to limit the autopsy to "just finding the bullets," Boswell said.

Humes rejected the admiral's idea as absurd, given the danger that something important might be missed in a hasty postmortem, and Burkley backed down, although he insisted they move quickly. "George Burkley, his main concern was, let's get this over with as fast as we could," Humes said later, recalling his annoyance. Burkley appeared worried above all about the delay's effect on Mrs. Kennedy, who was waiting with Robert Kennedy and other family and friends in the hospital's VIP suite on the seventeenth floor. She had announced she would not leave Bethesda until she could take her husband's body with her. Humes said he cringed at the thought of what she must be going through; he knew she was still wearing the bloodstained pink suit he had seen on television. (She had refused to change out of the clothes, in fact. "Let them see what they have done," she had told Burkley defiantly.) Still, much as he felt sympathy for Mrs. Kennedy, Humes felt rushed by her presence in the hospital. "It did harass us and cause difficulty," he remembered.

Burkley had another request of the autopsy doctors, and on this point he was insistent. He asked Humes to promise that the pathologists' report would hide an important fact about the president's health, unrelated to the assassination. He wanted no mention of the condition of Kennedy's adrenal glands. The White House physician knew an inspection of the adrenals would reveal that the president—despite years of public denials—suffered from a chronic, life-threatening disorder, Addison's disease, in which the glands, which sit on top of the kidneys, did not produce enough hormones. Kennedy might have given the appearance of ruddy good health, but Burkley knew that was often a result of makeup and other staging for the cameras. The president survived because of daily hormone supplements that included high doses of testosterone.

Humes, eager to begin, agreed. "He promised George Burkley that we would never discuss the adrenals until all of the then-living members of the Kennedy family were dead, or something like that," said Boswell, who went along with the plan, even though it was a blatant violation of protocol. Days after the autopsy, Burkley returned to Humes with another secret request, this one about the handling of the president's brain, which had been removed from the skull for analysis after the autopsy. As Burkley had asked, Humes delivered the brain, which had been preserved in formalin in a steel pail at Bethesda, to the White House so that it could be quietly interred with the president's body.* "He told me flat out that the decision had been made and that he was going to take the brain and deliver it to Robert Kennedy," Humes recalled.

Humes's work on the night of the autopsy was hampered for other reasons. In the hours after the president's death, the fear that the assassination was the work of a conspiracy, and that the conspirators might strike again, was a topic of fevered discussion in the hallways at Bethesda. As Humes and his team set to work, they overheard colleagues talk about how the Russians or the Cubans might be behind the murder, and how Lyndon Johnson, sworn in hours earlier as president, could be the next target.

The doctors began to worry for their own safety. If there was a conspiracy, the killers might want to hide the truth of exactly how the president had died. Was it possible the Bethesda pathologists might also be silenced, or their evidence seized and destroyed? "It seemed like there might be some sort of cabal" behind Kennedy's death, Boswell remembered thinking. "Anybody was likely to be killed." Humes's superior officer was so alarmed by the potential threat that he ordered Boswell to make sure that Humes, who had taken responsibility for writing the autopsy report, got back to his house safely. "So I got in my car behind Jim Humes, and I followed him home," Boswell said.

When Humes finally walked through his front door at about seven a.m., he had no opportunity to collect his thoughts, let alone sleep. He was scheduled to drive his son to church that morning for the boy's First Communion—Humes was determined to be there—and he knew he needed to return to Bethesda within a few hours for a telephone call with the doctors at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas who had tried, futilely, to save Kennedy's life. Humes later conceded he should have left the autopsy room and spoken with the Parkland doctors at some point Friday night, but he was under too much pressure to finish. "There was no way we could get out of the room," Humes said later. "You have to understand that situation—that hysterical situation—that existed. How we kept our wits about us as well as we did is amazing to me."

The call on Saturday to Dr. Malcolm Perry, the chief Parkland doctor to attend to Kennedy, resolved a central mystery for Humes. There had been no question among any of the doctors in Dallas or Bethesda about Kennedy's cause of death—the massive head wound from a bullet that blew away much of the right hemisphere of his brain, an image captured in awful photographs. The mystery was over what appeared to be the first bullet to hit the president, which entered his upper back or neck and should have remained relatively intact as it passed through soft tissue. Where had it gone? The Bethesda pathologists could find no obvious exit wound.

Humes and his colleagues struggled with the question for hours; it was one reason why the autopsy took so long. "I x-rayed the president's body from head to toe for the simple reason that missiles do very funny things occasionally in a human body," Humes said. Bullets often zig and zag once they strike flesh, even if fired from a direct angle, he explained. "It could have been in his thigh or it could have been in his buttock. It could have been any damn place." As they worked, Humes and the others talked about the unlikely possibility that the bullet had fallen back out of the entrance wound as the president's heart was massaged to try to restore a beat—speculation that made its way into the report of FBI agents observing the autopsy.

During the phone call, Perry had an explanation for the missing bullet. The Parkland doctors had performed a tracheotomy, cutting into the president's badly damaged windpipe to allow him to breathe, exactly where there had been a small wound in front of the throat, near the knot of his tie. Perhaps that was where the bullet had exited? "The minute he said that, lights went on and we said, a-ha, we have some place for our missile to have gone," Humes said. The tracheotomy, he assumed, had destroyed evidence of the exit wound. The doctors could never be certain where that bullet had finally landed, but at least they now thought they knew where it had gone—out of the president's throat.

* * *

That Saturday night, as Humes sat at his card table near the fireplace in his family room, he noticed the streaks of blood—the president's blood—that stained each page of his notes from the autopsy room, as well as each page of the draft autopsy report. He later recalled being repulsed by the stains.

Slowly, carefully, he began transferring the information from his notes to clean sheets of paper. "I sat down and word for word copied what I had on fresh paper," Humes said later. It took hours. His well-thumbed copy of Stedman's Medical Dictionary was at his elbow: he wanted no spelling errors on the report that he would give to the White House.

Only Humes knew what motivated him to do what he did next. Were there embarrassing errors in the original autopsy report and in his notes that he wanted to correct? Did he adjust the location of the entry and exit wounds of the bullets? Beyond his promise to Burkley to eliminate any reference to the president's adrenal glands, did he leave out other information? Was he ordered to? Whatever the reason, Humes decided—as he sat there at the card table—to destroy every piece of paper in his custody, except the new draft. He was determined, he said, to keep the bloodied documents from falling into the hands of "ghouls."

Years later, he admitted that he did not fully understand the implications of his actions, and he acknowledged that they might have helped feed the conspiracy theories that dogged him the rest of his career. He tried to reconstruct his thinking: "When I noticed these bloodstains were on these documents that I had prepared, I said, nobody's going to ever get these documents."


(Continues...)

Excerpted from A Cruel and Shocking Act by Philip Shenon. Copyright © 2013 Philip Shenon. Excerpted by permission of Henry Holt and Company.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Contents

Title Page,
Copyright Notice,
Dedication,
Epigraph,
Prologue,
PART 1 NOVEMBER 22–29, 1963,
PART 2 THE INVESTIGATION,
PART 3 THE REPORT,
PART 4 AFTERMATH,
Author's Note,
Notes,
Bibliography,
Index,
Photos,
Acknowledgments,
Also by Philip Shenon,
About the Author,
Copyright,

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3.5
( 12 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(4)

4 Star

(2)

3 Star

(4)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(2)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 12 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 25, 2013

    Excellent Chronicle of Warren Commission

    Like many people, I thought there was a conspiracy regarding the assassination of President Kennedy, especially after seeing Oliver Stone's movie with its graphic showing of the Zapruder film, which fueled the assumption that shots were fired from the grassy knoll. Since then, however, I have come to the conclusion that the Warren Commission had it right along, despite some of their actions, which fanned the flames of conspiracy theories, but which were actually little more than missteps in trying to put a voluminous report together under tremendous pressure in a short span of time.

    Books like this one, Case Closed, and Reclaiming History, along with documentaries produced by National Geographic, the History Channel, and PBS, which proved beyond a doubt that the shots were fired from the School Book Depository, that one bullet did indeed strike both the President and Gov. Connally, and that Oswald was too mentally unstable to have been used as a patsy by conspirators from any faction have shoved all doubt I had aside. Anyone with an open mind should read this book and others which thoroughly examine the factual evidence. Those who believe in conspiracies associated with the terrible events of November 22, 1963 will likely continue to read only what bolsters their improbable fantasies, unfortunately.

    9 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 3, 2014

    Recommended JFK Book

    At the fiftieth anniversary of the JFK assassination, we can expect a continuing reemergence of JFK assassination literature, even if, or perhaps typically if that is not matched or even approached by any new evidence or information about the murder. Shenon's book is one of these. For those who have never read one, this is not a bad place to start. I would caution any reader not to read just one, as there are hundreds, even thousands of books on this topic, and most of them are that own author's political viewpoint through the Kennedy assassination. If you ignore the title, this book has a lot of useful, but not particularly new information. Rather than reveal any "secrets" about the assassination, and borrowing its title from the preface to the Warren Commission Report, this book does a very credible job of presenting a history of the work of that Warren Commission. Interviewing many of the living junior lawyers on the commission, the author takes you through their work behind the scenes and shows how meticulous they were, especially Arlen Specter, who was to become a U. S. Senator, now deceased. The side issue that presumably was the main issue by the title was what Oswald was doing in Mexico in September of 1963. This is very readable and written in a responsible narrative style unlike so many other of the books on the assassination, the latter of which are poorly edited and do not take long to let you know which side of the philosophical political street the author comes from. This book is responsibly written and surprisingly, because of the detail and the focus on the Warren Commission's work, which most people have never read, but criticize, this book is a welcome addition to the literature.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 22, 2013

    Anonymous

    Good analysis Of the Warren Commision but did not go far
    Enough. Why was LBJ in such a hurry to get it done?
    Yes, the election was coming but so were the chances
    That the Kennedy's were going to disclose his past illegal actives And he could not allow that to happen. The Commision And the attorney's who worked there were only allowed to get what information he allowed them to have. He put a lid on the CIA and the FBI on what they were allowed to disclose So that the Warren Commision would conclude what he wanted. He refused to testify before the Commision and Warren would not make him
    , thou he had to power to summons him. He was a witness to a muder who was never called to testify- Why ? It was a white wash from the start. LBJ had the power
    To change history and he did. The long missing memo
    From Hoover, the coverup in Dallas and Mexico City by both the CIA And the FBI could only have been done by LBJ. You can stomp the TRUTH to the ground but eventually in will come back to haunt you ! Read the book and draw your own conclusions . I wish the author had clearly stated what seems
    So logical.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 2, 2013

    Worth the read

    A bit dry and nothing really new no matter how many books I read on the subject the end will never change so sad!!!

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 29, 2014

    It is quite obviious

    It is quite obvious that the government knows more about this and they are trying to hide information from the citizens of the Us. As with many other circumstances, I am positive that I will never accept what the government says as the truth. Too many things have been done unjustly in the government system, and my trust of the united states government has been undermined. It will be very hard or impossible for theunited states to get out of the black hole of indifference it is spiraling into. Unless some citizens wake up and realize what is going on, our once great nation will never retain its power and influence; indeed it will come to a horrible end. I am definitely not an alarmist. It just takes an average US citizen to realize that America is not like it could have been and should be.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 6, 2014

    A Cruel and Shocking Act is a history of the Warren Commission¿s

    A Cruel and Shocking Act is a history of the Warren Commission’s investigation of the assassination of President Kennedy.  I was fourteen at the time of the assassination and in my lifetime very few people have accepted the findings of the Commission.  Since that time there of have been books, movies, Congressional hearings, and TV documentaries all supposedly looking for the truth that the Warren Commission overlooked or ignored.  Conspiracy or no conspiracy is one of those arguments that most Americans seem to be able to agree upon and the Warren Commission’s glossing over the question has brought their conclusions into question.

    Shenon’s book does not answer the big question but it does give us a look inside of the creation of the Warren Commission and the way that it worked.  President Johnson’s coercion of the Chief Justice and other members of the commission that had no real desire to sit on the investigative team set a precedent that hindered the commission’s work throughout the process.  Warren’s friendship with the Kennedy family and his grandfatherly approach to some of the witness was a hindrance to the commission.  Most of the work of the commission was carried out by the younger “junior” lawyers that were added to the commission while the older more established lawyers went about their everyday business.  Even some of the selected commissioners were no-shows for much of the testimony and deliberations.  These young lawyers found themselves bound by the information that they received from the FBI and the CIA which in a lot of cases was slanted or just not given to the commission for various reasons.  

    Shenon’s book gives the impression that it was a foregone conclusion that no conspiracy would be found in the assassination.  It was the Cold War, just after the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the building of the Berlin Wall and the tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States were high.  President Johnson did not want a war with either Cuba or the Soviet Union so a conspiracy involving either of those entities was not the desired result of the investigation.  Also all of the politicians wanted it done before the 1964 elections.

    The Warren Commission, with the evidence available to it, found that no conspiracy existed and that Oswald acted alone.  Without all of the hindrances could they have decided differently?  Maybe, we will never know, but Shenon’s work shows that they did what they could with the evidence and tools that they had.  There will always be conspiracy theorists, whether it is Paul Lane or someone else, but working with what they had the Warren Commission made their decision. 

    I found A Cruel and Shocking Act and interesting read and an excellent add to the Kennedy assassination works.  Conspiracy or no conspiracy is still left up to each individual and maybe down the road in some dusty archives here in this country or some other country the truth will be found out.  As with the Warren Commission we must work with the evidence that we have before us.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 4, 2014

    I don't know how you can come to the "conclusion" that

    I don't know how you can come to the "conclusion" that the warren commission had it "right all along". What on earth are you smoking? 

    1. How could the commission have it "right" when all  the doctors that worked to save the presidents life at parkland hospital confirm the back of his head was blown off  which would indicate was shot from the front?
    2. How could the commission have it "right" when the Zapruder film clearly shows the head shot forced the president back and to the left? 
    3. How could the commission have it "right" when the police officers who arrested and questioned Lee Harvey Oswald described him as "cool" and "calm". Does that sound like someone who is mentally unstable? Why would George Demorenshild, a successful person who happened to be well connected to the CIA befriend Lee Harvey Oswald, if Oswald was a lone nut who was mentally unstable? 

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 11, 2013

    BOOK OK HAS A FEW TIDBITS I NEVER KNEW

    BOOK BRAKES DOWN THE WARREN COMMISIONS REPORT ..

    0 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 25, 2013

    ?..

    This is kinda sad. He looked like a gooduded

    0 out of 13 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 29, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 2, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 16, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 12 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)