A Nation of Moochers: America's Addiction to Getting Something for Nothing

( 6 )

Overview

Have we reached a tipping point where more Americans depend on the efforts of others than on their own? Are we becoming a nation of moochers?

In A Nation of Moochers, Charles J. Sykes argues that we are already very close to that point, if we have not already crossed the line: from the corporate bailouts on Wall Street, to enormous pension, healthcare, and other entitlement costs, to questionable tax exemptions for businesses and individuals, to the alarming increases in ...

See more details below
Paperback
$13.72
BN.com price
(Save 14%)$15.99 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (17) from $2.44   
  • New (7) from $8.63   
  • Used (10) from $2.44   
A Nation of Moochers: America's Addiction to Getting Something for Nothing

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99
BN.com price

Overview

Have we reached a tipping point where more Americans depend on the efforts of others than on their own? Are we becoming a nation of moochers?

In A Nation of Moochers, Charles J. Sykes argues that we are already very close to that point, if we have not already crossed the line: from the corporate bailouts on Wall Street, to enormous pension, healthcare, and other entitlement costs, to questionable tax exemptions for businesses and individuals, to the alarming increases in personal default and dependency, the new moocher culture cuts across lines of class, race, and private and public sectors.

A Nation of Moochers explores the shift in the American character as well as the economy. Much of the anger of the current political climate stems from the realization by millions of Americans that they are being forced to pay for the greed-driven problems of other people and corporations; increasingly, those who plan and behave sensibly are being asked to bail out the profligate. Sykes’ argument is not against compassion or legitimate charity, but distinguishes between definable needs and the moocher culture, in which self-reliance and personal responsibility have given way to mass grasping after entitlements, tax breaks, benefits, bailouts, and other forms of feeding at the public trough.

Persuasively argued and wryly entertaining, A Nation of Moochers is a rallying cry for Americans who are tired of playing by the rules and paying for those who don’t.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
“Charlie Sykes has hit another home run. The author of Profscam and A Nation of Victims takes aim at America's growing culture of entitlement and delivers a fusillade as hilarious as it is sobering. Sykes shows in devastating detail how we have slipped from being a nation of independent men and women to being a nation of moochers, happy to feed on the labors of others.  A Nation of Moochers is partly the report of a cultural pathologist, partly the tough-love prescription of a skilled social physician. Sykes outlines the nature and depth of our malady and expertly lays out the recovery plan. Buy it. Read it. Everyone not part of the welfare-industrial complex will be glad you did.”—Roger Kimball, author of Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Politicized Our Higher Education and The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America

“Charlie Sykes’ A Nation of Moochers provides a much-needed wakeup call for a nation approaching two perilous tipping points: a moral one and a fiscal one.  With our country facing unprecedented challenges and stark political choices, principled leaders will benefit from Sykes’ clear vision, keen insight and intellect.  If we’re serious about getting our nation back on track, then we would be wise to follow the lessons laid out in A Nation of Moochers.” – Paul Ryan, Member of Congress

“Brilliant… A nation of moochers really does encapsulate our problem about  a schizophrenic electorate that understands that there is no such thing as a free lunch, but still wants to get the free candy.”—Michelle Malkin (conservative blogger and author)

Publishers Weekly
Sykes A Nation of Victims argues that hardworking, tax-paying Americans are being turned into the nation’s piggy bank by freeloading “moochers,” both individual and corporate, who have given in to a culture of dependence and free lunch. He lays all this squarely at the feet of “elite” liberals, whose “Assumption of Incompetence”—the default position of assuming that most Americans are incapable and thus must be cared for—has cultivated an atmosphere where people are no longer required to fend for themselves. He points to Katrina victims misusing benefits, homeowners who walk away from underwater mortgages, unemployment benefits fraudsters, adult children living with their parents, big businesses accepting bailouts, and, somewhat less persuasively, food stamps and free school lunches. Though he doesn’t make an especially strong case that “Obamacare” is to blame, his argument is sobering: we’ve set up a system in which dependency begins at birth and extends through people’s entire lives, which has brought us to a tipping point in which more Americans are relying on the efforts of others rather than their own. Interestingly, his cure is less systemic than social: he suggests “dismantling Moocher Nation” by restoring some of the stigma of accepting a handout. Though at times verging on the purely mean-spirited recall the school lunches, his call for a return to personal responsibility is on point and persuasive. Jan.
Library Journal
Sykes (Dumbing Down Our Kids) has produced a determinedly one-sided look at the current American economy, arguing that the population is becoming increasingly dependent on government assistance. While many of the issues he raises are timely and newsworthy (e.g., unnecessary farm subsidies, loss of collective bargaining rights by public workers, the European debt crisis, corporate welfare, bank bailouts), his repetitive and biased viewpoint provides little new information, focusing instead on extreme and perhaps apocryphal examples of people taking advantage of the system, be it loans for education, mortgages, farm subsidies, pensions, or flood insurance. While researched and heavily footnoted, the book is crowded by quotations from the Heritage Foundation, and an entire chapter is devoted to Ayn Rand. No government program is deemed worthy, from free breakfast for school children to financial aid for college students. The only answers are to return to a culture of pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps and to "restore some of the stigma of mooching." This is a prime example of preaching to the choir. Those who agree with the author will have already heard all these stories; those who disagree will only be infuriated by them. VERDICT A strongly biased book. Not recommended.—Susan Hurst, Miami Univ. Libs., Oxford, OH
Kirkus Reviews
Curmudgeonly screed that simply echoes rhetoric all too familiar in today's political dialogue. Even those who wholeheartedly agree with radio talk-show host Sykes (50 Rules Kids Won't Learn in School: Real-World Antidotes to Feel-good Education, 2007, etc.) are unlikely to find much food for thought in this warmed-over attack on what he describes as America's "new culture of bailouts and irresponsible grasping, everything from corporations feeding at the trough to the permanent 'victims' of Hurricane Katrina." While the author directs some of his ire toward CEOs and large corporations, his main target are the largely undeserving lower classes and a welfare state that has replaced the older American culture of self-reliance and increasingly "sustain[s] deadbeats" with "Other People's Money." Sykes accepts the necessity of the "[n]early half of means-tested welfare payments that go to low-income elderly in nursing homes or the disabled," but not so the other half, which he claims go to "able-bodied adults and their children." He targets extended unemployment benefits, foreclosure relief and even school breakfast programs for needy children as unwarranted: "If America's children were actually in the throes of famine or the landscape were littered with victims of deprivation, even an expensive program might be justified." Many readers on both sides of the partisan political divide, will likely agree with his diatribe against "The Great Bailout of 2008-2009…[in which] taxpayers were essentially required to underwrite a decade of [financial] recklessness," but it's not exactly news. A tired argument for Tea Partiers and fans of conservative talk radio.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781250022325
  • Publisher: St. Martin's Press
  • Publication date: 4/16/2013
  • Pages: 320
  • Sales rank: 1,386,998
  • Product dimensions: 5.66 (w) x 8.04 (h) x 0.90 (d)

Meet the Author

CHARLES J. SYKES is senior fellow at the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute and a talk show host at WTMJ radio in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He has written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today and is the author of six previous books: A Nation of Victims, Dumbing Down Our Kids, Profscam, The Hollow Men, The End of Privacy, and 50 Rules Kids Won't Learn in School.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Chapter 1

 

A NATION OF MOOCHERS

 

We are all born moochers; whether we choose to remain so determines our character and our future. All we have to lose is our dependency.

 

 

Is America becoming a country where the irresponsible and grasping increasingly live off of those who work, save, invest, and otherwise play by the rules? Have we reached a tipping point where more Americans are relying on the efforts of others rather than their own?

Are we becoming a nation of moochers?

We are very close to that point if we have not already crossed the line. From the corporate bailouts on Wall Street to the declining stigmas on default and dependency, the new moocher culture cuts across lines of class, race, and private and public sectors. Members of the middle class are increasingly as likely to become moochers as the poor; CEOS are as likely to belly up to the trough as the underprivileged; and the BlackBerry has emerged as a more effective tool for mooching than a tin cup. In the Great Bailout, an expensively educated, richly compensated, elaborately insulated, politically powerful, and well-connected elite toyed with the nation’s wealth and bailed themselves out at the expense of millions of waitresses, steamfitters, shopkeepers, schoolteachers, farmers, retirees—and their children and grandchildren—in what may turn out to be the greatest intergenerational transfer of wealth in history.

Momentum

Moocher Nation is not driven by a coherent ideology or even a consistent approach to dealing with either need or “fairness.” What it has is … momentum.

More programs of dependency generate more reliance on ever more and varied handouts, as the habit of dependency becomes ingrained and increasingly attractive to others. Subsidies breed subsidies; pork inspires pork (especially if it can masquerade as stimulus); tax credits multiply like bacteria; and lobbyists swarm at the prospect of congressional handouts. The explosion of bailouts and handouts creates its own dynamic: How can you say no to would-be moocher A when B and C are getting mountains of federal cash? How can politicians turn down farmers when the bankers are fattening at the trough; or plead for fiscal restraint to Main Street when Wall Street is awash in OPM (Other People’s Money)? One CEO who jumps on a Gulfstream jet to fly to Washington to wring a few billion dollars from compliant senators inspires dozens, maybe hundreds, of other businessmen to book planes, trains, and limousines to get their own slice of somebody else’s American Dream.

The stigma of dependency—being on the dole—still runs deep in American culture, certainly far deeper than in Great Britain or France, where students and pensioners take to the streets at the merest whiff of a suggestion that they might lose one of their cherished benefits. But it is not inexhaustible. The stigma has been all but erased in some central cities where the long lines that form even at the rumor of free stuff have become testaments to the pervasiveness of the moocher culture, a way of life passed from generation to generation.

Meanwhile, the infrastructure of mooching issues forth armies of social workers, caring professionals, caseworkers, program officers, bureaucrats, advocates, activists, and nonprofits, who see it as their mission to ease the transition of taxpayer dollars into the hands of the “disadvantaged,” or at least the well-connected. Every crisis, every natural disaster or financial setback, becomes another occasion for expanding the size of the moocher state. Each cause has its own symbols of need and woe and justification for their own comfortable jobs as agents of the moocher culture: the deprived child, the bereft farmer, the impoverished oldster—but the message is always the same: more. Says the Tax Foundation’s Scott Hodge: “Every marketing guru will tell you that people love free stuff and they will take as much as they can get whether they need it or not. But for a nation, this is a recipe for disaster.”1

Human nature being what it is, politicians throughout the ages have understood that it is far easier and more popular to hand out bread and circuses, entitlements, and freebies than it is to take them away. Promises, even if they are unaffordable, tend to win more votes than truth telling, especially if that means delivering the bad news that there is no more free lunch and that government workers might have to contribute more to their own pensions.

Scenes of public employees besieging state capitols in Wisconsin and Ohio to protect their bloated benefits and union power are likely a preview of the ferocity with which the entitled will fight to keep their spot at the public trough.

Always More

There is an inexorable quality to the new culture. Regardless of how much has already been done or whether those efforts have succeeded or failed, advocates continue to press for ever greater efforts by the government to help the downtrodden. By definition, whatever has been or is being or will be done is insufficient: After trillions of dollars spent on the War on Poverty, more is urgently required, even if that means continually redefining poverty. But it is one thing to erect a safety net for the needy, and quite another to provide a soft down-filled mattress with a taxpayer-funded mint on the pillow and minibar privileges.

Some of these developments can be dismissed as artifacts of the deep recession, but the loss of the stigma associated with default and dependency may also mark a decisive shift in the American ethos and character. The Great Recession of 2007 saw the destruction of millions of jobs and vastly increased the numbers of Americans reliant on government. But the growth in dependency predated the deluge and Washington used the crisis as a pretext to further shrink the private sector and expand government dependency. This recession hit hardest those who played by the rules and sharpened the gap between the two Americas: those who had 401(k)s, owned a home they intended to pay for, and worked in the private economy, versus those who lived on government entitlements, deadbeats who defaulted on debts, and companies that benefited from bailouts or massive pork subsidies. All of this raises fundamental issues of fairness. As Oxford University ethicist Henry Shue says, “If whoever makes a mess receives the benefits and does not pay the costs, not only does he have no incentive to avoid making as many messes as he likes, but he is also unfair to whoever does pay the costs.” And philosopher David Schmidtz explains, “To be just is to avoid, as best we can, leaving our neighbors to pay for our negligent choices.”2

But that is precisely what has happened. Much of the anger of recent years stems from the realization by millions of Americans that the story of the ant and the grasshopper is being turned on its head: Increasingly, those who take responsibility are being asked to bail out the profligate.

The milestones are troubling:

• Even as more people became dependent on government, fewer were paying their share of the tab. By tax day in 2010, nearly half of U.S. households paid no federal income taxes. After years of cuts, credits, and outright rebates, 47 percent of households had no net liability at all. A family of four could make up to $51,000 without paying a nickel in federal income taxes.3 Many of them have a “negative tax liability,” which means they get a check from the government.

     “The result,” notes the Associated Press, “is a tax system that exempts almost half the country from paying for programs that benefit everyone, including national defense, public safety, infrastructure, and education.”4

• While the top 10 percent of earners now pay around 73 percent of the federal income tax burden, fully 40 percent of individuals actually get more money from the tax system than what they pay in. Rather than sending in a tax payment on April 15, the government actually sends them a check, paid for, of course, by other taxpayers. “In essence,” writes the Tax Foundation’s Hodge, “lawmakers have turned the IRS into an ATM machine for welfare benefits—and ATM now stands for Another Taxpayer’s Money.”5

• There are now more takers than makers in the American economy. As The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore writes, in the United States today, government now employs nearly twice as many people (22.5 million) as work in all of manufacturing (11.5 million). “It gets worse,” notes Moore. “More Americans work for the government than work in construction, farming, fishing, forestry, manufacturing, mining and utilities combined. We have moved decisively from a nation of makers to a nation of takers.”6

• Reliance on government has hit an all-time high: By mid-2010, one in six Americans were receiving aid from antipoverty programs.7* For the first time since the Great Depression, Americans took more in government benefits—in the form of unemployment compensation, welfare, and other aids—than they collectively paid in taxes. Government transfer payments swelled to more than $2 trillion, more than the total amount of taxes paid by individual Americans. Not counting government employees, 64.3 million Americans depend on government to pay for food, health, and housing (up from 21.7 million in 1962). The Heritage Foundation’s William Beach and Patrick Tyrell note that someone on government assistance now gets on average more than four times as much taxpayer money per year—$31,950—as he would have in 1962, adjusting for inflation.8* If government employees are added, more than 88 million Americans are now dependent on government for their livelihood—an increase of 163 percent since 1962.9

• Major Wall Street firms and failing car makers were handed hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer cash subsidies as rewards for their irresponsible risk taking and reckless deal making and spending. (Citigroup and General Motors each received $50 billion in direct aid; the total tab for bailouts may run into the trillions of dollars in a process that has “privatized gains and socialized losses.”) Most Americans, however, were not “too big to fail” and went without bailouts.

• Middle Americans increasingly find that work no longer pays. A cover story in Forbes documented the perverse incentives (especially for families with college-age students) that punish success and provide incentives for lowering income.10

• Contemporary politics is dominated by the freebie. Cash for Clunkers: Other people buy you a car (and destroy perfectly good ones in the process). Home credits: Other people help buy you a house. Pork spending: Other people pay for your goodies. In the ultimate moocher culture, someone else buys your food, provides housing, heating, transportation, takes care of your kids, pays for your health care—and gives you a free cell phone.

• The casino-like mortgage bubble was succeeded by a massive transfer of wealth from taxpayers to bail out reckless lenders and borrowers alike, adding to the nation’s exploding deficit. The unaffordable was bailed out by the unsustainable.

• A law professor from the University of Arizona argues that far more of the estimated 15 million American homeowners underwater on their mortgages should stiff their lenders and walk away from their mortgages. For good measure he suggests a spending binge before defaulting.11 As a sign that the stigma of default is fading, The Wall Street Journal reports that more homeowners are taking his advice and “deciding to abandon their loan obligations even if they can afford the payments.”12

• The gap between the two Americas (the public and private sectors) continues to grow. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, federal employees now earn more than double what private sector workers make. In 2009, the average federal civil servant pulled down pay and benefits of more than $123,000, while private employees made do with an average of $61,051 in total compensation. The gap between the two Americas has grown in the last decade, with the gap between the compensation of federal and private workers more than doubling.13 In addition to the cushier salaries and benefits packages, government workers on average also have more job security and far richer pensions (and more vacation days).

• The number of Americans now using food stamps has exploded even as the stigma of dependency has declined.14 Food stamp use hit a record 42.4 million in November 2010—a 58.4 percent jump in just three years.15 One in eight adults and one in four children now use the subsidy. One academic study found that fully half of Americans—and fully 90 percent of black children—at one time or another received food stamps before the age of 20.16

• Even as dependence on government rose, USA Today reported that income from the private sector dropped to its lowest share of American personal income in history. In the first quarter of 2010, only 41 percent of the nation’s personal income came from private business paychecks. Individuals received nearly a fifth of their income from government programs.17 Another 10 percent was paid in salaries and wages to government workers; when the cost of lavish fringe benefits is added, the proportion swells even more.

• We are extending dependency throughout society both vertically and horizontally. By legislative fiat the new health care bill extends the dependency of children to age 26, at least when it comes to health insurance, thus codifying a rolling redefinition of the age of independence. The legislation also expands the scope of middle-class dependency by providing government subsidies for health insurance to families making up to roughly $88,000 a year. By 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office, Obamacare will add another 16 million dependents to Medicaid, while another 19 million will receive taxpayer subsidies for their health insurance. By that year, the government will be responsible for 52 percent of the nation’s health care spending.18 This guarantees that dependency will begin at birth and extend throughout the adult life of many Americans.

• The 2011 federal budget envisioned a vast, permanent expansion of the welfare state, even after the recession ends. President Obama’s budget called for spending more than 10.3 trillion on poverty programs over the next ten years.19

• Central cities have become laboratories of mooching where the focus of political and economic activity is the expansion of or access to benefit programs, support programs, or, in the better cases, government jobs with high security and lavish benefits but little accountability. In particular, public education systems have become massive jobs programs (exemplified by the “rubber rooms” set aside for tenured teachers who can’t be fired) and perfect expressions of the moocher culture: You don’t expect much of me and I won’t expect much of you.

• To pay for all of this, taxes on future generations will have to be more than doubled to pay off an exploding national debt, which will reach 100 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) within a decade. By 2020, nearly half of all income tax revenues will go toward paying interest on the national debt.20 By 2050, the national debt will rise to more than 300 percent of the GDP; by 2080, it will be eight times the size of the entire economy.21

OPM (Other People’s Money)

This blizzard of transfer payments is advanced by advocates and politicians who rely on what William Voegeli wryly calls “non-Euclidean economics,” in which taxpayers are led to believe that all of these goodies are paid for by someone else. By “blackening the skies with criss-crossing dollars,” writes Voegeli, “the welfare state manages people’s perceptions of its costs and benefits to encourage them to believe an impossibility; that every household can be a net importer of the wealth redistributed by the government.”22

But despite the fondest hopes of those chasing the criss-crossing dollars, multiple mooches do not cancel each other out. The young may mooch off the old, the old off the young, but the result is not a wash. Rather, the mooching creates the habit and the expectation of relying on others; everyone feels not only entitled to the wealth of others, but convinced that they have to keep mooching or be left out. Only suckers pass up the free money.

The effect of all this on the national character goes beyond the impact on the economy. A culture of mooching undermines responsible behavior by rewarding and subsidizing failure, irresponsibility, and dependency.

In contemporary America, we now have two parallel cultures: an anachronistic culture of independence and responsibility, and the emerging moocher culture. We continually draw on the reserves of that older culture, with the unspoken assumption that it will always be there to mooch from and that responsibility and hard work are simply givens. But to sustain deadbeats, others have to pay their bills on time. Massive defaults are subsidized by the people who continue to meet their obligations to pay on time and in full. To paraphrase Margaret Thatcher, the problem with moochers is that sooner or later they run out of Other People’s Money. This divide has become the flashpoint of American politics and will be for the next several decades.

 

Copyright © 2011 by Charles J. Sykes

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 6 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(3)

4 Star

(2)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 6 Customer Reviews
  • Posted January 12, 2013

    Great read for those who want to make informed choices.

    The sad state of our economy is due largely to those who feel the government owes them something,even when they make no useful contribution to society. This book tells it all - one sickening federal giveaway after another. A must read for conservative Americans!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted September 21, 2012

    more from this reviewer

    Reader Beware

    If you aren't ready for a dose of government reality you aren't ready for this book. My eyes are wide open now and I am steaming made at the people that are supposed to be working for us!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 28, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 13, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 13, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 9, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 6 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)