- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Jim Watson is one of the world's most famous scientists. A principal architect and visionary of modern biology, a Nobel Prize winner at 34, and best selling author at 40 (The Double Helix), he has been a fearless commentator on the march of DNA science and its impact on society for over twenty years. This sparkling collection was a bestseller in hardcover, and, for the paperback edition, the author has added three newly written essays containing his reflections on the survival value of pursuing happiness, advice ...
Jim Watson is one of the world's most famous scientists. A principal architect and visionary of modern biology, a Nobel Prize winner at 34, and best selling author at 40 (The Double Helix), he has been a fearless commentator on the march of DNA science and its impact on society for over twenty years. This sparkling collection was a bestseller in hardcover, and, for the paperback edition, the author has added three newly written essays containing his reflections on the survival value of pursuing happiness, advice for new college graduates, and his thoughts on the completion of a draft of the human genome, a project he initiated over ten years ago.
Beginning when I was about 12, my father and I every Friday evening made the mile-long walk to the library on 73rd Street to browse among its stacks and invariably bringing several home to digest during the following week. Our house was also filled with books, the more recent of which came from the Book of the Month Club, but most of which came from the used book shops in the Loop or Hyde Park. Dad worshiped persons of reason and took particular pleasure in readingthe thoughts of the great philosophers. His library also had the occasional book on science, and it was those, not the books on philosophy, which I pored over when the weather was too unpleasant for bird watching. Learning about evolution particularly caught my fancy, with Darwin's theory of natural selection providing a rational way to think about the diverse forms of life that first excited me through trips to the Field Museum.
Even before I entered the University of Chicago in 1943, 1 had begun to daydream about being a scientist, though I had to wonder whether I was bright enough to enter this world filled with geniuses. All too clearly I had not entered the University of Chicago at 15 because of my high IQ. I was far from the child genius that say Wally Gilbert, several years later, grew up to be in Washington. My premature departure from South Shore High School instead reflected the fact that Robert Hutchins, still the almost boy president of the University of Chicago, considered American high schools disasters that never could be reformed. And instead of wasting money failing to improve them, he had the simple solution of getting kids into college two years earlier. That I was one of the first entrants into Hutchins' Four Year College owed much to my Southside-Irish raised mother, who had gone to the nearby University of Chicago. It was she who saw that I filled out the application form for a tuition scholarship which later let me attend college, initially needing only from my family the two three-cent fares for the daily streetcar ride of some 30 minutes.
My first two years at the U of C were superficially not very successful, with my grades (largely B's) continuing to expose to all my non-genius qualities. But they prepared me for the future by instilling upon me three new values. The first was to focus on original sources instead of textbooks - read the great books themselves, not the interpretations of others. The second value was the importance of theory. Of course, you have to know some facts, but much more important is how to put them together in some rational scheme. And thirdly, you had to concentrate on learning how to think as opposed to improving memorization skills. Initially, to my annoyance, the big comprehensive exams that gave us our grades for the entire year often seemed to bear no relation to what you learned in your lectures. With time I realized that I did not have to take notes but instead could concentrate on whether the lecturer's words actually made sense. In retrospect, I now realize I was acquiring the mental habits which later made me acceptable first to Luria and Delbruck and later to Francis Crick.
And Chicago being then the Second City and the University of Chicago not as old as Harvard, I saw no reason to treat authority with much reverence...
|Sources of the Essays||xi|
|Values from a Chicago Upbringing||3|
|Growing Up in the Phage Group||7|
|Minds That Live for Science||17|
|Early Speculations and Facts about RNA Templates||23|
|Bragg's Foreword to The Double Helix||33|
|Biographies: Luria, Hershey, and Pauling||37|
|Recombinant DNA Controversies|
|In Further Defense of DNA||49|
|Standing Up for Recombinant DNA||61|
|The Nobelist versus the Film Star||71|
|The DNA Biohazard Canard||75|
|Ethos of Science|
|Moving Toward the Clonal Man: Is This What We Want?||83|
|The Dissemination of Unpublished Information||91|
|Science and the American Scene||105|
|The Necessity for Some Academic Aloofness||109|
|Striving for Excellence||117|
|Succeeding in Science: Some Rules of Thumb||123|
|Rules for Graduates||127|
|War on Cancer|
|The Academic Community and Cancer Research||133|
|Maintaining High-Quality Cancer Research in a Zero-Sum Era||143|
|The Science for Beating Down Cancer||151|
|Societal Implications of the Human Genome Project|
|Moving on to Human DNA||167|
|Ethical Implications of the Human Genome Project||173|
|Genes and Politics||183|
|Five Days in Berlin||213|
|Good Gene, Bad Gene: What Is the Right Way to Fight the Tragedy of Genetic Disease?||227|
|Viewpoint: All for the Good--Why Genetic Engineering Must Soldier On||231|
|The Pursuit of Happiness||235|
|The Human Genome Revealed||239|
|Afterword: Envoi--DNA, Peace, and Laughter||245|
To begin this essay collection, I have included several autobiographical fragments about my earlier years that set the stage for the challenges facing me as I moved from a doer of science to my later life roles as a manager of science here at Cold Spring Harbor and occasional governmental advisor or bureaucrat. How I made decisions early in my life strongly influenced how I have tried to move the future of biology toward human betterment.
This book would not be appearing without the encouragement of Dr. John Inglis, Director of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, who helped in choosing writings from my past which have messages for today. Equally important, Walter Gratzer, whom Ifirst knew when we were both young scientists at Harvard, has much enriched this volume through his introductory and concluding essays.
James D. Watson
24 November 1999