The Age of Abundance: How Prosperity Transformed America's Politics and Culture

( 2 )

Overview

In The Age of Abundance, Brink Lindsey offers a bold reinterpretation of the latter half of the twentieth century. Following the rapid expansion of postwar America's economy, widespread affluence triggered tumultuous cultural changes that resulted in the contemporary ideologies of left and right. By shifting people's needs from tangible, day-to-day requirements like food, clothes, and employment to more intangible, value-based ones-a search for meaning, equality, and self-expression on the left and a subsequent ...
See more details below
This Hardcover is Not Available through BN.com
Note: This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but may have slight markings from the publisher and/or stickers showing their discounted price. More about bargain books
Sending request ...

Overview

In The Age of Abundance, Brink Lindsey offers a bold reinterpretation of the latter half of the twentieth century. Following the rapid expansion of postwar America's economy, widespread affluence triggered tumultuous cultural changes that resulted in the contemporary ideologies of left and right. By shifting people's needs from tangible, day-to-day requirements like food, clothes, and employment to more intangible, value-based ones-a search for meaning, equality, and self-expression on the left and a subsequent quest for stability and a return to traditional values on the right-mass prosperity has shaped today's polarized, "red vs. blue" political atmosphere. So how do we move past the stalemate and toward useful political discourse? Lindsey persuasively argues that an emerging consensus that mixes the social freedom of the left with the economic freedom of the right is trying to do just that-and it might be our best hope. A breathtaking re-evaluation of our recent past, The Age of Abundance will change the way we think about the future.

About the Author:
Brink Lindsey is vice president for research at the Cato Institute. He is the author of Against the Dead Hand: The Uncertain Struggle for Global Capitalism

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

George F. Will
It took confidence for Brink Lindsey, of the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington, to venture onto this well-plowed ground with The Age of Abundance: How Prosperity Transformed America’s Politics and Culture. This constantly stimulating book vindicates that confidence. His thesis, stated ironically with Karl Marx’s categories, is that in the second half of the 20th century, America left the “realm of necessity” and entered the “realm of freedom.” Americans “live on the far side of a great fault line” separating them from all prior human experience.
— The New York Times
The City Journal
An engaging argument that, probably better than any other, explains much of how we've arrived at our current past.
—Fred Siegel
Dallas Morning News
A wise, revealing book combining the long sweep of history with a documentarian's eye for detail.
&3151;Chris Tucker
Los Angeles Times
Lindsey's basic argument is fresh and provocative and his insights are frequently dazzling.
Publishers Weekly

More than any other cause, economic prosperity transformed the United States after World War II into a nation unlike any other in recorded history, posits Lindsey of the libertarian think tank the Cato Institute. Although Lindsey (Dead Hand: The Uncertain Struggle for Global Capitalism) acknowledges that millions of Americans live below the poverty line, he argues that mass prosperity changed the equation in many areas, including gender relations, race relations, labor-management relations, parent-child dynamics and organized religion. The result was the rise of a politically liberal counterculture, a politically conservative backlash, the labeling of blue states and red states, and a multitude of other political phenomenon. Although the book offers details about political campaigning, drug use, and the rise of rock and roll music among other events that made headlines from the 1950s into the 21st century, the details often overwhelm Lindsey's hypothesis. Ultimately, the book reads more like a college freshman survey course textbook than a compelling narrative. (May)

Copyright 2007 Reed Business Information
Los Angeles Times
“Lindsey’s basic argument is fresh and provocative and his insights are frequently dazzling.”
Booklist (starred review)
“With breathtaking analysis, Lindsey...offers a dizzying look...over American economics, politics, and culture to examine the complexities of abundance.”
Adrian Wooldridge
“Here is one of the freshest and most thought-provoking books on recent American history to appear in years.”
Michael Barone
“Shows us how great an achievement our economy is-it reshaped our society and our culture, for better and worse.”
Virginia Postrel
“In The Age of Abundance, Brink Lindsey provides an admirable-and much needed-model of rational, respectful, readable political argument.”
Douglas S. Massey
“In an age of abundance, the libertarian moment may have arrived, trumping the old division between left and right.”
Fred Siegel
“An engaging argument that, probably better than any other, explains much of how we’ve arrived at our current past.”
Chris Tucker
“A wise, revealing book combining the long sweep of history with a documentarian’s eye for detail.”
George F. Will
“Lindsey’s measured cheerfulness is, like his scintillating book, reasonable.”
Booklist
"With breathtaking analysis, Lindsey...offers a dizzying look...over American economics, politics, and culture to examine the complexities of abundance."
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780641962523
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
  • Publication date: 5/8/2007
  • Pages: 400
  • Product dimensions: 6.30 (w) x 9.10 (h) x 1.40 (d)

Meet the Author

Brink Lindsey is vice president for research at the Cato Institute. He is the author of Against the Dead Hand: The Uncertain Struggle for Global Capitalism, which the Wall Street Journal called "compelling" and "excellent" and the Economist declared was "full of elegantly argued good sense." His articles have appeared in numerous leading newspapers and opinion magazines such as the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, The New Republic, and the National Review. He lives with his family near Washington, D.C.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Age of Abundance
How Prosperity Transformed America's Politics and Culture

Chapter One

The Realm of Freedom

On July 24, 1959, in the depths of the Cold War, Vice President Richard Nixon and Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev stood face-to-face, close enough to smell each other's breath. Dozens of journalists and dignitaries crowded around them in increasingly nervous silence as the two argued heatedly. Khrushchev, the bald, brash son of Ukrainian peasants, raised his booming voice and waved his stubby hands in the air. Nixon, nearly a head taller, hovered over him, struggling to maintain his composure but then jabbing a finger into his adversary's chest. Precipitating this superpower showdown was a disagreement over . . . washing machines.

Nixon was in Moscow for the opening of the U.S. National Exhibition, a bit of Cold War cultural exchange cum oneupmanship that followed on the heels of an earlier Soviet exhibition in New York. He and Khrushchev were now in the fair's star attraction: a six-room, fully furnished ranch house, bisected by a central viewing hallway that allowed visitors to gawk at American middle-class living standards. The Soviet press referred to the house dismissively as the "Taj Mahal," contending that it was no more representative of how ordinary Americans lived than the Taj Mahal was of home life in India. Actually, it was priced at $14,000, or $100 a month with a 30-year mortgage—as Nixon put it, well within the reach of a typical steelworker.

Pausing before the model kitchen, packed with all the latest domestic gadgetry, Khrushchev blustered, "You Americans think that the Russian peoplewill be astonished to see these things. The fact is that all our new houses have this kind of equipment." He then proceeded to complain about the wastefulness of American capitalism—in particular, how foolish it was to make so many different models of washing machines when one would do. Nixon countered, "We have many different manufacturers and many different kinds of washing machines so that the housewives have a choice." From there he expanded to broader themes: "Isn't it better to be talking about the relative merits of our washing machines than the relative strength of our rockets? Isn't this the kind of competition you want?"

Whereupon Khrushchev erupted, "Yes, this is the kind of competition we want. But your generals say they are so powerful they can destroy us. We can also show you something so that you will know the Russian spirit." Nixon took the threat in stride. "We are both strong not only from the standpoint of weapons but from the standpoint of will and spirit," he shot back. "Neither should use that strength to put the other in a position where he in effect has an ultimatum."1

What came to be known as the "kitchen debate" was a moment of almost surreal Cold War drama. Had it been written as a piece of fiction, the scene could be criticized justly for the belabored obviousness of its symbolism. Here the great historic confrontation between capitalism and communism presented itself in distilled miniature—as a duel of wits between two of the era's leading political figures. Just as the Cold War combined ideological conflict with great power rivalry, so this odd, unscripted exchange fused both elements, as the disputants jumped from household appliances to nuclear doom without so much as a good throat clearing. Topping it all off, the spontaneous staging of the encounter in a transplanted American kitchen foreshadowed the Cold War's eventual outcome: communism's collapse in the face of capitalism's manifest superiority in delivering the goods. In capitalism, it turned out, lay the fulfillment of communism's soaring prophecies of mass affluence.

Richard Nixon made precisely this point during his formal remarks later that day at the official opening of the exhibition. He noted with pride that the 44 million American families at that time owned 56 million cars, 50 million television sets, and 143 million radios, and that 31 million of them owned their own homes. "What these statistics demonstrate," Nixon proclaimed, "is this: that the United States, the world's largest capitalist country, has from the standpoint of distribution of wealth come closest to the ideal of prosperity for all in a classless society."2 However casual his commitment to honesty over the course of his career, on that particular occasion Richard Nixon spoke the truth.

A century earlier, Karl Marx had peered into the womb of history and spied, gestating there, a radical transformation of the human condition. The traditional "idiocy of rural life," the newfangled misery of urban workers, would be swept away. The normal lot of ordinary people throughout history—to stand at the precipice of starvation—would be exchanged for a share in general abundance. In the new dispensation, the advanced development of productive forces would allow humanity's physical needs to be met with only modest effort. Consequently, the "realm of necessity" would yield to the "realm of freedom."

In that brave new realm, according to Marx, "begins that development of human energy which is an end in itself."3 A forbidding bit of Teutonic abstraction: what exactly could it mean? Marx was notoriously cryptic about his vision of utopia, but through the darkened glass of his dialectics we glimpse a future in which ordinary people, at long last, could lift their sights from the grim exigencies of survival. Freed from the old yoke of scarcity, they could concentrate instead on the limitless possibilities for personal growth and fulfillment.

It was Marx's genius to see this coming transformation at a time when the main currents of economic thought led toward altogether drearier forecasts. Thomas Malthus, of course, made his name by arguing—with ample justification in the historical record—that any increase in wages for the poor would be dissipated by a swelling birth rate. Meanwhile, David Ricardo, second only to Adam Smith in the pantheon of classical economists, posited an "iron law of wages" that mandated bare subsistence as the equilibrium toward which labor markets tended. With prophetic insight, Marx grasped that the progress of industrialization would render such fatalism obsolete. . . .

The Age of Abundance
How Prosperity Transformed America's Politics and Culture
. Copyright © by Brink Lindsey. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents


Introduction     1
The Realm of Freedom     15
Climbing Maslow's Pyramid     59
Howl     95
Signs and Wonders     141
Learning to Fly     179
Realignment     223
In Borges's Library     267
E Pluribus Unum?     307
Notes     343
Bibliography     363
Index     379
Read More Show Less

First Chapter

The Age of Abundance
How Prosperity Transformed America's Politics and Culture

Chapter One

The Realm of Freedom

On July 24, 1959, in the depths of the Cold War, Vice President Richard Nixon and Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev stood face-to-face, close enough to smell each other's breath. Dozens of journalists and dignitaries crowded around them in increasingly nervous silence as the two argued heatedly. Khrushchev, the bald, brash son of Ukrainian peasants, raised his booming voice and waved his stubby hands in the air. Nixon, nearly a head taller, hovered over him, struggling to maintain his composure but then jabbing a finger into his adversary's chest. Precipitating this superpower showdown was a disagreement over . . . washing machines.

Nixon was in Moscow for the opening of the U.S. National Exhibition, a bit of Cold War cultural exchange cum oneupmanship that followed on the heels of an earlier Soviet exhibition in New York. He and Khrushchev were now in the fair's star attraction: a six-room, fully furnished ranch house, bisected by a central viewing hallway that allowed visitors to gawk at American middle-class living standards. The Soviet press referred to the house dismissively as the "Taj Mahal," contending that it was no more representative of how ordinary Americans lived than the Taj Mahal was of home life in India. Actually, it was priced at $14,000, or $100 a month with a 30-year mortgage—as Nixon put it, well within the reach of a typical steelworker.

Pausing before the model kitchen, packed with all the latest domestic gadgetry, Khrushchev blustered, "You Americans think that the Russian peoplewill be astonished to see these things. The fact is that all our new houses have this kind of equipment." He then proceeded to complain about the wastefulness of American capitalism—in particular, how foolish it was to make so many different models of washing machines when one would do. Nixon countered, "We have many different manufacturers and many different kinds of washing machines so that the housewives have a choice." From there he expanded to broader themes: "Isn't it better to be talking about the relative merits of our washing machines than the relative strength of our rockets? Isn't this the kind of competition you want?"

Whereupon Khrushchev erupted, "Yes, this is the kind of competition we want. But your generals say they are so powerful they can destroy us. We can also show you something so that you will know the Russian spirit." Nixon took the threat in stride. "We are both strong not only from the standpoint of weapons but from the standpoint of will and spirit," he shot back. "Neither should use that strength to put the other in a position where he in effect has an ultimatum."1

What came to be known as the "kitchen debate" was a moment of almost surreal Cold War drama. Had it been written as a piece of fiction, the scene could be criticized justly for the belabored obviousness of its symbolism. Here the great historic confrontation between capitalism and communism presented itself in distilled miniature—as a duel of wits between two of the era's leading political figures. Just as the Cold War combined ideological conflict with great power rivalry, so this odd, unscripted exchange fused both elements, as the disputants jumped from household appliances to nuclear doom without so much as a good throat clearing. Topping it all off, the spontaneous staging of the encounter in a transplanted American kitchen foreshadowed the Cold War's eventual outcome: communism's collapse in the face of capitalism's manifest superiority in delivering the goods. In capitalism, it turned out, lay the fulfillment of communism's soaring prophecies of mass affluence.

Richard Nixon made precisely this point during his formal remarks later that day at the official opening of the exhibition. He noted with pride that the 44 million American families at that time owned 56 million cars, 50 million television sets, and 143 million radios, and that 31 million of them owned their own homes. "What these statistics demonstrate," Nixon proclaimed, "is this: that the United States, the world's largest capitalist country, has from the standpoint of distribution of wealth come closest to the ideal of prosperity for all in a classless society."2 However casual his commitment to honesty over the course of his career, on that particular occasion Richard Nixon spoke the truth.

A century earlier, Karl Marx had peered into the womb of history and spied, gestating there, a radical transformation of the human condition. The traditional "idiocy of rural life," the newfangled misery of urban workers, would be swept away. The normal lot of ordinary people throughout history—to stand at the precipice of starvation—would be exchanged for a share in general abundance. In the new dispensation, the advanced development of productive forces would allow humanity's physical needs to be met with only modest effort. Consequently, the "realm of necessity" would yield to the "realm of freedom."

In that brave new realm, according to Marx, "begins that development of human energy which is an end in itself."3 A forbidding bit of Teutonic abstraction: what exactly could it mean? Marx was notoriously cryptic about his vision of utopia, but through the darkened glass of his dialectics we glimpse a future in which ordinary people, at long last, could lift their sights from the grim exigencies of survival. Freed from the old yoke of scarcity, they could concentrate instead on the limitless possibilities for personal growth and fulfillment.

It was Marx's genius to see this coming transformation at a time when the main currents of economic thought led toward altogether drearier forecasts. Thomas Malthus, of course, made his name by arguing—with ample justification in the historical record—that any increase in wages for the poor would be dissipated by a swelling birth rate. Meanwhile, David Ricardo, second only to Adam Smith in the pantheon of classical economists, posited an "iron law of wages" that mandated bare subsistence as the equilibrium toward which labor markets tended. With prophetic insight, Marx grasped that the progress of industrialization would render such fatalism obsolete. . . .

The Age of Abundance
How Prosperity Transformed America's Politics and Culture
. Copyright © by Brink Lindsey. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 5
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 29, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)