Alcoholism Myths and Realities: Removing the Stigma of Society's Most Destructive Diseaseby Doug Thorburn
More than 100 widespread myths about drug and alcohol abuse are enumerated and then dispelled in this book about the reality of addiction. Questions such as Does proper parenting and involvement prevent alcoholism? and Do alcoholics lack willpower? are addressed, and a myriad of addiction-related falsities that the general public and/i>/i>/i>/i>
- LendMe LendMe™ Learn More
- Editorial Reviews
- Product Details
- Related Subjects
- Read an Excerpt
- What People Are Saying
- Meet the author
More than 100 widespread myths about drug and alcohol abuse are enumerated and then dispelled in this book about the reality of addiction. Questions such as Does proper parenting and involvement prevent alcoholism? and Do alcoholics lack willpower? are addressed, and a myriad of addiction-related falsities that the general public and even medical professionals have considered true are identified and refuted. Specific attention is paid to defining and understanding alcohol addiction, including guidelines on identifying symptoms of alcoholism in social settings and detailed information on the biological difference between the disease in its early and late stages.
"Every policymaker in America needs to read your book exposing the myths of chemical addiction...Excellent book." —Congressman Jim Ramstad (MN), member, Ways and Means Committee and Health Subcommittee
"Read it and be prepared to change your thinking on this important topic." —Michael Shermer, publisher, Skeptic magazine; columnist, Scientific American; author, Why People Believe Weird Things
"Every person on the planet should read this book. ...offers hope that help and healing is possible." —Cynthianna Appel, Fearless Reviews
- Galt Publishing
- Publication date:
- Sold by:
- Barnes & Noble
- NOOK Book
- File size:
- 1 MB
Read an Excerpt
Alcoholism Myths and Realities
Removing the Stigma of Society's Most Destructive Disease
By Doug Thorburn
Galt PublishingCopyright © 2012 Doug Thorburn
All rights reserved.
Alcoholism Made Simple: the Brain, the Biological Process & Inheritance
"Brain damage occurs only in obvious alcoholics."
There is no difference in aggregate levels of misbehaviors and personality problems in children raised in non-alcoholic homes, whether or not they develop alcoholism as adults. Practicing alcoholics engage in erratically destructive behaviors, while non-alcoholics rarely do. In recovery, alcoholics generally become, over time, gentle, kind, honest and non-destructive. These long-term observations of the life cycle of typical alcoholics suggest there is something very different about their brains while actively drinking vs. when not, whether before or after the drinking career. Since poor behaviors usually begin at or near the time of the first drinking episode, alcohol must be changing the brain's biochemistry. And, it must be occurring long before he or she becomes an obvious alcoholic, in which the personal and professional life has fallen apart.
To understand this, the biochemistry of alcoholism must be described. Don't let this scare you; it's really quite simple. Once understood, almost everything that seemed crazy and implausible about human behavior, whether public or private begins to make sense.
The human body converts alcohol first into a poison, acetaldehyde, and then into acetate, both of which find their way to the brain. While the former substance — in the same class of chemicals as formaldehyde — perversely makes the drinker feel good, the latter causes feelings of nausea, hangover and sleepiness. Now think about it: if a person experiences a quick conversion into acetate, he feels lousy or sleepy and is unlikely to keep drinking. If, on the other hand, the body blocks the conversion of acetaldehyde into acetate, the former works its magic and he feels good. It shouldn't be surprising if this person, experiencing a buildup of the former substance and little or no increase in the latter, continues to drink. Therefore, the speed at which the body converts alcohol into acetate determines a person's predisposition to alcoholism.
It's that simple.
The non-alcoholic's liver slowly turns alcohol into acetaldehyde, then quickly into acetate. As a result, there is little or no buildup of poison in the brain and instead quick feedback from the acetate-induced ill feeling, which serves to stop the drinking. This generally occurs at relatively low blood alcohol levels, usually .04 to .10 per cent. The top range is barely legally drunk for purposes of operating a motor vehicle.
On the other hand, the alcoholic liver converts alcohol into acetaldehyde quickly and then into acetate slowly. There is no immediate feedback (nausea, etc.) suggesting that the drinker slow down. Instead, the buildup of acetaldehyde causes a release of "feel-good" neurotransmitters called isoquinolines, which are opiate-like substances. The "I'm feeling fine" response serves as positive feedback to keep on drinking. The top range of blood alcohol level — BAL — to which most non-alcoholics ever drink is where the typical addict is barely getting started. If it stopped there all would be well; after all, there's nothing wrong with feeling really good. However, for alcoholics, this is where the problems begin.
Unfortunately, acetaldehyde, the poison, causes brain damage. Evidence that this occurs even during the hidden early stages (usually the first drinking occasions) is generally observable almost immediately in behaviors. Most parents chalk this up to adolescence. However, the changes should be assumed alcohol or other drug-related unless proven otherwise. Eventually, as poor behaviors continue and actual evidence of addictive use is uncovered, we can attribute the transformation to alcoholism.
When no other drugs are used, obvious personality changes may not become apparent without observing behaviors during and after several drinking events. Few alcoholics act badly every time they drink. On the other hand, they will misbehave at least some of the time. One set of misbehaviors occurs when young people become licensed to drive. Alcoholic teenagers will almost always, often with regularity, drive while intoxicated (we'll later discover why alcoholics can be expected to engage in such behaviors). This impaired judgment, manifest in behaviors, is indicative of brain damage rooted in alcoholism, even in the hidden early stage.
"The average age at which one becomes an alcoholic is 40."
Or 30, or 50. Any age but the early teens. Yet, most recovering alcoholics tell us they triggered alcoholism during their first drinking episode, usually at age 12 or 13. Looking back, they realize that alcohol did something different for them than for others. They often say, "I felt powerful." The feeling is described in almost heavenly terms as a "glow" or a "lift." We'll discover later that addicts act like they think they are Gods. If they act this way, they must think this, even if only on a subconscious level. If you felt god-like, you'd feel glowing and powerful too.
The buildup of poison on the brain results in brain damage causing distortions of perception and memory. The key distortion leads the afflicted person to believe that everything he says or does during a drinking event (and eventually, in many cases, in-between) is good or right and nothing bad or wrong. This opinion of his own perfection is the reason he develops a god-like sense of self, which translates into an inordinately large sense of self-importance, or an "inflated ego."
While we can't read his mind, we can see the resulting misbehaviors, which may become extraordinarily gruesome. Sometimes, these are observable at or near the inception of alcoholism, often during adolescence. For example, the behaviors of Eric Harris became deadly at a very young age, as did those of Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy. Harris, whose favorite drink at age 18 was whiskey, had been taking Luvox, prescribed for Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders and frequently used in treating depression, when he and Dylan Klebold murdered 13 innocents at Columbine High School in 1999. Dahmer and Bundy were obvious teenage alcoholics and became serial murderers in their late teens and twenties. Seemingly mild-mannered Charles Andrew Williams, who at 15 inflicted mayhem at a high school near San Diego, California in early 2001, killing two and wounding 13, had a history of drug use. As a young teen, he is said to have shared a pastime with the tougher boys in the neighborhood: smoking marijuana and stealing vodka and tequila from a local grocery store.
However, the behaviors of most alcoholics are often not so grisly or even overtly destructive. One of the most common misbehaviors exhibited by early-stage alcoholics is promiscuity. This is a more subtle, less obvious way by which to wield power over sexual partners, which can be destructive even if masked with charm. It is this perverse need to misuse power, especially capriciously, which leads to many of the bad behaviors that observers frequently witness in early-stage alcoholics.
"Alcoholism is a spiritual disease."
Recovering alcoholics often confuse cause and effect, believing that loss of spirituality precipitated their alcoholism.
The biochemistry of alcoholism results in an inflated ego. Having an inordinately large sense of self-importance interferes with spirituality. If you are God, there can be no other God. As recovering alcoholics often say, in active addiction they were the center of their universe, and yours.
An effect of alcoholism (and, therefore, a clue to its existence) is loss of spirituality. Recovery requires abstinence and ego deflation. Without both, good solid recovery in which behaviors markedly improve is impossible. The 12-Step Program works to deflate the ego by replacing it with a higher power. Since loss of spirit is only an effect of alcoholism, it cannot be its cause. Regaining spirituality is, however, imperative for recovery.
"You can choose not to be an alcoholic."
You can no more choose to not have alcoholism than to have or not have early-onset diabetes. All the alcoholic can do is choose not to drink. However, due to the biochemistry that makes him feel good and, at the same time, causes distortions in perception and memory, he cannot see that his drinking is a problem. Therefore, he needs to be convinced to make this decision.
It's a difficult choice. After all, alcohol (and, usually, numerous other drugs) not only makes the early-stage alcoholic feel good, but also powerful. His brain chemistry distorts perceptions and memory so that he views everything from the perspective that he is always right. Ask yourself this question: would you want to stop using a chemical that, at some level, made you not only feel great, but also god-like? Why would you abstain?
You wouldn't. This is the reason we need to help the addict make that choice by connecting his use of the drug to pain resulting from logical consequences. As long as close persons protect him from such outcomes, the odds of making the correct decision are remote. Instead, everyone must do all they can to hold the addict accountable for misbehaviors, which includes total disengagement from personal and professional relationships for as long as active addiction continues.
The difficulty in disengaging is not only that every close person needs to learn the trademark behaviors of practicing alcoholics, but also that disenabling must follow. Even one enabler can greatly reduce the odds of permanent sobriety. While this may be challenging, it is not insurmountable. It will become easier once the stigma surrounding alcoholism is removed, allowing family, friends and associates to freely discuss the possibility that alcoholism accounts for misbehaviors.
"The addict is in denial."
The damage that the poison, acetaldehyde, inflicts on the brain results in distortions of perception. The key distortion experienced by the alcoholic, coined "euphoric recall" by the late alcoholism authority Vernon Johnson, causes the addict to remember everything he does or says in a self-favoring light. He does not act badly; you do. He commits no wrongs; you do. If he does something for which he should be held accountable, it is because you made him commit the act. Hence, euphoric recall leads to what appear to be rationalizations. However, he truly believes that no matter how grotesque, what he did was the right thing to do under the circumstances.
Or, he may remember nothing. Many recovering addicts admit to having no idea how they got home (or wherever they "came to") after a day (or two, or three) of bingeing. Their first thought is often to check the car's front fender for bloodstains. These episodes, termed "blackouts," are periods of time during which events do not even enter the memory banks and, therefore, cannot be recalled.
He may also remember nothing at the time, having unintentionally engaged in "memory repression." While we are all capable of repressing memories, the addict does so far more completely and efficiently. There may be a good reason for this: if he could remember everything he did while in active addiction during a moment of clarity, he might go into irreversible emotional shock and become suicidal. His brain is merely doing what it can and must to prevent self-destruction.
"Denial" implies a willful refusal to not admit to something. Since alcoholism causes self-favoring distortions of perception and, often, no memory at all, there is nothing to admit. One cannot be in denial about something that he is incapable of seeing.
The term is an extremely misleading descriptor, responsible for tremendous misconceptions about alcoholism, which results in much of its stigma. A person in "denial" should know better; therefore, the alcoholic is unintelligent. Worse, a willful attempt to not admit to something makes the person a liar. However, the truth of the matter is, he usually is not stupid and the disease compels him to make what appear to be lies. He is, then, not in denial; he cannot be.
"With a Blood Alcohol Level between .10 and .24 per cent, even an alcoholic would appear inebriated."
Teetotalers begin to show the classic signs of drunkenness, including staggered gait and slurred speech, at BALs as low as .05 per cent. Normal drinkers (i.e., non-alcoholics) display such signs at BALs typically no higher than .10 per cent. However, early- to middle-stage alcoholics often appear stone cold sober at BALs of .20 per cent and even up to .24 per cent (three times the federal legal limit for operating a motor vehicle).
Hundreds of millions saw Henri Paul in the hotel video just prior to the reckless stunt in which he and Princess Diana were killed. Not only did he not look drunk in the video; bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, who was up close and personal, said that Henri Paul "did not appear to have [even] been drinking." Yet his BAL was .178 per cent, the equivalent of almost two bottles of wine or twelve shots of 80-proof liquor in four hours for a 200-pound person. Most non-alcoholics would be doing a face-plant after consuming this much booze. Not only was Paul apparently alert, but he also didn't make a fatal mistake in a 35 mile-per hour zone in a tunnel with giant pillars until he hit 90 mph. No one would likely have been the wiser if he had stayed below 80 mph.
Drug Recognition Experts are law enforcers who undergo special training in non-intrusive methods of determining which class or classes of drug or drugs a suspect is under the influence of. These experts report that alcoholics have passed standard balance and coordination tests (which include walking a straight line, bringing the finger to the nose from outstretched arm with eyes closed and standing on one leg) only to undergo blood tests measuring BALs as high as .28 per cent and beyond.
The author has asked numerous bartenders whether they could identify a highly tolerant early-stage alcoholic walking into a bar with a BAL of .15 per cent. This is the only group other than chemical dependency experts that almost uniformly gives the right answer. However, even this elite group usually believes the next myth.
"Two or three drinks per hour are needed to maintain a given Blood Alcohol Level."
When bartenders are asked the number of drinks required hourly for maintenance (to hold steady at a given BAL), the response is, typically, two or three. While this group of alcohol specialists isn't even close, no other class of people does any better.
The human body processes alcohol at roughly .015 per cent per hour, regardless of weight, sex or other factors. Each standard "drink" (12 ounces of beer with 5% alcohol, 5 ounces of wine containing 12% alcohol or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor-equivalent to 40% alcohol) increases the BAL by a relatively fixed amount depending on the person's weight. One drink increases a 200-pounder's BAL by .02 per cent and three-quarters of a drink by .015 per cent. Since the liver processes alcohol at .015 per cent per hour, only three-quarters of a drink per hour is needed for a 200-pound person to maintain the BAL (the point at which assimilation equals intake). Not even a bartender would have a clue that a patron with a BAL of .18 per cent, sipping his drink at the rate of 3.5 ounces of wine, 9 ounces of beer or barely over one ounce of hard liquor per hour, is a person with early-stage alcoholism.
He'd have even less of a clue observing a 120-pound person sipping a glass of wine. While she also processes the drug at .015 per cent per hour, each drink increases her BAL by .03 per cent and each half drink, .015 per cent. Therefore, half of a drink, or 2.5 ounces of wine, 6 ounces of beer or .75 ounce of 80-proof liquor — per hour — is all that's required for maintenance. So, she could walk into a bar, your home, work, or a restaurant for brunch late one Sunday morning with a BAL of .18 per cent and sip her Cabernet, Merlot, Chardonnay or champagne, without anyone being the wiser. Unless, of course, we begin to notice the bizarre or destructive conduct in which she will engage from time to time and understand that alcoholism is usually the impetus behind such behaviors.
Drinks needed over four hours to reach a BAL of:
Having no idea how little alcohol is required to maintain a given BAL was one of the keys to my inability to detect alcoholism in a person with whom I was once romantically involved. It was also a case in which a little bit of knowledge proved to be dangerous. I knew to look for gulping as a clue to alcoholism. She didn't gulp. I never saw the vodka mixed with her milk or the Bailey's added to her coffee, before we nursed a bottle of wine over an evening.
Excerpted from Alcoholism Myths and Realities by Doug Thorburn. Copyright © 2012 Doug Thorburn. Excerpted by permission of Galt Publishing.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
What People are Saying About This
(MN), member, Ways and Means Committee and Health Subcommittee
publisher, Skeptic magazine; columnist, Scientific American; author, Why People Believe Weird Things
Meet the Author
Doug Thorburn is the president of the PrevenTragedy Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing the tragic results of progressive alcoholism. He is the author of Drunks, Drugs, and Debits, Get Out of the Way!, and How to Spot Hidden Alcoholics. He lives in Northridge, California.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews