All is Vanity

All is Vanity

3.2 17
by Christina Schwarz

View All Available Formats & Editions

At once darkly comedic and moving, this witty exploration of female friendship, envy, and misguided ambition by the author of the number-one bestseller Drowning Ruth, deliciously satirizes the desire to shine in the world.

In All is Vanity, Margaret and Letty, best friends since childhood and now living on opposite coasts, reach their


At once darkly comedic and moving, this witty exploration of female friendship, envy, and misguided ambition by the author of the number-one bestseller Drowning Ruth, deliciously satirizes the desire to shine in the world.

In All is Vanity, Margaret and Letty, best friends since childhood and now living on opposite coasts, reach their mid-thirties and begin to chafe at their sense that they are not where they ought to be in life. Margaret, driven and overconfident, decides the best way to rectify this is to quit her job and whip out a literary tour de force. Frustrated almost immediately and humiliated at every turn, Margaret turns to Letty for support. But as Letty, a stay-at-home mother of four, begins to feel pressured to make a good showing in the upper-middle-class Los Angeles society into which her husband’s new job has thrust her, Margaret sees a plot unfolding that’s better than anything she could make up. Desperate to finish her book and against her better nature, she pushes Letty to take greater and greater risks, and secretly steals her friend’s stories as fast as she can live them. Hungry for the world’s regard, Margaret rashly sacrifices one of the things most precious to her, until the novel’s suspenseful conclusion shows her the terrible consequences of her betrayal.

Widely celebrated for her debut novel, Drowning Ruth, Christina Schwarz once again proves herself to be a writer of remarkable depth and

range. Like Drowning Ruth, All is Vanity probes into the mysteries of the human heart and uncovers the passions that drive ordinary

people to break the rules in pursuit of their own desires.

From the Hardcover edition.

Editorial Reviews

Beth Kephart
Despite the recent, entirely deserved success of Michael Chabon's Wonder Boys, Ian McEwan's Atonement and Carol Shields' Unless, novelists writing about the writing of novels have always been suspect. There's the "who cares?" factor, which is always difficult to transcend. There's the airlessness of such a construct. There's the danger that, in focusing on process, one neglects to tell a story.

In her aptly titled second novel, All Is Vanity, Christina Schwarz, the bestselling author of 2000's Drowning Ruth (an Oprah's Book Club pick), swims fearlessly out into such choppy waters and never returns to dry land. Her anti-heroine is Margaret, a formerly precocious child who realizes, at the age of thirty-three, that she has done nothing of meaning or import with her life. Yes, she is married to a thoughtful and mostly supportive man. Yes, she has had, until recently, a career as an English teacher at a private school on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. But what she really wants is to be Somebody, and the quickest route to celebrity is linked, in her less-than-perspicacious mind, to novel writing. "Writing a novel, I believed, would be a way to achieve glittering success without the painful and humiliating apprenticeship other well-regarded careers required, and which I ought to have undergone in my twenties. Too late for that, I thought. I needed quick results."

Margaret hasn't the first clue, of course, about how to get started. She writes a first sentence—"Elaine pushed her fingers through her long, dark hair in the pearly dawn"—discerns its many flaws and stalls. She gives herself exercises, makes lists, buys a baby-naming book, color codes charactertraits, makes elementary notes on plot, paints the apartment, enrolls in a class, exasperates her husband, spends money she does not have and, most critically, engages in a long conversation with her best lifelong friend, Letty.

If Margaret was always the dominant one, Letty was forever the foil. They grew up as each other's yin and yang, and as adults they are no different. Whereas Margaret's obsession, in the pages to come, will revolve exclusively around the writing and nonwriting of the ersatz novel, Letty's obsession will concern her desperate efforts to enter the high society she and her husband can hardly afford.

These, then, are the two strands that Schwarz pulls together; this is the sole province of this book. The more Margaret's fiction stagnates, the more Letty stirs up real-life adventures, until it is Letty's e-mails that begin to provide the stuff of actual interest. What happens next is heavily foreshadowed: Margaret does not just begin to appropriate Letty's stories (which increasingly get told in page after page of punctuation-perfect, dialogue-rich, never-an-instant-of-shorthand e-mails; the sort of e-mails that rarely get sent in the real world); she encourages (through acts of both complicit silence and ghastly advice) Letty's Gatsby-style downfall. It's all grist for the writing mill, and, Margaret figures, she'll be able to make it up to Letty one way or the other, just as soon as celebrity arrives.

What Schwarz does not give her characters in terms of wisdom—Margaret's thoughts about writing are relentlessly juvenile, and Letty's chase after social status is overwhelmingly familiar—she compensates for by way of irony and tone. Both Margaret and Letty have a somewhat Bridget Jones way of speaking, a sort of playful self-mockery that teeters somewhere between cuteness and despair.

Says Margaret, about her attempt to focus on her "work": "This was a forced concentration, a grit-your-teeth-and-press-your-fist-to-your-forehead-in-imitation-of-'The Thinker' concentration, a concentration in which one quarter of the brain dragged the rest screeching with the handbrake pulled up hard. It resulted in halting words, painfully squeezed forth one by one, as in the proverbial blood from a turnip."

Meanwhile, Letty e-mails Margaret about her desire to live in a fancier abode: "If I were the kind of person that lived in that house, I wouldn't have painted my toenails in the car on the way to the party; I would not have told my babysitter to microwave frozen enchiladas for my children's dinner; I would have remembered to make an appointment at the vet. I would be serene; I would be respectable; I would be a better Letty. You scoff. Yes, I can hear you scoffing away. But you have to agree that surroundings are important. If you feel sunnier in a bright room than in a murky one, wouldn't it follow that in a spacious, well-organized house, you'd feel generous and in control?"

It all ends calamitously, of course, as Margaret pulls Letty out into darker and darker waters and Letty, desperate Letty, offers herself up to the sharks. To say more about the ending would not be fair to Schwarz or to the reader, and that's unfortunate, because the book's true strength lies in the way Schwarz rams the hapless ambitions of her female protagonists up against each other and turns what feels (for the longest time) like a frothy farce into something closer to tragedy.

There are real issues, for all writers, about the appropriation of other lives for the sake of art. Writing is fraught with moral dilemma. Schwarz circles these hard truths in All Is Vanity, but she is impeded, in the telling of her tale, by the tedious self-absorption of her characters, the almost absurd quality of their myopia. Besides, Schwarz proved that she has real talent with her first novel, that she does in fact know far more than the rudimentary basics of character and plot. Had Margaret had some of Schwarz's wisdom in her, had she found a way to express it, All Is Vanity would have likely transcended the many perils of its conceit.
Publishers Weekly
The die was cast for Margaret and Letty back when they were childhood friends, in Pasadena, Calif. "Even in our games, she was always Robin to my Batman, Watson to my Holmes, Boswell to my Johnson," the grown-up Margaret muses in the East Village, where she now lives with her husband, Ted. Margaret has decided to quit teaching English to rich kids and write a meaningful novel. The trouble is, she doesn't have a plot. She strains to invent a hero, Robert Martin, who interminably makes breakfast while remembering Vietnam. But it is more fun to use her computer to exchange e-mails with Letty, a devoted mom whose world is turned upside down when her husband, Michael, lands a big-deal museum job in L.A. and the couple begin spending beyond their means. A while after the reader has figured out that Margaret would rather script Letty's life than Robert's, Margaret gloms onto the weird equation. The deeper Letty sinks into debt and degradation, the better the chances that Margaret can write a bestseller about her and make enough money to save them both. Exit Robert, enter Lexie, based on the Lettie whom Margaret manipulates electronically while feigning a best friend's concern. Schwarz (Drowning Ruth) has a wicked eye for human foibles. Ted's relentless accountancy (he records the purchase of Tic-Tacs), successful writer Sally Sternforth's insufferable ego, the cavalier ways of literary agent Heather Mendelson Blake, Michael's blind ambition: Schwarz nails them all. As funny as it is cruel, the novel sweeps you along on its fast-track slide to hell. While some readers may cavil at a morality play without redemption, others will respect the no-exit spin on ambition and greed. (Oct.) Forecast: Schwarz's Oprah-pick first novel-a historical drama-played to a very different audience than her second does. All Is Vanity will attract fans of urban satire and is a perfect cautionary tale for aspiring writers. Author tour. Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
After the painful clarity of her debut, Drowning Ruth, Schwarz tries something completely different and it works. At its heart is the exasperating and self-absorbed Margaret, who is overwhelmingly convinced of her own worth and perfectly content to lord it over good friend Letty, even if she does dwell on the opposite coast. As Letty struggles to raise a passel of kids, relieved that her art professor husband has a high-stakes offer from a museum, Margaret quits her teaching job at a private school in New York because she has decided to write a novel. Not surprisingly, the results are pretty disastrous but then Margaret throws out her text and starts with a new idea that involves manipulating Letty and her new-found fortune: "My novel would be all the better, I now saw with frightening clarity, the worse things got for Letty." What's noteworthy here is that the awful Margaret is both believable and mesmerizing you can't stop reading her story and it's a pleasure to watch Schwarz skewer so many aspects of contemporary consumerist society without sounding either condescending or self-absorbed herself. Poisonous good fun and a little heart-breaking, too; for all public libraries. [Previewed in Prepub Alert, LJ 6/1/02.] Barbara Hoffert, "Library Journal" Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
After her compassionate and hugely successful debut (Drowning Ruth, 2000), Schwarz returns with something completely different: a mean-spirited account of how a would-be novelist who can’t write brings down her best friend, a domestic social striver with dreams beyond her means. With great fanfare, Margaret quits her job as a private school English teacher in Manhattan to write her novel. Although she and husband Ted, who works for a nonprofit foundation, already live on a tight budget, Ted is supportive at first. After all, Margaret has assured him she can finish the book in a year. The only problem is that Margaret has no clue what to write. She begins and discards the story of a Vietnam vet, but mostly she fritters away her time in all the ways many (most?) writers know all too well--household chores, eating, and communicating with her best friend Lydia. Lydia and Margaret grew up together in California. Margaret was always the precious, more sophisticated one, the Robinson Crusoe to Lydia’s Friday. But it quickly emerges that Lydia has some natural talents, for language and writing for instance, that went unremarked by either. Lydia is still in California, a stay-at-home mom with a brood of children and a strapped budget whose husband Michael has just been lured from his tenured professorship to a better-paying, more high-profile job at a well-endowed museum. Soon Lydia and Michael begin spending: restaurant meals, new clothes, a new dishwasher, a new house. As Lydia e-mails Margaret about her domestic misadventures and about her increasingly more luxurious life with its accompanying financial strains, Margaret’s creative juices begin to flow. When Margaret starts egging Lydia on togreater excesses of spending, she knows she’s manipulating Lydia’s life for the purpose of her Madame Bovary–like plot. Unfortunately, she can’t manipulate Lydia out of financial ruin anymore than she can get her book published. Brave in its unforgiving nastiness, if not exactly amusing (and possibly toxic to aspiring writers). Author tour

Product Details

Random House Publishing Group
Publication date:
Sold by:
Random House
Sales rank:
File size:
2 MB

Read an Excerpt



I WAS A PROMISING CHILD. When I was seven, I spent an entire week hunkered down on the cranberry red carpeting in my father's study, building a scale model of the Temple of Athena at Paestum. I carved the columns out of Ivory soap with a paring knife and pushed red clay through my Play-Doh press to tile over the Styrofoam roof. I painted a frieze, which was cheating and ultimately unsatisfactory, since it was not authentically three-dimensional. My father wondered why not the Parthenon, but I wasn't interested in the obvious.

"Everyone knows the Parthenon, Dad," I said, in a superior tone, although, in fact, I knew no one other than he who was at all acquainted with the Greeks.

Three months after I'd finished my temple, my little brother, Warren, was parking his Hot Wheels in it.

When I was eight, I sewed two chamois I swiped from the garage into a little dress in the style of the Lakota Sioux. You'd think this would be less ambitious than the Temple of Athena, but the beadwork was extensive. Beads were very big then--my friends and I sat cross-legged on the driveway with little cups of color-coded plastic treasure near our knees and threaded them on elastic to give to one another as necklaces and bracelets. I had to cut apart five of the six chokers my very best friend, Letty, had given me to get enough beads just to finish the bodice of the dress.

My mother was less pleased with the Lakota costume than she'd been with the temple. Architecture, yes. Sewing, no. But at that point in my career, I didn't care what my mother or anyone else thought. I didn't care that the columns of my temple had bits of sticky string tied around them--to pump the gas, Warren explained--my pleasure was all in the making.

I could go on--I laid out the city of Ur in clay on the Ping-Pong table, rendered a map of Asia as experienced by Marco Polo, compiled a catalog of Scottish clans, and produced a page of medieval-looking illumination with hand-mixed inks--but I think my point is clear. I was precocious. I was enthusiastic, unswerving, creative. I had imagination. It took me only twenty years to realize that none of this mattered.

What you find out in your thirties is that clever children are a dime a dozen. It's what you do later that counts, and so far I had done nothing.

But I was going to change that, starting right now, this morning, Saturday, June 15. I'd set the alarm for four forty-five and was at my desk by five. The sky over Lower Manhattan was the gray of used wash water. I would shower around nine, I decided, to refresh myself after logging a decent morning's work. I had easy to hand two new and newly sharpened pencils--the soft number ones I liked--and a legal pad for notes. The cursor pulsed eagerly on the blank screen before me. I drew my feet under me and sat on my heels. I leaned forward, ready, nearly holding my breath. It seemed as though, with just a nudge, my novel would spin from my pent-up imagination in skeins of gorgeous, moving words.

"Elaine pushed her fingers through her long, dark hair in the pearly dawn," I typed--it was the first sentence that came into my head--and then rested a moment, reaching to tease from my own hair a snarl the cat had painstakingly worked into it during the night. Why "Elaine"? Should my main character have the name that came first into my head? Shouldn't the name suit the character the way "Daisy" suited Daisy Buchanan? With one of my pencils, I printed neatly on the legal pad--"Buy baby-naming book."

"Margaret?" My husband's voice came from the bedroom, muffled by down comforter and sleep.

"Ted, I'm working," I said, a touch of righteous indignation in my tone.

"Come back to bed," he murmured dreamily.

Fourteen hours before, I'd been an English teacher at Gordonhurst Academy, a private school on the Upper East Side. The administration had put on a little party in the Marshall Room to send off all of us who weren't coming back in the fall with Chinese chicken salad, a favorite cafeteria offering, and grape juice made adult by the addition of cranberry and seltzer. One by one, we were called to stand before the portrait of Fitzhugh Marshall to collect a handshake and a gift--Suzy Cargill, an art teacher, who was having a baby and had decided to stay home for a year; Valerie Finkelstein, who was trading biology classes for med school; John Kingsley, who was moving to St. Louis to be with his girlfriend; and Penny Burich, who had won the outstanding teacher award the year before and was going to Columbia for a doctorate to become an even better teacher than she already was.

"One of our colleagues from the English department is leaving us to write the great American novel," the headmaster announced.

I blushed and began to push my chair back.

"And I'm just hoping for a run-of-the-mill novel," I think I said, as I shook his hand, although, oh, yes, in some shameful corner of my ego, never to be admitted in public and to be tasted only with the tiniest, most fleeting lick in private, was a hard little lozenge of belief that this grandiose idea was true. Why not? I was an American, wasn't I? That I had not submitted for publication a single line since Cricket magazine passed on "The Misplaced Mitten" when I was twelve only meant that I had reservoirs of untapped talent.

My gift was a pair of slim books--one titled Character, the other Plot. I was touched by this gesture of support, although I knew I would use them only for a laugh. I had paged through that kind of thing often in bookstores, mostly to reaffirm that I would be a writer different from their intended audience. I aspired to be an artist, to blaze a fresh trail in prose, not to write the kind of paint-by-numbers potboiler such manuals encouraged. "You know," Neil McCloskey, my department head, said to me, quietly, kindly, as I held the books up for the teachers to admire, "you're always welcome back, if, you know, things don't work out."

I complained about this to Letty on the phone Saturday afternoon.

"But that's nice," she said. "He values you."

"It isn't nice--he assumes I'll fail."

"That's not a reflection on you. Think of all the great writers who couldn't get published. Think of Emily Dickinson."

"She was a genius, way ahead of her time. I doubt I'll write something too good to be published." There was, it seemed, some limit to my arrogance.

"Well, anyway, I admire you. I'd never have the guts."

"What you don't have is the time," I said, and, as if on cue, a crash sounded somewhere in the background, followed by a frantic wail.

"Gotta go," she said, and was gone.

Letty and I were so young when we met that neither of us can remember the occasion. Our mothers, so the story goes, deposited us in a playpen at Johnson campaign headquarters in Pasadena and told us to amuse ourselves. Other than their sporadic loyalty to the Democratic Party, and the fact that both of them relish the entirely fictitious notion of themselves as young women so busy with the affairs of the world that they raised their daughters to be independent even as infants, my mother and Pam Larue have very little in common, and their friendship was long ago reduced to the exchange of nonreligious "holiday" cards. But Letty and I have ever since been as close as twins.

That's not to say we're alike. It's more that we're a sort of team, in the classic sense of hero and sidekick, and I don't think I'm being immodest, but only truthful, when I cast myself as the hero. Of course, she's much better than I am at many things, but her qualities--patience, for instance, and an easy laugh--are those that make for a good right-hand man. Even in our games, she was always Robin to my Batman, Watson to my Holmes, Boswell to my Johnson, and the times when she's been clearly the leader have been uncomfortable.

I remember distinctly an incident in first grade, when we were each assigned to render a tree in fall colors. It was work obviously well below my level of accomplishment--at home I'd recently completed a mosaic of painted macaroni that approximated one of the floors of Pompeii--but it was enjoyable to do something that didn't demand all of my resources, and I was quite pleased with the artful way I'd arranged and overlapped my swatches of construction paper.

Our teacher had been making the rounds of the room, peering over shoulders noncommittally, when suddenly she stopped.

"Look here!" she exclaimed, whisking Letty's paper off her desk and holding it up. Two or three construction paper "leaves" fluttered to the floor. "Now this is a tree!"

Letty's tree was good. She'd painstakingly shredded her paper into pieces so small and massed them with such intricate variation that the crown gave the effect of actual foliage. Her work was not only good, it was, I recognized with a pang, better than mine, which now looked clumsy and haphazard--the efforts of a child--in comparison. Thankfully, I had the presence of mind to beam at Letty, who kept her head bent, shyly hiding a small, proud smile. Nevertheless, I was not happy for her. I was instead trying to console myself by noting that she had had the advantage of the sort of glue that dispensed only a small amount when you pressed the rubber applicator against the page, whereas I was forced to use the much more difficult to manage Elmer's. I even, for one brief second, disparaged her in my mind for putting so much energy into such a banal assignment.

Even as I experienced these feelings, I was deeply ashamed of them, and that shame is the only thing that now keeps me from utterly despising my small self. But while on the one hand I vowed never again to begrudge Letty her success, on the other, I promised myself that from that moment forward I would strain to the utmost, no matter what the project, so as never to be in a position to feel such chagrin again. That was the lesson I learned from first grade.

Letty was never so driven, which was at least in part the fault of her family. I think her parents must have had big plans for her when they named her Letitia, but there was never all that much get-up-and-go in the Larue household, and they let her name lapse into Letty almost immediately.

My mother was much more firm of purpose. "Please call her Margaret," she would say forbiddingly to everyone, even the well-intentioned mailman, who tried to shorten my name. My name, of course, presented a minefield of opportunities for corruptions--Meg, Peggy, Maggie, Margie, Maisie, Rita, Gretchen. She would accept none of them.

"Why?" I begged many times, especially during my Little Women period.

"Because your father and I named you Margaret," she said. "When you're older, you can let people call you whatever you decide, but I want to get a decent run out of the name we chose."

"Don't you like your name?" my father asked, puzzled and a little hurt.

I realize now that it wasn't the name I didn't like, but Margaret herself, whom I was beginning to find a little bossy. Margaret was admired, but Peggy, I believed, would be well liked. The way Letty was.

When I'd told Ted over our very late breakfast that I planned to work that afternoon and couldn't go with him on our regular Saturday ramble through the city, he was sweetly disappointed. "I thought you worked this morning. You don't need to write the whole thing the first week."

"I know, but I want to get a good bite out of it. If I just get half a chapter done this weekend, then I'll have a head start on Monday, when I can really buckle down while you're at work."

"You're right," he said. "If you think you'll get something done, you should work. Maybe we'll go to a movie tonight, then."

"Maybe," I said, "but I might be pretty far into my story by then. I may not want another narrative intruding."

Our kiss at the door savored of our great expectations for me.

I microwaved a cup of leftover coffee before I sat down at the table, turned on my laptop, and retrieved the document I'd named "Novel." Elaine with her ridiculous hair leapt onto the screen. I read over the single sentence I'd composed that morning. It seemed flat. It was going nowhere. "Pearly dawn" was pretentious. What had I been thinking, I wondered, pressing the delete key firmly? I couldn't write a novel just by stringing sentences together. I needed a plan, a sense of what I wanted to say. What did I want to say?

I pushed my laptop aside. I would take notes first, sketch out my ideas in old-fashioned ballpoint on solid paper. I noticed, as I bent to pick my pen off the floor where it had rolled, that the rug badly needed vacuuming. What with final exams and the deluge of grading, I hadn't cleaned the apartment in weeks. I tried to think of an important idea on which I could build a firm base for an important book, but the grit kept drawing my eyes to the floor. The windowsills, too, were fuzzy with dust, and the bottom of my coffee cup had collected some stickiness from the kitchen counter. I'd be able to think more clearly if my environment was less chaotic.

Around five-thirty, I sat down again at the computer. I'd cleaned all afternoon with satisfying concentration, interrupting my efforts between finishing the kitchen and starting the bathroom only for my call to Letty. I felt focused and relaxed, even a little weary. I was now ready to settle down for a few hours of mental exertion, so the sound of Ted's knock at the door was somewhat irritating.

"Why do you refuse to carry keys?"

In his hand was a small, plastic bag.

"What's that?"

"Just a little surprise."

I reached for the bag, but he held it back. "Later," he said. "It's not to be given without ceremony."

"So you had a good day of work?" he said, glancing into the closet with the window on an air shaft we both used as a study. But I'd been careful to turn off my laptop.

From the Hardcover edition.

Meet the Author

Christina Schwarz is the author of Drowning Ruth, a bestseller in both hardcover and paperback, which was selected for Oprah's Book Club, and Wes Craven optioned film rights for Miramax. She lives in New Hampshire.

From the Hardcover edition.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

All is Vanity 3.4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 16 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I haven't read this author's other books, but I will check them out to see how they are by comparison. This could have been a good book,  but I'm on page 164 and I just wanted to say, these characters could have been sketched out in way less time, and more entertaining things could have been done with the plot instead. Also, I'm not sure Schwarz in comfortable with these characters anyway. It feels like she just had  to get her perceptions about a type of woman off her chest. In a weird way, I feel like she is writing about who she fears she could be-  the would-be novelist, and she's way too convincing! Where is the interest here? I'm just slogging through in case she redeems herself.  I mean, if her other books are anything like this one, she's not that good. Or maybe , she wrote one really good book and should just wait ten or twenty years until she has another good idea. 
anonymous67 More than 1 year ago
I thought that the book started out slow, but kept my attention because of the humor and my own curiosity. Halfway through, the momentum changed and I couldn't put the book down. I loved the characters and loved reading about their lives and their problems. Well written, great character development, and a very realistic and relevant story line. A book that I hated to see end. Enjoy!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
The jacket sounded like such a good story. Unfortunately it took almost 200 pages for something to happen. I admit I did laugh out loud a few times but overall the book was boring.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed Drowning Ruth, what happened with this one? It was dull, the character a loser, I couldn't wait to finish it!
Guest More than 1 year ago
After reading Drowning Ruth, I just had to read another book by Christina Schwarz. I found the beginning of the book to be slow, but once I got through the first half I understood how this was about character development. Margaret, who is supposed to be the main character, is a boring person. Meanwhile, her friend, her side-kick in life is the person with the interesting life and the one who has made it. As the book winds down, the momentum picks up and I just couldn't put it down.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I read Drowning Ruth several years ago. Immediately after reading it, I longed for another book by Christina Schwarz that I could read. Finally, I was able to obtain All is Vanity. I related well to the characters, because I think that many of us avid readers all wish that we could write the great American novel someday. I actually was so engrossed in the novel, and it was so well-written, I didn't want to read what Schwarz had penned for the ending. I wanted to just stop and leave the novel be, but Schwarz was still able to take the novel and make readers see the hard work and dedication and loneliness that can creep into writing fiction/literature.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This is the first novel that I've read by Ms. Schwarz, and I can honestly say that I'll have to think twice about reading anything else that she's written. This was entirely too long. The first 200 pages were sluggishly paced, which set a bad precedent for the remainder of the novel. Ms. Schwarz seems to be a decent writer, however, I have to agree with the reviewer below, this novel fell flat.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Nothing against Christina Schwarz who has quite a creative way with words, but the story itself just didn't grab me. I found myself trudging thru most of it, albeit determined to finish once it finally got going about 2/3rds of the way through. I'll have to say the story was an apt reflection of the 'American' way of life, as shallow as that may be. What I found most intriquing about the book was how it gave us an inside look into a would-be novelist's world. The whole process of writing a book fascinates me so I found that part interesting, but the story itself was rather lacking. The ending, especially, seemed to be quite disconnected from the rest of the story. It left me scratching my head thinking, 'What was that all about?'
Guest More than 1 year ago
I couldn't put it down. Very funny yet truthful examination of friendships and society. Made me think of ways I might manipulate my own friends for my own needs. Remind me not to try to write a novel!
Guest More than 1 year ago
I absolutely loved this book. I think most of us can admit to having "friendships" with an underlying competition going on and the "Green Eyed Monster" at every turn of events. Margaret always in the limelight with he percocious behavior and Letty follows along. Most of us dump these relationships from school but their's continues on. I thought the risk Margaret was willing to take and Letty's trust of her "best friend" was very compelling. It definetly is a book of human emotions, greed, "one up man ship" and selfishness." I really found it difficult to put this book down especially the later 1/3. Humor at every turn but dramatic as well. Excellent! Marlene from NH
Guest More than 1 year ago
This book succeeds as both a biting satire of the materialism of contemporary America, and a believable human drama. I laughed out loud at parts of the book, but toward the end I could not put it down because I was so eager to see how it would all turn out. I am not proud to admit I saw a bit of myself and my own best friend in the two main characters, Margaret and Letty. I thought this was a much better book than Schwarz's "Drowning Ruth". This is a great book for any woman who has an ambition to be "something more".
Guest More than 1 year ago
Ummm where do you begin with this book...other than to say Margret (one of the main characters) was WRONG!!!! She wasn't a true friend. The book took too long to get to the point. Which was aggravating at times. The "real" story begins somewhat half way through the book!!! But all in all it was an OK book.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This astute and witty novel about two women friends is a sophisticated and astute social satire. But Schwartz has also written a sincere and heartbreaking tale. I couldn't put down the last third of the novel--the book is a very suspenseful page-turner, as well!