- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Andrew Jackson created the modern American presidency as we know it today. A backwoods orphan who fought his way to the pinnacle of power, Jackson ushered in a new era in which the people, not distant elites, were the guiding force in American politics. Democracy made its stand in the Jackson years, and he gave voice to the hopes and fears of a restless, changing nation facing challenging times at home and threats abroad. With his powerful persona and mystical connection to the people, Jackson moved the White House from the periphery of government to the center of national action, where it has remained ever since. Beloved and hated, venerated and reviled, he was also the most contradictory of men, forcing the Indians from their native lands yet risking everything to give more power to ordinary citizens. He was, in short, a lot like his country: alternately kind and vicious, brilliant and blind. Drawing on newly discovered family letters and papers, acclaimed author Jon Meacham has delivered the definitive human portrait of a pivotal president who forever changed the American presidency-and America itself.
2009 Pulitzer Prize in Biography Winner!
The narrative focuses not just on President Jackson but also on his household circle: because his beloved wife, Rachel, died before he was inaugurated, Jackson relied on his nephew Andrew Donelson (whom he had raised) and Donelson's wife, Emily, the former serving as his key aide, the latter as the hostess of his house. Meacham recounts how the three of them were caught up in a contretemps over the wife of the newly appointed secretary of war, John Eaton; Margaret Eaton was rumored to have borne a child while her first husband was away at sea (an absence longer than nine months), and Vice President Calhoun, the other cabinet secretaries and their wives, and most of the diplomatic corps refused to receive her, call on her, or recognize her in polite society. The treatment of Mrs. Eaton enraged Jackson; he and Rachel had lived together and taken marriage vows while she was technically still married to another man, and Jackson had fought duels to defend his wife's reputation out on the frontier. Young Emily Donelson, wanting to be accepted in Washington society, not only resisted pressures from "Uncle" to receive and call on Mrs. Eaton but also managed to outmaneuver him and retain her freedom of action. For much of the first term, the Donelsons remained a source of avuncular pride but also a source of frustration to Jackson, who could find contentment neither in the White House nor in the wider affairs of the capital.
This is a story that has been told before, and much of its significance lies in the fact that Jackson gave up on most of the cabinet (because they sided with the anti-Eaton forces, including some clergy leading the morality charge) and relied instead on a so-called Kitchen Cabinet of close advisers -- and a good thing for the country, since Jackson's first-term cabinet was (with the exception of Secretary of State Martin Van Buren) particularly incompetent. What Meacham adds here is the way the Donelsons experienced Jackson's travails, through letters that describe much of the maneuvering and all of the family tensions and squabbles. Time and again Meacham notes that Jackson seeks control and order and is denied both -- in his family and in the Washington community -- thus giving us a vivid view of the personal and political pressures. It is a portrait as well of the frontier culture transposed to the capital, in which personal slights are immediately noted, in which honor must be preserved, and in which physical violence always lurks just below the surface. And sometimes it does surface: one evening Eaton can take no more and wanders through the night searching for one of his tormenters, intent on killing the man. The potential victim appeals to Jackson, who downplays the threat, leading the man (wisely) to remove himself to Baltimore.
Eventually, Van Buren figures a way to defuse the tension: he resigns his post, thus precipitating a cabinet shuffle that also removes Eaton from the War Department and removes the Eatons from Washington. That in turn vastly improves Jackson's relationship with the Donelsons. And with all that settled, the second half of Meacham's biography takes a more conventional turn, with wonderfully crafted descriptions of some of the major political battles of the Jacksonian period. There is the veto of the bill rechartering the Bank of the United States, and Meacham expertly plumbs its significance -- Jackson's veto was cast on constitutional grounds, and even though the constitutionality of the bank had been supposedly settled by the Supreme Court in McCullough v. Maryland, Jackson asserted his power of concurrent interpretation. There is Jackson's order to Secretary of the Treasury Duane to remove deposits from the bank and place them in "pet" banks in the states, and Meacham explains why this prerogative to direct a secretary of the Treasury was a novel position in constitutional law, since this official was until then deemed to be as much supervised by Congress as by the president. There is the threatened nullification of a high tariff by South Carolina, with the ultimate threat of secession in the background; Meacham recounts the spirited Senate speeches on both sides of the issue (some of the best oratory in American history) and the final resolution of the matter; a new and lower tariff was passed at the same time as a bill allowing the president to use force to enforce the laws.
Some of the most harrowing pages involve the removal of Indian tribes from the Southeast to the Southwest. While Meacham goes easy on Jackson's own past as a warrior against Indians (who had many unflattering names for Jackson, none of which appear in the book), he does explain Jackson's ambivalent feelings about the tribes and his eventual decision to force what became known as the Trail of Tears and the decimation of the Indian populations. Similarly, Meacham provides accounts of the brutal treatment of slaves within Jackson's own family; he and the Donelsons and others in his extended family relied heavily on their slaves for household service, plantation labor, and, in Jackson's case, even the management of his properties. Although these slaves were severely disciplined with the lash, as Jackson lay dying at the plantation he comforted those in his presence by stating that "Christ has no respect to color" and that "we will all meet in Heaven."
Meacham's book is part of a welcome trend in presidential biography to weave together the presidential personality, the household interactions, and the politics of the era. "There is properly no history, only biography," Ralph Waldo Emerson noted, and in this masterly portrait of the Jackson clan, with fascinating mini-biographies of a cast of characters that seem made for a television series, it seems clear that Meacham has proven Emerson's point. But don't wait for the cable version; this is a book of wisdom about human nature, the American political culture, the politics of the Washington community, and so much more. --Richard Pious
Richard Pious is Adolph and Effie Ochs Professor at Barnard College and the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University. He is the author of The President, Congress and the Constitution (1984) and The War on Terrorism and the Rule of Law (2006), among other works. He has recently published articles on military tribunals, interrogation of detainees, warrantless surveillance, and war powers.
Excerpted from American Lion by Jon Meacham
Copyright © 2008 by Jon Meacham. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
A Note on the Text xi
Principal Characters xiii
Prologue: With the Feelings of a Father The White House, Washington, Winter 1832-33 xv
I The Love of Country, Fame and Honor Beginnings to Late 1830
1 Andy Will Fight His Way in the World 3
2 Follow Me and I'll Save You Yet 20
3 A Marriage, a Defeat, and a Victory 41
4 You Know Best, My Dear 52
5 Ladies' Wars Are Always Fierce and Hot 70
6 A Busybody Presbyterian Clergyman 86
7 My White and Red Children 91
8 Major Eaton Has Spoken of Resigning 98
9 An Opinion of the President Alone 114
10 Liberty and Union, Now and Forever 124
11 General Jackson Rules by His Personal Popularity 135
II I Will Die With The Union Late 1830 to 1834
12 I Have Been Left to Sup Alone 157
13 A Mean and Scurvy Piece of Business 177
14 Now Let Him Enforce It 198
15 The Fury of a Chained Panther 208
16 Hurra for the Hickory Tree! 218
17 A Dreadful Crisis of Excitement and Violence 222
18 The Mad Project of Disunion 227
19 We Are Threatened to Have Our Throats Cut 238
20 Great Is the Stake Placed in Our Hands 248
21 My Mind Is Made Up 254
22 He Appeared to Feel as a Father 260
23 The People, Sir, Are with Me 266
24 We Are in the Midst of a Revolution 275
III The Evening of His Days 1834 to the End
25 So You Want War 283
26 A Dark, Lawless, and Insatiable Ambition! 286
27 There Is a Rank Due to the United States Among Nations 291
28 The Wretched Victim of a Dreadful Delusion 298
29 How Would You Like to Be a Slave? 302
30 The Strife About the Next Presidency 307
31 Not One Would Have Ever Got Out Alive 315
32 I Fear Emily Will Not Recover 321
33 The President Will Go Out Triumphantly 334
34The Shock Is Great, and Grief Universal 340
Epilogue: He Still Lives 355
Author's Note and Acknowledgments 363
Notes 371
Bibliography 449
Illustration Credits 463
Index 465
coxanthony189
Posted October 20, 2008
Not his opinion on AJ in general. Any objective appraisal of history or biography takes a comprehensive look at the subject, the period at hand, and will point out the positive/negatives.
Yes, what happened to the Native Americans is one of the most unfortunate and shameful aspects of US history. Andrew Jackson is only one of an assortment of people, Democrat, Republican, and Native Americans themselves, who were involved.
Andrew Jackson, amongst other things, was also a war hero who defeated the British at New Orleans in the War of 1812.
There are a proliferation of Anti-Americans these days who only want to look at the bad things in our history, and not the positive. To criticize a man's work before it is even published, based not on the work but your opinion of the subject of his work (and to do so anonymously I might add) is irresponsible and cowardly.
39 out of 45 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.The anonymous critic must be a clueless "scholar" of United States history. How can one be a critic of a book when it has yet to be released? Many of us know what Andrew Jackson did to the Native Americans, but were we there? Of course not! So who are we to judge? I imagine the type of person that would judge Andrew Jackson about 180 years ago and also a book that has yet to be released must have a crystal ball! Besides, the man's face is on the twenty dollar bill. He obviously did something right. I'm looking forward to the release of American Lion to find out more about one of our nation's greatest presidents.
12 out of 18 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Actually, The Cherokees on the "Trail of Tears" were given used blankets from a hospital where there had been a small pox epidemic - not polio. Please get your conspiracy theories right.
There is no question that Jackson was VERY anti-Indian and he was in a large part responsible for their extirpation, however, to ignore the part of all the other players is infantile.
Furthermore, although it is possible that Jackson had something to do with exposing the Native Americans to small pox, nothing that I have read validates that accusation. Considering that Jackson's mother died of the disease and Andrew almost died, I tend to think he would not have been a part of this act.
I look forward to reading this book, I'll give it a 3 until I do get to read it.
11 out of 22 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.bluessnob
Posted July 7, 2009
I Also Recommend:
What a great read. This is a book that will engross you, enthrall you, and let you see what an important man Jackson was and how his reworking of the executive branch still lingers with us today. I loathed him for the way he treated the Native Americans, and cheered him on when he fought the bank and wold be assassins. Like or dislike him, he remains one of he most fascinating Presidents ever, in my opinion, and this book is worth the time.
6 out of 6 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted October 15, 2008
I Also Recommend:
Andrew Jackson destroyed the Cherokee nation (now Georgia) and during the "Trail of Tears" gave the Native Americans blankets with polio, with the guise of keeping them warm. The first president to use chemical warfare, probably the most evil American president to date.
6 out of 78 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.This book accomplishes what should be nearly impossible: It takes one of the single most fascinating figures in American history and manages to make him flat-out boring.
This book is a pure yawner.
I highly recommend H.W. Brands' fine Jackson biography over this.
I was shocked when I saw that this won a Pulitzer recently. I then realized how its author is the chief editor at a "mainstream" but staunchly left-leaning magazine.
Then, that explained it all. They sure do take care of their own.
Indeed, how this won and excellent recent books like Annette Gordon Reed's, "The Hemmingses of Monticello" or Harold Holzer's work on the time between Lincoln's election and when he took office did not, for example, is explained only by this fact.
5 out of 11 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Mr. Meacham has nothing to say about Andrew Jackson; and Mr. Meacham has no idea how to present his research (or, more likely, his assistants' research); and so Mr. Meacham gives us the same information over and over and over as he leaps from event to event. Don't waste your time and beware of Pulitzer Prize-winning books written by members of the publishing industry in New York City, the headquarters of the Pulitzer Prizes.
4 out of 9 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.this book was very well deserving of the politzer prize despite what the more harsh critcs say. there were alot of bad things said about this book, but they were said out of dislike for andrew jackson, not because it was a bad read. it isnt fair to critisize jon meacham out of hatred for andrew jackson. it is a very well written book with excellent research and in depth analysis of some of the defining moments of andrew jacksons time in office. i understnd that president jackson did some things that are frowned upon in american history. but without his courage and aggresive politics we may never have reached our potential, and without his will to preserve the union we may never have seen the likes of abraham lincoln, fdr, bill clinton or barak obama. he was a true patriot.
3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Andrew Jackson was the 7th American President. He won the popular vote for President in 1824, 1828 and 1832, but only ended up getting the position in 1828 and 1832. This book looks at his presidential experience. It's important because during his presidency he created the first real political party (that we might recognise today) and was the president who pretty much forced the US into a structure we have today, with a strong executive president that leads the country and expects the states to fall in behind him.
The big issue I have with the book is that I'm not altogether sure I liked the guy. He effectively re-defined the presidency, and to do that you have to have a very clear vision and the stubbornness to see it through. The thing is, while he was a populist, and I can see why people like him, he (to me at least) epitomises all that I find wrong about America. He pushed through a number of reforms that created greater political involvement in the population, but at a cost that ensured that future presidents only mirror popular sentiment, rather than trying to lead it.
If you want to understand the American presidency, you really need to read this book, but if you do, expect to be as infuriated as you are educated. Incidentally, if you view yourself as a "strict constructionist," read this book. If nothing else it might show you than even at the time the constitution was viewed as something that could be interpreted over time.
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted March 3, 2009
the book was interesting to readers not acquainted with the history, but the author insists on giving his own moral imperatives to the people and events based on the fashion of 2008.
This tendency to moralize repeatedly is, in my opinion, a major flaw.
3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.I enjoyed the way this book layed out the Jackson presidency. It broke down all the major issues of his day, along with the political climate of the country at that time. I also enjoyed reading about the way he interfaced with the major players of the day. I was surprised that the book skipped over his meeting with Santa Anna at the end of his presidency (While not important, it must have been interesting). I felt that this book fairly captured the good (battle against the bank; his fight to keep the country unified in the South Carolina nullification crisis; clearing the federal government of all debt), along with the bad (his blindness toward slavery and indian removal). The book did a good job of explaining Jacksons relevance today, and how he change the presidency. Overall, a good book.
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.When I found out I was interviewing Jon Meacham I was very excited. I had admired him as an editor and heard great things about his books. However I was not that interested in President Andrew Jackson. This book has really changed my mind ... what a facinating man. I am about a third of the way through and really surprised by this unusual and amazing man.
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Greatpierre
Posted February 2, 2010
I have no earthly idea how this book could become so popular. Read H.W. Brands Bio on Jackson! It is much better!
1 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted May 16, 2009
This book -- a discussion of Andrew Jackson's White House years -- has more detail about many of the people who surrounded Jackson than about Jackson himself. There is an enormous, and, in my opinion, excessive, amount of notes in the back of the book; however, the author only cites the page on which the annotated reference appears. He does not ennumerate the referenced item itself. Unless the reader flips back and forth to the notes at the end of each sentence, he or she doesn't know whether anything in that sentence is annotated in the notes or not. I tried referring to the notes when I got to the end of each chapter just to avoid the frustration of constantly checking to see if there was a note or not -- VERY irritating.
1 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Meacham does a thorough job of examining the various factors that influenced Jackson during his White House years. The advice Jackson remembers his mother giving him is a great passage, as is Daniel Webster's speech in defense of the Union. Jackson's battle against a central bank and to prevent South Carolina and other Southern states from seceding are examples of issues the book addresses, and illuminates with solid research.
Weaknesses are a sketchy treatmemt of Jackson's early life and too much concentration on the personality conflicts between Emily Donelson (Jackson's niece) and Margaret Eaton (wife of the Secretary of War). This may reflect a paucity of research material on Jackson's early days, and an overabundance of pesonal letters dealing with the latter subject. The conflict between the women weighed on Jackson during his White House years, but Meacham's detailed account of this aspect seems out of proportion to the space he devotes to other areas.
Overall, it'a a well-written biography with some inspirational moments, and certainly illuminates a president who has been prominent without being well-known. Recommended.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.WinstonMontgomery
Posted March 3, 2009
It is difficult to effectively write a story of a man who has been evaluated, judged, and in some respects villified when discussing a larger than life figure such as our seventh President, Andrew Jackson. But finding new information and leaving readers to judge Jackson on his merits as a President is, as Meacham did with his wonderful volume of "Franklin & Winston" (the behind the scenes story of the wartime friendship and alliance of Franklin Roosevelt and England's Winston Churchill), where Meacham is at his literally best.
Rather than focusing on Jackson's colorful historical background, Meacham reaches deep into the heart of the man who elects to lead his country but is torn between his obligation as President and his personal triumps and tragedies which he must leave behind. Jackson's historical significance at the time of his Presidency is important to the man behind the "American Lion".
Jackson's leadership as head of the U.S. Forces in the pivotal Battle of New Orleans in the war of 1812 is of course part of Jacksonian legend. Prior to reaching the Presidency, Jackson suffered through what even by today's standards would be considered a vicious and damaging presidential campaign. That coupled with financial difficulties in his personal affairs and the devasting loss of his beloved wife Rachel(a woman he once duled over for her honor) is how Jackson assumed the nations Presidency.
Meacham has a marvelous ability to make "American Lion" a book so vitally important to understanding our nations past and the men who led us, read like a first class novel of intrigue, suspense, human frailities and sufferings, coupled with extreme personal highs and terrible personal lows.
For eight years, Jackson struggled with expansionist issues,internal troubles and sadly the infamous Trail of Tears, the relocation of the Cherokee Nation from North Carolina to the Oklahoma Territory.
But Meacham reserves his most touching essays about Jackson, the man. American Lion by Jon Meacham is a Four Star study of a man and president who was pivotal in this country's growth when the United States was still young.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted May 10, 2010
The strength of this book was in the case made of Jackson changinng the role of the executive to an early model of what it has grown into. In effect, the book demonstrates the inability of the House/Senate to provide any direction and, so, are relegated to responding roles versus leading for the people. The irritation was that a given chapter didn't move chronologically, causing a reader to look back to assure one understands why something is happening when. Overall, the book does contribute to a discussion of what is the role of the executive versus the legistlature, was Jackson truly a Jeffersonian or a "closet" monarchist, is the executive or the legislature the "voice of the electorate"? This book does contribute to each of those discussions.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.gbglaw
Posted November 18, 2009
Very Interesting.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.WJB369
Posted October 18, 2009
I thoroughly enjoyed many aspects of this book, specifically the details of his youth and the second term of his presidency. Also, the battles with the bank and the State of South Carolina were very interesting. Lastly, the book did an exceptional job of explaining how Jackson transformed the presidency to what it is now. The only thing I did not like about the book was the time spent on Margaret Eaton. I would recommend the book to someone who is serious about history, as it is a very detailed and thorough account.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted September 12, 2009
Excellent review of our nation's history in a tumultous era; history does repeat itself!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
Andrew Jackson created the modern American presidency as we know it today. A backwoods orphan who fought his way to the pinnacle of power, Jackson ushered in a new era in which the people, not distant elites, were the guiding force in American politics. Democracy made its stand in the Jackson years, and he gave voice to the hopes and fears of a restless, changing nation facing challenging times at home and threats abroad. With his powerful persona and mystical connection to the people, Jackson moved the White House from the periphery of government to the center of national action, where it has remained ever since. Beloved and hated, venerated and reviled, he was also the most ...