Why didn't Al tell us that Kyoto won't save us?
Al Gore has been pushing the Kyoto Treaty on Americans since he was Vice-President, as the solution to global warming. Here's the sum total of all that he had to say about Kyoto in his book: Mr. Gore 'helped ... at the negotiations in Kyoto, Japan,' 'helped to write' the treaty, listed U.S. cities living with the Kyoto Protocol, and countries that ratified it. [Intro, p. 41, p. 288, p. 282] Thus, Al Gore was an 'insider' with inside knowledge of the limits of the Kyoto Protocol, yet he gave us no detailed information on it whatsoever. Richard Lindzen, PhD, the chair professor of meteorology in prestigious M.I.T. university, reviewed the movie version of this book. He said that he found Mr. Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth' highly inaccurate, and in regard to Gore's 'shrill alarmism,' commented 'To believe it requires that one ignore the truly inconvenient facts.' [Wall Street Journal, 'There is no 'Consensus' on Global Warming,' June 26, 2006] That's what I found, too. When I noticed that both the range of temperature rises to 2100 and the value of Kyoto's cooling were missing from the book, I put together the math involved in the action of the Kyoto Treaty on the final temperature in 2100 and saw the whole picture. Using the best known values* in F [preferred by Gore], we have: [4.5 to 7.2] - 0.3 = [4.2 to 6.9]. In other words, the range of the temperature increase by 2100 is only reduced by 0.3 degrees F and thus remains almost the same as without Kyoto. THUS, KYOTO WON'T SAVE US FROM GORE'S DISASTER NIGHTMARES AT ALL! It only cools the increases by about 5%, leaving 95% of the temperature increase by 2100 untouched! Either those disasters aren't going to happen anyway, per the actual convictions of many scientists who disagree with Mr. Gore, or we may as well get prepared to withstand whatever amount of them happens, Kyoto or no Kyoto! Now, I see why Mr. Gore withheld the values. He probably saw this result and recognized the same conclusion, since he wrote the book and must have known all the numbers. He knew he couldn't get people to make the economic sacrifices of Kyoto if that wouldn't even save them from his disasters. So, like Richard Lindzen commented, he just 'ignored the truly inconvenient facts.' *The numbers 4.5 to 7.2 come from an average of modest estimates by global warming advocates that predicted increases from 2.5 to 4 degrees C all the way to 2100. That translates directly to 4.5 to 7.2 degrees F. The 0.3 F given as the cooling effect of Kyoto comes from the definition in the Kyoto treaty, modified by estimates of scientists since then to about .08 degrees C by 2050. That is .144 degrees F, extrapolated to .288 F by 2100, rounded up to 0.3 F.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
An Inconvenient Truth, Gore's groundbreaking battle cry of a follow-up to the bestselling Earth in the Balance, will be published to tie in with a documentary film of the same name that will be seen in theaters across the country in May. Both the book and film were inspired by a series of multimedia presentations on global warming that Gore created and delivers to groups around the world. With this book, Gore, who is one of our environmental heroes -- and a leading expert -- brings together leading-edge research from top scientists around the world; photographs, charts, and other illustrations; and personal anecdotes and observations to document the fast pace and wide scope of global warming. He presents, with alarming