- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Set in Victorian England, Phillips's impressive third novel uses four linked viewpoints to explore class, gender, family dynamics, sexuality and sciences both real and fraudulent, ancient and newly minted. Joseph Barton, a London biological researcher, orders his four-year-old daughter, Angelica, who's been sleeping in her parents' bedroom, to her own room. Joseph's wife, Constance, resists this separation from her child and the resumption of a marital intimacy that, given her history of miscarriage, may threaten her life. Soon Constance notices foul odors, furniture cracks and a blue specter that appears to attack Angelica while she sleeps. When she reports these supernatural visitations to the unimaginative Joseph, the rift between them widens. Desperate, Constance turns to actress-turned-spiritualist Annie Montague for help. Phillips (Prague) captures period diction and detail brilliantly. At its strongest, the multiple-viewpoint narration yields psychological depth and a number of clever surprises; at its weakest, it can slow the book's momentum to an uncomfortably slow (if authentically Victorian) pace. Author tour. (Apr.)
Copyright 2007 Reed Business Information1. Can anyone be justly blamed for the situation at the Barton house?
2. How did your impressions of Constance Barton, Anne Montague, Joseph Barton, and Angelica Barton change with each of the four parts?
3. Were there really ghosts at the Barton house? Do you think Arthur Phillips believes in the supernatural, or is he a man of science? Or does it matter?
4. What is Constance really fighting, if not a blue flying man? What does the specter represent? Why is it important that it be male? Would you say Constance is insane? Why or why not? Which is more frightening: the supernatural or the real horrors in Constance’s home and mind? What’s the difference?
5. Do you think Dr. Miles’s insights about the Bartons’ situation are reasonable? How do they compare to Anne Montague’s?
6. Does Anne Montague help or hinder Constance? Why is Constance special to Anne, although Anne has treated many similar cases?
7. How are the roles of motherhood and fatherhood discussed in the novel? Consider Constance as a girl, a mother, and a motherless mother. Consider Joseph’s relationship with his mother and father, and his sense of himself as a father. How can Anne, who has never had children of her own, be a mother to both Constance and Angelica?
8. How is childhood portrayed in this novel? Who is protecting whom? Who needs protection most?
9. Do you think Angelica is innocent, all things considered?
10. What is the difference between Joseph’s feelings of failure and Constance’s? How do their respective realizations of failure affect them? Did you feel more sympathetic to one or the other of these characters?
11. Who uses sex as a weapon in Angelica, literally or figuratively? Who is dominated or manipulated by it? Is sex particularly dangerous in the Victorian context? If so, how?
12. Mature narrator Angelica writes from Constance’s point of view: “for that was precisely the issue in this house: the flesh reality of intellectual conversation” (p. 137). What does this mean? How does Joseph’s interpretation of the “issue” differ?
13. Do the issues presented in this Victorian ghost story apply to contemporary readers? Do they resonate with your own life?
14. Do you think Constance’s reaction to Joseph’s work testing on animals is reasonable or hysterical? Is Joseph a sadist or a scientist? Can he be both? Do you think men are intrinsically more scientifically minded, and women intuitively minded? Does the author think so?
15. Do you agree with Anne’s statement, “No woman has ever launched a war, and no woman ever could” (p. 166)? Do you agree when she proposes, “Anywhere that women live free of men, they live with legs” (p. 186)? Do you think this is a feminist novel?
16. Why did Phillips make Joseph an ex-military man? What about Joseph’s foreigner status? How do these aspects of the character affect our opinions of him and the opinions of the characters in the novel?
17. In Angelica, some characters are or were actors, they speak in the dialogue of classic plays, and they go to the theater together. Why does Phillips use theater metaphors throughout the novel?
18. What do you think Phillips is saying about perception, reality, illusions, and dreams with Angelica?
Anonymous
Posted April 20, 2008
I was really captivated by the premise for this book, but I feel that it fell quite short of my expectations. There were certainly portions of the book that were very engaging. The various perspectives did provide some thought-provoking ideas and intrigues. However, I was often times frustrated by the voice as I could not tell who was telling the story 'I actually thought the family dog was telling the story at one point... but there was no dog in the story'.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted December 23, 2011
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Anonymous
Posted December 2, 2007
After finishing 'Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell,' I was quite immersed in the world of Victorian literature, so I picked up a copy of Arthur Phillips' 'Angelica.' I loved his previous book, 'The Egyptologist,' so 'Angelica' seemed like a 'sure thing' for me. It was. I don't know when I've enjoyed a book more. 'Angelica' takes place in late-Victorian London and revolves around the Barton household: Joseph, his seemingly very neurotic wife, Constance, their four-year-old daughter, Angelica, and even their 'sturdy Irish maid,' Nora. Of course other sundry characters enter the picture, such as actress-turned-spiritualist, Anne Montague, Joseph's 'friend,' Harry Delacorte, and the lemon cake loving Dr. Miles. 'Angelica' is the story of many things. It's a ghost story. It's a story of the deterioration of a marriage. It's a story of child abuse and its consequences. It's a story of lust. It's a story of love. It's a story of ultimate betrayal. Above all, it's a story of ultimate sadness. The book, in Phillips' able hands, is perfectly written. Not one word could be replaced with one better suited. It's a perfect marriage of art and craft. Arthur Phillips proved he certainly knew his stuff in 'The Egyptologist,' and in 'Angelica,' he even tops himself. Missing this book would be missing the reading experience of a lifetime. And don't worry about the open ending. All the clues are there and putting the puzzle pieces together is half the fun. (Note: Don't overlook secondary characters and don't overlook Constance's reading habits.) A book or two more and Arthur Phillips is going to be known as one of our greatest writers ever. His work is mesmerizing. In fact, he is one of America's greatest writers right now. It's time you found that out. Pick up a copy of 'Angelica' for yourself and see. Not only is the book a masterpiece that will have you reading far into the night, it's also perfect for a book discussion group.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Stationary store clerk Constance is euphoric and overwhelmed when she marries biological researcher Joseph Barton as she has changed from lowly shop girl to the lady of the manor. She decides to give her spouse children, but over the years only Angelica is born. When their daughter turns four, Joseph insists their offspring no longer sleep in their room. Constance panics as she fears for Angelica¿s safety having seen spirits hover over her child however Joseph¿s temper is more frightening so she reluctantly accepts that Angelica will sleep in her own room. Still Constance consults with a spiritualist Anne Montague, who thinks there is something perverted about Joseph and his ferocious rage at home that manifests in the spirits. Joseph cannot understand why his wife suddenly fears him and cringes at his touch as if he is a beast. Years later, an adult Angelica wonders whether when she was a child if her father was a sexual predator, her mother a delusional maniac, or something even more frightening from beyond. --- This late Victorian psychological suspense tale switches perspective as the key players provide their point of view re what is happening when Angelica turned four. The story line grips readers who are unsure as to what is the truth as each person¿s version seems right at the time it is presented. Interestingly the audience will empathize with Constance and Joseph as hey share in common the belief that their partner does not understand them. ANGELICA is a strong suspense thriller that will keep fans reading to learn supernatural or mundane cause and effect. --- Harriet Klausner
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted May 17, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted June 14, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted March 13, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Overview
BONUS: This edition contains excerpts from Arthur Phillips's The Tragedy of Arthur, The Song Is You, Prague, and The Egyptologist.From the bestselling author of The Egyptologist and Prague comes an even more accomplished and entirely surprising new novel. Angelica is a spellbinding Victorian ghost story, an intriguing literary and psychological puzzle, and a meditation on marriage, childhood, memory, and fear.
The novel opens in London, in the 1880s, with the Barton household on the brink of collapse. Mother, father, and daughter provoke one another, consciously and unconsciously, ...