Good read
Most of the characters are well developed and the plot moves along at a good pace. I recommend this book.
I finished this book a few days ago and the rest of this review may contain spoilers so read on at your own risk as I'm going to write what I think off the top of my head before the points fade from memory: The first book of McKinney's I read was Dead City and I liked the fast pace of it. I was a little unsure in that book as to the author's poking here or there at broader points and in this book, without a doubt, he does and I'm fine with that as a whole. In general zombie books suffer from a one sided dilemma. Authors of vampire or werewolf books get to draw metaphors and plot directions from the undead, but not in zombie books ... zombies just kinda moan and groan and the author has to use the living to press a point and a juicy plot. I think McKinney has done a fairly good job of that, but what is his broader point? Almost like a checklist on a notepad the author presents me with a few things that stood out: Courage without consequence is meaningless, loyalty to anything removes liberty but complete liberty leads to anarchy, nihilism is empty, one chooses to live and in that choice we acknowledge that life has meaning. He doesn't do this with metaphors or plot but almost with aphorisms inserted into the plot. In general I think he must point to virtue instead of courage without consequence because by the very nature of our causation its impossible for an action or inaction not to produce a consequence. So I feel he's poking at virtue here and I think he kinda jumps to the last point of virtue leading to choosing a life of meaning. I think that could be his broader point, but he doesn't expand enough on his checklist for a conclusion. I feel the author tries to draw a link to his middle points of anarchy and nihilism by saying we must reach a balance and then he sticks that into the sock of virtue by saying that by choosing to live we must acknowledge life has meaning and therefore it isn't a nest of nihilism ... have a nice day! Its primitive at best and the whole book more or less rests on it. Is it virtuous to choose only that which you have known? Is the word "death" a meaningless concept because it lacks personal experience? These thoughts should immediately come to mind. If one is to tread down this path, walk! Maybe he will walk some more in his next novel but he literally puts his toe in a pond and looks at the ripples and provides a crayon drawing. Maybe he's more of a philosopher than the book gives credit and he's building the next novel or maybe not. I get leery of ideological propaganda and so far I don't think he's going to cross that line. I like authors that provide a plot and characters that test ones convictions from the characters point of view. For example Dostoevsky does this. They make one understand, and sometimes love, the things one should despise so that one can come out with a broader prospective on life and this author had a really good opportunity with Jasper. I feel he did a great job developing Ed, Billy, Barnes and even Aaron but missed Jasper. Get rid of the checklist, stick those points into the plot, and use the character development of Jasper to ring the points home by making one actually understand the leader of this Jonestown. This novel is basically Jonestown with zombies and a checklist of philosophical aphorisms. Its OK.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.