Disappointing, riddled with factual errors
In the hands of a skilled writer with a sense of history, Area 51 could have been an important historical work. But as it is, the author confounds fact with fiction in what appears to be an attempt to create a sensational story. Some of the narrative is compelling but the book is riddled with factual errors, leaving the reader not knowing what is real, and what is not. The author attempts to rail against government secrets, but parts of her book undermine her thesis. She lets on at the beginning of the book that the book is about "government projects and operations that are secret from Congress and secret from the people who make up the United States." She rails against the deception of governments, asserting what I think is her underlying cause that "government policy on secrets undermines the greater good." But she leaves to the reader's imagination exactly what secrets she is referring to. Are all government secrets necessarily evil? The focus of her book, before she gets carried away, is on the U-2 program and Oxcart. Is Jacobsen suggesting that the US government should have advertised its work at Area 51? Jacobsen says that the U-2 was the CIA's "best chance to get hard intelligence on the Soviet Union, considering that one photograph could provide the Agency with as much information as approximately ten thousand spies on the ground." Is Jacobsen suggesting that we would have been better off with trying to recruit ten thousand spies on the ground in the Soviet Union? Or possibly Jacobsen is suggesting that the government should come clean about the miscreants sent by Stalin in a flying disc that crashed at Roswell. Government secrets are a serious topic that deserve more thoughtful examination than Jacobsen is able to provide. The author is certainly not a student of history or geography. She calls the MVD (Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh Del), the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Soviet Union, the "MBD" and mistranslates it. She persistently calls the Soviet Union, Russia. The list of gross factual errors continues. Jacobsen wanted to say that America's intelligence services had no idea about what was going on east of the Ural Mountains, which would be Soviet Asia, but instead says that they had absolutely no idea "what was happening west of the Ural Mountains." The author's sense of direction in the US fares no better. Burbank, California is not "nine miles to the southwest" of Northridge--the correct answer is that it is southeast. Although she is correct that Tsar Nicolas II was shot in 1918, it did not "set[] off the Communist Revolution." The Bolshevik Revolution occurred in October (old style) 1917. The author's failure even to understand basic historical facts undermines her entire "story" not even talking about the infamous wacky "Revelation" chapter on "child-size aviators" with "large heads and abnormally oversize eyes" sent by Stalin to the US. My hope is that this book will prompt others to take a closer look at the activities and work at Area 51, and that they will create an accurate account before those who are no longer able to share their firsthand accounts. They certainly deserve better than this historical hack job.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.