The Art of Asking: Ask Better Questions, Get Better Answers [NOOK Book]

Overview

Ask the Right Questions in the Right Ways...And Get the Answers You Need to Succeed!

Discover the core questions that every manager needs to master...how to avoid the mistakes business questioners make most often...ten simple rules for asking every question more effectively. Learn how to ask tough questions and take control of tough situations...use questions to promote innovation, drive change, identify hidden problems, and get failing ...

See more details below
The Art of Asking: Ask Better Questions, Get Better Answers

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$12.49
BN.com price
(Save 43%)$21.99 List Price

Overview

Ask the Right Questions in the Right Ways...And Get the Answers You Need to Succeed!

Discover the core questions that every manager needs to master...how to avoid the mistakes business questioners make most often...ten simple rules for asking every question more effectively. Learn how to ask tough questions and take control of tough situations...use questions to promote innovation, drive change, identify hidden problems, and get failing projects back on track.

Ask better questions, get better answers, achieve better results!

“Required reading for every leader who wishes to see his or herorganization flourish and career progress.”

Garry A. Neil, MD, Corporate Vice President, Johnson & Johnson

“Asking, listening, understanding the real meaning of the answers, and taking actions based on facts are really the essence of managing. This book has helped me in connecting the dots in my understanding (and lack thereof) of why things really did not work the way I expected them to.”

Pradip Banerjee, PhD, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Xybion; retired partner, Accenture

“The framework and techniques provide outstanding ideas for executives to both gain better information and develop the analytical skills of their teams.”

Terry Hisey, Vice Chairman and US Life Sciences Leader, Deloitte

We’ve all met the corporate inquisitor: the individual whose questions seem primarily intended to terrify the victim. The right goal is to solve the problem--and to build a more effective, collaborative organization where everyone learns from experience, and nobody’s too intimidated to tell the truth.

That means asking the right questions in the right ways. This book will teach you how to do precisely that. Terry J. Fadem shows how to choose the right questions and avoid questions that guarantee obvious, useless answers...how to help people give you the information you need...how to use body language to ask questions more effectively...how to ask the innovative or neglected questions that uncover real issues and solutions.

You’ll learn how to adopt the attributes of a good questioner...set a goal for every question...use your personal style more effectively...ask tough questions, elicit dissent, react to surprises, overcome evasions, and more. Becoming a better questioner may be the most powerful thing you can do right now to improve your managerial effectiveness--and this book gives you all the insights, tools, and techniques you’ll need to get there.

  • Evaluate your current “questioning” skills...
    ...then systematically improve them
  • Choose better questions...
    ...and ask them the right way
  • Ask tough questions more effectively
    Get at the truth, uncover the real problem, and solve it
  • Master the crucial nonverbal aspects of asking questions
    Finding your best style and the right body language
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780132703796
  • Publisher: Pearson Education
  • Publication date: 12/15/2008
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 224
  • Sales rank: 425,982
  • File size: 759 KB

Meet the Author

T.J. (Terry) Fadem is a veteran manager with 25 years of experience ranging from supervising steel workers (J&L Steel) to managing in a major corporation (DuPont) to working with start-up companies. His business venture teams have been profiled in books and periodicals, and he has also been a frequent speaker and consultant on strategic management issues. Fadem is currently the managing director, Corporate Alliances at the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania where he is also a member of the Core Team of the Mack Center for Technological Innovation at the Wharton School. In addition, Fadem is president of the Biomedical Research and Education Foundation.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Art of AskingThe Art of AskingAsk Better Questions, Get Better Answers

Preface: Corporate InquisitionsThe Not-So-Grand Inquisitor

He sat behind a desk holding a pitchfork, as all upper-level managers do when they are bedeviling their employees. Well, at least that's how many people picture the boss. This guy was actually holding one that resembled an implement of the devil—a long black handle with a red trident at the end. An appropriate accompaniment for a kid in a Halloween costume, it was out of place with the corporate blue suit of the middle-aged business director. But, as you will see in a moment, this was a manager who was out of step with his business.

Managing business development efforts for a major electronics company with worldwide supply chains is a daunting job for anyone. He had responsibility for overseeing a major growth initiative for the company—one that would likely determine the future of the division. His infrequent visits to the facility that housed the main business unit were as welcome as the arrival of bird flu.

The project he had come to review was beset with problems. The marketing organization criticized research, believing that the product design would not meet customer expectations. Every redesign that satisfied the demands of marketing added costs to the product that threatened to price it out of the market it was targeted to reach, thus making the salespeople very unhappy. And they all argued with manufacturing because no matter what design was settled on, no one in the plant had any confidence the product could be manufactured reliably. The project was woefully behind schedule and so far over budget that the likelihood of recovering development costs had become a major concern for management.

The desk that he was using, as a physical barrier between himself and the team as much as anything else, rested on a concrete platform, about a foot high, in an old factory warehouse. He actually needed the desk because this particular group of employees was known to hurl chairs when they disagreed with each other. Who knows what they might heave at this guy? Although the original purpose of the elevated floor was to keep gunpowder dry, it now functioned as a stage on which the manager attempted to transform himself into an inquisitor. He had come to visit a business team that was producing a seemingly unending stream of problems rather than products.

This meeting was convened to find solutions to the problems the development team had been having so that production could be scheduled and the sales force could start to take orders. In reality, the director was holding an inquisition. He believed he knew the answers—he just wanted to ask the questions. So, with evil scepter in hand, he conducted an investigation, calling on his victims by pointing his pitchfork at them as if to skewer each respondent on one of the barbs.

He pointed to the engineering supervisor.

Inquisitor: What do you mean you can't get the boards to work? Who designed them? Who built the prototypes?

He paused here to catch his breath. No one was going to speak.

Inquisitor: What's wrong with you people? Can you explain this?

The silence continued. There was no answer to his bullying, except for one of the engineers who entered the room late. A particularly brilliant designer, "Doctor Doom" accepted the verbal challenge.

Inquisitor: The project is now overdue by six months. Not one part can be produced for the original forecasted cost. What is the final projected cost of the production model now?

Dr. Doom: About four times what we planned at the start!

Delivering bad new was Dr. Doom's specialty, hence the nickname. He appeared to enjoy telling managers the truth, as he saw it, and seemed especially pleased if it was very bad news that was not expected by management—and this was indeed, very bad news.

Inquisitor: We're losing time, and now you tell me that we have lost any hope of having a price advantage? Do any of you think this makes sense? Can you explain this?

He pointed to one of the marketing people in the room.

Inquisitor: What's wrong with you people? How could you let this happen?

Although offensive by most standards, this particular inquisitor was a small i inquisitor in this company. He was threatening to lower-level people, but in reality, he had only a limited ability to dismiss staff or end careers. This company had an abundance of inquisitors in training.

The business director worked for a general manager who was the real "Grand Inquisitor" of the company. The GM was so good at inquisitions that careers spontaneously combusted under the intense pressure of his examinations during business review meetings. There was no need for any burning at the stake. He was known to extract resignations on the spot.

If you work in a company or any organization long enough, you might eventually attend or participate in an inquisition or two. I have seen a number of them, and I believe most if not all inquisitions are unnecessary. Although hopefully not commonplace, they do happen, and they represent many of the worst characteristics of inappropriate questioning conducted by managers in their daily work. One of the reasons that unsuitable questioning occurs is that the skills employed when conducting inquiries tend to be those that are passed on by example.

If mentors or senior managers are particularly good at asking questions (and if they are also personally successful), their skills are passed on to those who want to emulate them. As in the case just discussed, however, if managers' skills are tactless and the company is still successful under this kind of leadership, the reverse happens. Poor habits are perpetuated. People are fooled into thinking that bullying, intimidating, or torturing by "elocutioning" employees can bring success just because they see these traits in managers of successful enterprises. Even when a business fails, if people had no other mentors to learn from, they have few positive skills to take forward in their career.

Unfortunately, as discussed in the next few chapters, not all successful managers, including those who possess excellent questioning skills, excel at asking questions all the time.

Managers ask questions for a wide variety of specific reasons. For purposes of our discussion, I have boiled the reasons down to three general categories of inquiry:

  1. Questions asked because the answer is important
  2. Questions asked because the question is important
  3. Questions asked because the process of asking is important

In the first category, the answer is more important than the question, so all questions need to be asked with that fact in mind. A manager might want to learn about an idea, or, as in the previously discussed case, the issue under investigation may be "what went wrong" (even though the management devil in this example had no real interest in the answer). In addition to asking questions effectively, managers need simultaneously to employ listening skills.

In the second category, the question is more important than the answer. A manager might want a particular line of reasoning to be used to evaluate projects, or perhaps other considerations should be addressed and the question is a tool to be applied to the situation. There might be no answer to some questions because they are designed to generate discussion rather than answers. This practice is common in many classrooms where questions are designed to get students to think about the question or sharpen their analytical skills rather than supply a correct answer. The business director in the short example mentioned previously actually didn't care about the questions either.

For him, the process of asking questions—the inquisition—was what mattered most. So, the manner of asking seemed to be his overriding concern. He was intentionally making people feel uncomfortable by grilling them with questions and letting them know that he didn't care about the answers. But, there are less-threatening circumstances where the process of asking is designed by the manager to instruct or to get a group or an individual to approach a problem differently. Mentors, professors, consultants, and advisors often play this role with their questions.

In other cases, the process of asking can be used to allow the group to develop new ideas. So, not all questioning that focuses on process is an inquisition.

For most managers, interest lies in the question as well as the answer. And, it's the process of asking that establishes the importance of each question and answer. This book was designed to address the need for improving questions as well as the manner in which managers ask them—to thus achieve better answers, which are ultimately what is needed for a business to succeed in the long run.

The business management "devil" in the opening story eventually met his due. After months of delays, the development team finally produced a viable product, over a year behind schedule and well over budget—but it was completed. Fighting stopped long enough to get the job done, and everyone on the project team moved on to other assignments or left for jobs elsewhere.

By sheer coincidence, I happened to be present when this particular business director was making a presentation to the Grand Inquisitor—the general manager of the division.

The director's business unit was not doing well. Errors in judgment coupled with poor forecasting had led to two straight years of underperformance. New products were delayed, morale was poor, and there was no end in sight. Under intense questioning from the general manager, he self-destructed.

Grand Inquisitor: Forget the numbers, what's your analysis of the situation? Why do you have such bad news about something you should've fixed long before now?

Director: Exchange rates hurt our European margins, costs are up in our plants in Asia due to environmental concerns, and marketing forecasted a more aggressive return than the sales force was able to deliver.

Grand Inquisitor: That's not good enough. And what else?

Director: Well, if my analysis isn't good enough for you, you can find someone else to run this business.

Grand Inquisitor (rather triumphantly): I will.

And then, in a perverse twist of the pitchfork, which was now buried deep in the manager's ego, he gleefully moved on to attack any self-esteem that remained.

Grand Inquisitor: But I'm still waiting for a good explanation from you for such a bad performance.

Turning red and gasping for air, the exasperated manager stalked out of the meeting and immediately resigned.

The business eventually failed and was sold off by the parent company. It's now doing better under different management. I lost track of the not-so-grand inquisitor, but the Grand Inquisitor general manager went on to be an even more overbearing boor of a manager as the CEO of another company, where he was eventually awarded a golden parachute for leading yet another crop of business managers to extinction. There was little in his record of leading businesses that demonstrated the kind of good performance expected from a true business leader. A mythology followed him around with vague references to how he saved a business with his great insights fresh out of school with his MBA. I never met a witness to this history. He just always seemed to appear on the scene when the business conditions were failing just enough to blame previous management, impress people with excruciatingly tortuous questioning sessions, and then leave the business right before it crashed. To this day, I cannot understand why he was never held to account for years of poor performance, not to mention ruined careers. This lack of accountability is a troubling aspect of business management visible in a number of places in the market.

Improving a manager's ability to ask a question is no guarantee that business performance will be improved, but it should help. It is possible that both the project and the business of the manager cited in the preceding example might have performed better if the manager had been better prepared to ask questions of the people who worked for him. This book offers an opportunity for managers at all levels to improve one of the most basic aspects of their jobs: asking questions!

© Copyright Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface: Corporate Inquisitions xii

Introduction: Questioning Is the Skill of Management 1

Common Errors: How to Recognize and Correct Them 15

Neglected Questions 33

Misuses of Management Skills: Inquisitions Are Not the Only Abuse of Questioning 43

Questioning: Improve Your Skills 53

Signs and Signals 77

Types of Questions 85

Use of Skills 117

Listening 173

Conclusions 179

Epilogue 185

Definitions 187

References 191

Questioning as a Spectator Sport: Where to Go to Watch and Learn the Game 195

Endnotes 199

Read More Show Less

Preface

The Art of Asking

Ask Better Questions, Get Better Answers

Preface: Corporate Inquisitions

The Not-So-Grand Inquisitor

He sat behind a desk holding a pitchfork, as all upper-level managers do when they are bedeviling their employees. Well, at least that's how many people picture the boss. This guy was actually holding one that resembled an implement of the devil—a long black handle with a red trident at the end. An appropriate accompaniment for a kid in a Halloween costume, it was out of place with the corporate blue suit of the middle-aged business director. But, as you will see in a moment, this was a manager who was out of step with his business.

Managing business development efforts for a major electronics company with worldwide supply chains is a daunting job for anyone. He had responsibility for overseeing a major growth initiative for the company—one that would likely determine the future of the division. His infrequent visits to the facility that housed the main business unit were as welcome as the arrival of bird flu.

The project he had come to review was beset with problems. The marketing organization criticized research, believing that the product design would not meet customer expectations. Every redesign that satisfied the demands of marketing added costs to the product that threatened to price it out of the market it was targeted to reach, thus making the salespeople very unhappy. And they all argued with manufacturing because no matter what design was settled on, no one in the plant had any confidence the product could be manufactured reliably. The project was woefully behind schedule and so far over budget that the likelihood of recovering development costs had become a major concern for management.

The desk that he was using, as a physical barrier between himself and the team as much as anything else, rested on a concrete platform, about a foot high, in an old factory warehouse. He actually needed the desk because this particular group of employees was known to hurl chairs when they disagreed with each other. Who knows what they might heave at this guy? Although the original purpose of the elevated floor was to keep gunpowder dry, it now functioned as a stage on which the manager attempted to transform himself into an inquisitor. He had come to visit a business team that was producing a seemingly unending stream of problems rather than products.

This meeting was convened to find solutions to the problems the development team had been having so that production could be scheduled and the sales force could start to take orders. In reality, the director was holding an inquisition. He believed he knew the answers—he just wanted to ask the questions. So, with evil scepter in hand, he conducted an investigation, calling on his victims by pointing his pitchfork at them as if to skewer each respondent on one of the barbs.

He pointed to the engineering supervisor.

Inquisitor: What do you mean you can't get the boards to work? Who designed them? Who built the prototypes?

He paused here to catch his breath. No one was going to speak.

Inquisitor: What's wrong with you people? Can you explain this?

The silence continued. There was no answer to his bullying, except for one of the engineers who entered the room late. A particularly brilliant designer, "Doctor Doom" accepted the verbal challenge.

Inquisitor: The project is now overdue by six months. Not one part can be produced for the original forecasted cost. What is the final projected cost of the production model now?

Dr. Doom: About four times what we planned at the start!

Delivering bad new was Dr. Doom's specialty, hence the nickname. He appeared to enjoy telling managers the truth, as he saw it, and seemed especially pleased if it was very bad news that was not expected by management—and this was indeed, very bad news.

Inquisitor: We're losing time, and now you tell me that we have lost any hope of having a price advantage? Do any of you think this makes sense? Can you explain this?

He pointed to one of the marketing people in the room.

Inquisitor: What's wrong with you people? How could you let this happen?

Although offensive by most standards, this particular inquisitor was a small i inquisitor in this company. He was threatening to lower-level people, but in reality, he had only a limited ability to dismiss staff or end careers. This company had an abundance of inquisitors in training.

The business director worked for a general manager who was the real "Grand Inquisitor" of the company. The GM was so good at inquisitions that careers spontaneously combusted under the intense pressure of his examinations during business review meetings. There was no need for any burning at the stake. He was known to extract resignations on the spot.

If you work in a company or any organization long enough, you might eventually attend or participate in an inquisition or two. I have seen a number of them, and I believe most if not all inquisitions are unnecessary. Although hopefully not commonplace, they do happen, and they represent many of the worst characteristics of inappropriate questioning conducted by managers in their daily work. One of the reasons that unsuitable questioning occurs is that the skills employed when conducting inquiries tend to be those that are passed on by example.

If mentors or senior managers are particularly good at asking questions (and if they are also personally successful), their skills are passed on to those who want to emulate them. As in the case just discussed, however, if managers' skills are tactless and the company is still successful under this kind of leadership, the reverse happens. Poor habits are perpetuated. People are fooled into thinking that bullying, intimidating, or torturing by "elocutioning" employees can bring success just because they see these traits in managers of successful enterprises. Even when a business fails, if people had no other mentors to learn from, they have few positive skills to take forward in their career.

Unfortunately, as discussed in the next few chapters, not all successful managers, including those who possess excellent questioning skills, excel at asking questions all the time.

Managers ask questions for a wide variety of specific reasons. For purposes of our discussion, I have boiled the reasons down to three general categories of inquiry:

  1. Questions asked because the answer is important
  2. Questions asked because the question is important
  3. Questions asked because the process of asking is important

In the first category, the answer is more important than the question, so all questions need to be asked with that fact in mind. A manager might want to learn about an idea, or, as in the previously discussed case, the issue under investigation may be "what went wrong" (even though the management devil in this example had no real interest in the answer). In addition to asking questions effectively, managers need simultaneously to employ listening skills.

In the second category, the question is more important than the answer. A manager might want a particular line of reasoning to be used to evaluate projects, or perhaps other considerations should be addressed and the question is a tool to be applied to the situation. There might be no answer to some questions because they are designed to generate discussion rather than answers. This practice is common in many classrooms where questions are designed to get students to think about the question or sharpen their analytical skills rather than supply a correct answer. The business director in the short example mentioned previously actually didn't care about the questions either.

For him, the process of asking questions—the inquisition—was what mattered most. So, the manner of asking seemed to be his overriding concern. He was intentionally making people feel uncomfortable by grilling them with questions and letting them know that he didn't care about the answers. But, there are less-threatening circumstances where the process of asking is designed by the manager to instruct or to get a group or an individual to approach a problem differently. Mentors, professors, consultants, and advisors often play this role with their questions.

In other cases, the process of asking can be used to allow the group to develop new ideas. So, not all questioning that focuses on process is an inquisition.

For most managers, interest lies in the question as well as the answer. And, it's the process of asking that establishes the importance of each question and answer. This book was designed to address the need for improving questions as well as the manner in which managers ask them—to thus achieve better answers, which are ultimately what is needed for a business to succeed in the long run.

The business management "devil" in the opening story eventually met his due. After months of delays, the development team finally produced a viable product, over a year behind schedule and well over budget—but it was completed. Fighting stopped long enough to get the job done, and everyone on the project team moved on to other assignments or left for jobs elsewhere.

By sheer coincidence, I happened to be present when this particular business director was making a presentation to the Grand Inquisitor—the general manager of the division.

The director's business unit was not doing well. Errors in judgment coupled with poor forecasting had led to two straight years of underperformance. New products were delayed, morale was poor, and there was no end in sight. Under intense questioning from the general manager, he self-destructed.

Grand Inquisitor: Forget the numbers, what's your analysis of the situation? Why do you have such bad news about something you should've fixed long before now?

Director: Exchange rates hurt our European margins, costs are up in our plants in Asia due to environmental concerns, and marketing forecasted a more aggressive return than the sales force was able to deliver.

Grand Inquisitor: That's not good enough. And what else?

Director: Well, if my analysis isn't good enough for you, you can find someone else to run this business.

Grand Inquisitor (rather triumphantly): I will.

And then, in a perverse twist of the pitchfork, which was now buried deep in the manager's ego, he gleefully moved on to attack any self-esteem that remained.

Grand Inquisitor: But I'm still waiting for a good explanation from you for such a bad performance.

Turning red and gasping for air, the exasperated manager stalked out of the meeting and immediately resigned.

The business eventually failed and was sold off by the parent company. It's now doing better under different management. I lost track of the not-so-grand inquisitor, but the Grand Inquisitor general manager went on to be an even more overbearing boor of a manager as the CEO of another company, where he was eventually awarded a golden parachute for leading yet another crop of business managers to extinction. There was little in his record of leading businesses that demonstrated the kind of good performance expected from a true business leader. A mythology followed him around with vague references to how he saved a business with his great insights fresh out of school with his MBA. I never met a witness to this history. He just always seemed to appear on the scene when the business conditions were failing just enough to blame previous management, impress people with excruciatingly tortuous questioning sessions, and then leave the business right before it crashed. To this day, I cannot understand why he was never held to account for years of poor performance, not to mention ruined careers. This lack of accountability is a troubling aspect of business management visible in a number of places in the market.

Improving a manager's ability to ask a question is no guarantee that business performance will be improved, but it should help. It is possible that both the project and the business of the manager cited in the preceding example might have performed better if the manager had been better prepared to ask questions of the people who worked for him. This book offers an opportunity for managers at all levels to improve one of the most basic aspects of their jobs: asking questions!

© Copyright Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3
( 13 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(2)

3 Star

(4)

2 Star

(2)

1 Star

(3)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 13 Customer Reviews
  • Posted May 25, 2009

    Indispensable Communication Tools

    I can't tell you how many times I've failed to get my message across to my employees. I always thought they never listened. It never occurred to me that it mas my style of communication that needed to change. Fadem's book is excellent. It gave me communication tools that I've badly needed for a long time. I'm getting 110% more out of my employees than I ever did before by employing the tips and advice given here. If you're a manager of any kind, you can't afford not to have this book.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 15, 2012

    Very current and informative

    This was written as a manual for having effective management meeting conversations, but easily translates into everyday life. This book helps to formulate questions to actually FIND answers. It also points out how the way questions are asked can be identified as truly looking for an answer, just wanting agreement, posturing to look more important, leading questions that can only have one answer (correct or not). There is much depth and information for people truly wanting to be more successful -- in business or in life. A lot of good common sense approaches are explained. This book was a find! I wish I had read it BEFORE I retired from years in management positions. Ha

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 17, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    Filled a Gap!!

    The competency of asking the right questions has continued to appear on my annual performance review. I searched through several books on the topic and this one was the most helpful. The only thing that I would have changed would be the layout -- did not flow between chapters very well; choppy.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 4, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 11, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 7, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 29, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 15, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 25, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 21, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 6, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 17, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 1, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 13 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)