Recovering Dewey's 'Tertium Quid'
Although many essays (and anthologies of essays) have appeared on the topic of classical pragmatism versus neopragmatism, this is the first book-length project I know of to tackle the controversy from a viewpoint fully conversant with and sympathetic to Dewey¿s signal contribution. It is quite refreshing to discover a scholar who not is not only aware of, but champions, the vital Deweyan conceptions of having versus knowing, primary experience, and the centrality of inquiry. Hildebrand¿s grasp of Dewey¿s engagement with direct and critical realism is exemplary, and his ¿deconstruction¿ of Rorty¿s antirealism is nothing short of amazing¿¿wicked¿ comes to mind! Although Hildebrand¿s alternative ¿practical standpoint¿ falls short, in my view, of Dewey¿s full transactional integration of experience and nature, this book opens up an area of research of vital importance. It is well written, informed, and cogent.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
Perhaps the most significant development in American philosophy in recent times has been the extraordinary renaissance of Pragmatism, marked most notably by the reformulations of the so-called "Neopragmatists" Richard Rorty and Hilary Putnam. With Pragmatism offering the allure of potentially resolving the impasse between epistemological realists and antirealists, analytic and continental philosophers, as well as thinkers across the disciplines, have been energized and engaged by this movement.
In Beyond Realism and Antirealism: John Dewey and the Neopragmatists, David L. Hildebrand asks two important questions: first, how faithful are the ...