- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
"Will the ordinary man become a scientist?...Bucchi exposes the inadequacy of the ‘technochratic model’ but also the weaknesses of contemporary bioethics when facing the increasing dilemmas posed by science and technology to contemporary society."
-Il Corriere della Sera [Italian leading newspaper]
"Bucchi provides a clear, rigorous and accessible discussion – often enriched by a subtle irony – of complex and ambiguous issues, showing that science and innovation are not neutral terrains, but rather among the key conflictual contexts in which contemporary social and political changes take place."
-Italian Review of Sociology
"A dense but accessible book...Bucchi acutely describes the shortcomings of the technocratic and ethical responses to the contemporary dilemmas of science and technology."
-Italian Edition of the New York Review of Books
Nuclear energy, stem cell technology, GMOs: the more science advances, the more society seems to resist. But are we really watching a death struggle between opposing forces, as so many would have it? Can today’s complex technical policy decisions coincide with the needs of a participatory democracy? Are the two sides even equipped to talk to each other?
Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens answers these questions with clarity and vision. Drawing upon a broad range of data and events from the United States and Europe, and noting the blurring of the expert/lay divide in the knowledge base, the book argues that these conflicts should not be dismissed as episodic, or the outbursts of irrationality and ignorance, but recognized as a critical opportunity to discuss the future in which we want to live. Massimiano Bucchi’s analysis covers the complex realities of post-academic science as he:
• Explores the widely debated theme of science and democracy across a broad range of technological controversies.
• Overviews issues raised by the current relationship among scientists, policymakers, business interests, and the public.
• Dispels stereotypes of the detached scientific community versus the uninformed general public.
• Examines the role of the media in framing scientific debate.
• Addresses the question of how to move beyond technocracy to a more fruitful collaboration between scientists and citizens.
• Offers a bold vision for a future in which the scientific and public spheres regard each other as partners working toward a shared purpose.
Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens has great value as a postgraduate text for courses in technology and society, political science, and science policy. It will also find an interested audience among scientists, policymakers, managers in the technological sector, and concerned lay readers.
"In his brilliant new book, Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens, Massimiano Bucchi opens for the reader the Pandora’s box of the complex relationship between scientists and citizens in contemporary, democratic societies. With major corporations owning university labs and academic researchers (and their institutions) pocketing millions (literally) from the proceedings of patents resulting from their scientific work, Bucchi analyzes the implications of contrasting drives toward for-profit and open science, private and public science. Without pulling his punches, and without hiding behind easy, popular solutions, Bucchi clearly lays out the choices we face when confronted with a science whose potential societal impact – positive and negative – is becoming ever greater (e.g., nuclear energy, genetically modified foods, genetic engineering). Based on a wealth of empirical evidence and case studies, the book is extremely accessible and well written, making it an ideal introduction to the issues. I would highly recommend it to specialists and non-specialists alike!"
-Roberto Franzosi, Professor in Department of Sociology at Emory University
Science-Society as a ‘Clash of Civilizations?’
The introduction briefly sets the background of the book. Increasing conflicts regarding science and technology issues cannot be dismissed as a sort of ‘clash of civilizations’ between a science striving to advance and a society resisting to it. Such conflicts are indeed a dramatic symptom but of a different, and perhaps more profound, challenge: how to face the increasing number of issues on matters involving science and technology with the needs of democratic participation?
The Technocratic Response: All Power to the Experts (with the Blessing of Well-Educated Citizens)
The shaking pillars of the traditional, technocracy response to the challenges of technoscience (delegating decision to the experts, with the blessing of citizens appropriately ‘educated’ through multiplying communicative efforts to promote science) are highlighted in this chapter. Common stereotypes – e.g. scientific illiteracy on the part of the public being largely responsible for the decisional impasse on science related matters – are challenged on the basis of international empirical data and practical cases. Delegating decisions to the experts appears no longer viable due to factors like the declining perception of expertise as neutral and the experts as a homogeneous and consistent community; the role of the media in scrutinizing expert sources and policy decisions; emerging demands to be involved in such decisions on the part of citizens.
Einstein has left the building: coming to terms with post-academic science
Technoscience public debates and conflicts take place within the context of a profound change in the conditions under which knowledge is produced, validated and disseminated; the differences between ‘big science’ in the post-war era and contemporary post-academic science are highlighted (e.g. connection with business priorities, emerging of knowledge property issues, shift of focus from the physical to the biomedical sciences, mediatization, global dimension), together with their relations with broader forces shaping society; implications for the role of science in society are also widely discussed.
Citizens in the laboratory, Scientists in the Streets
The inadequacy of a vision of ‘science vs. society as a clash of civilizations’ and of a technocratic solution to dilemmas and conflicts appears inadequate in the face of the increasing trespassing of the expert/lay divide in knowledge production. Multiple examples are given of knowledge co-production forms and arenas: patient associations shaping the priorities and very content of biomedical research; expert authorities being negotiated in courts; protest movements incorporating scientific knowledge to campaign on issues related to science and technology; users participating in innovation and technology design processes. The chapter also documents some of the most recent and significant experiences worldwide, aimed at institutionalising citizen participation and balancing expert advice with the views of stakeholders and other social actors. Finally, it is shown how the presence of citizens within research laboratories is more and more paralleled by the mobilization of researchers in the public arena – when they protest against budget cuts or against state regulation of certain research fields, or simply advocate greater public concern.
Choosing the World We Want: Democracy in the Age of Technoscience
How to move beyond the illusions of technocracy? (Bio)Ethical self regulation (of both users and producers of technoscience) appears both inadequate to solve the dilemmas and conflicts facing us. The final chapter argues that the challenges of contemporary technoscience requires us to rethink not just the role of science in our societies, but democracy itself as a genuine confrontation among different visions regarding our future . If science has become too important to be left to scientists only, democracy cannot live without technoscience expertise. The alternative to technocracy is not the negation of research and innovation, but a democracy in which expertise is a resource, rather than an alibi to escape difficult political decisions; a democracy in which political uncertainty is dealt with openly and in conjunction with technical uncertainty. But to do this, we need to abandon the traditional idea of a ‘zero sum’ relationship between science and society, in which every concession to democracy is mistakenly perceived as diminishing and contaminating the role of expert knowledge.