Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging

Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging

5.0 1
by Brian Z. Tamanaha
     
 

ISBN-10: 0691142807

ISBN-13: 9780691142807

Pub. Date: 10/26/2009

Publisher: Princeton University Press

According to conventional wisdom in American legal culture, the 1870s to 1920s was the age of legal formalism, when judges believed that the law was autonomous and logically ordered, and that they mechanically deduced right answers in cases. In the 1920s and 1930s, the story continues, the legal realists discredited this view by demonstrating that the law is marked

Overview

According to conventional wisdom in American legal culture, the 1870s to 1920s was the age of legal formalism, when judges believed that the law was autonomous and logically ordered, and that they mechanically deduced right answers in cases. In the 1920s and 1930s, the story continues, the legal realists discredited this view by demonstrating that the law is marked by gaps and contradictions, arguing that judges construct legal justifications to support desired outcomes. This often-repeated historical account is virtually taken for granted today, and continues to shape understandings about judging. In this groundbreaking book, esteemed legal theorist Brian Tamanaha thoroughly debunks the formalist-realist divide.

Drawing from extensive research into the writings of judges and scholars, Tamanaha shows how, over the past century and a half, jurists have regularly expressed a balanced view of judging that acknowledges the limitations of law and of judges, yet recognizes that judges can and do render rule-bound decisions. He reveals how the story about the formalist age was an invention of politically motivated critics of the courts, and how it has led to significant misunderstandings about legal realism.

Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide traces how this false tale has distorted studies of judging by political scientists and debates among legal theorists. Recovering a balanced realism about judging, this book fundamentally rewrites legal history and offers a fresh perspective for theorists, judges, and practitioners of law.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780691142807
Publisher:
Princeton University Press
Publication date:
10/26/2009
Edition description:
New Edition
Pages:
264
Product dimensions:
6.00(w) x 9.10(h) x 0.80(d)

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments ix
CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1
PART ONE: THE LEGAL FORMALISTS
CHAPTER 2: The Myth about Beliefs in the Common Law 13
CHAPTER 3: The Myth about "Mechanical Jurisprudence" 27
CHAPTER 4: The Holes in the Story about Legal Formalism 44
PART TWO: The Legal Realists
CHAPTER 5: Realism before the Legal Realists 67
CHAPTER 6: A Reconstruction of Legal Realism 91
PART THREE: STUDIES OF JUDGING
CHAPTER 7: The Slant in the "Judicial Politics" Field 111
CHAPTER 8: What Quantitative Studies of Judging Have Found 132
PART FOUR: LEGAL THEORY
CHAPTER 9: The Emptiness of "Formalism" in Legal Theory 159
CHAPTER 10: Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide 181
Afterword 200
Notes 203
Index 251

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging 5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 1 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago