I read introductions when they're included. You can get insight
I read introductions when they're included. You can get insight into the material and the author. So, when I read, "What if a culture was based on the dark side of fantasy?..." I expect something deep, intriguing, complex. I think, "Hey! This might be a new riff on fantasy along the lines of Salvatore's Dark Elf." Well, it's supposed to be a story of a ruthless game of politics and intrigue, with magic and romance, too, but falls well short because the concepts are well beyond the storytelling abilities of the author. She's competent, but RA Salvatore she is not.
Now before fans go nuts, let me tick off the problems:
1. Editorial: I'm not talking spelling or grammar. This omnibus is about 200 pages too long, evident in book 2 where a whole section about a war is included. It really adds nothing to story, for we've repeatedly seen that Jaennelle's dangerously powerful. She done more core character development, but she didn't. She also adds chapters of Saetan's mundane activities. Good short stories, but misplaced.
2. Characters lacking development: We all know books that have a whole slew of complex societies, worlds, and characters. Tolkien, Salvatore, Brett, Rothfuss. However, what to do with a "dark fantasy" that suddenly gives you unicorns? Ridley Scott's Legend does this masterfully, but Scott is a masterful storyteller. Bishop is not. Again, an editor would have asked, "What's the purpose here?" She introduces peoples at random - for perhaps humane behavior and ecology themes - but they show up at odd times adding no value.
3. Overhyped: It's competent writing but not great writing. It's like a General Hospital Ice Princess sequel. Then I see this review: "A uniquely realized [?!] fantasy filled with vibrant colors and rich textures. [What is this? Ethan Allen?]" The Romance Times. AH! Yes, fans. It's a romance novel with adventure. She's channeling Joan Wilder. Cue Fabio shot.
4. What complexity?: She says she wants to explore dark themes and cultures, but she doesn't here. By contrast, Jim Butcher constructs a solid world. Bishop's people DO stuff, but there's no reasoning. We even hear of some "protocols" and guides, but we don't hear anything more. Oh yeah! One of the characters is handed a book to read. Lucky him.
5. The Flip-Flops. Supposedly this "culture" is matriarchal. Women rule. Not really. At some points, men do some awful stuff and get away with it. If there really were a matriarchal code where men serve, then those things would not happen. Period. Moreover, when a woman does try to exert her influence (aside from the evil queen duo), it's hit or miss if she succeeds.
6. Dallas In Chains. Apparently dark fantasy to Ms. Bishop means that S&M is required. Unlike Dark Elf, we aren't talking complex issues outside of perverse sexual conduct. Why? Because it isn't dark! The "evil" characters are sadists, sure, but that alone doesn't make them evil. The evil witches don't really get fair treatment, save for "Look! Those are evil witches! Hate them." Disney's Snow White is way darker. In this series, you have dark characters, but it is not a dark place. You want dark and twisted? Read the Dresden files books that feature the Faerie Queen. Bottom line: Having evil characters who do evil things does not make a story dark, nor does adding "black" to your series title.
So, did I hate it? No. Is it OVERRATED? Heck yeah!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
The award-winning trilogy, now in one volume—with a new introduction.
Anne Bishop’s critically-acclaimed Black Jewels Trilogy is the saga of a young but still-innocent Queen more powerful than even the High Lord of Hell—and the three sworn enemies determined to win her and gain a prize that could be terriblebeyond imagining…