Blame: Its Nature and Norms
One mark of interpersonal relationships is a tendency to blame. But what precise evaluations and responses constitute blame? Is it most centrally a judgment, or is it an emotion, or something else? Does blame express a demand, or embody a protest, or does it simply mark an impaired relationship? What accounts for its force or sting, and how similar is it to punishment?

The essays in this volume explore answers to these (and other) questions about the nature of blame, but they also explore the various norms that govern the propriety of blame. The traditional question is whether anyone ever deserves to be blamed, but the essays here provide a fresh perspective by focusing on blame from the blamer's perspective instead. Is our tendency to blame a vice, something we should work to replace with more humane ways of relating, or does it rather lie at the very heart of a commitment to morality? What can we legitimately expect of each other, and in general, what sort of attitude do would-be blamers need to have in order to have the standing to blame? Hypocritical or self-righteous blame seems objectionable, but why?

The contributions to this volume aim to give us a fuller picture of the nature and norms of blame, and more generally of the promises and perils of membership in the human moral community.
1135376702
Blame: Its Nature and Norms
One mark of interpersonal relationships is a tendency to blame. But what precise evaluations and responses constitute blame? Is it most centrally a judgment, or is it an emotion, or something else? Does blame express a demand, or embody a protest, or does it simply mark an impaired relationship? What accounts for its force or sting, and how similar is it to punishment?

The essays in this volume explore answers to these (and other) questions about the nature of blame, but they also explore the various norms that govern the propriety of blame. The traditional question is whether anyone ever deserves to be blamed, but the essays here provide a fresh perspective by focusing on blame from the blamer's perspective instead. Is our tendency to blame a vice, something we should work to replace with more humane ways of relating, or does it rather lie at the very heart of a commitment to morality? What can we legitimately expect of each other, and in general, what sort of attitude do would-be blamers need to have in order to have the standing to blame? Hypocritical or self-righteous blame seems objectionable, but why?

The contributions to this volume aim to give us a fuller picture of the nature and norms of blame, and more generally of the promises and perils of membership in the human moral community.
55.0 Out Of Stock
Blame: Its Nature and Norms

Blame: Its Nature and Norms

Blame: Its Nature and Norms

Blame: Its Nature and Norms

Paperback(New Edition)

$55.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Temporarily Out of Stock Online
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

One mark of interpersonal relationships is a tendency to blame. But what precise evaluations and responses constitute blame? Is it most centrally a judgment, or is it an emotion, or something else? Does blame express a demand, or embody a protest, or does it simply mark an impaired relationship? What accounts for its force or sting, and how similar is it to punishment?

The essays in this volume explore answers to these (and other) questions about the nature of blame, but they also explore the various norms that govern the propriety of blame. The traditional question is whether anyone ever deserves to be blamed, but the essays here provide a fresh perspective by focusing on blame from the blamer's perspective instead. Is our tendency to blame a vice, something we should work to replace with more humane ways of relating, or does it rather lie at the very heart of a commitment to morality? What can we legitimately expect of each other, and in general, what sort of attitude do would-be blamers need to have in order to have the standing to blame? Hypocritical or self-righteous blame seems objectionable, but why?

The contributions to this volume aim to give us a fuller picture of the nature and norms of blame, and more generally of the promises and perils of membership in the human moral community.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780199860845
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 12/27/2012
Edition description: New Edition
Pages: 336
Product dimensions: 6.10(w) x 9.20(h) x 1.00(d)

About the Author

D. Justin Coates works on issues in ethics, moral psychology, and the philosophy of action. He is the Law and Philosophy Fellow at the University of Chicago Law School.

Neal A. Tognazzini works at the intersection of metaphysics and ethics on problems of agency, free will, and moral responsibility. His publications have appeared in Nous, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly, and Philosophy and Public Affairs, among other venues. He is an Assistant Professor at The College of William & Mary.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: The Contours of Blame
D. Justin Coates and Neal A. Tognazzini

Chapter 2: Moral Blame and Moral Protest
Angela M. Smith

Chapter 3: Wrongdoing and Relationships: The Problem of the Stranger
George Sher

Chapter 4: The Expressive Function of Blame
Christopher Bennett

Chapter 5: Interpreting Blame
T. M. Scanlon

Chapter 6: Blame and Punishment
David Shoemaker

Chapter 7: Directed Blame and Conversation
Michael McKenna

Chapter 8: Taking Demands Out of Blame
Coleen Macnamara

Chapter 9: Civilizing Blame
Victoria McGeer

Chapter 10: Free Will Skepticism, Blame, and Obligation
Derk Pereboom

Chapter 11: Valuing Blame
Christopher Evan Franklin

Chapter 12: Rightness and Responsibility
R. Jay Wallace

Chapter 13: What is an Excuse?
Erin I. Kelly
Chapter 14: The Standing to Blame: A Critique
Macalester Bell

Chapter 15: Standing in Judgment
Gary Watson

References
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews