The Blueprint: A Plan for Living Above Life's Storms [NOOK Book]


Seven-time Grammy award-winning artist Kirk Franklin offers powerful, streetwise advice for building a fulfilling life in the face of any adversity.

Kirk Franklin's life was hardly built on a firm foundation. Abandoned by both his father and mother, Kirk was constantly told he was an unwanted child. He struggled mightily yet managed to triumph, dedicating his life to helping others find hope during hardship....
See more details below
The Blueprint: A Plan for Living Above Life's Storms

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$12.99 price


Seven-time Grammy award-winning artist Kirk Franklin offers powerful, streetwise advice for building a fulfilling life in the face of any adversity.

Kirk Franklin's life was hardly built on a firm foundation. Abandoned by both his father and mother, Kirk was constantly told he was an unwanted child. He struggled mightily yet managed to triumph, dedicating his life to helping others find hope during hardship. With The Blueprint, he provides an inspiring blend of God and grit to deliver real-world words of wisdom on provocative topics including:

•The true definition of manhood
•Deadbeat dads, divorce, and despair in family life
•Why faith that only takes place in a church is dead

In the spirit of Hill Harper's Letters to a Young Brother and T. D. Jakes's He-Motions, The Blueprint delivers an honest new direction, taking faith out of the pews and into the real lives of all who struggle.

Watch a Video

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble

Gospel singer Kirk Franklin has won seven Grammies, sold over 12 million albums, and had 20 number-one gospel hits; but the road to gold wasn't a smooth one and few early observers could have imagined that this product of a poor, broken home would ever succeed. This memoir describes the crooked path he pursued and the mistakes he made before settling into a productive, faithful life. The Blueprint is not a religious tract wrapped in the guise of a first-person story; it is the story of someone who got through and knows how difficult it is.

Publishers Weekly
Franklin is a musician and seven-time Grammy Award winner whose early life was anything but a blueprint for success. Yet succeed he did. Born to a teenage mom who didn’t want him and to a father he never knew, he was adopted by his aunt. Franklin was introduced to Christianity early on, but his home environment was harsh and unloving. Given his history, this artist’s future often seemed dismal, and yet Franklin tells his fans that God reached down and changed him, and slowly, but markedly, transformed his thinking and his lifestyle to one that followed a pattern of biblical manhood. Throughout the text, Franklin expounds upon faith, relationships, parenting, sex, and marriage, with a casual, energetic verve that will either win readers over or annoy those who find it disorganized and underedited. No doubt, Franklin’s story is told to ennoble men and women of faith, but much of the content comes across as put together in piecemeal fashion. (May)
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781101429532
  • Publisher: Penguin Group (USA)
  • Publication date: 5/18/2010
  • Sold by: Penguin Group
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 256
  • Sales rank: 646,216
  • File size: 483 KB

Meet the Author

Kirk Franklin
Kirk Franklin is the top gospel artist in Nielsen Soundscan history, selling more than twelve million albums and more than twenty #1 gospel hits. The host of his own BET talent search program, Sunday Best, he is the winner of seven Grammy awards, six NAACP awards, and many other honors. Also the author of the memoir, Church Boy: My Music & My Life, he lives in Texas with his wife, Tammy, and their four children.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt



Lyons Press

Copyright © 2010 J. Kenneth Blackwell and Kenneth A. Klukowski
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-1-59240-547-3

Chapter One


The biggest problems we're facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all. And that's what I intend to reverse when I'm president of the United States. -Senator Barack Obama, March 31, 2008

We're Star Wars fans-and not at all ashamed of it. In fact, we think an argument could be made that liking Star Wars might make you a better American. Case in point: In the final blockbuster installment of the six-part Star Wars movie series, the evil Chancellor Palpatine, citing an "emergency," makes his move to abolish the Constitution that has kept the Galactic republic free for a thousand years. "In order to ensure security and continuing stability," proclaimed the wrinkly chancellor, "the republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic empire! For a safe and secure society!" The chamber leaps to its feet, clapping and cheering their new emperor, a supreme leader with a unified government devoted to realizing his agenda.

All were cheering except for a few statesmen in one booth, who had fought tirelessly to protect the Constitution and keep the republic free. Looking on with despair and disbelief as the crowd showered their praise and adoration on their emperor, one said to the others, "So this is how liberty dies ... with thunderous applause."

* * *

The cheers and applause from his inauguration ceremony had barely faded when Barack Obama made the opening moves in his strategy to transform our republic.

As soon as he was elected, Barack Obama began naming his senior political appointees. Like every president-elect, he announced his nominees for secretaries of State, Treasury, and Defense, for attorney general, and for all the various departments and agencies in the executive branch: Hillary Clinton to State, Janet Reno's old deputy Eric Holder to the Justice Department, Robert Gates to the Pentagon. Also as expected, he named various White House staffers, such as his chief of staff, national security advisor, and press secretary. Such appointments were routine at the time, though Obama may have had second thoughts about them since then. (Watching press secretary Robert Gibbs try to give a press briefing on any given day illustrates this point nicely.)

All of these appointments were normal, the actions of any new president. But unlike other new presidents, Obama also started naming a new type of political appointee. These people would have the powers of Senate-confirmed government officials without ever having to undergo Senate confirmation. They would have budgetary power over vast sums, but would not have to submit to the congressional appropriations process. They would have dozens answering to them, throughout government agencies. But they would answer to no one-except the president.

They are the czars.

There is no more blatant aspect of President Barack Obama's power grab than his czar strategy. Obama has appointed a number of "czars"-executive officials named by this president to wield vast power, often in secret, and answerable only to him. They enable him to avoid congressional oversight and public accountability.

And they are unconstitutional.

What the Heck Is a "Czar"?

President Obama's czars-a key element of the imperial presidency-have centralized unprecedented power in the White House, creating a shadow government. Considering the transparency that Obama promised when running for the White House, the hypocrisy associated with these czars is simply stunning.

Barack Obama's czars come in three types, of varying threat levels to our democracy.

The first-and least dangerous-are Senate-confirmed officials in certain departments in the executive branch, exercising intrusive power into private industry or people's lives. They must testify before Congress, and they hold offices that were lawfully created, but use government power to interfere in the private sector, meddling with the business decisions made by corporate experts and co-opting private companies into extensions of the government.

The second kind consists of certain presidential appointees in various White House offices invented by Congress. These offices are authorized by Congress and have a mission defined by statute. some are even Senate-confirmed. But these officials are part of the Executive Office of the President (EOP), and some are part of the White House Office (WHO), which primarily consists of those directly answering to the president or his immediate staff. As such, these czars in EOP, and especially those listed as part of WHO, are shielded from all sorts of congressional accountability and oversight, even while shaping major aspects of national policy.

The third-and most dangerous-are officials named by President Obama to certain posts that Obama fashions out of thin air. Almost all are White House staff officials exercising the sort of power found in Cabinet secretaries or undersecretaries (which are senate-confirmed positions), but were simply named to these brand-new positions by President Obama. These officials, and even the offices they fill, were simply created by executive fiat.

Each of these czars is dangerous. Most, if not all, are illegal-for several reasons. All of them must go, and the republic is not safe until they're gone.

No One's Had Czars like Obama

President Obama's defenders love to trot out the line that previous presidents have had czars. It's only fair to acknowledge that other presidents have, in fact, had appointees that were called czars. For example, George H. W. Bush appointed Bill Bennett (Ronald Reagan's education secretary) as America's "drug czar." The real title for that position is the director of the White House office of national Drug Control Policy. That office was created by Congress, and everyone refers to its director as the drug czar because it's easy to remember and the title is not such a mouthful. And Bill Clinton appointed an AIDs czar. So sure, there have been czars before.

But not like this.

While other presidents have had one or two appointees nicknamed "czars," Barack Obama is using dozens of czars to actually run much of the federal government. Few people object to the idea of someone in the White House focused on finding policies to keep drugs away from kids. But now whole areas of national policy have been taken inside the White House and vested in these czars, removed from the democratic process and input from the people's elected representatives in Congress. Worse still, some of these czars are specifically overseeing vitally important matters for this country.

At the moment of this writing, there is only one of the first types of czar (the least-dangerous type, from a constitutional standpoint). He is Herb Allison, the Troubled Asset relief Program (TARP) czar. His official title is the assistant secretary of the Treasury for financial stability. This person has the power to direct the hundreds of billions of dollars in the financial bailout (the TARP program) to stabilize the American financial sector. He has enormous power that interferes with the private sector and injects politics into corporate America, but at least we have some safeguards against too much abuse from this office. It's terrible policy, but not inherently illegal.

Another czar that may fall into this category is mark Lloyd, the diversity czar whose official title is the chief diversity officer of the Federal Communications Commission. As part of the FCC, Lloyd is not part of the White House staff, and his position is not Senate-confirmed, either. Lloyd is discussed in detail in chapter 8, as he is the White House's point man on banning conservative talk radio.

The other czars, all of whom belong to the two most dangerous varieties, are listed below. They operate entirely within the White House.

There are other czars as well, some even created by George W. Bush: the terrorism czar, and the war czar who coordinates the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But while Bush and previous presidents had five or fewer czars, President Obama has more than thirty. The issue is not so much that any such czars exist, but that the president has enough of them, holding exactly the right positions of power, to run much of the government completely outside the constitutional framework.

Together, these czars form a shadow government. Whole swaths of federal power, both policymaking (i.e., lawmaking) and enforcement, have been concentrated in the White House under President Obama's exclusive control. Power that once was vested in agencies, or determined to be outside the proper scope of government, has now been seized by the White House. We are witnessing a massive, unconstitutional power grab.

These Czars Are Unconstitutional

Quick review: The Constitution of the United States is a remarkable document. Article I of the Constitution creates the legislative branch and establishes the offices of House and Senate members. Article II sets forth the executive branch and establishes the offices of the president and vice president. And Article III maps out the judicial branch, with the offices of supreme Court justices and the judges of any lower federal courts Congress creates by statute. Just like that, in three articles, our Founding Fathers created the most stable government in history.

It's a strong framework-one that allows Congress to fill in the blanks by creating new offices when needed. Why is congressional power to create new offices a big deal? Three reasons:

First, if an office is a creation of Congress, then Congress has a right to exercise oversight, and so the person holding that office can be required to appear before Congress and testify under oath about his actions.

Second, offices created by Congress are covered by the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires public hearings and records when decisions are made, leaving a paper trail. The APA also empowers people or companies affected by these decisions to sue in federal court, allowing a judge to see if the evidence supports what the agency did. The APA makes government transparent.

And third, all of these offices have separate lines in Congress's annual appropriations bills. This gives Congress the power of the purse, meaning legislators can get information about activities to decide whether to continue funding them.

These three safeguards help make government work for the people. But the Obama presidency has decided they're simply in the way, and have exempted themselves from each of them.

How has Obama been accomplishing this? By ignoring the law. The Constitution's framework lays out two types of positions in the executive branch: principal officers and inferior officers. The first of these are nominated by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. For less-important government officers, called inferior officers, Congress decides whether they are appointed either by the president, agency heads, or the courts, and they do not require Senate confirmation. (Congress can never authorize itself to appoint officers, however, our Founding Fathers didn't trust government. For separation-of-powers reasons, the only branch that can create a federal office-Congress-is the only one that can't fill those offices. Brilliant, right?)

It's a fuzzy line separating principal officers from inferior officers. Courts consider several factors in distinguishing between the two types of executive officers, like whether the officer is subject to removal by another officer, the nature of the officer's duties, the scope of his jurisdiction, and how long he serves. But principal officers go all the way down the governmental food chain to assistant secretaries and deputy undersecretaries. If the assistant secretary of agriculture for civil rights and the deputy undersecretary of commerce for intellectual property must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, then it doesn't really pass the laugh test that a government official running General Motors or overseeing the national economy doesn't need to be Senate-confirmed.

But whether such positions require Senate confirmation or not, the important fact remains that all these offices must be created by Congress. Congress never created a car czar to run the nation's largest automakers. Yet Ron Bloom (a former union official) now controls General motors, dictating what cars GM will make and wielding the power to fire its executives. And one CEO has already been canned because Automaker in Chief Obama didn't approve of him. Congress never established an office to regulate executive compensation, yet pay czar Kenneth Feinberg has the power to dictate how much any senior employee at any company taking bailout funds can make. And they're now talking about regulating all companies, whether they took bailout funds or not.

Two key constitutional principles protect our republic:

Separation of powers: The Constitution divides government power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to keep any one branch-or one person-from having too much power.

Checks and balances: The Constitution gives each of the three branches a check over the power of the other two, to use government power to keep other government power in check.

Both principles protect the liberty of the American people from an overreaching, all-powerful government. And both are thrown out the window by the existence of President Obama's czars.

Need an Example? Just Look at Ambassadors

If this all seems a bit theoretical, there's one type of czar that perfectly shows how this whole system is constitutionally illegal. The president's apologists can bicker over what sort of appointees need Senate confirmation, but there's at least one office that's beyond doubt: In Article II, the Constitution says that all ambassadors must be confirmed by the Senate. On that point, President Obama is clearly in violation.

An ambassador is appointed by the president to represent the United States to foreign nations. While the White House or State Department often sends higher-ranking officers to handle especially dicey situations or weighty matters, sometimes even sending the secretary of state, all those individuals whose full-time, permanent duties are to represent America are ambassadors. Yet Obama has named Richard Holbrooke (the Afghanistan czar) as Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, George Mitchell (the Mideast peace czar) as Special Envoy to the Middle East, and J. Scott Gration (the Sudan czar) as Special Envoy to Sudan.

These men are not "special envoys"; they're ambassadors. They speak for our country, representing the president and his foreign policy, with the power to represent our nation in deliberations and negotiations with the foreign nations they're visiting. We cannot have one man assigning such power to anyone he wants. The Founding Fathers knew that, and so they put a constitutional check on the president with Senate confirmation of ambassadors.

So why haven't these three men stood for confirmation? Just look at their assignments: Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Middle East. That's about as important as it gets; those are among the hottest spots around the globe where our vital interests are at stake. If the U.S. ambassadors to Micronesia, Sri Lanka, and Belgium (countries that most people can't even find on a map) require Senate confirmation, then why is that constitutional check not in play when it comes to delicate relations with areas that could lead us all to a nuclear war?

Because President Obama wants to completely control the foreign policy concerning those countries without having to consult with the Senate or without having any of his lieutenants be subject to oversight. So he calls them "special envoys" instead of ambassadors to avoid the confirmation process. But if these guys aren't ambassadors, then we don't know what an ambassador is. And since one of your authors served as an ambassador to the United Nations (Blackwell-and yes, I had to be confirmed by the Senate), we think we know an ambassador when we see one. And we're pretty sure Obama does too.


Excerpted from THE BLUEPRINT by KEN BLACKWELL KEN KLUKOWSKI Copyright © 2010 by J. Kenneth Blackwell and Kenneth A. Klukowski. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction IX

Chapter 1 Movin' On Up 1

Chapter 2 The Ultimate Blueprint 7

Chapter 3 Upon This Rock 19

Chapter 4 What Is Your Life's Purpose? 33

Chapter 5 Lifescaping 57

Chapter 6 If You're Single, Make Some Noise! 81

Chapter 7 The Blueprint for My Soldiers 99

Chapter 8 The Blueprint for Adam: Men and Sex 115

Chapter 9 The Blueprint for Eve: Women and Sex 139

Chapter 10 Passing the Baton: The Blueprint for Relationships and Marriage 153

Chapter 11 It Takes a Whole Nation: The Blueprint for Parents 171

Chapter 12 I Believe: The Blueprint for Faith 189

Chapter 13 The Blueprint for Moving Forward 213

Acknowledgments 233

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 32 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 32 Customer Reviews
  • Posted September 20, 2010

    Thank God for real talk.

    I applaud Kirk Franklin; in fact, I feel he deserves a standing ovation for his book, THE BLUEPRINT-A Plan For Living Above Life's Storms. Yes, I applaud Mr. Franklin for keeping it "One Hundred" - in other words, for keeping it real and focused. Thank you, Kirk for not presenting to us 231 pages of meaningless church lingo and garbage! I find it refreshing to have a gospel music artist write a book with genuine talk, focused on genuine issues facing today's society, including the church. For you "Kirk-ites", church folks or readers in general, who desire superficial, inane jargon or verbiage, this particular book is not for you. This is not the book that will have you feeling warm and fuzzy all over. Instead, THE BLUEPRINT, will challenge you to face yourself and choose to make a decision. Just like in his music, Kirk has written something to everyone in this book. He speaks to the sista's, the brotha's, the single folk, the married folk, the divorced folk, the black folk, the pigment challenged folk, the saved folk and the unsaved folk. He confronts issues from self-esteem to anger to sex to racism. Kirk's BLUEPRINT references the original and all time best selling Blueprint (The Holy Bible) throughout its pages. You get a message here from a young man who is humble and unafraid to be transparent. We can all relate to THE BLUEPRINT, because many of the challenges and struggles Kirk Franklin has been through, so have all of us - clergy collar or no clergy collar. For those of you traveling life's journey, finding it appropriate to don a mask, THE BLUEPRINT will assist you in putting the mask away forever. THE BLUEPRINT will assist in directing you onto the right path; it will help fortify your relationship with Jesus Christ and if you don't have one, THE BLUEPRINT may convince you to seriously consider one. A resounding applause goes right here -- for Kirk Franklin -- for choosing to pen a book of substance and Christ inspired direction. Brotha Percy

    4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 27, 2010

    Kirk Franklin's The Blueprint is AWESOME!

    I just love this book. I have read so many Christian books over the years and they make you feel good, challenge you a bit - but I have never wanted to re-read a book like this until now.

    Kirk has an amazing ability to keep this book real, raw and fresh. I read through this book in no time - it made me laugh, cry, but most importantly think on those areas in my life that the Lord is challenging me to reveal - even it is just to the Lord.

    I could not suggest a better book to anyone - whether you know the Lord or not - that could motivate you to seek Him. Stop right now and get this book - you will not regret it!

    3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 18, 2010

    I Also Recommend:

    I Wanted More From This Book

    Kirk Franklin has been successful as a gospel artist, but as a writer, I wanted more. It seemed like he tackled too many topics and that left him unable to delve into the issues at hand. I would have been better if he picked one topic like family and focused on that. Who I though to complain? A book I would recommend though, "When God Stopped Keeping Score," which tackles something we all need in our life, forgiveness.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 18, 2014

    I Also Recommend:

    wow good song

    wow good song

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 31, 2011


    Excellant reading, informativel, and encouraging- Recommend reading

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 18, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 18, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 11, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 8, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 19, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 18, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted June 25, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 18, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 1, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 2, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 26, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted June 11, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 8, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 2, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 13, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 32 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)