Blur: How to Know What's True in the Age of Information Overloadby Bill Kovach, Tom Rosenstiel
Amid the hand-wringing over the death of "true journalism" in the Internet Age-the din of bloggers, the echo chamber of Twitter, the predominance of Wikipedia-veteran journalists and media critics Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel have written a pragmatic guide to navigating the twenty-first century media terrain. Yes, old authorities are being dismantled, new ones… See more details below
Amid the hand-wringing over the death of "true journalism" in the Internet Age-the din of bloggers, the echo chamber of Twitter, the predominance of Wikipedia-veteran journalists and media critics Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel have written a pragmatic guide to navigating the twenty-first century media terrain. Yes, old authorities are being dismantled, new ones created, and the very nature of knowledge has changed. But seeking the truth remains the purpose of journalism. How do we discern what is reliable? Blur provides a road map, or more specifically, reveals the craft that has been used in newsrooms by the very best journalists for getting at the truth. In an age when the line between citizen and journalist is becoming increasingly unclear, Blur is a crucial guide for those who want to know what's true.
An insightful but dry guide to the challenges of responsible journalism—and the citizenry it serves—amid the technological revolution of news and information.
This is a companion volume of sorts to the co-authors' The Elements of Journalism (2001), to which it often refers and for which it offers an update. Both Kovach and Rosenstiel are respected newspaper veterans, though their concern here is not with the survival of the print medium but with the principles that distinguish news of depth and value from finger-pointing opinion, special-interest propaganda and uninformed gossip. "The challenge for those who produce the news, and those who consume it," they write, "is to apply human values against the inherent bias of the technology." Since technology stresses speed, economy and quick hits over comprehensiveness and verification, readers must become savvier about where to look and whom to trust for the sort of public service that journalism has provided. "At the beginning of this century, it was forecast that more new information would be created in three years than had been created in the previous three hundred thousand years," write the authors, but they argue that the current shift in communication isn't dramatically more significant than previous ones (the written word, printing press, radio and television, etc.). The bulk of the text offers step-by-step analysis of the processes by which the best journalists practice their craft and can have their work evaluated by consumers slogging their way through the mire of available information. The book's major drawback is that the writing is too matter-of-fact, making the rare simile such as this all the more welcome: "In a sense, blogs are like muffins. They are a shape, but the batter that goes into it might run the gamut from chocolate cake to bran."
In building their case for the "Next Journalism," the authors might have offered a little more chocolate, a little less bran.
- Bloomsbury USA
- Publication date:
- Sales rank:
- Product dimensions:
- 5.50(w) x 8.10(h) x 0.70(d)
and post it to your social network
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews >