Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Global Communication: Theories, Stakeholders, and Trends

Global Communication: Theories, Stakeholders, and Trends

1.0 1
by Thomas L. McPhail

See All Formats & Editions

Global Communication is the most definitive text on multi-national communication and media conglomerates, exploring how global media, particularly CNN, the BBC, Euronews, and Al Jazeera, influence audiences and policy makers alike.  
  • Includes four completely new chapters on Asian media, Euromedia, the Middle East, and public diplomacy from a


Global Communication is the most definitive text on multi-national communication and media conglomerates, exploring how global media, particularly CNN, the BBC, Euronews, and Al Jazeera, influence audiences and policy makers alike.  

  • Includes four completely new chapters on Asian media, Euromedia, the Middle East, and public diplomacy from a post 9/11 perspective
  • Updates the story of arab media with a section on "Arab Media and the Al Jazeera Effect" by Middle East-based expert Lawrence Pintak
  • Covers the global war on terrorism and the substantial US investment in Iraqi media
  • Provides updated accounts and overviews of the largest and most important media corporations from around the world, from MTV and CNN to Bollywood
  • Incorporates discussions of Hulu, YouTube, Myspace, and the Twitter phenomenon as well as new stakeholders in global online media 

Product Details

Publication date:
Wiley Desktop Editions
Sold by:
Barnes & Noble
File size:
2 MB

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher
Praise for the second edition:
"Thomas L. McPhail's Global Communicatons offers important, scholarly insights on the major trends and global network of international communications. Issues affecting media are updated for all new developments since 2002: from the newfound war on terrorism and Iraq war to Arabic media. From world multimedia organization issues to NWICO debates and broadcasting and news corporation challenges, Global Communication is a must for any student of worldwide communications." Midwest Book Review

“Thomas McPhail’s updated Global Communication is a must-read critical assessment of the current state of the international media in the post-9/11 world. It provides an excellent starting point for discussion about the role of international communication in our global community’s future.” George Barnett, SUNY-Buffalo

“An excellent introduction to the major institutional players in global media. McPhail shows how the far-flung operations of media and advertising conglomerates are increasingly shaping information and entertainment around the world.” Michael Curtin, University of Wisconsin

Meet the Author

Thomas L. McPhail is a media critic and Professor of Media Studies and Fellow in the Center for International Studies at the University of Missouri. He began his career with the eminent media scholar Marshall McLuhan. McPhail is also author of Development Communication (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009) and has served for over a decade on the Canadian National Commission for UNESCO.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews

Global Communication: Theories, Stakeholders, and Trends 1 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 1 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I had to read this book as a textbook for a class. To be blunt, the textbook was the most terrible, poorly authored and edited, and unprofessional textbook I have ever been forced to read. To calm my frustrations while reading the textbook, I listed problems with the textbook as I read. Here are a few of them, in no particular order, summarized and with commentary. --Poor grammar/punctuation/run-on sentences: This textbook had a plethora of grammatical and other errors that greatly hindered my comprehension of the material. Every single chapter had numerous errors that made it very hard for me to read the textbook and understand the material. Some examples include: missing periods (and a new sentence had definitely begun--had it not, it would have been a run on The sentence would have looked like this.); "glocalization" instead of globalization and other various typos; improper use of words, such as "forge" on page 207; and various other errors, such as having two words that meant the same thing next to each other, but did not make sense in context--kind of like writing typing like this. It was as if there was no editor, and this was a very rough draft of the book. --An absurd amount of abbreviations: I understand that many organizations to which the book referred had abbreviations to go along with them, but many of them were spelled out only once, and then brought back up again later in the book. Oftentimes they weren't spelled out at all, and left as abbreviations. This made it very hard to understand what was being discussed and hindered my ability to follow easily.  --Lots of material was nonspecific: The book often had vague sentences/paragraphs in it that meant nothing. For instance, "There has been a deficit between the US and EU." A deficit of what, between whom (the government?), and when? Many questions of mine were left unanswered due to this vague writing style. Also in the textbook: "It amplified it." I had no idea to what each "it" referred. --Rambling: all the authors involved in this book rambled without reason. A great deal of content is irrelevant. With that, paragraphs jumped from topic to topic within paragraphs, seemingly without reason. --Repetition: all of the authors repeated themselves numerous times. I understand repeating for emphasis, but the amount the authors repeated themselves was ridiculous and unnecessary.  --Very few citations: Evidence is often uncited in this book, though there are a handful of in-text citations and always a Works Cited at the end of the chapter. I don't understand why some information is specifically cited, but the rest only is referenced on the Works Cited page. Furthermore, authors seldom introduced who a scholar was before referencing them. As a reader, it was very hard for me to find what they were writing to be credible, if I have no idea what the credentials of the person who they referenced are.  --Politically-slanted: Much of the content in this book is politically slanted towards the democratic party. While I am a democrat, I found this inappropriate to be included in a textbook.  --Outdated/inconsistent dates: though this book was updated in 2010, a ridiculous amount of the information in this book is outdated and not chronological. For instance: the USIA was referenced as the public diplomacy department for the US. This has not existed since 1999. There is no reason the USIA should be noted in the textbook as the current department of public diplomacy. Furthermore, dates were often inconsistent in the textbook--one page, for instance, said an event happened in 2003, the next page said it happened in 2004. Also something to note is that nearly all events are related to the end of the Cold War. This is extremely outdated, especially seeing as the book was updated in 2010, nearly twenty years after the Cold War ended. While I understand that the Cold War had many effects on global communications, I feel that global communications has such a quick rate of change, that the Cold War is inappropriate to reference. Statistics are also often from the 1960s in this textbook. This too is inappropriate, seeing as the book was updated in 2010. --Other wrong material: This book was littered with wrong information and words that were not words, such as "twittering," when in actuality the word is "tweeting." I would expect this mistake from a 75 year old, not a Mass Communications textbook, which should be very in tune with terminology like this. --Other irritating habits: This book is full of irritating habits that made the textbook frustrating to read. A few select habits include: listing nearly everything in 3's (I'm sure there were more or fewer than three reasons for some events and concepts); often saying something "can be summarized"; using "basically" often; not explaining why something is "worth noting"; and saying "first," but never going onto "second." Overall, this book was extremely frustrating and tiresome to read. Much of what I learned is outdated, irrelevant, or plainly wrong. Because of this, I had a very hard time with the course and did not enjoy it, in the least. With that, I do NOT recommend this book.