- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
"The Brother of Jesus is an interesting work which certainly shines a strong light on an undervalued aspect of early Christianity . . . . offers an excellent overview of the Jewish/James approach to Chritian origins that is well-researched and documented."
"In telling the story of James, Jeffrey Butz provides us with a renewed consideration of the profound spiritual interconnectedness between Christianity, Judaism, and Islam . . . "
"This volume is eminently readable and accessible to nonscholars while being thorough in its research. . . . challenges readers to rethink the nature of both orthodoxy and heresy."
PERSONA NON GRATA:
JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
Jesus . . . came to his hometown . . . On the Sabbath he began to teach in the synagogue, and many who heard him were astounded. They said, “Where did this man get all this? What is this wisdom that has been given to him? What deeds of power are being done by his hands! Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary and the brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon, and are not his sisters here with us?”
(The Gospel According to Mark 6:1–3)
Jesus had siblings. This simple, seemingly innocuous statement actually raises a host of profound questions, the answers to which have startling implications. Perhaps it is because these questions are so sensitive to some Christians—indeed, divisive—that the subject of Jesus’ brothers and sisters has largely been ignored both by biblical scholars and by the Christian church. Yet the evidence of Jesus’ siblings is so widespread that there can be no doubt of their existence. The amount of information that exists on Jesus’ brothers, particularly James, is quite surprising. As we see above, Mark even provides the names of Jesus’ four brothers; nonetheless, in my experience both as a pastor of a Lutheran church and an instructor of world religions in a public university, people are almost always incredulous when told that Jesus had brothers and sisters. This is not something they have usually been taught in church or Sunday School.
The recent discovery, in 2002, of an ancient Middle Eastern ossuary (a burial box) made international headlines because of the startling inscription on the box, which identified this particular ossuary as once containing the bones of, “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.” This find was shocking both to the academic community and the general public for two reasons. First, if genuine (and this is still a hotly debated question), the artifact would be the first archaeological evidence—literally written in stone—of the existence of Jesus, but even more intriguing to the public was the fact that this burial box was purported to be that of James, whom the New Testament refers to in several places as the “brother” of Jesus. The many newspaper and magazine articles which appeared after the announcement of this discovery all gave short shrift to the ossuary itself and devoted the majority of space to the controversy over whether Jesus could have had a brother. That is what most fascinated the public.
FROM JACOB TO JAMES
We shall not go here into the particulars of the discovery and testing of the ossuary, which has been amply documented elsewhere;1 instead, our focus will be on the person whose bones are claimed to have once been entombed in that box: the brother of Jesus, most commonly known in church tradition as “James the Just” (because of his exceeding righteousness) or “James of Jerusalem” (his base of operations) or, much more rarely, “James the Brother of Jesus.”
James’ name is derived from one of the great patriarchs of Jewish history—Jacob. “James” is the English translation of the Greek Iakob, which is itself a translation of the Hebrew Ya’akov. In the English translation of the Greek New Testament, Iakob is always translated as “Jacob” when referring to Old Testament figures, and as “James” when referring to Christian figures. This is interesting because, as we shall see, James represents a bridge between Judaism and Christianity. The Greek “Jacob” became the English “James” by way of Latin, in which Jacobus and Jacomus are variations of the same name. The Latin also explains why in European history the dynasty of King James is referred to as “Jacobite” or “Jacobean.”
Iakob was an exceedingly common name in first-century Israel, as evidenced by the fact that eight different people in the New Testament bear the name. The scholarly consensus is that half of the occurrences of the name in the New Testament refer to James the son of Zebedee (the brother of John, also referred to as James the Elder), one of two apostles who bear the name. A third of the occurrences of the name refer to Jesus’ brother, who is, unfortunately, often confused with the James known as James the Less, but James the Less is correctly James the son of Alphaeus, the second of the two apostles who bear the name. That the brother of Jesus has sometimes been called James “the Less” is just one example of the many slights and indignations he has been forced to bear.
It is surprising that such widespread ignorance of Jesus’ siblings exists, for, besides the New Testament itself, there exist quite a number of non-canonical writings from the earliest days of the church which provide absolutely reliable evidence that Jesus not only had siblings, but that some (if not all) of his brothers played significant roles in the leadership of the early church. In fact, James was considered by many early Christians to be the first “bishop” of the church, the successor to Jesus following the crucifixion, making James in essence the first “pope,” not Peter as Catholic tradition has maintained. The church father Clement of Alexandria in his work Hypostases (Outlines), written at the beginning of the third century, makes the following rather startling statement: “After the ascension of the savior, Peter, James [the Son of Zebedee], and John did not claim pre-eminence because the savior had specifically honored them, but chose James the Just as Bishop of Jerusalem.”2 While Clement’s use of the title “bishop” is certainly an anachronism, it is a term that, as we shall see, does accord well with James’ role in the church as it is described in both the book of Acts, Luke’s history of the early church from the ascension of Jesus to Paul’s imprisonment in Rome, and in Paul’s letter to the Galatians, where Paul describes two meetings he had with James and the other apostles in Jerusalem.
|Introduction : of revolutions and paradigm shifts||1|
|1||Persona non grata : James the brother of Jesus||8|
|2||A family divided : Jesus' family in the gospels||20|
|3||James of Jerusalem : the witness of Luke and Paul||50|
|4||Pope James : the first Apostolic Council and the incident at Antioch||65|
|5||Apostolic intrigue : Paul's final visit to Jerusalem and the death of James||86|
|6||Keeping the candle burning : James in history and tradition||104|
|7||The brother of God : James, Gnosticism, and Jewish Christianity||123|
|8||Orthodoxy and heresy : James and the quest for the historical Jesus||142|
|9||The forgotten hero : James and the origins of Christianity||169|
|10||Thy kingdom come : a new paradigm to repair the breach||180|
|Epilogue : healing the wasteland||192|
Posted June 20, 2005
The Brother of Jesus and the Lost Teachings of Christianity by Jeffrey J. Butz. Reviewed by Peter Senese, author of Cloning Christ. I want to begin my review by saying that I am a layman who continues to seek knowledge of the historical Jesus. I am by no means a scholar, but simply a man seeking a deeper relationship with Christ. I would consider my faith in Christ strong. This provides me with the strength and courage needed to explore historically the actual life of Jesus during his physical life. From what I have discovered thus far in my own quest, it has become important for me in my desire to become closer to Christ to understand the social structures, political agendas, and personal interactions of Jesus. This is by no means an easy task as many theological scholars today have claimed. Nevertheless, I think it is imperative that theological scholars continue to explore the various writings that share the life of Christ, and place this text (and the many revisions that have occurred over time) in the social, political, and personal intent of Jesus¿ life. In James, The Brother of Jesus, Lutheran minister Jeffrey J. Butz does a phenomenal job in presenting his research and cross references of various writings in order to portray a very understandable and credible set of scenarios of the early Church and its leadership, specifically, what was the true role of James, the brother of Jesus. In doing so Jeffrey J. Butz provides to the reader the opportunity to think through, by understanding James and his true role as one of if not the true leader of the Christ movement, what actually was occurring during the time immediately after the death of Christ, and, what Jesus was actually trying to share with the world. Over the years in particular scholars have extended the divisionary arguments of the division between James and Paul, and the initial roots that have led to the direction of the present Christ following. In order to realize the differentiation between the immediate followings of Jesus, and how they changed over a rather short period of time, it is critical that we understand what was actually occurring socially and politically during the historical period immediately after Christ sacrifice. Carefully using canonical and Gnostic gospels, not to mention a wide assortment of writings by historians, Butz does a wonderful job clarifying a present void that is a part of the `Early Christ Movement¿. In doing so, readers are forced to think through the wonderment of the life of Christ. Overall, this is a must read for anyone who seeks a closer relationship with Christ. In understanding the historical movements of the early Church, I believe we can all develop a closer relationship with Christ. I would also like to add that I believe it took a great deal of courage to write this book since there are contradictions to the present structures that comprise organized Christendom. I would like to thank the author for showing the courage and the stamina required to write and share with the world what I believe to be a historically accurate story of James, and in doing so, sharing a new dimension to the life of Jesus Christ.
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 17, 2013
I just finished reading this book in Nook format, and absolutely loved it! As an enthusiast of religious history, this is a perfect addition to my ever growing library. The paperback is small, and quite portable, and it helps to have both versions in case more than one person in the house wants to read the book. The print version has a good sized font, but if you enjoy reading outdoors as I do, the anti-glare screen on the Nook makes for much easier reading. I learned a great deal about Jesus' brother, James, and the early Christian faith.
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 8, 2014
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
ASKS THE DIFFICULT QUESTIONS Purchased this book to learn more about Early Christianity and found it to be an outstanding read with very comprehensive research and very sound in conclusions. I will admit, after reading this book, many of the passages and teachings in the NT finally became very clear and made a great deal of sense. I would recommend this book to anyone with an open mind and interested in all of the facts and documents outside of the "orthodox" library pertaining to Yeshua and the initial Church in Jerusalem. I am reminded that what was once orthodox can become heresy but encouraged that with increased knowledge and research, what was once heresy by finally become the orthodox.
Posted June 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Posted August 30, 2010
No text was provided for this review.