Cardozo: A Study in Reputation

Overview

What makes a great judge? How are reputations forged? Why do some reputations endure, while others crumble? And how can we know whether a reputation is fairly deserved? In this ambitious book, Richard Posner confronts these questions in the case of Benjamin Cardozo. The result is both a revealing portrait of one of the most influential legal minds of our century and a model for a new kind of study—a balanced, objective, critical assessment of a judicial career.

"The present compact and unflaggingly interesting ...

See more details below
Paperback (1)
$16.47
BN.com price
(Save 5%)$17.50 List Price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (18) from $2.35   
  • New (9) from $7.28   
  • Used (9) from $2.35   
Sending request ...

Overview

What makes a great judge? How are reputations forged? Why do some reputations endure, while others crumble? And how can we know whether a reputation is fairly deserved? In this ambitious book, Richard Posner confronts these questions in the case of Benjamin Cardozo. The result is both a revealing portrait of one of the most influential legal minds of our century and a model for a new kind of study—a balanced, objective, critical assessment of a judicial career.

"The present compact and unflaggingly interesting volume . . . is a full-bodied scholarly biography. . . .It is illuminating in itself, and will serve as a significant contribution."—Paul A. Freund, New York Times Book Review

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Booknews
Legal scholar and judge Posner (Seventh Circuit, US Court of Appeals) provides a portrait of famed jurist Benjamin Cardozo, a reading of Cardoza's influence on American common law, an assessment of his opinions, and a look at the making and unmaking of judicial reputation. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Jerry Goldman
No one disputes Richard Posner's reputation. He is the prolific, paternal protagonist of the law-and-economics school. As an academic, he defined and elaborated economic analysis of law and legal institutions. As a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, he is a productive powerhouse, deftly weaving his economic threads into the loom of the law. Some antagonists who tired of (or objected to) the Posnerian approach in academia thought navely that an appoint- ment to the bench would confine and perhaps exhaust Posner's considerable curiosity and inexhaustible energy. If anything, judicial experience has made him more productive. Besides writing more opinions by far than any of his colleagues, Posner manages to contribute to the scholarly enterprise in ever more inventive ways. Jurisprudence, law and literature, reputation, and soon, sexuality, are his most recent off-the-bench, book- length outputs in just the last three years. Praised for inven- tion, Posner manages with apparent effortlessness to focus his powerful gaze on fascinating questions. In this monograph-length study, based on the Cooley Lectures at the University of Michigan in 1989, Posner explores the reputation of Nathan Benjamin Cardozo, who served as a judge (and later chief judge) on New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, from 1914 to 1932. President Herbert Hoover nominated Cardozo to be the 75th justice of the Supreme Court of the United States; he served from 1932 to 1938. There is a division of opinion concerning Cardozo's place in the pantheon of great jurists, and Posner analyzes and reflects on Cardozo's life and writings to evaluate his contributions. Cardozo's critics have come to question his liberalism (is it authentic?), his judicial philosophy (is it more than bromides?), and his writing style (is it "obese and archaic"?). These are legitimate issues to explore, argues Posner, given the dearth of critical assessments of Cardozo and of judges generally. The first three chapters are devoted to Cardozo's life, philosophy, and judicial technique. Here Posner displays his ample gift for exposition and criticism. He penetrates Cardozo' style, offering explanations for Cardozo' distinctive prose. A common example is Cardozo's inversion of subjects and predicates. ("Negligent the act is, and wrongful in the sense that is is unsocial, but wrongful and unsocial in relation to other travel- ers, only because the eye of vigilence perceives the risk of danger." [This from Cardozo's much celebrated and criticized opinion in Palsgraf v. Long Island R. Co. quoted in Posner p.44.] Cardozo also used metaphor and aphorism; and critics have labeled his style "ornate." Posner takes issue with these critics and defends Cardozo rightly for his brevity and vividness. If Cardozo's style merits criticism, it is for sometimes writing with "exotic grace." (44) Page 51 follows The first third of Posner's study reveals much of Posner's skill as literary critic and accessible expositor. Social scientists will perk up in much of the remainder when Posner reveals his analytic creativity. He begins by formulating a theory of reputation, by which he means reputation in the broad sense of being "widely regarded in a good light" or the equiva- lent to fame.(58) Regrettably, Posner does not offer a succinct statement of his theory, but implies such a theory from a set of general points about reputation: that it is facilitated by the "generality, variety, and ambiguity of the reputee's work." that luck bears on reputation. [In terms of posthumous fame, Lincoln died at the right time and in the right man- ner.(62)] that time is another factor, for in time good luck and bad luck should wash out the random element in reputation as- sessment. that politics plays a role in reputation. Judges closely associated with ideologies (e.g., of liberalism or conserva- tism) are likely to be in the running with high reputations because they are exemplars of that ideology. Any discussion and explanation of reputation calls for some tool to measure it. Posner employs citation analysis as such a yardstick. He examines the virtues and liabilities of citation analysis in assessments of academic scholarship. Though they are an imperfect proxy for reputation, Posner concludes that citation counts are an acceptable index of quality, especially when critics have posed no viable empirical substitute. Posner then elaborates the special problems associated with legal citations and lawyers as citers. With all its imperfections, citation studies for Posner are a tool to measure judicial reputation. Posner's citation research is illuminating. His approach is akin to triangulation. While acknowledging the imperfections in citation studies, he employs citations from a number of creative directions and bases: citations to names of judges and to judges and scholars; citations by courts to opinions by Cardozo and other judges with whom he sat; comparisons of citations to Cardozo's Supreme Court opinions with opinions of Brandeis and Stone; and a comparison of citations to Cardozo and other judges opinions in contracts and torts casebooks. For example, Posner searched the principal law reviews electronically for articles mentioning well-known judges. (Posner's name was not on the list, but out of modesty not lack of influence.) Professional reputation in the law, as measured by these citations, is strong- ly correlated with a seat on the Supreme Court and with recency. Justices Brennan and Rehnquist lead the pack of judges and scholars in the period covered by Posner's data (1982-89). Posner refines his citation tool by comparing citation counts to Cardozo's 1914 opinions with counts to his colleagues 1914 opinions. (1914 was Cardozo's first year on the New York Court of Appeals. Decisions were assigned by rotation; Cardozo had no control over decisions Page 52 follows assigned to him.) The evidence from multiple directions shows that Cardozo exercised far more influence on the law than his colleagues, as measured by citations to his opinions. Further elaboration of the citation counts reveals Cardozo's influence to citing courts in other states and to federal courts, far outdis- tancing colleagues who, at the time, were regarded in Cardozo's league. From so many directions, the evidence points to Cardozo's high reputation. Posner then synthesizes legal analytics and reputation analysis. Cardozo's reputation was established as a common-law judge on the New York Court of Appeals. His appointment to the Supreme Court, where he served only six years, may well have been anticlimactic. He did not leave a strong imprint on any field of Supreme Court jurisprudence, which also coincides with Posner's citation analysis. What then does Posner make of Cardozo's reputation? He is unquestionably the most famous common-law judge of the twentieth century but far from the most influential judge. Cardozo's impact derives from his exposition and synthesis, not his intel- lectual creativity. "He made law clearer, more interesting, more intelligible," observes Posner. Two primary factors outdistance other explanations of Cardozo's eminence: the rhetoric of his opinions and his judicial program (stated in THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS) "of bringing law closer to the (informed) nonlawyers sense of justice." Cardozo's skill was in sugar coating his pragmatism with respect for precedent. In an Epilogue, Posner suggests several avenues for re- search. There is much here for quantitative and nonquantitative investigators. It should fuel other investigations simply because the idea of reputation needs more work. For example, Posner urges examination of the unsampled Cardozo opinions and the unsampled opinions of Cardozo's colleagues on the Court of Appeals. Here Posner seeks further testing of his hypotheses. But if such a study only confirms Posner's findings, there is little evidence that such an endeavor will aid the investigator's reputation (though it may add marginally to Posner's). Such is the structure of present-day social science, unlike present-day science, that it gives little credit for the confirmation of another investigator's hypotheses. However, an investigator might build or establish a reputation in the event that he proved Posner wrong. Posner also offers up investigations of opinion assignment, signed versus per curiam opinions, quantitative analysis of judicial reputation, and studies of the literary dimension of opinion writing. All of this is well worth considering. The subjects and the techniques are familar to social scientists in public law. The increasing availability of LEXIS places critical judicial studies, like Posner's examination of Cardozo, within our grasp. Posner has once again illuminated a worthy enterprise with by his creative gaze. Time will tell whether he has become a beacon leading others in his path.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780226675565
  • Publisher: University of Chicago Press
  • Publication date: 2/28/2009
  • Edition description: 1
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 163
  • Product dimensions: 5.50 (w) x 8.00 (h) x 0.60 (d)

Table of Contents

Introduction
1. The Life, the Person, the Reputation
2. Cardozo's Judicial Philosophy
3. Cardozo's Judicial Technique
4. Reputation in General
5. Cardozo's Reputation: Measures of Magnitude
6. Cardozo's Judicial Contribution
7. A Summary with Comparisons Epilogue: Vistas in Research Index

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Posted December 29, 2008

    A Must Read for All Judges & Attorneys Preparing Opinions

    C.J. Posner brings to light the importance of writing opinions. The study of Judge Cardozo ought to be read by all judges and attorneys. Unfortunately, too many state court judges (at least in Florida) neglect their duty of writing reasoned opinions and delegate this wonderful part of their profession to attorneys, who commonly provide a bare bone opinion which fails to inform the public about the facts of the case, as well as the reasoning and logic of the decision. Furthermore, too many state appellate decisions (at least in Florida) lack detailed reasoning and are summarily denied per curiam. In this brief book, the author provides the reader an insight into the judicial profession and how a dedicated justice provides the public an opportunity to appreciate the judicial process. This is a wonderful book and should be read by all law students, clerks, attorneys and most importantly our judges. The prolific writing of C.J. Posner transcends time and only begs the question of how the philosopher manages to publish so much, while presiding over a case load! Cardozo is an impressive work by a brilliant author.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)