Charles Jessold, Considered as a Murderer

( 8 )

Overview

One of The Wall Street Journal's Best fiction books of 2011

England, 1923. A gentleman critic named Leslie Shepherd tells the macabre story of a gifted young composer, Charles Jessold. On the eve of his revolutionary new opera’s premiere, Jessold murders his wife and her lover, and then commits suicide in a scenario that strangely echoes the plot of his opera—-which Shepherd has helped to write. The opera will never be performed.

Shepherd first...

See more details below
Paperback
$11.46
BN.com price
(Save 23%)$15.00 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (53) from $1.99   
  • New (14) from $1.99   
  • Used (39) from $1.99   
Charles Jessold, Considered as a Murderer

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99
BN.com price

Overview

One of The Wall Street Journal's Best fiction books of 2011

England, 1923. A gentleman critic named Leslie Shepherd tells the macabre story of a gifted young composer, Charles Jessold. On the eve of his revolutionary new opera’s premiere, Jessold murders his wife and her lover, and then commits suicide in a scenario that strangely echoes the plot of his opera—-which Shepherd has helped to write. The opera will never be performed.

Shepherd first shares his police testimony, then recalls his relationship with Jessold in his role as critic, biographer, and friend. And with each retelling of the story, significant new details cast light on the identity of the real victim in Jessold’s tragedy.

This ambitiously intricate novel is set against a turbulent moment in music history, when atonal sounds first reverberated through the concert halls of Europe, just as the continent readied itself for war. What if Jessold’s opera was not only a betrayal of Shepherd, but of England as well?

Wesley Stace has crafted a dazzling story of counter-melodies and counter-narratives that will keep you guessing to the end.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
This intellectually provocative novel from Stace (the pseudonym of musician John Wesley Harding) brings to life the English music world of the first half of the 20th century. Early one June morning in 1923, gifted composer Charles Jessold, after the dress rehearsal of his first opera, Little Musgrave, kills his wife and her lover and commits suicide at his London home. The murders echo the plot of Jessold's years-in-the-making opera as well as the life and work of Carlo Gesualdo, a 16th-century Italian composer. Instead of revolutionalizing English music, Little Musgrave is canceled. Wealthy music critic Leslie Shepherd, who considered himself Jessold's mentor, wrote the opera's libretto, but his frustration over Jessold's procrastination and arrogance led to their estrangement. Twenty-two years later, Shepherd reveals startling new details that put a different, more chilling perspective on the tragedy. Stace (Misfortune) succinctly explores obsession and the relationship between art and life in this satisfying historical. Author tour. (Feb.)
From the Publisher
“A tremendously imaginative novel that’s really several novels in one, for beneath its sparkling surface there are some very murky depths. A wonderfully disquieting read.” —Sarah Waters, author of The Little Stranger

“This is one of the few novels I have read that is truly musical. Wesley Stace is a brilliant and intensely original writer and this is his most unusual book yet.” —Audrey Niffenegger, author of The Time Traveler’s Wife

“A gripping narrative that twists and turns to the end...By far the most confident musical fiction I have read in years.” —Norman Lebrecht, New Statesman (UK)

“Wesley Stace’s tale of music and murder is a baroque intellectual thriller, wittily erudite and psychologically astute.” —Alex Ross, author of The Rest Is Noise

“We might have predicted that Wesley Stace—-a fine novelist and a fine musician—-would one day write a novel about music, but could we have predicted that it would be so brilliant? The dialogue sparkles, the prose glimmers, and for once you leave a novel not just haunted by the characters and the story, but humming the tunes.” —Jonathan Coe, author of The Rotters’ Club

“[Stace’s] twisty plot of jealousy and murder unfolds with Nabokovian precision during Britain’s early twentieth-century folk and early music revival.” —Ludovic Hunter-Tilney, Financial Times (UK)

“Recalls one of the greatest and saddest novels of the period, Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier and follows the tradition of great novels of imaginary music.” —Roz Kaveney, The Times Literary Supplement (UK)

Library Journal
In his other life, novelist Stace (Misfortune; By George) is alt-folk-rock singer John Wesley Hardin. His new work narrates the short life and tragic death of Charles Jessold, an English composer of considerable promise who kills his wife and her lover and commits suicide on the night before the premiere of his folk opera, Little Musgrave. Because the opera's plot parallels too closely the sensational deaths, it never opens. The story is told three times over, first in a news release; then with a sanitized narrative prepared by Jessold's champion and collaborator, a gentleman critic named Leslie Shepherd; and finally, in Shepherd's bald retelling of events years later. The narrative is like a set of Chinese boxes, or perhaps an Agatha Christie novel: open one box and another still waits to be opened and contains a very different story. A virtue of this highly enjoyable diversion is Stace's sensitivity to tone: he captures the way aesthetes wrote and talked in the giddy early 1920s, when feyness and wit were all. VERDICT This clever, entertaining novel will appeal to music and opera buffs and literary-historical fiction fans. [Jessold's killings parallel the 16th-century composer Carlo Gesualdo's murder of his wife and her lover.—Ed.]—David Keymer, Modesto, CA
Kirkus Reviews

Nabokovian cunning distinguishes this energetic third novel from the British-born author of well-received historical fiction (by George, 2007, etc.), who leads another artistic life as popular singer-songwriter John Wesley Harding.

An homage to the Russian-American master appears in the figure of the narrator, musicologist-critic Leslie Shepherd, whose fussy mentoring of the eponymous 20th-century composer CharlesJessold echoes the parasitic devotion of narrator Charles Kinbote to elusive genius John Shade, in Nabokov's ineffably intricate novelPale Fire. Shepherd is likewise a narrator; in fact, he's two of them, as Stace treats us to Shepherd's account, written for the police, of the crime referred to in the novel's title. For Jessold, on the eve of the premiere of his opera Little Musgrave (based on a lurid folk tale), killed his wife and her lover, then took his own life—essentially repeating the notorious act of his near-namesake, Italian Renaissance composer Carlo Gesualdo (a real historical figure). Then, after reporting thus to the proper authorities, Shepherd undertakes a second narrative, revealing What Really Happened. Suspense is cleverly maintained throughout, and a wealth of detail about the 20th-century folk-music revival in England is nicely contrasted with the rise of modernist music, anathema itself to the fastidious Shepherd (a stuffy comic character whom P.G. Wodehouse might have been proud to create). Stace knows all these territories intimately and peppers the narrative with guest appearances by historical composers (e.g., Ralph Vaughan Williams, Arnold Schkenberg), even offering a glimpse of a fictional one: Adrian Leverkuhn, the antihero of Thomas Mann'sDoctor Faustus. This yeasty tale can perhaps be faulted for a few too many lame jokes and a surfeit of ostentatious wordplay. But it dances at a sprightly pace, and few readers will regret being told the same tale twice, especially when it's as frisky and entertaining as this one/these two.

Stace's versatility makes this one just about irresistible.

Anna Mundow
As hints of forbidden passions and shameful secrets multiply, Stace's novel…becomes morbidly engaging. The final twist is both affectingly pathetic and suitably operatic.
—The Washington Post
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780312680107
  • Publisher: Picador
  • Publication date: 2/1/2011
  • Pages: 400
  • Sales rank: 406,702
  • Product dimensions: 5.30 (w) x 8.20 (h) x 1.20 (d)

Meet the Author

Wesley Stace is the author of the international bestseller Misfortune and by George. He has released fifteen albums under the name John Wesley Harding, and he lives in Philadelphia.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

I met Charles Jessold, the murderer, on 21 May 1910, the day after

King Edward’s funeral. We were guests at a Hatton Manor

Saturday-to-Monday, and it was on that very fi rst eve ning that I

had occasion to tell of Carlo Gesualdo, the composer whose story

made such a lasting impression.

I had just entered the room, a quick inventory of which revealed:

three composers (one of note, two of naught), a conductor,

and a miscellany of vicars, musical scholars and enthusiasts; not to

mention Cedric Mount (our most esteemed member) and of course

Antic Jackson who, despite arriving on the same late train from

town, had managed to beat me downstairs. I was, as ever, the token

musical critic.

The only stranger was a young man standing over the piano. In

impeccably creased grey flannels and gaudily striped tie, he was our

junior by some years. His face, a pick-and-mix assortment, conformed

to no classical ideal. His forehead was too broad and his

lips too mean for his fleshy cheeks, although the ever-glimmering

smile at their left corner gave an impression of geniality. His thick

black hair was slicked lavishly with pomade.

His eyes, later described as devilish, were nothing of the kind;

rather they were beady, though being a lucid emerald green, not

unattractively so. In conversation, they spoke directly to you, a

somewhat unnerving compliment that turned a stranger into a

confi dant whether he cared to be or not. When it was his turn to

listen, those eyes never strayed from yours. To avoid his gaze, one

sought refuge in the perfectly straight line from the top of his nose

to the cusp of the chin that he was later to disguise with a goatee

(interpreted as Mephistophelean, of course). Above his eyes, that pale

billboard of forehead advertised his every fl icker of emotion.

This newcomer leaned in rapt attention, back arched to a stylised

forty- five degrees, his elbow on the lid of the piano, hand to

his chin, thumb tucked under: a remarkably self-conscious pose. I

found myself wondering whether he was perhaps used to being

observed. He certainly ‘lit up’ a room. Any producer worth his salt

would have plucked him from a crowd.

I realised that someone was playing the piano only when he

stopped. The pianist, Mark Wallington, rose and with a sweep of

the hand surrendered his stool to the young man, whose mask of

deliberation disappeared into a broad smile that bared unruly

teeth dominated by handsomely vampirical incisors. He raised his

hands, as if to demonstrate that there was nothing up his sleeves,

and played what he had just heard to an astonishing degree of accuracy.

The performance, brought off with some relish, was

greeted by applause from a group by the fireside.

‘The arrangement and harmonisations to boot!’ proclaimed St

John Smith à la ringmaster. ‘Will anyone else try to stump him?’

The young man bowed. Not so self-conscious after all; just youthful,

serious, in the spotlight.

I called casually to our host, the fifteenth Viscount Hatton, who

met my eyes with a raised finger implying that I was far more interesting

than what ever minor obstacles stood in his path. He was

known as ‘Sandy’ for his sun-freckled, desert complexion, though

all he knew of the Sahara was a bunker at Sunningdale.

‘You’re like a German verb, Leslie,’ he said when he finally materialised.

A calculated insult. ‘Always last.’

‘But just on time, and like a French adjective, agreeable.’ I

waved a vague finger towards the young man: ‘Who’s the performing

seal?’

‘Now now.’

‘Can he balance a red ball on his nose?’

‘Probably.’ Sandy surveyed his domain with satisfaction. Jackson

and I were the last pieces in his weekend’s jigsaw. ‘A pleasure,

Leslie.’ I bowed. ‘Ah,’ he said with an approving smile at the cabal

in question. ‘A reprise of the star turn.’

Again a somewhat tuneless original was rendered; again the

young man duplicated it, as though the first player had printed a

piano roll and he merely pedalled it through. It seemed the Memory

Man had reached the climax of his act.

‘I didn’t know there was to be a music-hall turn in addition to

our fishing expedition,’ I said pianissimo as we broadcast smiles

about us.

‘A mere trifle. The pièce de résistance is yet to come.’

‘Oh, I am disappointed.’

‘I believe he was something of an . . . infant prodigy.’ He savoured

the words for my benefit.

‘Played Three Blind Mice in all keys by the age of four? Wrote

his first sonata in utero?’

‘Very possibly. But his days of prodigiousness are done. He is

unhappily studying composition under Kemp at St Christopher’s,

Cambridge . . .’

Kemp’s was a name I was known to pooh-pooh at every opportunity,

so I instead indicated the wunderkind’s tie. ‘Are those Kit’s

colours?’

‘No, I believe that may be the tie of . . .’ he paused for comic

effect . . . ‘the Four Towns Music Festival in Kent. There’s a

mother, I am told, to whom he is very loyal, and she has him work

as accompanist at that august provincial gala. Jessold may not

strictly be from the top drawer, dear Shepherd, but I saw a young

man of promise.’

You invited him.’ I thought we had been speaking of an interloper,

an extraneous other making up numbers in the back of someone’s

Bentley. Sandy waved away my apology.

‘He is going down this year, and when Kemp asked me to speak

to the University Madrigal Society I unavoidably met Jessold, its

president.’ The keen madrigalist was currently attacking a bit of

ragtime with venom, pounding the keys into submission.

‘What’s he got against the piano?’

‘His touch is a little agricultural, probably years of banging out

“Poor Wandering One” for the daughters of the local clergy, but

then Jessold has no pretensions to be a concert pianist.’

‘Eureka! He has pretensions to be a composer?’

‘Yes.’

‘He angled for an invitation to mingle with the great and the

good?’

‘Far from it. Kemp can’t speak highly enough of him. So I con-

vinced Jessold that the one that got away was lurking here in the

Lower Thames. And lo! There he sits! The very image of the

young composer, earnestly ingratiating himself to the crowd as a

child seeks to please his parents. He’ll get over that. I have yet to

hear any work.’

St John extricated himself from the knot around the piano.

‘Racket rather sets my teeth on edge,’ he said with a grimace. ‘It’s

so desperately jaunty. Youth must, I dare say.’

Sandy slipped off his signet ring, tinkling the side of his champagne

fl ute. Glasses of Oeil de Perdrix were raised towards him in

toast. ‘Hatton welcomes you. I welcome you. Tomorrow we work;

to night we play. But first, I know Jessold, new of this parish, has

been diverting some of you. We’ll let the boy take a breather . . .

but I’d like to make him sing once more for his supper. Freddie, to

the piano.’

Fat Frederic Desalles was so cruelly camouflaged by his jacket

that his head appeared to be peeking from behind the cushions

of the sofa. He struggled to attention and made his way to the piano.

We held our breath nervously on the stool’s behalf. Landing

was achieved.

‘I am here.’ He played a little something that he intended us to

imagine effortlessly thrown off, but even this little doodle bore the

tragic hallmarks of his many other failures. Some thought Freddie’s

sole qualifications to be a composer were that he believed in

God and his name sounded foreign; but he could Handel a religious

theme as well as any man in Britain. ‘At your service!’

‘Jessold, make yourself scarce,’ commanded Sandy.

The butler escorted Jessold from the room. I looked at the young

man as he left; he glanced over his shoulder, catching me, as it were,

red-handed. A departing star knows there is always someone looking.

‘When they are at a suitable distance,’ Sandy continued, ‘I will

ask Freddie to play a melody, of say four or fi ve lines, unknown

to Jessold. Perhaps one you might like to improvise for us now,

maestro; perhaps a little something from your redoubtable

arsenal.’

No one could doubt the size of Desalles’ arsenal. Drinks, pale

and pink, were replenished as he sketched his rough draft. It was

typically Desallesean (there is certainly no such word, nor ever

shall be): churchfully plain, easily ignored.

‘We shall now bring Jessold back into the room.’ Sandy tugged

the bell pull imperiously. ‘And you, Freddie, will play him the first

half of your melody. But no more than that.’

On his return, the young man again assumed that study of

trance-like meditation as he refined the music’s possibilities in his

mind. Desalles ended his rendition on a suspended D minor, an

appropriately haunting chord for this demonstration of Cecilian

clairvoyance. Jessold did not move. He was not yet ready.

‘Once more, Freddie, please,’ asked Sandy.

This time, when Desalles reached that inconclusive D, Jessold

took his place, played the first three lines, and elided effortlessly

into the next two, melodically twinned, if not identically harmonised,

with Frederic’s originals. We’ve all heard pieces where the composer’s

next thought was predictable (and Desalles was not the

most unconventional), but this was something quite apart. Jessold,

alert to every possible melodic path, had narrowed it down to one:

this one. It was more akin to the reduction of a mathematical

equation.

His final flourish was a plagal chord of amen that parodied Desalles’

Messiah complex. No one clapped more enthusiastically than

Freddie himself. I willingly joined in, delighted that the boy had

none of the fear of self-expression endemic in those schooled in

composition. One marvelled at the strength of character that had

escaped unscathed from Kemp’s clutches!

‘Rather better than the prototype,’ I muttered.

‘Ask him how he does it,’ said Sandy as the bell rang for dinner.

The first toast was to the departed king; the second, to the new

George. I had feared that the funeral and its surrounding sea of

dark blue serge might spell the postponement of our weekend’s

pleasure, but our party was of sterner stuff.

My reward for years of uninterrupted friendship with our host

was a seat next to the man of the moment who boasted the unseasonable

glow of a cross-country runner on a freezing December

morning, with babyish skin that seemed ruddy with overly zealous

shaving. A tureen hovered to my left as a ghostly consommé, complete

with ectoplasm, was ladled into my bowl. I introduced myself

to Jessold by name.

‘Of The World?’ he asked without a semiquaver rest.

I nodded, flattered. ‘I know you only as Jessold.’

Charles Jessold.’

A smile, perhaps a little reptilian, slid across my face. ‘Charles

Jessold?’

‘I hope you are not going to ask me if I am the Charles Jessold,

for I am almost certainly not.’ There was a forthrightness about

him: nothing ungracious or rudely done, but he spoke his mind. ‘I

am a composer, but I have yet to trouble the critics with anything

worth their ink.’

‘I look forward to the imposition. Does anyone remark on your

name?’

‘Never. Jessold is rare, apparently, almost extinct in Britain except

in parts of Suffolk.’

‘No. It is the two names in tandem . . . not merely Jessold.’ He

looked at me uncomprehending. ‘Together they put me in mind of

a composer. You have perhaps never heard of Carlo Gesualdo?’ His

expression did not change. ‘Being the president of a madrigal society,

and being a Charles Jessold, you ought.’

‘Well, I already feel an etymological kinship with him.’

‘Ha! Have a care, Jessold. His is not a name to take in vain.’

As I installed myself to tell Gesualdo’s remarkable story, I uttered

the composer’s name as a bold headline.

‘Carlo Gesualdo!’ hooted Forbes, our pet literarian, eavesdropping.

Forbes and I enjoyed a cantankerous relationship, taking

nothing personally: we were used to riding against one another.

‘Carlo Gesualdo! Beware of the Shepherd, young Jessold. Behind

his public face, that of an unassuming, if violently nationalist, musical

scribe, lurks a ridiculous antiquarian. Inky- fingered goeth he,

under a layer of dust, slicing through the musty cobwebs of our

musical history as he may.’ All good-natured, no doubt, but I did

not care to be the butt of his chaffi ng when I had such a story to

tell. I turned back to my food, mindful not to give an impression

of pique. On blundered Forbes, undaunted: ‘What ever made you

think of that ghoulish character, Shepherd? The vaguest coincidence

of two names? Please spare our young friend that Halloween

horror. At least while he’s eating.’

I had barely noticed the arrival of the chaud-froid, a Hatton favourite.

The promise of conversation had withered like Klingsor’s

garden so I took a momentary, dignified vow of silence, content to

postpone my revelations. Sandy had referred to Jessold’s promise. I

had scoffed, but I could feel it too.

Read More Show Less

First Chapter

Charles Jessold, Considered as a Murderer


By Wesley Stace

Picador

Copyright © 2011 Wesley Stace
All right reserved.

ISBN: 9780312680107

I met Charles Jessold, the murderer, on 21 May 1910, the day after King Edward’s funeral. We were guests at a Hatton Manor Saturday-to-Monday, and it was on that very fi rst eve ning that I had occasion to tell of Carlo Gesualdo, the composer whose story made such a lasting impression. I had just entered the room, a quick inventory of which revealed: three composers (one of note, two of naught), a conductor, and a miscellany of vicars, musical scholars and enthusiasts; not to mention Cedric Mount (our most esteemed member) and of course Antic Jackson who, despite arriving on the same late train from town, had managed to beat me downstairs. I was, as ever, the token musical critic. The only stranger was a young man standing over the piano. In impeccably creased grey flannels and gaudily striped tie, he was our junior by some years. His face, a pick-and-mix assortment, conformed to no classical ideal. His forehead was too broad and his lips too mean for his fleshy cheeks, although the ever-glimmering smile at their left corner gave an impression of geniality. His thick black hair was slicked lavishly with pomade. His eyes, later described as devilish, were nothing of the kind; rather they were beady, though being a lucid emerald green, not unattractively so. In conversation, they spoke directly to you, a somewhat unnerving compliment that turned a stranger into a confi dant whether he cared to be or not. When it was his turn to listen, those eyes never strayed from yours. To avoid his gaze, one sought refuge in the perfectly straight line from the top of his nose to the cusp of the chin that he was later to disguise with a goatee (interpreted as Mephistophelean, of course). Above his eyes, that pale billboard of forehead advertised his every fl icker of emotion. This newcomer leaned in rapt attention, back arched to a stylised forty- five degrees, his elbow on the lid of the piano, hand to his chin, thumb tucked under: a remarkably self-conscious pose. I found myself wondering whether he was perhaps used to being observed. He certainly ‘lit up’ a room. Any producer worth his salt would have plucked him from a crowd. I realised that someone was playing the piano only when he stopped. The pianist, Mark Wallington, rose and with a sweep of the hand surrendered his stool to the young man, whose mask of deliberation disappeared into a broad smile that bared unruly teeth dominated by handsomely vampirical incisors. He raised his hands, as if to demonstrate that there was nothing up his sleeves, and played what he had just heard to an astonishing degree of accuracy. The performance, brought off with some relish, was greeted by applause from a group by the fireside. ‘The arrangement and harmonisations to boot!’ proclaimed St John Smith à la ringmaster. ‘Will anyone else try to stump him?’ The young man bowed. Not so self-conscious after all; just youthful, serious, in the spotlight. I called casually to our host, the fifteenth Viscount Hatton, who met my eyes with a raised finger implying that I was far more interesting than what ever minor obstacles stood in his path. He was known as ‘Sandy’ for his sun-freckled, desert complexion, though all he knew of the Sahara was a bunker at Sunningdale. ‘You’re like a German verb, Leslie,’ he said when he finally materialised. A calculated insult. ‘Always last.’ ‘But just on time, and like a French adjective, agreeable.’ I waved a vague finger towards the young man: ‘Who’s the performing seal?’ ‘Now now.’ ‘Can he balance a red ball on his nose?’ ‘Probably.’ Sandy surveyed his domain with satisfaction. Jackson and I were the last pieces in his weekend’s jigsaw. ‘A pleasure, Leslie.’ I bowed. ‘Ah,’ he said with an approving smile at the cabal in question. ‘A reprise of the star turn.’ Again a somewhat tuneless original was rendered; again the young man duplicated it, as though the first player had printed a piano roll and he merely pedalled it through. It seemed the Memory Man had reached the climax of his act. ‘I didn’t know there was to be a music-hall turn in addition to our fishing expedition,’ I said pianissimo as we broadcast smiles about us. ‘A mere trifle. The pièce de résistance is yet to come.’ ‘Oh, I am disappointed.’ ‘I believe he was something of an . . . infant prodigy.’ He savoured the words for my benefit. ‘Played Three Blind Mice in all keys by the age of four? Wrote his first sonata in utero?’ ‘Very possibly. But his days of prodigiousness are done. He is unhappily studying composition under Kemp at St Christopher’s, Cambridge . . .’ Kemp’s was a name I was known to pooh-pooh at every opportunity, so I instead indicated the wunderkind’s tie. ‘Are those Kit’s colours?’ ‘No, I believe that may be the tie of . . .’ he paused for comic effect . . . ‘the Four Towns Music Festival in Kent. There’s a mother, I am told, to whom he is very loyal, and she has him work as accompanist at that august provincial gala. Jessold may not strictly be from the top drawer, dear Shepherd, but I saw a young man of promise.’ ‘You invited him.’ I thought we had been speaking of an interloper, an extraneous other making up numbers in the back of someone’s Bentley. Sandy waved away my apology. ‘He is going down this year, and when Kemp asked me to speak to the University Madrigal Society I unavoidably met Jessold, its president.’ The keen madrigalist was currently attacking a bit of ragtime with venom, pounding the keys into submission. ‘What’s he got against the piano?’ ‘His touch is a little agricultural, probably years of banging out “Poor Wandering One” for the daughters of the local clergy, but then Jessold has no pretensions to be a concert pianist.’ ‘Eureka! He has pretensions to be a composer?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘He angled for an invitation to mingle with the great and the good?’ ‘Far from it. Kemp can’t speak highly enough of him. So I con- vinced Jessold that the one that got away was lurking here in the Lower Thames. And lo! There he sits! The very image of the young composer, earnestly ingratiating himself to the crowd as a child seeks to please his parents. He’ll get over that. I have yet to hear any work.’ St John extricated himself from the knot around the piano. ‘Racket rather sets my teeth on edge,’ he said with a grimace. ‘It’s so desperately jaunty. Youth must, I dare say.’ Sandy slipped off his signet ring, tinkling the side of his champagne fl ute. Glasses of Oeil de Perdrix were raised towards him in toast. ‘Hatton welcomes you. I welcome you. Tomorrow we work; to night we play. But first, I know Jessold, new of this parish, has been diverting some of you. We’ll let the boy take a breather . . . but I’d like to make him sing once more for his supper. Freddie, to the piano.’ Fat Frederic Desalles was so cruelly camouflaged by his jacket that his head appeared to be peeking from behind the cushions of the sofa. He struggled to attention and made his way to the piano. We held our breath nervously on the stool’s behalf. Landing was achieved. ‘I am here.’ He played a little something that he intended us to imagine effortlessly thrown off, but even this little doodle bore the tragic hallmarks of his many other failures. Some thought Freddie’s sole qualifications to be a composer were that he believed in God and his name sounded foreign; but he could Handel a religious theme as well as any man in Britain. ‘At your service!’ ‘Jessold, make yourself scarce,’ commanded Sandy. The butler escorted Jessold from the room. I looked at the young man as he left; he glanced over his shoulder, catching me, as it were, red-handed. A departing star knows there is always someone looking. ‘When they are at a suitable distance,’ Sandy continued, ‘I will ask Freddie to play a melody, of say four or fi ve lines, unknown to Jessold. Perhaps one you might like to improvise for us now, maestro; perhaps a little something from your redoubtable arsenal.’ No one could doubt the size of Desalles’ arsenal. Drinks, pale and pink, were replenished as he sketched his rough draft. It was typically Desallesean (there is certainly no such word, nor ever shall be): churchfully plain, easily ignored. ‘We shall now bring Jessold back into the room.’ Sandy tugged the bell pull imperiously. ‘And you, Freddie, will play him the first half of your melody. But no more than that.’ On his return, the young man again assumed that study of trance-like meditation as he refined the music’s possibilities in his mind. Desalles ended his rendition on a suspended D minor, an appropriately haunting chord for this demonstration of Cecilian clairvoyance. Jessold did not move. He was not yet ready. ‘Once more, Freddie, please,’ asked Sandy. This time, when Desalles reached that inconclusive D, Jessold took his place, played the first three lines, and elided effortlessly into the next two, melodically twinned, if not identically harmonised, with Frederic’s originals. We’ve all heard pieces where the composer’s next thought was predictable (and Desalles was not the most unconventional), but this was something quite apart. Jessold, alert to every possible melodic path, had narrowed it down to one: this one. It was more akin to the reduction of a mathematical equation. His final flourish was a plagal chord of amen that parodied Desalles’ Messiah complex. No one clapped more enthusiastically than Freddie himself. I willingly joined in, delighted that the boy had none of the fear of self-expression endemic in those schooled in composition. One marvelled at the strength of character that had escaped unscathed from Kemp’s clutches! ‘Rather better than the prototype,’ I muttered. ‘Ask him how he does it,’ said Sandy as the bell rang for dinner. The first toast was to the departed king; the second, to the new George. I had feared that the funeral and its surrounding sea of dark blue serge might spell the postponement of our weekend’s pleasure, but our party was of sterner stuff. My reward for years of uninterrupted friendship with our host was a seat next to the man of the moment who boasted the unseasonable glow of a cross-country runner on a freezing December morning, with babyish skin that seemed ruddy with overly zealous shaving. A tureen hovered to my left as a ghostly consommé, complete with ectoplasm, was ladled into my bowl. I introduced myself to Jessold by name. ‘Of The World?’ he asked without a semiquaver rest. I nodded, flattered. ‘I know you only as Jessold.’ ‘Charles Jessold.’ A smile, perhaps a little reptilian, slid across my face. ‘CharlesJessold?’ ‘I hope you are not going to ask me if I am the Charles Jessold, for I am almost certainly not.’ There was a forthrightness about him: nothing ungracious or rudely done, but he spoke his mind. ‘I am a composer, but I have yet to trouble the critics with anything worth their ink.’ ‘I look forward to the imposition. Does anyone remark on your name?’ ‘Never. Jessold is rare, apparently, almost extinct in Britain except in parts of Suffolk.’ ‘No. It is the two names in tandem . . . not merely Jessold.’ He looked at me uncomprehending. ‘Together they put me in mind of a composer. You have perhaps never heard of Carlo Gesualdo?’ His expression did not change. ‘Being the president of a madrigal society, and being a Charles Jessold, you ought.’ ‘Well, I already feel an etymological kinship with him.’ ‘Ha! Have a care, Jessold. His is not a name to take in vain.’ As I installed myself to tell Gesualdo’s remarkable story, I uttered the composer’s name as a bold headline. ‘Carlo Gesualdo!’ hooted Forbes, our pet literarian, eavesdropping. Forbes and I enjoyed a cantankerous relationship, taking nothing personally: we were used to riding against one another. ‘Carlo Gesualdo! Beware of the Shepherd, young Jessold. Behind his public face, that of an unassuming, if violently nationalist, musical scribe, lurks a ridiculous antiquarian. Inky- fingered goeth he, under a layer of dust, slicing through the musty cobwebs of our musical history as he may.’ All good-natured, no doubt, but I did not care to be the butt of his chaffi ng when I had such a story to tell. I turned back to my food, mindful not to give an impression of pique. On blundered Forbes, undaunted: ‘What ever made you think of that ghoulish character, Shepherd? The vaguest coincidence of two names? Please spare our young friend that Halloween horror. At least while he’s eating.’ I had barely noticed the arrival of the chaud-froid, a Hatton favourite. The promise of conversation had withered like Klingsor’s garden so I took a momentary, dignified vow of silence, content to postpone my revelations. Sandy had referred to Jessold’s promise. I

had scoffed, but I could feel it too.



Continues...

Excerpted from Charles Jessold, Considered as a Murderer by Wesley Stace Copyright © 2011 by Wesley Stace. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3
( 8 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(1)

4 Star

(3)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(3)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 8 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 17, 2013

    Ben to stace

    Hey srry im back for the night

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 3, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 10, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 6, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 27, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 1, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted June 15, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 10, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 8 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)