- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Chocolate on Trial: Slavery, Politics, and the Ethics of Business recounts the events surrounding the libel trial in which Cadbury Bros. sued the Standard of London over the newspaper's accusation that the firm was hypocritical in its use of slave-grown cocoa. Lowell J. Satre's story probes the issues of globalization, corporate social responsibility, journalistic sensationalism, and devious diplomacy at a time when Western industrialized society was beginning to ask whether some cheap goods might not have too high a cost.
Based on meticulous research and written in clear and elegant prose, Chocolate on Trial is the first book about a landmark trial that laid bare the interplay of politics, labor, and social activism in the wake of imperialism and the globalizing economy.
|1||Henry W. Nevinson and modern slavery||1|
|2||The firm of Cadbury and the world of slave labor||13|
|3||Portugal and West Africa||33|
|5||Joseph Burtt's report||73|
|6||Careful steps and concern - or dragging feet and hypocrisy?||100|
|8||Cadbury Bros., Ltd. v. The Standard Newspaper, Ltd.||149|
|10||Humanitarians, the foreign office, and Portugal, 1910-1914||183|
Posted January 19, 2007
This superb book studies the connection between slavery in West Africa and the British, and Quaker, firm of Cadbury, particularly in the first decade of the twentieth century. From the 15th century, the slave trade was the foundation of the Portuguese empire. Even in the early 1900s, Angola was still a slave state, with half its people enslaved. The British Empire was an ally of Portugal, so it was complicit in the slavery. Portugal¿s islands of Sao Tome and Principe, 150 miles off Africa¿s west coast, had 40,000 slaves producing cocoa beans which Cadbury had been buying since 1886. From 1901 to 1908, Cadbury got half its beans from the islands. A Foreign Office official noted, ¿The fact of the matter is that the system is neither more nor less than slavery but that we do not dare to say much as we might thus offend the Portuguese with whom we desire to stand well.¿ In the 1900s, the British Empire was trying to recruit African labour from Portuguese Africa for its gold mines in South Africa. The Foreign Office warned against the ¿danger of learning inconvenient facts which might oblige us to make representations to the Portuguese Govt. which we don¿t want to do.¿ So Britain, like Portugal, ignored the treaties obliging them to act to halt the slave trade. Prime Minister Lord Salisbury ordered, ¿Leave it alone.¿ In 1901, William Cadbury first heard rumours of slave labour on the islands. All the evidence that he later received confirmed that there was a brutal slave trade in Angola, that the labourers on the islands were forced, that the death rate was huge (often 20% a year), and that none was free ever to leave. Yet Cadbury did not boycott the products of slave labour until 1909. The company claimed that discreet diplomacy, and continued purchase of Sao Tome¿s cocoa, would improve the workers¿ position. Their position, however, did not improve: 6,000 slaves died every year, though profits certainly increased, as did the number of slaves and the amount of cocoa exported. Humanitarian pressure groups tried to get the British government to act in the labourers¿ interests. It responded with endless promises to press the Portuguese state to reform, and repeated investigations and commissions. This all proves the folly of relying on companies, pressure groups, treaties or governments to effect improvement. Angola and the islands used forced labour until they won independence from Portugal in 1975. How we have progressed since then! Such outrages are long gone. Yet in 2001, the Financial Times reported, ¿Nestle and Cadbury were accused of turning a blind eye to child slavery in the cocoa industry.¿ A 2002 study estimated that 284,000 children worked in West Africa¿s cocoa farms. Another study concluded that there were 15,000 child slaves in the Ivory Coast alone. Cadbury responded, ¿We were completely unaware of the allegations concerning cocoa growing in the Cote d¿Ivoire.¿ Plus ca change. The USA spends $8.5 billion a year on chocolate products, Britain spends £4 billion, while the children who produce the chocolate toil in poverty and slavery.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.