Gift Guide

Churchill and Seapower

( 1 )


Winston Churchill had a longer and closer relationship with the Royal Navy than any British statesman in modern times, but his record as a naval strategist and custodian of the nation's sea power has been mired in controversy since the ill-fated Dardanelles campaign in 1915. Today, Churchill is regarded by many as an inept strategist who interfered in naval operations and often overrode his professional advisers - with inevitably disastrous results.

Churchill and Seapower is the...

See more details below
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (23) from $4.87   
  • New (9) from $10.98   
  • Used (14) from $4.87   


Winston Churchill had a longer and closer relationship with the Royal Navy than any British statesman in modern times, but his record as a naval strategist and custodian of the nation's sea power has been mired in controversy since the ill-fated Dardanelles campaign in 1915. Today, Churchill is regarded by many as an inept strategist who interfered in naval operations and often overrode his professional advisers - with inevitably disastrous results.

Churchill and Seapower is the first major study of Winston Churchill's record as a naval strategist and his impact as the most prominent guardian of Britain's sea power in the modern era. Based on extensive archival research, the book debunks many popular and well-entrenched myths surrounding controversial episodes in both World Wars, including the Dardanelles disaster, the Norwegian Campaign, the Battle of the Atlantic, and the devastating loss of the Prince of Wales and Repulse in 1941. It shows that many common criticisms of Churchill have been exaggerated, but also that some of his mistakes have been largely overlooked - such as his willingness to prolong the Battle of the Atlantic in order to concentrate resources on the bombing campaign against Nazi Germany.

The book also examines Churchill's evolution as a maritime strategist over the course of his career, and documents his critical part in managing Britain's naval decline during the first half of the twentieth century. Churchill's genuine affection for the Royal Navy has often distracted attention from the fact that his views on sea power were pragmatic and unsentimental. For, as Christopher M. Bell shows, in a period dominated by declining resources, global threats, and rapid technological change, it was increasingly air rather than sea power that Churchill looked to as the foundation of Britain's security.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
Historian Bell (The Royal Navy), of Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, addresses a surprisingly neglected aspect of Winston Churchill's career: his attitude to sea power. Churchill's relationship to the Royal Navy was closer and more comprehensive than that of any other modern British statesman. Bell combines archival and published material to make a convincing case for Churchill's reputation as a naval strategist and a "steward of the Royal Navy" despite the criticisms of politicians, sailors, and historians (and two disastrous naval campaigns while he served as Lord of the Admiralty early in both world wars). The author shows Churchill's approach to naval power to be unsentimental and pragmatic in his views on sea power. Early faith in the navy's offensive potential was shaken by its limited achievements in WWI. Thereafter Churchill came to regard the navy's mission as predominantly defensive. His frustrated efforts in WWII to find an offensive role against a German-controlled continent led him to conclude that the navy should be maintained at the lowest level necessary to fulfill its defensive mission while offensive resources were best funneled to air power. But Churchill also met the navy's most important needs and protected its long-term interests as well as possible in the context of changing strategic requirements, concludes Bell in this illuminating study. 16 pages of b&w photos. (Dec.)
From the Publisher
"Bell's important study leaves the reader with a sense not just of Churchill's prowess as a naval strategist but of his wisdom as a grand strategist. In taking the long view of Churchill's career, Bell puts Churchill's views on sea power, whether operational or strategic, into a larger context. In the many positions he held, Churchill evaluated what the nation needed for its national security in a world of rapid geopolitical and technological changes, and he accepted that those needs went far beyond sea power." —Journal of British Studies
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780199693573
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press
  • Publication date: 12/1/2012
  • Pages: 432
  • Sales rank: 506,104
  • Product dimensions: 6.40 (w) x 9.30 (h) x 1.60 (d)

Meet the Author

Christopher M. Bell is Associate Professor of History at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia. He is the author of The Royal Navy, Seapower and Strategy between the Wars and co-editor of Naval Mutinies of the Twentieth Century: An International Perspective.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction: Sea Power in the Age of Churchill
1. Apprenticeship: 1901-1914
2. Learning Curve: The First World War
3. Adjusting to the Post-war World, 1919-24
4. The Treasury Years: The Ten Year rule, the Japanese 'Bogey', and the 'Yankee Menace'
5. Disarmament, Rearmament, and the Path to War: The 1930s
6. First Lord of the Admiralty, 1939-1940: The Phoney War and the Norwegian Campaign
7. The War against Germany and Italy, 1940-1941
8. Courting Disaster: The Deterrence of Japan and the Dispatch of Force Z
9. The Battle of the Atlantic, the Imports Crisis, and the Closing of the 'Air Gap'
10. The Defeat of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan
Epilogue: The Verdict of History
Select Bibliography

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 5
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Posted January 16, 2013

    This is the first book I have read specifically about Churchill

    This is the first book I have read specifically about Churchill and it was an excellent and very informative read. I am a retired naval officer and I came away from the book thinking that a man who professed to love the navy did not understand the application of sea power. He seemed to try to use it as if it were an army and applied the same rules for its application. This book also left me with the impression that Churchill like Reagan has one of the most inflated and undeserved reputations. I guess his reputation is mainly due to style over substance because of his speeches during the blitz.
    During World War I as first Lord of the Admiralty he wanted to send the Royal Navy into the confines of the Baltic to launch an invasion of Germany with the support of Russian armies despite the fact that Russia was not interested. His idea of sending the fleet that was maintaining the blockade of Germany and its battle fleet which was keeping the Germans from reaching the ocean did comprehend the essential strategic mission being accomplished by the Royal Navy. However that mission was not an offensive one that made headlines and he was willing to sacrifice it for headline grabbing action.
    His biggest mistake was to believe that battleships could force open the Dardanelles without army support. If he understood the history of ship versus fortification battle he would understand that his fleet could not silence the Turkish batteries and could only hope to run past them like Farragut at New Orleans. Once past the straits the straights would still be closed to transports or merchant ships and his fleet would be beyond support and would have to eventually make the run back down the straights.
    In the 1920s he was the Minister of the Exchequer and severely restricted military expenditures by enforcing the idea that no war would be fought for 10 years so the military could let immediate preparedness for war end. This was a constantly moving 10 years which resulted in the severe diminishment of the arms manufacture industry. Yet in the 30s as Germany began to be perceived as a threat he bashed the policy that he himself enacted. I have reached the conclusion that Churchill like many people with executive power focus on furthering their mission to the exclusion of how it affects the big picture in the pursuit of self-promotion. An example of this can be seen in Donald Rumsfeld being appointed to run the Office of Economic Opportunity in 1969. No one today thinks of Rumsfeld as an advocate of minority opportunities but he did his job, which obviously was not a cause he believed in, so well that Nixon had to throttle him back because he was too aggressive in pursuit of those goals.
    In World War II Churchill to his credit recognized the vulnerability of Germany to having its iron ore imports from Sweden being cut off. He wanted to invade Norway to cut the summer sea route of the ore but did not want to occupy Sweden to cut off the more important summer route of the ore. Unless both routes were closed the goal would not be achieved. After reading this book I have concluded that had an occupation of Norway and Sweden prior to German invasion of Norway followed by a cross Baltic invasion of Germany would have been far more effective than invading France. There would have been climate and terrain issues to have been considered but had this supply of iron ore been cut off Germany would have collapsed much sooner. Churchill’s interference in naval operations during the Norway campaign helped make the operation a failure.
    The operations that Churchill supported in World War II once again showed he did not understand the application of sea power. He sent HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse to Singapore as a political act to deter Japan from war in the Pacific but did not consider the consequences for those ships if Japan went to war any way. Churchill did not understand that in war capital ships only had value as part of a balanced fleet. Japan paid no attention to the British capital ships in designing their plans and easily sunk the warships at great loss in lives.
    His concept of launching the Torch invasion of North Africa which he conducted to whittle down the German forces prior to a cross channel invasion did not take into account that British control of the Mediterranean effectively removed the German forces as an asset for Hitler in the defense of Europe. Once the Suez was safe the Germans in Africa were as good as in prison camps but still being fed by Germany. His peripheral operations against Italy and the Balkans drained off allied resources and delayed the invasion of Europe which resulted in the USSR occupying all of Eastern Europe.
    Lastly his favoring strategic bombing of Germany resulted in Coastal Command not having adequate numbers of long range aircraft which prolonged the battle of the Atlantic resulting in Britain almost losing at sea and costing thousands of more lives for a bombing campaign that has since been proven to have been overrated in its impact on Germany. Churchill was one of these guys who if you told him funding was for an offensive of any kind he would always favor that over defensive funding on misplaced principal. Churchill like Reagan was tremendously overrated. Churchill did not understand sea power which is really sad when you consider his professed love of the navy.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)