BN.com Gift Guide

Civic War and the Corruption of the Citizen [NOOK Book]

Overview

In this unique book, Peter Alexander Meyers leads us through the social processes by which shock incites terror, terror invites war, war invokes emergency, and emergency supports unchecked power. He then reveals how the domestic political culture created by the Cold War has driven these developments forward since 9/11, contending that our failure to acknowledge that this Cold War continues today is precisely what makes it so dangerous.  With eloquence and urgency Meyers argues that the mantra of our ...
See more details below
Civic War and the Corruption of the Citizen

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$16.99
BN.com price
(Save 43%)$30.00 List Price

Overview

In this unique book, Peter Alexander Meyers leads us through the social processes by which shock incites terror, terror invites war, war invokes emergency, and emergency supports unchecked power. He then reveals how the domestic political culture created by the Cold War has driven these developments forward since 9/11, contending that our failure to acknowledge that this Cold War continues today is precisely what makes it so dangerous.  With eloquence and urgency Meyers argues that the mantra of our time—“everything changed on 9/11!”—is false and pernicious. By contrast, Civic War and the Corruption of the Citizen provides a novel account of long-term transformations in the citizen’s experience of war, the constitution of political powers, and public uses of communication, and from that firm historical basis explains how a convergence of these social facts became the pretext for unprecedented opportunism and irresponsibility after 9/11. Where others have observed that our rights are under attack, Meyers digs deeper and finds that today “government by the people” itself is at risk.  Sparkling with historical and philosophical insight, this is a dramatic diagnosis of the American political scene that at once makes clear the new position of the citizen and the necessity for active citizenship if democracy is to endure.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Contexts
A satisfying explanation of how politics in America since 9/11 fit into the larger political culture of the past half century. . . . Meyers' insights offer a helpful guide to our democratic challenges as we attempt to move beyond the fear-inducing rhetoric and policies of the War on Terror.—Contexts

— Andrew M. Lindner

Ira Katznelson

“Just when it seemed as if there was nothing more to say about fear, terror, and emergency after 9/11, this original diagnosis and bracing call for a reassertion of the powers of citizenship offers a restorative work of democratic theory. Assertive and insistent, the eloquence of Civic War and the Corruption of the Citizen compels attention and demands an active response.”
Craig Calhoun

“This is among the most important analyses that I’ve seen of what has happened to politics in the wake of the September 11 attacks. No other thinker has so clearly articulated how both terrorism and the response to it threaten democracy by suppressing contentious political speech. Meyers’s argument is timely, impressively learned, and compelling.”
John Brady Kiesling

“After September 11, 2001, U.S. politicians embraced the rhetoric of war as a substitute for politics. Armed with 2,500 years of the European philosophical tradition, epigrammatic prose, and fiery detachment, Peter Meyers slays the monsters our sleep of reason brought forth. In its brilliant exposition of the duty of the citizen to exercise informed judgment in the collective self-defense, Civic War and the Corruption of the Citizen is a remarkable addition to the literature of civic engagement.”

Contexts - Andrew M. Lindner

"A satisfying explanation of how politics in America since 9/11 fit into the larger political culture of the past half century. . . . Meyers' insights offer a helpful guide to our democratic challenges as we attempt to move beyond the fear-inducing rhetoric and policies of the War on Terror."—Contexts
The Barnes & Noble Review
Published in late 2008, Civic War and the Corruption of the Citizen by Peter Alexander Meyers merits more attention than the rather narrow acclaim it received following its appearance -- though its neglect may be a matter of its timing as well as its tenor. It is the opening volume in a trilogy of works on political theory that will bear the overarching title "Democracy in America After 9/11."

Reading it now is a constant reminder of the difference that a change of administrations can make, for the pages of Civic War are saturated with the concerns, the topical references, and the uneasy ambience of the first several years of the 21st century, when the office of the president was occupied by a man who proclaimed his role to be "the decider" in tones suggesting that this is the most sophisticated political doctrine he or anyone else might ever imagine. As it happens, Meyers's focus as a theorist is on precisely that topic: how democracy is shaped by the habits (and the failures) of political imagination.

To discuss our recent experience in such terms means establishing a certain degree of distance from the events of the past eight years -- moving from journalism's first draft of history to a higher plane, from which we can examine not just long-term trends but (to use an old bit of philosophical shorthand) the "conditions of possibility" of democratic politics. For Meyers, the aftermath of 9/11 raises questions about the nature and activity of what he calls "the Citizen." That capital letter emphasizes the element of abstraction involved here, for Meyers is trying to define an essence, a mode of being, rather than a demographic group.

"Just as being a doctor is constituted by seeing, thinking, and acting like a doctor," he writes, "so being a citizen is constituted by distinctive ways of seeing, thinking, and acting." What distinguishes the role of Citizen is that you have to play it with other people also assuming that role. You have to enter the public sphere to argue, to debate, to make decisions together with others through the existing mechanisms governing large-scale common action. To be a Citizen means establishing (and indeed insisting upon) some degree of control over those mechanisms for deciding and directing how power will be used.

The real target of an act of terrorism, then, is the Citizen -- not in the sense that individuals, like buildings, are destroyed, but that it seeks to reduce the public to stunned helplessness. (The desire to create "shock and awe" is, in the strictest sense, a terrorist intention.) The temptation in the face of terror is to hand over complete control to those with power. Such abdication of the role of Citizen may be done via democratic means, but it is deeply antipolitical.

The term Meyers uses for this tendency is "monocracy," referring to "the aspiration to or achievement of a form of government in which just one power is decisive." We are trained to think of democracy in America as characterized by a separation of powers designed to check monocracy, but the impulse remains a durable one even so.

And it is reinforced by -- even perhaps finally indistinguishable from -- the pronounced tendency to describe any sort of public struggle as a "war." Presidents have declared war on unemployment (FDR), poverty (LBJ), and drugs (Nixon), and more recently on terrorism. The recurrent use of a metaphor has the effect of turning it from a rhetorical device to something taken as a given. In ways both overt and subtle, it shapes, and deforms, how we imagine responding to a crisis. For one thing, war tends to concentrate power in the hands of the executive branch.

The role of the Citizen shrinks, even apart from any limitations on civil rights imposed by a president overreaching his authority. This tendency towards monocracy is, in part, a failure of the imagination. "Our faculty for projective future orientation," writes Meyers, "is always operative in everyday life; it guides the next step, balances dependence, affirms plurality, adjusts the division of action, allocates our energies, and so forth."

To have the habit of conceiving political life through reference to preparation for combat is deeply destructive of the capacity for citizenship. But it is a prevailing condition -- one that Meyers describes through the unfamiliar and sometimes puzzling expression "civic war." In a state of civil war, the nation is split into warring camps; by contrast, "civic war" reflects a kind of excessive unity, in which the scope of political dispute is narrowed by the urgencies of mobilization.

Meyers interprets 9/11 not as an event leading the United States into a condition of civic war but, rather, as a moment when long-standing monocratic tendencies intensified because of the weaknesses in our capacity to be Citizens in any strong sense. Affixing a flag sticker to your car does not count; nor (pace the 43rd president) does going shopping at the mall count as a gesture of public-spiritedness.

The roots of this atrophy run deep. We tend to speak of the Cold War as having ended almost two decades ago, but Meyers's argument is that the past few years have been a continuation of the state of civic war that consolidated during that drawn-out, uneasily "stable" stand-off. "It is impossible," he writes, "that institutions, beliefs, and practices built up over several generations simply dissolve into thin air. They must persist, even if in so doing they often take on unexpected or perverse new forms."

There are implications to this argument that seem much more radical than anything Meyers explicitly draws out from it. One is hard pressed to see how any revitalization of the Citizen's role would be possible given the degree of corruption in both the institutions and the mores wrought by decades of civic war. But then, this is the first book of three -- and it may be that later volumes will deepen what is only intriguingly suggested here.

In the meantime, what can any Citizen with the least imagination do except to listen to William Blake's manifesto from 1804? ""Rouse up," he called out to his readers, "set your foreheads against the ignorant Hirelings! For we have Hirelings in the Camp, the Court, & the University: who would if they could, for ever depress Mental & prolong Corporeal War." That was more than 200 years ago, which just proves that the struggle for change, while very slow, is at least steady work. --Scott McLemee

Scott McLemee writes the weekly column "Intellectual Affairs" for Inside Higher Ed. He is a member of the board of directors of the National Book Critics Circle.

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780226522104
  • Publisher: University of Chicago Press
  • Publication date: 5/15/2009
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 376
  • File size: 476 KB

Meet the Author

Peter Alexander Meyers is professor of American Studies at the Sorbonne Nouvelle in Paris and is presently a visiting researcher in the School of Historical Studies at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Port of Entry

1 From Shock to Terror
2 From Terror to War
3 The Circle of War and Emergency
4 The Regeneration of Emergency through Violence
5  The Cold War Is Not Over
6 The Distemper of Monocracy
      1 The Cold War Today
      2 Today's Cold War in the System of Civic War
      3 Civic War and the Monocratic Tendency
      4 Two Poles of Power: Monocratic Omnipotence and Jeffersonian Justification
      5 Phases of Communication: Secrets, Lies, and Publicness
      6 The Export of "Moral Clarity"
      7 The Cold War Comes Home: The Revival of Reaganism
      8 The Breeding Ground of Monocracy
      9 The Constitution of Power and the Corruption of the Citizen after September 11th
Notes
Works Cited
Index
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)