Cocktail Economics: Discovering Investment Truths from Everyday Conversations

Overview

“Successful investors are those who can pick the right investments for different economic conditions. It’s like matching wine with food. In this book, Victor Canto is both your star chef and sommelier. Don’t be afraid to put Cocktail Economics to work today. You’ll find that two-star investing has become a four-star endeavor.”

–Charlie Parker, financial maven and former Chief Financial Officer of Continental Insurance

“Victor Canto’s insight and uber-rational approach will forever change the way you look at risk and return. Perhaps equally

... See more details below
Hardcover
$28.00
BN.com price
(Save 6%)$29.99 List Price
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (13) from $1.99   
  • New (5) from $12.49   
  • Used (8) from $1.99   
Sending request ...

Overview

“Successful investors are those who can pick the right investments for different economic conditions. It’s like matching wine with food. In this book, Victor Canto is both your star chef and sommelier. Don’t be afraid to put Cocktail Economics to work today. You’ll find that two-star investing has become a four-star endeavor.”

–Charlie Parker, financial maven and former Chief Financial Officer of Continental Insurance

“Victor Canto’s insight and uber-rational approach will forever change the way you look at risk and return. Perhaps equally important, he’ll make you a better economic and political thinker. No one has a greater understanding of how marginal changes in world economics and politics impact portfolio holdings.”

–Neil Rose, CFA, CIO Cadinha & Co.

“I count Victor Canto among today’s best and smartest investment advisors. He has made money in both the good times and bad for many a satisfied client. With this book, he has now done all investors, including myself, an important service: He has written a widely accessible book about the marriage of economics and investing, and the crucial ties that bind the two. It’s the story of how big ideas make the investment world go round.”

–From the Foreword by Dr. John Rutledge, Chairman, Rutledge Capital, LLC

What can moonshine, mountain climbers, power plants, salmon, football players, and well-known celebrities teach you about investing? More than you ever imagined!

Through entertaining, easy-to-understand anecdotes, analogies, and examples, Canto reveals why the most successful investment strategies reflect a balance of active and passive approaches. You’ll learn how to “read” economic cycles, identifying the specific asset classes most likely to outperform in tomorrow’s business environment.

Construct and optimize your winning investment plan, step-by-step, from start to finish!

MAKE HAY WHILE THE SUN SHINES

The case for predicting, forecasting, and timing

PASSIVE INVESTING? ACTIVE INVESTING? NO. BOTH.

Why you need to take both sides in the never-ending debate

ELASTICITY: CATCH IT IF YOU CAN

Putting industry behavior to work for you

CALIFORNIA , FRANCE, AND THE “LOCATION EFFECT”

Investing internationally in the age of globalization

TURN “SMOKE” INTO “SIGNALS”

Making the most of publicly available price data

YOUR PORTFOLIO VS. THE GOVERNMENT

Anticipating and responding to regulations and taxation

TILT TOWARD SUCCESS, ONE STEP AT A TIME

Build your benchmark portfolio, then optimize it for changing environments

Victor Canto reveals exactly how the economy affects markets and how to “read” business cycles so you can profit from every shift in the business cycle. Among the topics covered: investing internationally in the age of globalization; transforming price data into usable market “signals”; anticipating the impact of regulations and taxation; and more. From start to finish, Canto’s focus is practical, and his focus is simple: outstanding investment results.

Foreword xii

Preface xvii

Introduction: The Above-Average Opportunity xxi

Chapter 1: The Buy-and-Hold Connection: Investing Fundamentals, Courtesy of the American Homeowner, the American Dream–or Reality? 1

Chapter 2: Leaping the Transaction-Cost Hurdle: Sometimes It’s Easy, Other Times It’s Not 19

Chapter 3: Dressing Appropriately for the Stock Market: The Potential Payoffs of a Switching Strategy 31

Chapter 4: Catch Elasticity If You Can: An Introduction to Industry Behavior 47

Chapter 5: Putting High-Beta to Work: Industry-Based Portfolio Strategies 67

Chapter 6: California Is a Country: An Introduction to the Location Effect 83

Chapter 7: …And France Is a State: How to Invest Internationally in the Age of Globalization 99

Chapter 8: Pipelines to Our Investment Returns: How We Get What We Want, in the Amount We Want, and When We Want It 113

Chapter 9: Who Are You? Investor Profiles and the Case for Asset Allocation 131

Chapter 10: Your Benchmark Portfolio. . .and Beyond 145

Chapter 11: Turning Smoke into Signals: How to Make the Most Out of Price Data 157

Chapter 12: Making Hay While the Sun Shines: The Case for Predicting, Forecasting, and Timing 173

Chapter 13: The Fight Is On: How to Invest Properly Relative to Regulations, Inflation, and Taxation 195

Chapter 14: Ending the Never-Ending Debate: Active vs. Passive Investing and Why You Can Take Both Sides 217

Chapter 15: A Rational Walk Down Wall Street: Darting Between Passive and Active When the Odds Are in Your Favor 233

Chapter 16: Alpha Bets: The Case for Hedge Funds and a Greek Letter You’ll Want in Your Portfolio 247

Chapter 17: Tilting Toward Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Above-Average Asset Allocation 265

Index 291

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780132432733
  • Publisher: FT Press
  • Publication date: 5/21/2007
  • Pages: 302
  • Product dimensions: 6.40 (w) x 9.28 (h) x 1.02 (d)

Meet the Author

VICTOR A. CANTO is Chairman and Founder of La Jolla Economics, an economic consulting firm located in La Jolla, California. He served as tenured Associate Professor of Finance and Business Economics at the University of Southern California (USC), and as Visiting Professor at both the Universidad Central del Este (Dominican Republic) and UCLA.

Dr. Canto has been published in The Wall Street Journal and Investor’s Business Daily, and in many leading economic journals, including Economic Inquiry, Journal of Macroeconomics, The International Journal, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, The Southern Economic Journal, Applied Economics, Weltwirstchaftliches Archiv, The CATO Journal, Public Finance, and The Journal of International Money and Finance. His series on portfolio strategy appeared in the Financial Analysts Journal.

He holds a M.A. and Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Chicago (1974, 1977).

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

PrefacePreface

My first teaching experience was a disaster. The year was 1977, and the venue was the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. It was an important time for me. I had just left the University of Chicago with a doctorate in economics, along with a full head of ideas and plenty of energy. Economics wasn't only my vocation; it was my passion. I was about to jump into action at USC's graduate school of business. What could be better?

A root canal, perhaps.

My initial feeling was one of awkwardness. It turned out that most of my students were older than me. They also were a much different sort than my colleagues back in Chicago—people who could consume large portions of economic theory at a sitting. My students at USC worked during the day and went to school at night. They went to business school to learn how to make money, how to get a better job, how to succeed. They were practical people, and they wanted little more than the action points they could apply to their business lives. Theory? Theory didn't stand a chance with this crowd. At the time, the late 1970s, residential real estate prices were climbing about 1 to 2 percent a month in the Los Angeles area. This had my business students ravenous for knowledge about real estate finance—and finance in general—and turned off by even a whiff of macro- or microeconomics. My impression was that some of my students viewed economics as a minor inconvenience, at best, while most found it a major nuisance—a requirement that had to be satisfied before they could pursue their fortunes.

My youthful penchant toward showing off probably didn't help matters any. From theoutset, I overemphasized the analytical aspects of economics, which I thought to be my forte, and quickly found that most of my students did not share my enthusiasm. The stark differences between teacher and student were reflected in the poor evaluations I received at the end of the semester. I was devastated at the time. Worse, analytics aside, I simply could not understand why my students were not as passionate as I was about economics in general. Doesn't everyone interested in success in life carry around a pair of economic viewing glasses through which they study their surroundings, calculate, and plan for the future? Many of my students commented in their evaluations that they failed to see how the textbook, or even the subject, would help their careers. After all, many of them already were working. And outside of perhaps the finer points of real estate and the letters MBA after their names, many figured they already possessed what they needed to get ahead.

I knew then, as now, that no one ever knows everything he or she needs to get ahead, that life and experience instruct and challenge us each and every day. But my students were certain that economics need not be part of their life programs. Teaching economics to MBA students seemed like a daunting task at the time. But I would recover.

The next semester, I told my students that even if they did not accept how economic theory could aid their careers, they could benefit from its study in at least one way: Economics, I revealed, was an excellent conversation piece. If grasped even to a nominal degree, it could elevate their status in all manner of social situations, from the cocktail party, to the business luncheon, to the client dinner. Wouldn't it be nice, I asked, if they could discuss with confidence the important political and economic issues of the day? (I note here and do throughout this book that political and economic issues forever are intertwined.) At the very least, they should know what the economic and political issues are, and if they wanted to show off a little, their opinions should be informed because the person with an informed opinion best articulates a position.

I suggested that we try this approach for a while, calling it cocktail economics. By definition, we would apply economic theory to the everyday events that might be discussed over, well, cocktails. For my part, I hoped the approach would spark a fire of interest in the subject. If it didn't, we could fall back on the course outline. The students agreed, and cocktail economics was a go.

Most of my MBA students subscribed to The Wall Street Journal, so I suggested at the outset that we go over the paper's editorial page each class. (In all honesty, I suspect that most of my students agreed to this as a way of reducing the time spent on the textbook. But one has to start somewhere.) A few rules were in play: First, if an editorial discussed some policy action in Washington, the students needed to figure out the breadth of the initial impact of that action. Would the policy affect the economy as a whole or just a region or an industry? To answer this, they needed to identify the nature of economic "shocks," those disruptions to the economic trajectory that are either natural or manmade. Would the shock in question affect the demand or supply side of the market? The succeeding step was to determine how the economy would return to a state of equilibrium in the wake of a shock. Would this occur through a change in price or a change in output? I argued that if consumers and/or suppliers exhibited a degree of flexibility, the bulk of the adjustment back toward equilibrium would occur in the form of quantity changes (or the shift in the amount of a product or good in the economic pipeline), with little or no change in price. On the other hand, if inflexible factors were at work—for instance if there was little give in a supplier's production capacity—prices would have to change to clear the market and restore equilibrium.

This last analysis, it turns out, was dear to the hearts of my students. Because they were businesspeople, I asked them simply to think of who would benefit and who would lose in the aftermath of each shock we studied. My students all wanted to be on the side of the "winners" in life, so at the very least, they were intrigued.

With cocktail economics set in motion, my classes initially became livelier—even entertaining. And to the extent that my students were able to correctly answer each question related to the editorials we surveyed, I reminded them that they could now carry these informed opinions to the office, bar, or restaurant—anywhere they met with clients, colleagues, or even friends. Their skills at arguing and debating would only improve across this process. Finally, I told them that, if nothing else, cocktail economics would teach them how to better tell a story and maybe even enhance their ability to identify good investments.

This scheme soon took on a life of its own, with frowns turning to smiles and nodding-off being replaced with straightened backs and wider eyes. Correspondingly, my ratings as a teacher improved, and I felt very satisfied: I had found a way to both motivate my students and engage them in economic thought.

It has been more than 25 years since I began using this method, but I still find it gratifying when my former students mention it. The chance meetings are few and far between, but nearly every time, the conversation starts the same way: "Professor Canto, I'll always remember cocktail economics." Sometimes they mention that they still use this approach, that they return to it every time they have a big decision to make.

In this book, I have applied the cocktail-economics approach to my theories on investing. I have attempted to be conversational and to employ guiding anecdotes to help reduce what can be complex economic theories to the common-sense basics. But these are powerful basics. Whereas some of my former students might apply cocktail economics to their big life decisions, you will be encouraged to apply it to your investment portfolio—a place where the right decisions can usher in true prosperity.

© Copyright Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Foreword xii

Preface xvii

Introduction: The Above-Average Opportunity xxi

Chapter 1: The Buy-and-Hold Connection: Investing Fundamentals, Courtesy of the American Homeowner, the American Dream–or Reality? 1

Chapter 2: Leaping the Transaction-Cost Hurdle: Sometimes It’s Easy, Other Times It’s Not 19

Chapter 3: Dressing Appropriately for the Stock Market: The Potential Payoffs of a Switching Strategy 31

Chapter 4: Catch Elasticity If You Can: An Introduction to Industry Behavior 47

Chapter 5: Putting High-Beta to Work: Industry-Based Portfolio Strategies 67

Chapter 6: California Is a Country: An Introduction to the Location Effect 83

Chapter 7: …And France Is a State: How to Invest Internationally in the Age of Globalization 99

Chapter 8: Pipelines to Our Investment Returns: How We Get What We Want, in the Amount We Want, and When We Want It 113

Chapter 9: Who Are You? Investor Profiles and the Case for Asset Allocation 131

Chapter 10: Your Benchmark Portfolio. . .and Beyond 145

Chapter 11: Turning Smoke into Signals: How to Make the Most Out of Price Data 157

Chapter 12: Making Hay While the Sun Shines: The Case for Predicting, Forecasting, and Timing 173

Chapter 13: The Fight Is On: How to Invest Properly Relative to Regulations, Inflation, and Taxation 195

Chapter 14: Ending the Never-Ending Debate: Active vs. Passive Investing and Why You Can Take Both Sides 217

Chapter 15: A Rational Walk Down Wall Street: Darting Between Passive and Active When the Odds Are in Your Favor 233

Chapter 16: Alpha Bets: The Case for Hedge Funds and a Greek Letter You’ll Want in Your Portfolio 247

Chapter 17: Tilting Toward Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Above-Average Asset Allocation 265

Index 291

Read More Show Less

Preface

Preface

My first teaching experience was a disaster. The year was 1977, and the venue was the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. It was an important time for me. I had just left the University of Chicago with a doctorate in economics, along with a full head of ideas and plenty of energy. Economics wasn't only my vocation; it was my passion. I was about to jump into action at USC's graduate school of business. What could be better?

A root canal, perhaps.

My initial feeling was one of awkwardness. It turned out that most of my students were older than me. They also were a much different sort than my colleagues back in Chicago—people who could consume large portions of economic theory at a sitting. My students at USC worked during the day and went to school at night. They went to business school to learn how to make money, how to get a better job, how to succeed. They were practical people, and they wanted little more than the action points they could apply to their business lives. Theory? Theory didn't stand a chance with this crowd. At the time, the late 1970s, residential real estate prices were climbing about 1 to 2 percent a month in the Los Angeles area. This had my business students ravenous for knowledge about real estate finance—and finance in general—and turned off by even a whiff of macro- or microeconomics. My impression was that some of my students viewed economics as a minor inconvenience, at best, while most found it a major nuisance—a requirement that had to be satisfied before they could pursue their fortunes.

My youthful penchant toward showing off probably didn't help matters any. From the outset, I overemphasized the analytical aspects of economics, which I thought to be my forte, and quickly found that most of my students did not share my enthusiasm. The stark differences between teacher and student were reflected in the poor evaluations I received at the end of the semester. I was devastated at the time. Worse, analytics aside, I simply could not understand why my students were not as passionate as I was about economics in general. Doesn't everyone interested in success in life carry around a pair of economic viewing glasses through which they study their surroundings, calculate, and plan for the future? Many of my students commented in their evaluations that they failed to see how the textbook, or even the subject, would help their careers. After all, many of them already were working. And outside of perhaps the finer points of real estate and the letters MBA after their names, many figured they already possessed what they needed to get ahead.

I knew then, as now, that no one ever knows everything he or she needs to get ahead, that life and experience instruct and challenge us each and every day. But my students were certain that economics need not be part of their life programs. Teaching economics to MBA students seemed like a daunting task at the time. But I would recover.

The next semester, I told my students that even if they did not accept how economic theory could aid their careers, they could benefit from its study in at least one way: Economics, I revealed, was an excellent conversation piece. If grasped even to a nominal degree, it could elevate their status in all manner of social situations, from the cocktail party, to the business luncheon, to the client dinner. Wouldn't it be nice, I asked, if they could discuss with confidence the important political and economic issues of the day? (I note here and do throughout this book that political and economic issues forever are intertwined.) At the very least, they should know what the economic and political issues are, and if they wanted to show off a little, their opinions should be informed because the person with an informed opinion best articulates a position.

I suggested that we try this approach for a while, calling it cocktail economics. By definition, we would apply economic theory to the everyday events that might be discussed over, well, cocktails. For my part, I hoped the approach would spark a fire of interest in the subject. If it didn't, we could fall back on the course outline. The students agreed, and cocktail economics was a go.

Most of my MBA students subscribed to The Wall Street Journal, so I suggested at the outset that we go over the paper's editorial page each class. (In all honesty, I suspect that most of my students agreed to this as a way of reducing the time spent on the textbook. But one has to start somewhere.) A few rules were in play: First, if an editorial discussed some policy action in Washington, the students needed to figure out the breadth of the initial impact of that action. Would the policy affect the economy as a whole or just a region or an industry? To answer this, they needed to identify the nature of economic "shocks," those disruptions to the economic trajectory that are either natural or manmade. Would the shock in question affect the demand or supply side of the market? The succeeding step was to determine how the economy would return to a state of equilibrium in the wake of a shock. Would this occur through a change in price or a change in output? I argued that if consumers and/or suppliers exhibited a degree of flexibility, the bulk of the adjustment back toward equilibrium would occur in the form of quantity changes (or the shift in the amount of a product or good in the economic pipeline), with little or no change in price. On the other hand, if inflexible factors were at work—for instance if there was little give in a supplier's production capacity—prices would have to change to clear the market and restore equilibrium.

This last analysis, it turns out, was dear to the hearts of my students. Because they were businesspeople, I asked them simply to think of who would benefit and who would lose in the aftermath of each shock we studied. My students all wanted to be on the side of the "winners" in life, so at the very least, they were intrigued.

With cocktail economics set in motion, my classes initially became livelier—even entertaining. And to the extent that my students were able to correctly answer each question related to the editorials we surveyed, I reminded them that they could now carry these informed opinions to the office, bar, or restaurant—anywhere they met with clients, colleagues, or even friends. Their skills at arguing and debating would only improve across this process. Finally, I told them that, if nothing else, cocktail economics would teach them how to better tell a story and maybe even enhance their ability to identify good investments.

This scheme soon took on a life of its own, with frowns turning to smiles and nodding-off being replaced with straightened backs and wider eyes. Correspondingly, my ratings as a teacher improved, and I felt very satisfied: I had found a way to both motivate my students and engage them in economic thought.

It has been more than 25 years since I began using this method, but I still find it gratifying when my former students mention it. The chance meetings are few and far between, but nearly every time, the conversation starts the same way: "Professor Canto, I'll always remember cocktail economics." Sometimes they mention that they still use this approach, that they return to it every time they have a big decision to make.

In this book, I have applied the cocktail-economics approach to my theories on investing. I have attempted to be conversational and to employ guiding anecdotes to help reduce what can be complex economic theories to the common-sense basics. But these are powerful basics. Whereas some of my former students might apply cocktail economics to their big life decisions, you will be encouraged to apply it to your investment portfolio—a place where the right decisions can usher in true prosperity.

© Copyright Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)