- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
1. It’s almost axiomatic that History demands a scapegoat when something goes wrong. In Marie Antoinette’s case, the “arrogant Austrian,” the “selfish spendthrift,” made the perfect target for the revolutionary demagogues. How often throughout history has the outsider, the “other,” been blamed for the failure, for example, of a nation’s economy? Discuss examples, past and present.
2. Historians have debated for more than two centuries as to whether Marie Antoinette had a love affair with Count Axel von Fersen, and if so, how far it went on a scale of platonic to sexual. Do you think they had a relationship? If so, how intense do you think it was? Do you think Louis knew about it? Do you think he forgave Marie Antoinette? Do you think she forgave herself?
3. During the ill-fated flight to the frontier on the night of June 20–21, 1791, why do you think Louis insisted that Axel leave the royal family at Bondy, even though Axel was the mastermind of the plot to escape? Tragically, there was a domino effect of mishaps and screwups with the plans from that point on. Do you think that if Louis had allowed Count von Fersen to remain on the coachman’s box, the family might have made it to safety?
4. The French nicknamed Louis XVI “Le Désiré” when he began his reign. He ended up deposed and executed. Do you think Louis was a good ruler? Why or why not?
5. If you had lived during the years 1789–1794 would you have been a revolutionary, a royalist, or more like the characterization of the young sculptress Louison Chabry, who was -neither wealthy nor impoverished, and who struggled to comprehend what the massive social and political changes were all about and tried to make sense of them?
6. What do you make of the fact that some of the most bloodthirsty revolutionaries, specifically Jacques Hébert and Maximilien Robespierre, dressed not like the sans-culottes they identified with politically, but like the aristocrats they condemned? Discuss this in conjunction with the numerous condemnations of Marie Antoinette’s ostentatious wardrobe and the accusations of her extravagant expenditures on it.
7. Biographers and historians have claimed that Madame Royale, Marie Antoinette’s daughter Marie Thérèse, whom she nicknamed Mousseline, was as a child, very cold to her mother and as an adult extremely unforgiving of Marie Antoinette’s character. Marie Thérèse’s own memoirs are indeed not very charitable toward her mother. What do you make of this and why do you think Madame Royale felt this way? Do you think her feelings are justified? Do you believe Marie Antoinette loved her daughter as much as she did her sons?
8. In August 1791, in a letter to the comte de Mercy-Argenteau, Marie Antoinette penned a remarkable sentence, which those who believe her to have been insensible of the turmoil around her might find to be surprisingly self-aware. She wrote, “Tribulation first makes one realize what one is.” What does that statement mean to you in light of her life’s journey and where it had led her by this point? How did tribulation both affect and change Marie Antoinette? If you were in her shoes, how might you have coped with the same tribulations?
Posted January 24, 2014
This is the third in the Marie Antoinette series by Juliet Grey. I read all three, having previously known very little about Marie Antoinette. Juliet Grey brings history to life in this trilogy and gave me the feeling that I was actually inside the queen's head, understanding what she was feeling with each dramatic event in her life. In the end, I found this to be one of the saddest stories I have ever read.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 7, 2013
The French Revolution is nearly always portrayed in a way that downplays and romanticises the level of violence that took place. As most great nations involved in some kind of despicable conflict the French like to paint the leaders of the revolution as morally untouchable freedom fighters. When in fact the sadistic side in their personalities, their thirst for power and their lack of conscience was allowed to reign without obstruction throughout that period of time. It was a dark, bloody, violent and unforgiving time.
Marie Antoinette is often depicted as the spendthrift, the fashion savvy selfish foreigner, who dared to rule over the superior French. Fact is the country never forgave her for being Austrian. Then and even now people tend to forget that she was a mother,a friend and a wife. A strong woman deprived of her husband and her children. Kept imprisoned like a criminal and murdered by a bloodthirsty mob.
The author has tried to connect to what it must have been like for Marie in those last months of her life and although her upbringing and stance on royalty is evident, that wasn't enough of a crime to treat her as they did. The French not only blamed her for the crippling financial situation they found themselves in, they also maligned her character in the most despicable way.
Abolishing the monarchy to create a Republic and feed the common folk is one thing, but condoning mass murder, violence and unspeakable acts of gore is reprehensible.
The writing was a tad dry, especially in the first half. There is a lot of factual data thrown in and Marie doesn't really get a strong voice until the second half. Even then I think the author kept her distance from the character emotionally, perhaps in an attempt to not appear biased towards Marie in any way.
I received a copy of this book via NetGalley.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted April 20, 2015
No text was provided for this review.