Consciousness or co-optation: Ethnic political power and movement outcomes in Ecuador and Australia.

Paperback (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $72.26
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (1) from $72.26   
  • New (1) from $72.26   

More About This Textbook


How can political challengers avoid co-optation and other forms of moderation? This dissertation illuminates how institutional participation led to the co-optation of the Indigenous Australian movement and the factors which equipped the Ecuadorian Indigena movement to elude a similar fate. Most contestants in political struggles must at some point consider participation or co-operation with an opponent. This dissertation's findings suggest how activists might evaluate such arrangements, and, if they select engagement, how to proceed with full awareness of the advantages and disadvantages. Unlike many other scholars, I differentiate productive and counterproductive institutional participation: productive participation results in concessions without unduly weakening the movement whereas counterproductive participation jeopardizes challenger influence in exchange for paltry gains. Based on meticulous research---including interviews and archival data---and using process tracing methodology, my analyses suggest that the Indigena movement resisted counterproductive participation, thereby avoiding co-optation, because numerous activists had developed an advanced consciousness: a cognizance of the mechanisms underlying elite domination and an awareness of the need for countervailing movement autonomy and safeguards. By maintaining a powerful organization, they could also constrain potentially deleterious participation by less aware activists. In contrast, the Indigenous Australian movement's lack of widespread consciousness and weak organizational capacity contributed to its co-optation and demobilization. In addition to suggesting how activists can avoid co-optation and benefit from participation, my research explores how they may acquire an advanced consciousness. This study also has implications for the agency-structure debate: Is challenger behavior shaped by the challengers themselves or the external environment? Critics of the political process theory synthesis---an amalgamation of resource mobilization theory, the political opportunity structures perspective, and framing analysis---claim that it privileges structural over ideational factors. In assessing the synthesis' ability to explain the cases, I find it elucidates why one movement succumbed to structural impulses, but cannot explain the other's resistance: the synthesis model indeed fails to account for agency, consciousness, and related phenomena. Although recent scholarship has attempted to "bring culture back in," the underlying theorizing is often narrow and empirically weak. This dissertation overcomes such shortcomings by offering theoretical insights grounded in real-world data.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781243456595
  • Publisher: BiblioLabsII
  • Publication date: 9/2/2011
  • Pages: 300
  • Product dimensions: 8.00 (w) x 10.00 (h) x 0.78 (d)

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)