Introduction: Jefferson's Revenge 1
Part I. Preliminaries 17
Chapter 1. There Is Nothing That Interpretation Just Is 19
Part II. Traditionalism 33
Chapter 2. Burkean Minimalism 35
Chapter 3. Rationalists vs. Burkeans 60
Chapter 4. Due Process Traditionalism 93
Part III. Populism 123
Chapter 5. Backlash's Travels 125
Chapter 6. Public Opinion and Social Consequences 140
Chapter 7. Public Opinion and Judicial Humility 165
Part IV. Cosmopolitanism 185
Chapter 8. What Other Nations Do 187
A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Beforeby Cass R. Sunstein
Pub. Date: 01/19/2009
Publisher: Princeton University Press
The future of the U.S. Supreme Court hangs in the balance like never before. Will conservatives or liberals succeed in remaking the court in their own image? In A Constitution of Many Minds, acclaimed law scholar Cass Sunstein proposes a bold new way of interpreting the Constitution, one that respects the Constitution's text and history but also refuses to/i>
The future of the U.S. Supreme Court hangs in the balance like never before. Will conservatives or liberals succeed in remaking the court in their own image? In A Constitution of Many Minds, acclaimed law scholar Cass Sunstein proposes a bold new way of interpreting the Constitution, one that respects the Constitution's text and history but also refuses to view the document as frozen in time.
Exploring hot-button issues ranging from presidential power to same-sex relations to gun rights, Sunstein shows how the meaning of the Constitution is reestablished in every generation as new social commitments and ideas compel us to reassess our fundamental beliefs. He focuses on three approaches to the Constitutiontraditionalism, which grounds the document's meaning in long-standing social practices, not necessarily in the views of the founding generation; populism, which insists that judges should respect contemporary public opinion; and cosmopolitanism, which looks at how foreign courts address constitutional questions, and which suggests that the meaning of the Constitution turns on what other nations do.
Sunstein demonstrates that in all three contexts a "many minds" argument is at workput simply, better decisions result when many points of view are considered. He makes sense of the intense debates surrounding these approaches, revealing their strengths and weaknesses, and sketches the contexts in which each provides a legitimate basis for interpreting the Constitution today.
This book illuminates the underpinnings of constitutionalism itself, and shows that ours is indeed a Constitution, not of any particular generation, but of many minds.
- Princeton University Press
- Publication date:
- Edition description:
- New Edition
- Product dimensions:
- 6.20(w) x 9.30(h) x 0.90(d)
Table of Contents
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews