Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System

Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System

by J. Mitchell Pickerill
     
 

ISBN-10: 0822332353

ISBN-13: 9780822332350

Pub. Date: 05/17/2004

Publisher: Duke University Press Books

In Constitutional Deliberation in Congress J. Mitchell Pickerill analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court’s constitutional decisions on Congressional debates and statutory language. Based on a thorough examination of how Congress responds to key Court rulings and strategizes in anticipation of them, Pickerill argues that judicial review—or the

…  See more details below

Overview

In Constitutional Deliberation in Congress J. Mitchell Pickerill analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court’s constitutional decisions on Congressional debates and statutory language. Based on a thorough examination of how Congress responds to key Court rulings and strategizes in anticipation of them, Pickerill argues that judicial review—or the possibility of it—encourages Congressional attention to constitutional issues. Revealing critical aspects of how laws are made, revised, and refined within the separated system of government of the United States, he makes an important contribution to “constitutionalism outside the courts” debates.

Pickerill combines legislative histories, extensive empirical findings, and interviews with current and former members of Congress, congressional staff, and others. He examines data related to all of the federal legislation struck down by the Supreme Court from the beginning of the Warren Court in 1953 through the 1996–97 term of the Rehnquist Court. By looking at the legislative histories of Congressional acts that invoked the Commerce Clause and presented Tenth Amendment conflicts—such as the Child Labor Act (1916), the Civil Rights Act (1965), the Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990), and the Brady Bill (1994)—Pickerill illuminates how Congressional deliberation over newly proposed legislation is shaped by the possibility of judicial review. The Court’s invalidation of the Gun-Free School Zones Act in its 1995 ruling United States v. Lopez signaled an increased judicial activism regarding issues of federalism. Pickerill examines that case and compares congressional debate over constitutional issues in key pieces of legislation that preceded and followed it: the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 and the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 1997. He shows that Congressional attention to federalism increased in the 1990s along with the Court’s greater scrutiny.

Read More

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780822332350
Publisher:
Duke University Press Books
Publication date:
05/17/2004
Series:
Constitutional Conflicts
Pages:
208
Product dimensions:
6.00(w) x 9.10(h) x 0.90(d)

Table of Contents

List of tables and figures
Acknowledgments
Introduction1
1Constitutional deliberation in a separated system11
2Judicial review : roadblock, speed bump, or detour?31
3The shadows of uncertain scrutiny : legislating in a period of judicial dualism63
4The missing constitution : legislating in the darkness of judicial deference95
5The nature of things : anticipation and negotiation, interaction and reaction133
App. AJudicial review decisions and relevant legislation155
App. B: In-depth interviews161
Notes167
Table of cases175
Bibliography177
Index183

Read More

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >