Constitutional Politics in the States: Contemporary Controversies and Historical Patterns / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $1.99
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 98%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (9) from $1.99   
  • New (4) from $65.00   
  • Used (5) from $1.99   


The reliance on state declarations of rights to expand rights protections during the last two decades has highlighted the political importance of state constitutions. Yet, throughout American history up to the present day, state constitutions have been the battleground for fundamental political conflicts. This edited volume analyzes the efforts of various groups to achieve their ends via constitutional revision and constitutional amendments, examines the responses to controversial state constitutional rulings, and assesses the consequences of constitutional politics on substantive state policy.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Provides background and case studies for understanding the revival of state constitutional law and politics since the 1970s, when lawyers began turning to state rather than the US constitution for protection of rights. Explores the themes that recur among many states: the intrastate distribution of political power, the scope of state government's authority, and its relation to economic activity; amendment processes; the right to privacy; term limitations; victims' rights, school finance; and other topics. The treatment is more historical and political than legally technical. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (
Daniel R. Pinello
For the past two decades, the "new judicial federalism" has dominated scholarly analysis of state constitutional politics. As the introduction to CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS IN THE STATES notes, though, civil-liberties claims based on state declarations of rights represent a small portion of state-court business. In turn, judges vie among many contenders forming, revising, and interpreting constitutions. This volume seeks to investigate the roles of other players, explicate the differences between constitutional politics at the state and national levels, and "indicate the usefulness of a broader perspective on state constitutions and on state constitutional politics" (p. xv). The text also stimulates reflection about the place of political science in the study of law and politics. The book succeeds in part. The most consequential project is Donald S. Lutz's analysis of all 50 state constitutions determining what factors affect amendment rate, defined as "the average number of formal amendments passed per year since [a] constitution came into effect" (p. 28). He convincingly demonstrates word length best explains the frequency of constitutional alteration. The more provisions in an original charter, the more targets to recast. No other statistically significant variables (including geographical size, population, level of industrialization, per capita personal income, and per capita state expenditure) appear. Lutz notably concludes that "ordinary legislative matters not needed to establish a constitutional framework should be kept out of . . . constitution[s]" and "once one nonconstitutional policy issue is allowed in, any policy issue can be constitutionalized, so a short-range strategy of constitutionalizing a particular policy issue leads to a kind of tragedy of the constitutional commons whereby the security of everyone's long-range interests is reduced" (p.45). Champions of balanced budgets, victims' rights, school prayer, and whatnot should ponder this wisdom before enshrining policy preferences in constitutions. A second strong achievement is the test by Russell S. Harrison and G. Alan Tarr of the dynamic- and constrained-court models articulated by Gerald Rosenberg. The New Jersey Supreme Court's decades-long campaign to revamp public-school financing is the setting. According to Harrison and Tarr, the Garden State's experience suggests that "judicial initiatives in constitutional policy making may be even less promising than Rosenberg had assumed" (p. 196) and reinforces the importance of judicial understanding of what Donald Horowitz termed "social facts." But for an introductory historical essay, the remaining chapters are case studies. Rebecca Mae Salokar provides a history of Florida's tumultuous passage of a constitutional right to privacy, counseling that the marketing of amendments determines electoral success. John David Rausch, Jr., chronicles term-limitation initiatives in four states (Oklahoma, Washington, Michigan, and Florida). Candace McCoy analyzes California's misnamed "Victims' Bill of Rights," canvassing familiar ideological territory in the politics of criminal procedure and apparently synopsizing her 1994 book. Barry Latzer supplies an intriguing tale of dogged resistance by the post-Rose-Bird California Supreme Court to ever-more-conservative criminal-procedure initiatives threatening judicial independence. (Unfortunately, the McCoy and Latzer papers substantially overlap.) Gerald Benjamin and Melissa Cusa wonder whether New York's mandating plebiscites every 20 years calling for constitutional conventions is a viable alternative to the popular initiative for achieving serious structural reform in state government. The authors resolve that resultant legislative command over constitutional revision in the Empire State only safeguards existing institutional relationships. "Bargains among self-interested politicians" (p. 68) prove tenacious, stifling popular innovation. Although generally competent (with the Benjamin and Cusa piece quite good), these efforts are less distinguished than those of Lutz and of Harrison and Tarr. Why? What differentiates political scientists from other political or quasi-political observers holds the key. Three years ago, in the American Political Science Association's decennial survey of the state of the discipline, Martin Shapiro lamented the humble station of public-law scholars in political science. He supplied abundant benchmarks of the low status of the law-and-courts subfield. Shapiro's complaint shouldn't have been a surprise, though. The media long ago monopolized explaining court action to the masses. At the elite level, judicial-politics educators too often lose in competition with law faculty for students, research grants, and teaching lines. Indeed, only political-science departments in universities without law schools typically have traditions revering research in judicial politics, with Princeton the most conspicuous example. University trustees, cost-conscious administrators, and legislators (in the case of state-funded institutions) view J.D.s as far more marketable than M.A.s and Ph.D.s. In a Darwinian world, then, how do political scientists studying courts and judges separate themselves from journalists and law professors investigating similar material? Political scientists' training in social-science methodology affords an answer. Law schools increasingly do offer methods courses, but to succeed professionally, law faculties don't have to be as sensitive to research methodology as social scientists. Political scientists thus can profit from their awareness of research design, data collection, hypothesis testing, statistical analysis, and the like. If law-and-courts scholars limit themselves to traditional case studies and legal analysis, however, journalists and law professors resolutely will prevail. The former are better storytellers; the latter, masters of case law. CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS IN THE STATES appears in the Greenwood Press series "Contributions in Legal Studies." Half of the essays deal with court action, and seven of nine contributors have professional affiliations in departments of political science. Accordingly, one gauge of the book's success is how well the authors exploit their special scholarly training in the study of law and politics. The essays by Lutz and by Harrison and Tarr clearly manifest the distinctive touch of political science. The former employs careful comparative investigation and statistical analysis, linchpins of social-science methodology. By probing federal-court models at the state level, the Harrison and Tarr work enriches a lively debate presently exciting public-law discourse. The balance of CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS IN THE STATES is case studies, most indistinguishable from those in law reviews and elite magazines. As such, case studies don't challenge the dominance of journalists and law professors in law and politics. Yet even here, political scientists could have an edge by recalling Harry Eckstein's identification of "crucial-case studies" รน special instances that, alone, invalidate or confirm theories. Although elusive creatures, crucial-case studies would separate public-law research from other endeavors. These essays, however, neither aspire to the role nor merit the designation. With a pool of 50 jurisdictions, state constitutional politics, like state and local politics generally, beckons scholars to meaningful comparative inquiry. Comparing American states, furthermore, obviates problems with differences in language, culture, political systems, and so forth common to political science comparing nations. Public-law students should mine this rich ore more. Untold research hovers around single data points while so little yearns for comparative gold. With three players in peak form, CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS IN THE STATES wins the bronze. References Harry H. Eckstein. 1975. "Case Study and Theory in Political Science," in Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), HANDBOOK OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, Vol. 7, pp. 79-138. Donald L. Horowitz. 1977. THE COURTS AND SOCIAL POLICY. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Gerald N. Rosenberg. 1991. THE HOLLOW HOPE: CAN COURTS BRING ABOUT SOCIAL CHANGE? University of Chicago Press. Martin Shapiro. 1993. "Public Law and Judicial Politics," in Ada W. Finifter (ed.), POLITICAL SCIENCE: THE STATE OF THE DISCIPLINE II. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780313285233
  • Publisher: ABC-CLIO, Incorporated
  • Publication date: 4/30/1996
  • Series: Contributions in Legal Studies Series , #81
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 246
  • Lexile: 1570L (what's this?)
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 0.69 (d)

Meet the Author

G. ALAN TARR is Director of the Council for State Constitutional Studies at Rutgers University-Camden.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

1 State Constitutional Politics: An Historical Perspective 3
2 Patterns in the Amending of American State Constitutions 24
3 Constitutional Amendment through the Legislature in New York 47
4 Creating a State Constitutional Right to Privacy: Unlikely Alliances, Uncertain Results 73
5 The Politics of Term Limitations 98
6 Crime as a Boogeyman: Why Californians Changed Their Constitutional to Include a "Victims' Bill of Rights" (and What It Really Did) 128
7 California's Constitutional Counterrevolution 149
8 School Finance and Inequality in New Jersey 178
Bibliographic Essay 203
Index 211
About the Contributors 221
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)