Consuming Kids: Protecting Our Children from the Onslaught of Marketing and Advertising

Overview

The average American child sees about 40,000 television commercials every year. Companies target younger viewers all the time, selling everything from sugar cereals to minivans, and cross-promotional marketing influences everything from the food stocked in school vending machines to the characters who appear in children’s books. Kids are requesting specific brands as soon as they can talk. American corporations spend over $15 billion yearly on marketing to children in an effort ...
See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$11.32
BN.com price
(Save 29%)$16.00 List Price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (41) from $1.99   
  • New (9) from $6.70   
  • Used (32) from $1.99   
Sending request ...

Overview

The average American child sees about 40,000 television commercials every year. Companies target younger viewers all the time, selling everything from sugar cereals to minivans, and cross-promotional marketing influences everything from the food stocked in school vending machines to the characters who appear in children’s books. Kids are requesting specific brands as soon as they can talk. American corporations spend over $15 billion yearly on marketing to children in an effort to cultivate nagging, insatiable, “cradle-to-grave” consumers.

In this shocking and engrossing exposé, psychologist Susan Linn reveals how the marketing industry preys on kids from the day they’re born, exploiting their vulnerabilities and skewing their values in order to influence what they eat, wear, and play with. This advertising blitz stifles creativity and exacerbates obesity, eating disorders, violence, sexual precocity, and substance abuse. Linn—a mother herself—recognizes that parents alone are no match for the marketing experts. What they need is the concerted help of healthcare professionals, educators, and legislators who have children’s best interests in mind. Consuming Kids is a call to action for anyone who cares about the well-being of children.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
“A powerful warning and wake-up call.” –Marian Wright Edelman

“Forces us to see a world in which it is considered legitimate to treat children and their tastes as market potential and to manipulate them accordingly accordingly.” –Penelope Leach

“A call to arms. . . . We can and must take back our parental roles.” –T. Berry Brazelton, M.D.

Susan Linn

“A cri de coeur on behalf of people too young to suspect how their ‘share of mind’ is being jealously divided. . . . Linn does a fine job of exposing the wickedness of preying commercially on the young.” –The Wall Street Journal

“Arguing passionately . . . Linn makes a compelling case for restricting commercial access to children.” –The Washington Post Book World

“A measured, but ultimately devastating, critique of consumerism and American childhood.” –Mother Jones

“A take-charge book [filled with] a multitude of amazing and often terrifying facts. . . . An important and startling book that should be read not only by parents, but by policymakers as well.” –Rocky Mountain News

“The most disturbing book of the year–a fact-filled study of just how commercialized childhood has become.” –The Weekly Standard

“At last a book that provides the data, the arguments, and the passion that can be mobilized to end marketing to children. Susan Linn is a hero of our times.” –Howard Gardner, author of Changing Minds

“Like Eric Schlosser in Fast Food Nation, Linn . . . put[s] together a truly devastating case . . . couch[ed] in the most reasonable terms possible. . . . A socially conscious account that deserves wide exposure.” –Publishers Weekly (starred review)

“Linn presents a salient, substantial, and worrying case. . . . As useful as it is serious, this book is necessary reading for parents.” –Alissa Quart, author of Branded

“[A] forceful exposé. . . . Illuminating.” –Library Journal (starred review)

“A compelling and compassionate critique. . . . If you’re thinking marketing to kids has gotten out of hand, and are wondering what to do, this book is for you. . . . Susan Linn has provided a road map for taking back the culture of childhood.” –Juliet B. Schor, author of Born To Buy

“Generous with both advice and the names of organizations already on the case.” –The Boston Globe

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781400079995
  • Publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 8/9/2005
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 304
  • Product dimensions: 5.20 (w) x 8.00 (h) x 0.64 (d)

Meet the Author

Susan Linn is Instructor in Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Associate Director of the Media Center at Judge Baker Children’s Center in Boston. An award-winning producer and ventriloquist, she is internationally known for her pioneering work using puppets as therapeutic tools with children and is co-founder of the coalition Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. She lives in Brookline, Massachusetts, with her husband and daughter.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Foreword by Penelope Leach
Acknowledgments

Introduction: The Marketing Maelstrom

1. Notes from the Underground: Thirty-Six Hours at a Marketing Conference

2. A Consumer in the Family: The Nag Factor and Other Nightmares

3. Branded Babies: From Cradle to Consumer

4. Endangered Species: Play and Creativity

5. Students for Sale: Who Profits from Marketing in Schools?

6. Through Thick and Thin: The Weighty Problem of Food Marketing

7. Peace-Keeping Battle Stations and Smackdown!: Selling Kids on Violence

8. From Barbie and Ken to Britney, the Bratz, and Beyond: Sex As Commodity

9. Marketing, Media, and the First Amendment: What’s Best for Children?

10. Joe Camel Is Dead, but Whassup with Those Budweiser Frogs?: Hooking Kids on Alcohol and Tobacco

11. If Values Are Right, What’s Left?: Life Lessons from Marketing

12. Ending the Marketing Maelstrom: You’re Not Alone

Appendix: Resources
Notes
Suggested Reading
Index

Read More Show Less

Introduction

“A call to arms. . . . We can and must take back our parental roles.” –T. Berry Brazelton, M.D.

The introduction, discussion questions, suggestions for further reading, and author biography that follow are intended to enhance your group’s discussion of Susan Linn’s Consuming Kids, a lively, eye-opening investigation into the blatant manipulation of the youngest and most vulnerable members of America’s commercialized culture.

Read More Show Less

Foreword

1. Linn cites the deregulation of advertising on children’s television during the Reagan administration and the current laxity of laws limiting the formation of media conglomerates as major factors in the commercialization of childhood [p. 6]. What do these policies reflect about America’s view of the role of government in society? How do the arguments for regulation stand up against those for deregulation? The advertising industry says that it is self-regulating adequately. Do you agree? Have recent political trends made the creation of vast mega companies like Viacom, Disney, and Time Warner inevitable? Could the negative impact of their reach and dominance have been predicted?

2. From the invasion of Internet chat rooms to the employment of “cool” kids to hype various products, “even traditional venues for spreading what used to be legitimately called popular culture–word of-mouth, for example–have been co-opted by corporations” [p. 6]. A recent article in The New York Times Magazine noted that “trendsetters” selected by corporations to promote their products are often unpaid volunteers. Why are teenagers particularly susceptible to assuming this role?

3. Research shows that children today are reaching physical maturity earlier than previous generations (for instance, girls are entering puberty earlier than their mothers did, p. 27). What affect does this have on how children perceive themselves? Have these changes distorted society’s attitudes about childhood? What are the challenges for girls reaching puberty earlier than their peers? What can society do to support them?

4. Hasresearch into the emotional and social development of children failed to keep pace with studies of biological changes? What aspects of children’s behavior or attitudes deserve further investigation? What specific questions would be useful in determining the influence of marketing and of the media?

5. Linn argues that “the process of marketing” has a significant impact on family life [p. 32]. How have marketers exploited both everyday observations about kids’ behavior and more subtle psychological insights into the parent-child relationship? Why are some families more susceptible than others? In addition to social and economic status, what factors shape consumer behavior? Does Consuming Kids offer explanations that surprised you or contradicted your assumptions? How does Linn support her conclusions? Is her evidence objective, or does it reflect a bias?

6. Has public television betrayed its audience by forming partnerships with commercial interests, or are its alliances with toy manufactures and its participation in shopping malls an economic necessity? Do tie-ins with fast-food companies and brand-licensing deals with unhealthy food products undermine or negate the educational benefits of broadcasting Sesame Street, Arthur, and other programs for young children? Do you think that commercial-free television for children is important? Why or why not?

7. The effects of television shows, DVDs, and computer programs for babies and toddlers have not been fully investigated. There is no evidence that the youngest and most impressionable children gain anything from them that can’t be gained quicker from real life. Do you think that products like Baby Einstein, Brainy Baby, and Baby Genius should be removed from the marketplace until such research is completed?

8. “Given the current confluence of sophisticated media technology and the glorification of consumerism, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to provide children with an environment that encourages creativity and original thinking” [p. 62]. Do today’s advanced technologies represent a greater intrusion on a child’s environment than the introduction of radios, movies, and television in the past? Does the use of popular fictional characters as marketing tools for zillions of products [p. 64] make it impossible for children to create their own fantasies and games? Do your own experiences support the view that children today exhibit less creativity–and have less fun–than previous generations? What other changes in society might explain the lack of imaginative play among kids today?

9. Why is the Internet such a strong influence on today’s youth? To what extent has it replaced the “community” you knew as a child?

10. How do today’s mass-marketing techniques differ from those with which you grew up? How has the advent of electronic media altered not just the dissemination but the content and direction of commercial messages?

11. During the 1990s corporations extended their reach into schools, sponsoring newscasts, field trips, vending machines, classroom instructional materials, and more. Can a case be made that companies like Burger King, which sponsors scholarships, or Nike, which supplies athletic equipment, perform a social service that outweighs their more selfish interests? Are the trade-offs worth it? Do you agree that commercialism in schools can compromise the quality and integrity of education? Given the decline of public funding for education in many parts of the country, how would you answer the question “Who Profits from Marketing in Schools?”

12. Linn suggests that a good way to frame discussions about sex and violence in the media is to recognize that the things children are exposed to on a daily basis (including “plotless” ads and musical videos) are all narratives that transmit cultural values [p. 109]. Use this approach to critique specific ad campaigns, children’s programs, prime-time series that children are likely to watch, and popular video and computer games. Do they encourage age-inappropriate behavior? What are the long-term implications of the ideals they present and the role models they use?

13. Do you agree with Linn’s statement, “The ‘worst’ effect [of marketing to children] will depend on your child’s weaknesses or predilections” [p. 9]? Are the negative effects of violent messages more serious, for example, than the risks linked to the marketing of unhealthful foods? Are parents able to counteract some messages more effectively than others?

14. After reading Consuming Kids, what specific marketing techniques do you think are the most insidious?

15. Why has the political right taken the most active role in calling for government controls of the media? Is the left defending its political principles (particularly the sanctity of the First Amendment) at the expense of the nation’s children? Does Linn’s perspective encompass the concerns of people all along the political spectrum? How do her own political leanings, as well her professional roles as a psychologist and children’s advocate, shape the way she presents her arguments?

16. The use of violence and sex in the media has raised objections for a long time, and many studies have shown that most parents feel that marketing contributes to their children becoming too materialistic. What new information or insights does Consuming Kids contribute to the debate? Are the solutions Linn provides realistic? What reform efforts by the public have been successful in the past? Are there parallels between the methods and goals of those efforts and the call to action in Consuming Kids?

17. Linn argues that marketing to children is a societal issue, not just an issue that concerns families. Do you agree? What is society’s responsibility to children?

Read More Show Less

Reading Group Guide

“A call to arms. . . . We can and must take back our parental roles.” –T. Berry Brazelton, M.D.

The introduction, discussion questions, suggestions for further reading, and author biography that follow are intended to enhance your group’s discussion of Susan Linn’s Consuming Kids, a lively, eye-opening investigation into the blatant manipulation of the youngest and most vulnerable members of America’s commercialized culture.

1. Linn cites the deregulation of advertising on children’s television during the Reagan administration and the current laxity of laws limiting the formation of media conglomerates as major factors in the commercialization of childhood [p. 6]. What do these policies reflect about America’s view of the role of government in society? How do the arguments for regulation stand up against those for deregulation? The advertising industry says that it is self-regulating adequately. Do you agree? Have recent political trends made the creation of vast mega companies like Viacom, Disney, and Time Warner inevitable? Could the negative impact of their reach and dominance have been predicted?

2. From the invasion of Internet chat rooms to the employment of “cool” kids to hype various products, “even traditional venues for spreading what used to be legitimately called popular culture–word of-mouth, for example–have been co-opted by corporations” [p. 6]. A recent article in The New York Times Magazine noted that “trendsetters” selected by corporations to promote their products are often unpaid volunteers. Why are teenagers particularly susceptible to assuming this role?

3. Research shows that children today are reaching physical maturity earlier than previous generations (for instance, girls are entering puberty earlier than their mothers did, p. 27). What affect does this have on how children perceive themselves? Have these changes distorted society’s attitudes about childhood? What are the challenges for girls reaching puberty earlier than their peers? What can society do to support them?

4. Has research into the emotional and social development of children failed to keep pace with studies of biological changes? What aspects of children’s behavior or attitudes deserve further investigation? What specific questions would be useful in determining the influence of marketing and of the media?

5. Linn argues that “the process of marketing” has a significant impact on family life [p. 32]. How have marketers exploited both everyday observations about kids’ behavior and more subtle psychological insights into the parent-child relationship? Why are some families more susceptible than others? In addition to social and economic status, what factors shape consumer behavior? Does Consuming Kids offer explanations that surprised you or contradicted your assumptions? How does Linn support her conclusions? Is her evidence objective, or does it reflect a bias?

6. Has public television betrayed its audience by forming partnerships with commercial interests, or are its alliances with toy manufactures and its participation in shopping malls an economic necessity? Do tie-ins with fast-food companies and brand-licensing deals with unhealthy food products undermine or negate the educational benefits of broadcasting Sesame Street, Arthur, and other programs for young children? Do you think that commercial-free television for children is important? Why or why not?

7. The effects of television shows, DVDs, and computer programs for babies and toddlers have not been fully investigated. There is no evidence that the youngest and most impressionable children gain anything from them that can’t be gained quicker from real life. Do you think that products like Baby Einstein, Brainy Baby, and Baby Genius should be removed from the marketplace until such research is completed?

8. “Given the current confluence of sophisticated media technology and the glorification of consumerism, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to provide children with an environment that encourages creativity and original thinking” [p. 62]. Do today’s advanced technologies represent a greater intrusion on a child’s environment than the introduction of radios, movies, and television in the past? Does the use of popular fictional characters as marketing tools for zillions of products [p. 64] make it impossible for children to create their own fantasies and games? Do your own experiences support the view that children today exhibit less creativity–and have less fun–than previous generations? What other changes in society might explain the lack of imaginative play among kids today?

9. Why is the Internet such a strong influence on today’s youth? To what extent has it replaced the “community” you knew as a child?

10. How do today’s mass-marketing techniques differ from those with which you grew up? How has the advent of electronic media altered not just the dissemination but the content and direction of commercial messages?

11. During the 1990s corporations extended their reach into schools, sponsoring newscasts, field trips, vending machines, classroom instructional materials, and more. Can a case be made that companies like Burger King, which sponsors scholarships, or Nike, which supplies athletic equipment, perform a social service that outweighs their more selfish interests? Are the trade-offs worth it? Do you agree that commercialism in schools can compromise the quality and integrity of education? Given the decline of public funding for education in many parts of the country, how would you answer the question “Who Profits from Marketing in Schools?”

12. Linn suggests that a good way to frame discussions about sex and violence in the media is to recognize that the things children are exposed to on a daily basis (including “plotless” ads and musical videos) are all narratives that transmit cultural values [p. 109]. Use this approach to critique specific ad campaigns, children’s programs, prime-time series that children are likely to watch, and popular video and computer games. Do they encourage age-inappropriate behavior? What are the long-term implications of the ideals they present and the role models they use?

13. Do you agree with Linn’s statement, “The ‘worst’ effect [of marketing to children] will depend on your child’s weaknesses or predilections” [p. 9]? Are the negative effects of violent messages more serious, for example, than the risks linked to the marketing of unhealthful foods? Are parents able to counteract some messages more effectively than others?

14. After reading Consuming Kids, what specific marketing techniques do you think are the most insidious?

15. Why has the political right taken the most active role in calling for government controls of the media? Is the left defending its political principles (particularly the sanctity of the First Amendment) at the expense of the nation’s children? Does Linn’s perspective encompass the concerns of people all along the political spectrum? How do her own political leanings, as well her professional roles as a psychologist and children’s advocate, shape the way she presents her arguments?

16. The use of violence and sex in the media has raised objections for a long time, and many studies have shown that most parents feel that marketing contributes to their children becoming too materialistic. What new information or insights does Consuming Kids contribute to the debate? Are the solutions Linn provides realistic? What reform efforts by the public have been successful in the past? Are there parallels between the methods and goals of those efforts and the call to action in Consuming Kids?

17. Linn argues that marketing to children is a societal issue, not just an issue that concerns families. Do you agree? What is society’s responsibility to children?

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)