Courtly Encounters: Translating Courtliness and Violence in Early Modern Eurasia

Courtly Encounters: Translating Courtliness and Violence in Early Modern Eurasia

by Sanjay Subrahmanyam

View All Available Formats & Editions

Cross-cultural encounters in Europe and Asia in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries brought the potential for bafflement, hostility, and admiration. The court was the crucial site where expanding Eurasian states and empires met and were forced to make sense of one another. By looking at these interactions, Courtly Encounters provides a fresh


Cross-cultural encounters in Europe and Asia in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries brought the potential for bafflement, hostility, and admiration. The court was the crucial site where expanding Eurasian states and empires met and were forced to make sense of one another. By looking at these interactions, Courtly Encounters provides a fresh cross-cultural perspective on the worlds of early modern Islam, Counter-Reformation Catholicism, Protestantism, and a newly emergent Hindu sphere.

Both individual agents and objects such as texts and paintings helped mediate encounters between courts, which possessed rules and conventions that required decipherment and translation, whether in words or in pictures. Sanjay Subrahmanyam gives special attention to the depiction of South Asian empires in European visual representations, finding a complex history of cultural exchange: the Mughal paintings that influenced Rembrandt and other seventeenth-century Dutch painters had themselves been earlier influenced by Dutch naturalism. Courtly Encounters provides a rich array of images from Europe, the Islamic world, India, and Southeast Asia as aids for understanding the reciprocal nature of cross-cultural exchanges. It also looks closely at how insults and strategic use of martyrdom figured in courtly encounters.

As he sifts through the historical record, Subrahmanyam finds little evidence for the cultural incommensurability many ethnohistorians have insisted on. Most often, he discovers negotiated ways of understanding one another that led to mutual improvisation, borrowing, and eventually change.

Editorial Reviews

Jeremy Adelman
Every page of this book is like a voyage of discovery. Subrahmanyam illustrates how encounters between peoples did not just take place 'out there' in the peripheries of imperial systems, but also in the very nerve centers of power, the imperial courts of Eurasia. From Persia to Aceh, royal households were settings for the making of mutual perceptions of Muslims, Christians and Hindus—with powerful visual and textual accounts of sharing, killing, and martyrdom. While so much of world history accents the strangeness of global encounters, Subrahmanyam brilliantly illuminates how much intimacy was laced into the intrigue and violence of courtly systems.
David Nirenberg
No historian paints on a broader canvas, or with more pointillist precision, than Sanjay Subrahmanyam. His account of courtly cultural interaction ranges across centuries and continents, helping us understand encounters as divers as those of Moctezuma and Cortés, Timur the Great and the ambassadors of the Emperor Hung Wu. His theoretical acumen gives us new tools with which to think about the translation, transmission, and transformation of cultures. And his seemingly endless knowledge of sources in countless languages and artistic genres teaches us about the history of nearly everything, from the uses of gunpowder to the iconography of halos. Like a great museum, Courtly Encounters is a book to be visited again and again.
Pamela H. Smith
Through an intriguing set of early modern events and the texts and images that emerged from them, Courtly Encounters considers the commensurability of cultures, memory and forgetting, imperial court violence and intimacy, the language of martyrdom, and the ebb and flow of images, ideas, and texts back and forth across Eurasia. After a scholarly lifetime of seeking out connected histories, Sanjay Subrahmanyam is alive to the lived experience of the past and its capacity to upend historical accounts narrowed by visions of 'Europe' and 'Asia' as separate spheres with separated histories. All historians should pay attention to his conclusion that encounters between societies don't just happen, but are made, and they are made, not between whole societies, but in fragments and fractions, including at the individual level.
Francesca Trivellato
Subrahmanyam is a master historian to whom we owe yet another dazzling and penetrating account of how Europe and Asia interacted before modern colonialism. He unravels the creative and often idiosyncratic mix of emulation, coercion, and sheer improvisation that allowed people of disparate backgrounds to absorb and make sense of each other's traditions. Both the skeptics and the romantics in matters of cross-cultural encounters will find Courtly Encounters a rewarding and provocative read.
The Hindu - B. Surendra Rao
A splendid book of felicitous erudition and critical inquiry, which should make the readers think afresh...Courtly Encounters does not give a naïve picture of cultural assimilation. Nor does it suggest that cultural encounters and transactions should only be located in courtly high culture. Instead, it provides certain historical contexts, in which cultures meet, collide, coalesce, growl at each other and negotiate with one another at the same time, and with easy conscience...History playfully provides many instances of cultural encounters and dialogues. That history defies a single, simple narrative indeed constitutes its richness. This book decants it in full measure.

Product Details

Publication date:
Mary Flexner Lecture Series of Bryn Mawr College , #2
Edition description:
New Edition
Product dimensions:
5.60(w) x 8.30(h) x 1.30(d)

Read an Excerpt

From Chapter Four: Courtly Representations

In this chapter, we turn in a more purposeful manner to questions of long-distance cultural circulation between courts, and the closing of a rather wide circle. We have looked earlier at courtly exchanges and encounters in the context of the Deccan, and then with the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean world, extending into Southeast Asia. More generally, the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries witnessed a considerable quickening in intercontinental trade and the circulation of humans, other animals, plants, ships, commodities from bullion, guns and pepper to porcelain and furs, and even (some would say especially) microbes. In some instances, the situations in 1500 and 1700 were so radically apart that one can qualify the change as truly revolutionary; this is the case with the massive restructuring and even outright destruction of the fabric of pre-Columbian societies on the American continents over that period. In other cases, the pace of change was less dramatic but still appreciable. China and India had already been connected to the western Mediterranean in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, but the connection was a feeble one probably comprising a few dozen direct traders and travelers each year, while practically no ships made it from the Mediterranean or the seas west thereof to the Indian Ocean. By 1700, the extent of connection was far more considerable, and even Japan—reputedly in its “restricted” (kaikin or sakoku) phase—continued to maintain contact with Western Europe through the Dutch trading factory in Deshima. It is still our habit when we recount this history to present it essentially as one of a growing European presence in and influence on Asia (the so-called “expansion-and-reaction” paradigm), with relatively little attention to the closing of the circle. One can see why such a habit of thought persists; in comparison to a rather large number of Europeans in Asian waters, relatively few Asians made it to say Portugal or the Netherlands between 1500 and 1700. Fewer still lived to tell the tale, though we may have underestimated the numbers of those who did. One half of the circle is thus drawn perforce in far stronger traits than the other. This is however not a reason to ignore the many and interesting ways in which the circle was indeed closed. One of these was arguably through art and visual representation at the courtly level.

In order to further the analysis, a central notion that we can return to here is that of “incommensurability,” which we have already adverted to in our earlier discussion of Kuhn and Feyerabend, and their latter-day heirs. We have seen that Kuhn hesitated between an argument regarding the “indeterminacy of translation,” and the idea that incommensurability was in point of fact a failure of exact translation. From the latter position arose the development of the idea of “cultural incommensurability,” favouring a view in which cultures were seen as complexes that were both coherent in and of themselves and largely impermeable to others. Indeed, if they were permeated, the view was that this could only lead to forms of corruption or cultural degradation. Now, as it happens, the implications of ideas such as these for the study of early modern visual encounters and interactions in an inter-imperial context have largely remained unexplored. In particular, the tension between ideas of commensurability and agency would merit further investigation. But this would surely require us to focus on well-defined actors and particular actions and processes rather than paint cultural interaction itself, as it were, in broad brush-strokes.

Meet the Author

Sanjay Subrahmanyam is Professor and Doshi Chair of Indian History at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >