- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things [NOOK Book]
Available on NOOK devices and apps
Need a NOOK? Explore Now
Need a NOOK? Explore Now
At last. You have finally found the time to sink into your favorite armchair, relax, and pick up a book. Your daughter uses a computer in the next room while the baby crawls on the carpet and plays with a pile of colorful plastic toys. It certainly feels, at this moment, as if all is well. Could there be a more compelling picture of peace, comfort, and safety?
Let's take a closer look. First, that comfortable chair you are sitting on. Did you know that the fabric contains mutagenic materials, heavy metals, dangerous chemicals, and dyes that are often labeled hazardous by regulators — except when they are presented and sold to a customer? As you shift in your seat, particles of the fabric abrade and are taken up by your nose, mouth, and lungs, hazardous materials and all. Were they on the menu when you ordered that chair?
That computer your child is using — did you know that it contains more than a thousand different kinds of materials, including toxic gases, toxic metals (such as cadmium, lead, and mercury), acids, plastics, chlorinated and brominated substances, and other additives? The dust from some printer toner cartridges has been found to contain nickel, cobalt, and mercury, substances harmful to humans that your child may be inhaling as you read. Is this sensible? Is it necessary? Obviously, some of those thousand materials are essential to the functioning of the computer itself. What will happen to them when your family outgrows the computer in a few years? You will have little choice but to dispose of it, and both its valuable and its hazardous materials will be thrown "away." You wanted to use a computer, but somehow you have unwittingly become party to a process of waste and destruction.
But wait a minute — you care about the environment. In fact, when you went shopping for a carpet recently, you deliberately chose one made from recycled polyester soda bottles. Recycled? Perhaps it would be more accurate to say downcycled. Good intentions aside, your rug is made of things that were never designed with this further use in mind, and wrestling them into this form has required as much energy — and generated as much waste — as producing a new carpet. And all that effort has only succeeded in postponing the usual fate of products by a life cycle or two. The rug is still on its way to a landfill; it's just stopping off in your house en route. Moreover, the recycling process may have introduced even more harmful additives than a conventional product contains, and it might be off-gassing and abrading them into your home at an even higher rate.
The shoes you've kicked off on that carpet look innocuous enough. But chances are, they were manufactured in a developing country where occupational health standards — regulations that determine how much workers can be exposed to certain chemicals — are probably less stringent than in Western Europe or the United States, perhaps even nonexistent. The workers who made them wear masks that provide insufficient protection against the dangerous fumes. How did you end up bringing home social inequity and feelings of guilt when all you wanted was new footwear?
That plastic rattle the baby is playing with — should she be putting it in her mouth? If it's made of PVC plastic, there's a good chance it contains phthalates, known to cause liver cancer in animals (and suspected to cause endocrine disruption), along with toxic dyes, lubricants, antioxidants, and ultraviolet-light stabilizers. Why? What were the designers at the toy company thinking?
So much for trying to maintain a healthy environment, or even a healthy home. So much for peace, comfort, and safety. Something seems to be terribly wrong with this picture.
Now look at and feel the book in your hands.
This book is not a tree.
It is printed on a synthetic "paper" and bound into a book format developed by innovative book packager Charles Melcher of Melcher Media. Unlike the paper with which we are familiar, it does not use any wood pulp or cotton fiber but is made from plastic resins and inorganic fillers. This material is not only waterproof, extremely durable, and (in many localities) recyclable by conventional means; it is also a prototype for the book as a "technical nutrient," that is, as a product that can be broken down and circulated infinitely in industrial cycles made and remade as "paper" or other products.
The tree, among the finest of nature's creations, plays a crucial and multifaceted role in our interdependent ecosystem. As such, it has been an important model and metaphor for our thinking, as you will discover. But also as such, it is not a fitting resource to use in producing so humble and transient a substance as paper. The use of an alternative material expresses our intention to evolve away from the use of wood fibers for paper as we seek more effective solutions. It represents one step toward a radically different approach to designing and producing the objects we use and enjoy, an emerging movement we see as the next industrial revolution. This revolution is founded on nature's surprisingly effective design principles, on human creativity and prosperity, and on respect, fair play, and goodwill. It has the power to transform both industry and environmentalism as we know them.
Toward a New Industrial Revolution
We are accustomed to thinking of industry and the environment as being at odds with each other, because conventional methods of extraction, manufacture, and disposal are destructive to the natural world. Environmentalists often characterize business as bad and industry itself (and the growth it demands) as inevitably destructive.
On the other hand, industrialists often view environmentalism as an obstacle to production and growth. For the environment to be healthy, the conventional attitude goes, industries must be regulated and restrained. For industries to fatten, nature cannot take precedence. It appears that these two systems cannot thrive in the same world.
The environmental message that "consumers" take from all this can be strident and depressing: Stop being so bad, so materialistic, so greedy. Do whatever you can, no matter how inconvenient, to limit your "consumption." Buy less, spend less, drive less, have fewer children — or none. Aren't the major environmental problems today — global warming, deforestation, pollution, waste — products of your decadent Western way of life? If you are going to help save the planet, you will have to make some sacrifices, share some resources, perhaps even go without. And fairly soon you must face a world of limits. There is only so much the Earth can take.
Sound like fun? We have worked with both nature and commerce, and we don't think so.
Copyright (c) 2002 William McDonough & Michael Braungart
| Introduction: This Book Is Not a Tree | 3 | |
| Ch. 1 | A Question of Design | 17 |
| Ch. 2 | Why Being "Less Bad" Is No Good | 45 |
| Ch. 3 | Eco-Effectiveness | 68 |
| Ch. 4 | Waste Equals Food | 92 |
| Ch. 5 | Respect Diversity | 118 |
| Ch. 6 | Putting Eco-Effectiveness into Practice | 157 |
| Notes | 187 | |
| Acknowledgments | 193 |
Anonymous
Posted June 6, 2004
This is an extraordinary and unlikely book. It is not printed on paper, but on a waterproof polymer with the heft of good paper and more strength, a substance that reflects the right amount of light, yet holds the ink fast. It seems like an impossible fantasy, but so does much of what the authors propose about design and ecology. They speak with the calm certainty of the ecstatic visionary. Could buildings generate oxygen like trees? Could running shoes release nutrients into the earth? It seems like science fiction. Yet, here is this book, on this paper. The authors make a strong case for change, and just when you¿re about to say, ¿if only,¿ they cite a corporation that is implementing their ideas. However, it¿s hard to believe their concepts would work on a large scale, in the face of powerful economic disincentives. We believe authors do aim some of their criticism at obsolete marketing and manufacturing philosophies, but the overall critique is well worth reading.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted July 13, 2008
This book is a must for anyone who is looking to learn about what it TRULY means to be green. If you are a novice or a LOHAS addict, you will learn a lot about the environment, recycling/downcycling, and the future of product development.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 21, 2007
The material within the pages of the book was fascinating and true to the premise of the book the pages that the words were printed on truly carried out the message of sustainablity.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 26, 2006
Cradle to Cradle is truly one of a kind. McDonough and Braungart manage to convey a strong sense of environmentalism and pragmatism concurrently, looking out for the welfare of the planet and capitalist economy at the same time. They are pioneers in the sense of incorporating the environment and the economy, a connection that has been lacking for quite some time, and turning into one vehicle for our future progress.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted February 4, 2006
Beautiful and inspiring, I'm lucky that my sister's friend Rachel ever recommended this book to me! Innovative solutions to some of the biggest problems of the modern world are presented here. Right now we are living at odds with the eco-system and this book shows how we can all do a 180. Anyone who needs to feel a sense of hope and see that there is a lot of beauty in nature needs to pick up this book!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted March 28, 2003
This book is a must read for everyone who wishes to preserve this planet. Not at all like the usual environmentalist sobbing. Truly eye-opening and thought provoking. Not only does it tell of the multifarious injustices done to nature, it also provides a viable and feasible solution that should be implemeted by all.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted October 4, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 28, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 17, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted December 24, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted December 18, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted August 17, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted March 13, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted October 13, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted April 18, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted August 14, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted August 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted July 22, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted July 6, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted May 4, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Overview
A manifesto for a radically different philosophy and practice of manufacture and environmentalism
"Reduce, reuse, recycle" urge environmentalists; in other words, do more with less in order to minimize damage. As William McDonough and Michael Braungart argue in their provocative, visionary book, however, this approach perpetuates a one-way, "cradle to grave" manufacturing model that dates to the Industrial Revolution and casts off as much as 90 percent of the materials it uses as waste, much of it toxic. Why not challenge the notion that human ...