- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Crash Course: The American Automobile Industry's Road from Glory to Disaster [NOOK Book]
Available on NOOK devices and apps
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Timeline
1 Where the Weak Are Killed and Eaten 3
2 Dynasty and Destiny 14
3 Glory Days of Ponies and Goats 30
4 Crummy Cars and CAFE Society 45
5 Honda Comes to the Cornfields 63
6 Repentance, Rebirth, and Relapse 78
7 "Car Jesus" and the Rise of the SUV 99
8 Potholes and Missed Opportunities 116
9 From Riches to Rags 136
10 The Hurricane That Hit Detroit 161
11 Chapter 11? 191
12 As the Precipice Approaches 216
10 Bailouts, Bankruptcies, and Beyond 244
Afterword: Another Chance 275
Acknowledgments 281
Notes 283
Index 293
Anonymous
Posted November 19, 2010
I read and reread a book co-authored by Mr. Ingrassia called Comeback, The Fall and Rise of the American Auto Industry which I thought to be a fascinating behind the scenes look at the decline of the American auto companies in the 1980s and their upturn in the 1990s. It's depth really made sense in explaining why GM was near bankruptcy in 1992, or why Chrysler was in a world of hurt by 1990.
I have found Crash Course to be lacking in the depth of scope that was covered by Comeback, and the writing style somewhat subpar to that in Comeback. In a particular lacking area is the saga of General Motors. While some points are very valid (half-measures and reluctancy to get tough with the UAW) much is just simply left out.
Cases in point:
- GM CEO Jack Smith: Achieved a miraculous financial turnaround at GM in the early 1990s. However, this was done largely by cutting costs at all levels, including R&D and product development. While the short term numbers generated by this cost cutting were good, it turned people off to GM cars as feeling cheap. The overly bland styling of most GM cars of the 1990s did not help. To be sure, all you need to do is look at a 1999 Malibu verses a 2009 Malibu, or a 1999 Suburban vs. a 2009 model. Model years are 10 apart, but interior quality and overall build quality are light years ahead in the 2009 model. The bland, cheap feeling product is a critical fact in explaining GM's fall and is all but ignored in this book.
- GM CEO Rick Wagoner: Much time and energy is spent by the author making him into this terribly incompetent CEO. But by ignoring the fact in the above point, the author essentially ignores the fact that Mr. Wagoner had to rebuild the product lineup from the ground up when he took over, and do it within the constraints of a 85+ year old company with all its financial liabilities, and historical and perceptual liabilities. Not an easy task for anyone, and certainly made even more difficult by the size and complexity of GM itself. But, if you look at the product right now, on November 19, 2010, no one can argue that Rick Wagoner's efforts were not successful in this area. Remember, a car typically takes four years to bring to market. Everything you see GM producing is something Rick Wagoner approved. The Volt, the Camaro, the CTS, the new crop of Buicks (Regal, LaCrosse, and Enclave) to name a few are all wildly successful. All of that is totally ignored by the author.
Adding to the author's lack of credibility is a part of the book where he discusses the auto task force created by President Obama. Surpringly, even here, in the context of 2009, the author knocks GM as having a few standout products (like the new Malibu) stuffed in with many "yawners" like the Pontiac Bonneville. Why is this a credibility issue? Well, the Bonneville production stopped in 2005, four years prior to the writing of this book. Making mention of it as if it was still in the lineup is just not factually correct. In fact, I'm hard pressed to name "many yawners" in the GM lineup today.
In summary, not a book I will be re-reading any time soon, unlike Comeback, which was co-authored with Joseph B White. The writing style is bland, facts omitted, and other points made that are just not factually correct in the first place.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 28, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 7, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted April 9, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 25, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted September 23, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted October 3, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted February 13, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted October 25, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 10, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted March 1, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted May 17, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 10, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 23, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 30, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted August 20, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 31, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Overview
With an updated Afterword by the author.This is the epic saga of the American automobile industry’s rise and demise, a compelling story of hubris, missed opportunities, and self-inflicted wounds that culminates with the president of the United States ushering two of Detroit’s Big Three car companies—once proud symbols of prosperity—through bankruptcy. With unprecedented access, Pulitzer Prize winner Paul Ingrassia takes us from factory floors to small-town dealerships to Detroit’s boardrooms to the White House. Ingrassia answers the big questions: Was Detroit’s self-destruction inevitable? What were the key turning points? Why did Japanese automakers ...