BN.com Gift Guide

Creation and Change: Genesis 1:1-2.4 in the Light of Changing Scientific Paradigms

Paperback (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $1.99
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 88%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (15) from $1.99   
  • New (7) from $9.50   
  • Used (8) from $1.99   

Overview

In this book Professor Douglas Kelly persuasively argues for a literal interpretation of the seven day account of creation found in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. He assesses both the biblical details and the scientific data to show that there is a convincing case for this understanding and how it is scientifically viable.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
"I greatly appreciate the content as well as the style of this book. It is the best work that I have read on this subject. The author's statements concerning the role of faith in science are very important; the subject is frequently misunderstood. With regard to this exegesis of the biblical text I hope that Douglas Kelly's courageous voice will be listened to." ~ Frederick N. Skiff, Professor of Physics, University of Iowa
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781857922837
  • Publisher: Christian Focus Publications
  • Publication date: 5/20/2004
  • Pages: 240
  • Sales rank: 1,434,341
  • Product dimensions: 5.35 (w) x 8.54 (h) x 0.59 (d)

Meet the Author

Douglas F. Kelly is the Richard Jordan Professor of Theology, Reformed Theological Seminary, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 11, 1999

    Hebrew scholar backs literal Genesis

    <p align='justify'> The main thesis of Dr Kelly¿s book is that the author of the Hebrew text of Genesis 1:1¿2:4 can only have intended to write a straightforward, historical account. Although many modern theologians claim that Genesis is poetry, it has none of the hallmarks of Hebrew poetry, such as parallelism. Dr Kelly backs this up by sound linguistic analysis. He quotes an earlier authority as saying:</p> <dir><p align='justify'> <FONT COLOR='#800080'>`the man who says</font> <FONT COLOR='#008000'>¿I believe that Genesis purports to be a historical account, but I do not believe that account¿</font><FONT COLOR='#800080'> is a far better interpreter of the Bible than the man who says, `I believe that Genesis is profoundly true, but it is poetry.¿</FONT></p></dir> <p align='justify'> Also, Dr Kelly painstakingly documents the history of interpretation of Genesis, and shows that the almost uniform view throughout the church era was that it was intended to mean what it said. Long age and theistic evolutionary interpretations were invented only after long ages/evolutionary views became fashionable. That is, the interpreters were trying to read things from outside Scripture into the text. So they ceased to regard Scripture as authoritative, so were effectively if unwittingly contradicting Christ, e.g. John 10:35. Instead, they regarded man¿s (fallible) interpretation of nature as authoritative. How can anyone be a consistent follower of Christ if he denies what Christ believed about Scripture, including Genesis 1 and 2 (see Matthew 19:3¿6, Mark 10:2¿9)?</p> <p align='justify'> Dr Kelly quotes not only evangelicals, but liberals like the 19<sup>th</sup> century exegete Prof. Marcus Dods, who wrote that any interpretations of Genesis 1:1¿2:4 that deny the straightforward meaning were `futile and mischievous¿, and that they:</p> <dir><p align='justify'><FONT COLOR='#008000'>`do violence to Scripture [and] foster a style of interpretation by which the text is forced to say what the interpreter desires.¿</FONT></p></dir> <p align='justify'>Dods also said,</p> <dir> <p align='justify'><FONT COLOR='#008000'>`if, for example, the word 'day' in these chapters does not mean a period of twenty-four hours, the interpretation of Scripture is hopeless.¿</FONT></p></dir> <p align='justify'>We can see the results in seminary after seminary ¿ when one generation denied the plain meaning of the creation account, the next generation or two denied the plain meaning of the accounts of Christ¿s bodily resurrection and virginal conception.</p> <p align='justify'> Dr Kelly is highly qualified to write about the theological aspects of Genesis ¿ he is Professor of Systematic Theology at Reformed Theological Seminary, Charlotte, North Carolina. He cites a number of Church Fathers and Reformers, as well as the expert Jewish commentor Cassuto. <p align='justify'> Although he is not a scientist himself, he augments his case with examples of design in biology expounded by people like the biochemicst Dr Michael Behe. The main materialistic argument against Behe has nothing to do with real science, but an <i>a priori</i> rejection of a Designer. Behe, although not a biblical creationist, has faced the same sort of academic arrogance, argument from authority and chronological snobbery faced by defenders of biblical creation.</p> <p align='justify'> However, since science is not Dr Kelly's forté, it¿s to be expected that there are some inaccuracies. But these have been pointed out by creationist scientists themselves! See the review by Dr Carl Wieland, CEO of <i>Answers in Genesis</i> (Australia), in <I>Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal</I> 12(2):52¿54, 1998 (posted on the <i>Answers in Genesis</i> and Tru

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)