Cruciverbalism: A Crossword Fanatic's Guide to Life in the Grid

( 3 )


If you love crosswords, Cruciverbalism is bound to enhance your puzzling pleasure. Acclaimed crossword expert Stanley Newman takes you behind the grid to show what really makes crossword puzzles (and their creators) tick—and offers proven strategies that will make you a better solver.

Stan reveals…

The untold story of the victory of the young crossword Turks over puzzledom's Old Guard, paving the way for the lively, contemporary crosswords you ...

See more details below
This Hardcover is Not Available through
Note: This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but may have slight markings from the publisher and/or stickers showing their discounted price. More about bargain books


If you love crosswords, Cruciverbalism is bound to enhance your puzzling pleasure. Acclaimed crossword expert Stanley Newman takes you behind the grid to show what really makes crossword puzzles (and their creators) tick—and offers proven strategies that will make you a better solver.

Stan reveals…

The untold story of the victory of the young crossword Turks over puzzledom's Old Guard, paving the way for the lively, contemporary crosswords you enjoy today…Why it's become a tradition for daily newspaper puzzles to increase in difficulty during the week…Common solving mistakes, and why it's better to focus on one area of a puzzle at a time…Why you shouldn't feel guilty about consulting "performance-enhancing" reference works…100 Essential Words crossworders need to know…The woman who made crosswords what they are today…The hidden rules of the grid that will make you a better clue sleuth, including Evocatives, Partials, Hedgers, and the rare but devious Basic Confusables…The five championship-clinching traits of the gridmasters…and more.

You'll even discover a philosophy for approaching crosswords that, come to think of it, works pretty well for life, too—and makes it a lot of fun!

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
Crossword puzzlers come in all shapes and sizes: Casual weekend dabblers, commuters who take their puzzles with morning coffee, seven-day fanatics who know a 12-letter word for the study of puzzles. Cruciverbalism serves as a road map to these wondrous grids and the people who knot their brows trying to solve them. Newsday crossword editor Stanley Newman and Wall Street Journal deputy books editor Mark Lasswell present crosswords from both sides of the board; from puzzle creators to puzzle solvers. Populist enigmatology.
Publishers Weekly
Crossword puzzle fans will eat up this entertaining stew of history, arcana and personalities in this memoir-cum-instruction manual by longtime Newsday crossword editor Newman and Wall Street Journal deputy books editor Lasswell. And woven into the mix is a great lesson in how to engineer a midlife career switch. Newman, an advocate of "new wave" crosswords, gleefully describes his "war" with "pedantic" Eugene Maleska, the New York Times crossword editor from 1977 to 1993, a David-vs.-Goliath tale. But Newman doesn't neglect the nuts and bolts about difficulty levels (contrary to popular belief, Sunday isn't the hardest puzzle of the week: it's about midweek-level, but bigger), the types of clues used by constructors and the most effective ways to approach puzzle solving (start with an easy clue and try to fill in that entire section before moving on). Newman touts the health benefits of puzzling, citing studies that show it can help ward off Alzheimer's and senile dementia. He also provides some interesting trivia bits, among them, that the late Seagram's chairman Edgar Bronfman's passion for puzzles helped Newman finance a Lincoln Town Car, and many of the puzzles appearing in daily newspapers are constructed by prison inmates. (Nov.) Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
“Crossword puzzle fans--solvers and constructors alike--will find a wealth of useful tips in this book.”
Boston Globe
“A breezy insider’s look at the puzzlers’ small world, along with some tips to improve your own performance.”
New York Times
“Cruciverbalism could be neatly encapsulated in three lines: ‘Obsessive wordsmith/Enraged by stuffy old clues/Thinks outside the grid.’”
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780641905766
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
  • Publication date: 10/31/2006
  • Pages: 160
  • Product dimensions: 5.80 (w) x 7.10 (h) x 0.60 (d)

Meet the Author

Acclaimed puzzle creator, editor, and publisher Stanley Newman is crossword editor for Newsday, with puzzles syndicated worldwide. He holds the world record for the fastest completion of a New York Times crossword.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt


A Crossword Fanatic's Guide to Life in the Grid
By Stanley Newman Mark Lasswell


Copyright © 2006 Stanley Newman Mark Lasswell
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-06-089060-6

Chapter One

Crossfire: The Pipsqueak Manifesto

I remember the date when I declared war on the New York Times crossword puzzle: October 19, 1984. It was the day of the LOA outrage. My annoyance with the Times puzzle was simmering much of that fall-who can forget the affront to Good Times TV star Jimmie Walker, lumped into the clue "Comedian or former N.Y. mayor" for an answer that employed the less-than-dy-no-mite! spelling, Jimmy Walker? Then there was the infamous "parting words" clue for farewell, an answer that a plurality of solvers-and lexicographers-would regard as one word. But LOA was what pushed me over the edge. Or, rather, its clue did: "Seat of Wayne County, Utah."

Now, in the course of building a crossword puzzle, it is sometimes necessary to include the sequence L-O-A when you've got an exquisite stack of words that will work only if you can keep those three letters in the mix. Fair enough. The painless tradition is to give the clue "Mauna ___," for the famous volcano in Hawaii, and move on. No doubt Times puzzle editor Eugene Maleska wanted to find a fresh way of cluing LOA. But "Seat of Wayne County, Utah" was beyond the pale. Aside from the 364 residents of Loa, Utah, at the time (I looked it up) and possibly a few cross-country truckdrivers, it was unlikely that anyone who sat down with the Times puzzle that day would have known the three-letter answer to the Wayne County clue.

A small matter, you say? Ha! The LOA incident epitomized what was ailing the sickly Times puzzle in those days. A formerly grand institution known for its daring innovations, delightful wordplay, and all-around cerebrally stimulating fun had been reduced to this: A three-block dead zone in the puzzle, where you could get the L and O and still not be sure of the answer unless your last name was Rand or McNally. Getting it right depended entirely on answering the crossing words correctly-and spelling them right, too, since you had no way of knowing if the seat of Wayne County was correctly spelled LOA, LOB, or LOC-or LOX, LOY, or LOZ, for that matter. That was a sorry predicament, but the truly annoying thing about the clue was what it reflected about the Times puzzle. You didn't know what the seat of Wayne County was, you didn't care what the seat of Wayne County was once you'd learned it, and you wouldn't ever use that information again in your life unless it came up again in the Times puzzle. Mauna Loa, on the other hand, was a place of some renown-there was a certain value attached to it beyond its use in puzzling; you might hope to visit it one day on a vacation in Hawaii, or you might feel you'd learned something interesting if, in a well-crafted puzzle, you found out that the phrase "mauna loa" means "long mountain." My apologies to the people of Loa, but "Seat of Wayne County, Utah" was a useless piece of information that made it into the Times puzzle solely because Eugene Maleska took a pedant's pleasure in flummoxing other people with obscure facts.

When the Wayne County crime against crosswords was committed, I had been publishing a newsletter, the Crossworder's Own Newsletter, for less than a year. Occasionally I'd take potshots at the Times puzzles for mistakes, pointless trivia, and their seeming hostility toward-or outright ignorance of-the contemporary world (Maleska once rejected a puzzle because he maintained that one answer, car seat, was a "forced" concept dreamed up by the puzzler. Tell that to his kids.). But now, post-LOA, I took up the battle against the Times as a crusade. Resentment against Maleska's regime had been brewing for years in the puzzle community, but taking on the Bigfoot of the business directly was considered lunacy. A strange parallel world had developed in the early 1980s as the best solvers and puzzlemakers in the country began flocking to Games magazine, even as the Times-which these aficionados had once revered-continued to reign in the public's mind as the ultimate in puzzling. It was still the most prestigious showcase for puzzlemakers.

I knew a lot of the expert puzzlers because I had taken up crosswords with a passion a few years earlier-becoming a cruciverbalist, as crossword enthusiasts sometimes like to call themselves-after having been just a casual solver in the past. But I did have a competitive streak and a good memory for the sort of facts that crop up in puzzles, and after entering a crossword contest on a whim in 1981, I was hooked. (The American Crossword Puzzle Tournament in Stamford, Connecticut, only a few years old at that point, has since become an institution among puzzlers and is still held at the Stamford Marriott each March.) I threw myself into learning how to solve puzzles faster, began building a collection of many hundreds of notecards recording unfamiliar words I encountered-yes, I was a tad obsessive about it-and in a matter of months I was winning tournaments. The quality of the puzzles at the tournaments, the fascinating people who made them and solved them, the general atmosphere of sparky intelligence and good humor at the events-all of this seemed worlds away from the dreary Times puzzle emanating from West 43rd Street in Manhattan seven days a week. The very people who were so lively and brilliant at the tournaments were often the same folks sending puzzles they'd constructed to Maleska and crossing their fingers in the hope that they hadn't violated any of his myriad strictures, thus inviting another one of his infamously vicious rejection letters.

This was an era when typical clues at the Times would refer to a "Famed soprano" or "First words of St. John's Gospel, Latin" (Answer: In principio erat). Fun, eh? Meanwhile, in what amounted to an underground movement, crossword tournaments were beginning to take off. The American Crossword Puzzle Tournament was ...


Excerpted from Cruciverbalism by Stanley Newman Mark Lasswell Copyright © 2006 by Stanley Newman Mark Lasswell. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4.5
( 3 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)