Da Vinci Code Controversy: 10 Facts You Should Know


Get the facts behind the sensational fiction! Dan Brown's novel, The DaVinci Code, has stormed the bestseller charts and both the book and upcoming film claim to be based on truth, a truth shocking enough to rock the foundations of Christianity. What is the truth? Could you defend your faith if challenged by those who believe Brown's fiction? Use this brief, practical book as a tool to begin conversations, to explain your beliefs, or to get the facts straight.
See more details below
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (20) from $1.99   
  • New (7) from $1.99   
  • Used (13) from $1.99   
The Da Vinci Code Controversy: 10 Facts You Should Know

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook - New Edition)
BN.com price
(Save 14%)$5.24 List Price


Get the facts behind the sensational fiction! Dan Brown's novel, The DaVinci Code, has stormed the bestseller charts and both the book and upcoming film claim to be based on truth, a truth shocking enough to rock the foundations of Christianity. What is the truth? Could you defend your faith if challenged by those who believe Brown's fiction? Use this brief, practical book as a tool to begin conversations, to explain your beliefs, or to get the facts straight.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780802448590
  • Publisher: Moody Publishers
  • Publication date: 5/28/2006
  • Pages: 74
  • Product dimensions: 5.10 (w) x 7.90 (h) x 0.30 (d)

Meet the Author

MICHAEL EASLEY received his Bachelor of Science in education from Stephen F. Austin State University, and his Master of Theology and Doctor of Ministry degree from Dallas Theological Seminary. He served as Senior Pastor at Grand Prairie Bible Church and Immanuel Bible before becoming the eighth president of Moody Bible Institute. In January 2009, he became the Teaching Pastor at Fellowship Bible Church in Nashville, TN. Dr. Easley has authored two books: Interludes, Prayers and Reflections of a Servant's Heart and The DaVinci Code Controversy. Dr. Easley and his wife, Cindy, were married in 1980, and together they are raising four children.

JOHN ANKERBERG (B.A., University of Illinois; M.A., and M.Div., Trinity Evangelical School; D.Min., Bethel Theological Seminary) is the president and founder of The Ankerberg Theological Research Institute and the producer and host of the nationally televised John Ankerberg Show. He is the author, co-author and/or editor of 76 books, including Middle East Meltdown, The Da Vinci Code Controversy and Ready with An Answer for the Tough Questions About God. John and his wife, Darlene, have one daughter and reside in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Da Vinci Code Controversy

10 Facts You Should Know
By Michael J. Easley John Ankerberg Dillon Burroughs

Moody Publishers

Copyright © 2006 Michael J. Easley and John Ankerburg
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-8024-4859-3

Chapter One

Fact #1 The Bible Is Complete and Accurate

"The Bible is a product of man ... not of God." (DVC, 231)

"To rewrite the history books, Constantine knew be would need a bold stroke. From this sprang the most profound moment in Christian history ... Constantine commissioned and financed a new Bible, which omitted those gospels that spoke of Christ's human traits and embellished those gospels that made Him godlike. The earlier gospels were outlawed, gathered up, and burned." (DVC, 345)

"The New Testament is based on fabrications." (DVC, 341)

Welcome to the world of The Da Vinci Code! Could such statements be based on fact? Unfortunately, many have wholeheartedly bought into The Da Vinci Code's idea that much of the Bible includes later editing that created the text and beliefs we hold today. However, when we cross the line from fiction to facts, we quickly discover that the claims made in Dan Brown's best seller are just that-fiction.

One reason we may feel frustrated about challenges like The Da Vinci Code is that we do not knowhow we received the Bible. How was the Bible created, written, and handed down over the generations? If challenged by a friend or coworker about the Bible's origins, would you have the basic information to explain what you believe?

If you are unsure of how to respond, you're not alone. A recent study revealed that fewer than 24 percent of American Christians can accurately answer key questions regarding core Christian beliefs. So to help in our understanding of how the Bible originally came about, let's discover what is not true and what is true about the Bible as addressed in The Da Vinci Code.

The Fiction

"The Bible ... has evolved through countless translations, additions, and revisions. History has never had a definitive version of the book." (DVC, 231)

The Da Vinci Code claims that Emperor Constantine attempted to destroy any gospel records that differed from his choices, but that the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hammadi texts preserve additional information about Christ. Nothing could be further from the truth.

First, many documents called the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered between 1947 and 1956. These extremely well-preserved documents-many complete sections and literally thousands of fragments-are ancient Hebrew texts written before the life of Christ. (The most remarkable is a complete copy of the book of Isaiah on display in the Israel Museum, Jerusalem.) Considered by scholars a major discovery for Old Testament research, these scrolls include some of the earliest manuscripts of many Old Testament Bible books. Their most significant contribution to historical research has actually been to confirm the accuracy of other Old Testament texts handed down by Jewish rabbis. The Da Vinci Code's claim that these scrolls contained extra gospels is impossible, since they were written approximately two hundred years before Jesus lived in Israel. The Da Vinci Code is either wrong-or lying. Constantine would likely have not even known they existed.

Second, the Nag Hammadi documents were Gnostic texts containing religious writings from over a hundred years after the earthly life of Christ. Most were written by authors other than those claimed by each book. No critical scholars agree that the Gospel of Thomas, for instance, was actually written by the apostle Thomas. Between AD 100 and AD 250, several books were written with the name of an apostle attached to them to lend a stamp of authenticity to the writing.

Third, the historical works on the Council of Nicaea never mention arguments over which books to include in the New Testament or disputes regarding other Gnostic books. In fact, only two people of the over three hundred in attendance disagreed on the final decision regarding the Nicene Creed. This could hardly be called a conspiracy!

The Facts

"All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17

"Since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught." Luke 1:3-4

So if the Bible didn't emerge from conspiracy and political motives, how did it come into being? First, we must recognize that the Bible is unique among all the ancient books of the world. The Bible was written by forty authors over a period of 1,500 years. To find the Bible without error and in agreement in its essentials can only be explained through God's supernatural intervention.

How did the twenty-seven New Testament books come down to us and result in the present form? Everything starts with Jesus. Most scholars hold that Jesus' earthly ministry began when He was in His late twenties. He chose twelve apostles to follow Him and learn from Him over a three-year period. The New Testament books are intimately connected to the Twelve: those who walked with Jesus.

Who Wrote the New Testament? The twenty-seven books have nine basic sources.

Two apostles, Matthew and John, wrote gospels. John also wrote three letters and Revelation. Peter authored two letters and was a source for Mark's gospel. Peter also recognized Paul's writings as Scripture (2 PETER 3:16).

Luke based his gospel on the eyewitness testimony of the apostles. He was also a traveling companion of the apostle Paul. Paul later quotes Luke's gospel as Scripture in 1 Timothy 5:18.

James and Jude were human brothers of Jesus. James did not believe Jesus was the Christ until after Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to him personally. James later became bishop of the Jerusalem church and wrote the New Testament book of James. Jude believed after the resurrection as well, writing the book that bears his name.

The author of Hebrews was well-known to the recipients of his teachings, but not to everyone in the early church, which delayed the epistle's immediate acceptance. Many claim the author was Barnabas, a fellow missionary with Paul. Others believe Apollos wrote it during his early year with Paul in Corinth. Whoever wrote the book of Hebrews had direct contact with an apostle.

Nine individuals wrote the twenty-seven books received by the churches as Scripture. All the New Testament books were written approximately AD 50 to 80. Only John's gospel was written in the 90s, but all of these books were received by different church congregations and in circulation before AD 95. Within approximately one generation of the New Testament's completion, every book had been cited by a church father. In AD 367 Athanasius wrote an authoritative list of these twenty-seven books.

World-renowned scholars affirm that the Scriptures were not mishandled or mistranslated as they were copied and handed down. After examining and comparing the New Testament documents with other books of ancient history, Sir Frederick Kenyon, formerly director and principal librarian of the British Museum, stated:

In no other case is the interval of time between the composition of the book and the date of the earliest extant [the oldest texts that exist today] manuscripts so short as in that of the New Testament. The interval, then, between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence become so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down to us substantially as they were written, has now been removed. Both the authenticity and the general integrity of the books of the New Testament may be regarded as finally established.

When The Da Vinci Code suggests the Bible's final content was decided on at Nicaea, it's untrue. All but two of 318 church leaders held to the divinity of Jesus as worded in the Nicene Creed. The real reason these church leaders gathered was to settle a dispute with Arius, a man who argued that Jesus was a created being rather than the Creator of all things. This assertion stood in opposition to the apostles, including John, who wrote, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made" (JOHN 1:1-3). If He is Creator, then He could not create Himself. In staying true to the apostles' teaching, these bishops affirmed that Jesus was of the same nature as God rather than a similar nature.

How do we know the books in the Old Testament are from God? Norman Geisler presents the case about the facts of the Old Testament this way:

Jesus taught definitely that God was the originator of the Hebrew Old Testament. He taught as authoritative or authentic most of the books of the Hebrew canon ... he asserted that the Old Testament as a whole was unbreakable Scripture (JOHN 10:35); that it would never perish (MATTHEW 5:18); and that it must be fulfilled (LUKE 24:44) ... Jesus not only defined the limits ... but he laid down the principle of canonicity.

In Matthew 5:17-19 Jesus speaks of the inspiration of God's Word in the Old Testament. "Inspiration," notes Charles Ryrie, "is ... God's superintendence of the human authors so that, using their own individual personalities, they composed and recorded without error His revelation to man in the words of the original autographs." Several additional New Testament passages affirm this teaching.

When researching the New Testament, you will find that the number of early texts far exceeds that of any other work in history. The earliest fragments of the gospel of John emerge from within one generation of the apostle John's life (approximately AD 125).

In total, over 5,300 Greek texts (the original New Testament language), 10,000 Latin texts, and 9,300 other versions exist from the early history of the church. In comparison, of sixteen well-known classical Greek authors, the typical number of early copies is fewer than ten, with the earliest copies dating from 750 to 1600 years after the originals were written.

Outside of the New Testament, several additional early writings connect with the events of historic Christianity. The second generation of Christianity includes eight clear sources supporting its authority.

Why are the church fathers important?

The church fathers were first-, second-, and third-generation church leaders and followers of the apostles who personally served with Jesus. In addition to spreading the teachings as taught directly from the apostles, they help affirm the acceptance and accuracy of the New Testament text from frequent references in their writings. For instance, Irenaeus (AD 170) quoted twenty-three of the twenty-seven New Testament books less than a hundred years after the writing of the New Testament books, meaning that he had access to this many books together within a generation of the apostles. This would have been a tremendous accomplishment for a culture whose writings could only be spread through handwritten copies! Some of the early leading church fathers (and sources) include ...

1. CLEMENT. He was a leading elder in the church at Rome. In his epistle to the Corinthians (AD 95), he cites portions of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and introduces them as the actual words of Jesus. 2. PAPIAS. He was bishop of Hierapolis in Phrygia and author of Exposition of Oracles of the Lord (AD 130), citing the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, presumably as accepted works. He specifically refers to John's gospel as containing the words of Jesus. 3. JUSTIN MARTYR. He was the best-known defender of Christianity in the second century (AD 140) and considered all four gospels to be Scripture. 4. THE DIDACHE. This served as an ancient manual of Christianity that dates between the end of the first century and the beginning of the second century. It cites portions of the first three gospels, referring to them as the words of Jesus, and quotes extensively from the gospel of Matthew. 5. POLYCARP. A student of the apostle John, he quotes portions of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, referring to them as the very words of Jesus (AD 150). 6. IRENAEUS. A student of Polycarp (AD 170), he quotes from twenty-three of the twenty-seven New Testament books, omitting only the shortest New Testament books such as Philemon and 3 John. 7. THE MURATORIAN FRAGMENT. Dating to about AD 175, it includes Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John as the four gospels. In total, this list includes twenty-three of the twenty-seven New Testament books. 8. PAPYRUS 45. This fragment, dated around AD 200, includes all four gospels together.

New Testament Greek scholar Kurt Aland comments that the New Testament "was not imposed from the top, be it by bishops or synods, and then accepted by the communities.... The organized church did not create the canon [New Testament]; it recognized the canon that had been created."

But just how were the New Testament books selected? How can we know that these books are accurate and reliably the Word of God? The basic historical rules that guided recognition of the canon are as follows, listed in question format:

1. Was the book written or supported by a prophet or apostle of God? This was the most important factor. The reasoning here is that the Word of God which is inspired by the Spirit of God for the people of God must be communicated through a person of God. Second Peter 1:20-21 assures us that Scripture is only written by God's people. In Galatians the apostle Paul argued support for the book of Galatians by appealing to the fact that he was an authorized messenger of God, an apostle. 2. Is the book authoritative? In other words, can it be said of the book as it was said of Jesus, "The people were amazed at his teaching, because he taught them as one who had authority, not as the teachers of the law" (MARK 1:22). Put another way, does this book ring with the sense of "The Lord says ..."? 3. Does the book tell the truth about God consistent with previous revelation? A group called the Bereans searched the Old Testament Scriptures to determine whether Paul's teaching was true (ACTS 17:11). They knew that if Paul's teaching did not resonate with the Old Testament writings, it could not be of God. Agreement with all earlier revelation was essential (GALATIANS 1:8). 4. Does the book give evidence of having the power of God? Any writing that does not exhibit the transforming power of God in the lives of its readers could not have come from God. Scripture says that the Word of God is "living and active" (HEBREWS 4:12). Second Timothy 3:16-17 indicates that God's Word has a transforming effect. If the book in question did not have the power to change a life, then the book could not have come from God. 5. Was the book accepted by the people of God? In Old Testament times, Moses' scrolls were immediately placed into the ark of the covenant (DEUTERONOMY 31:24-26), as were Joshua's (JOSHUA 24:26). In the New Testament, Paul thanked the Thessalonians for receiving his message as the Word of God (1 THESSALONIANS 2:13). Paul's letters were also circulated among the churches (COLOSSIANS 4:16: 1 THESSALONIANS 5:27). It was common that the majority of God's people would initially accept God's Word.


Excerpted from The Da Vinci Code Controversy by Michael J. Easley John Ankerberg Dillon Burroughs Copyright © 2006 by Michael J. Easley and John Ankerburg. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)