Dark Cosmos: In Search of Our Universe's Missing Mass and Energy

Dark Cosmos: In Search of Our Universe's Missing Mass and Energy

by Dan Hooper
     
 

View All Available Formats & Editions

Everyone knows that there are things no one can see, for example, the air you're breathing or a black hole, to be more exotic. But not everyone knows that what we can see makes up only 5 percent of the Universe. The rest is totally invisible to us.

The invisible stuff comes in two varieties—dark matter and dark energy. One holds the Universe together while

See more details below

Overview

Everyone knows that there are things no one can see, for example, the air you're breathing or a black hole, to be more exotic. But not everyone knows that what we can see makes up only 5 percent of the Universe. The rest is totally invisible to us.

The invisible stuff comes in two varieties—dark matter and dark energy. One holds the Universe together while the other tears it apart. What these forces really are has been a mystery for as long as anyone has suspected they were there, but the latest discoveries of experimental physics have brought us closer to that knowledge. Particle physicist Dan Hooper takes his readers, with wit, grace, and a keen knack for explaining the toughest ideas science has to offer, on a quest few would ever have expected: to discover what makes up our dark cosmos.

Editorial Reviews

SEED Magazine
A Notable Book of 2006
Publishers Weekly
As Fermi Lab astrophysicist Hooper tells readers, the mass in any solid object, like a chair or a table, makes up only about 4% of the universe. The other 96% of the cosmos consists of invisible "dark matter" and "dark energy." Scientists have known about dark matter for a long time; some minigalaxies are composed almost entirely of the stuff. Dark energy is a more recent discovery: it's what seems to be pushing the universe apart faster and faster. Hooper explains why he and his colleagues have ruled out many leading candidates for the constituent particles of dark matter, like neutrinos. Today they are betting on particles called superpartners that bear Seussian names like sneutrinos, zinos and Higgsinos. Some researchers believe the missing mass may just be ordinary matter moving through the extra dimensions posited by string theory. Dark energy, which accounts for two-thirds of the energy in the universe, presents even more of a mystery. According to the author, some scientists have theorized that multiple universes may play a role. Hooper's clear presentation in very simple, jargon-free prose should appeal especially to young people just starting to get excited about the mysteries that still await them in science. (Nov. 1) Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
Library Journal
Hooper, a young theoretical astrophysicist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, helps us recall our sense of wonder at the universe with this enthusiastic tribute to the arduous, mind-expanding field of cosmology. Hooper introduces and briefly analyzes conflicting cosmological theories quintessence theory, anthropic principle, Copernican principle and lightly touches on the theological, nonscientific idea of Intelligent Design. In recounting major discoveries, he wisely pays attention to the scientific contributions of both men and women. He ends his work with a call for more research and discovery. Hooper's book is comparable to fellow physicist Lawrence Krauss's popular works (The Physics of Star Trek) in its sense of fun and its accessibility to the lay reader. (Krauss contributed the introduction to Dark Cosmos.) Recommended for public and academic libraries. Sara Rutter, Univ. of Hawaii Lib. at Manoa, Honolulu Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
Seed Magazine
A Notable Book of 2006

Read More

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780061130335
Publisher:
HarperCollins Publishers
Publication date:
10/30/2007
Edition description:
Reprint
Pages:
256
Sales rank:
1,374,184
Product dimensions:
5.31(w) x 8.00(h) x 0.57(d)

Read an Excerpt

Dark Cosmos

In Search of Our Universe's Missing Mass and Energy
By Dan Hooper

HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.

Copyright © 2006 Dan Hooper
All right reserved.

ISBN: 006113032X

Chapter One

Our Dark Universe

The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes. --Sherlock Holmes

Take a look around you. You see a world full of things. Tables, chairs, the floor, a cup of coffee, shoes, bicycles--things. Most of us casually think of the world as space filled with such things, the sort of stuff you can hold in your hand or stub your toe on. But how much of our world is really made up of objects that you can see? Think of the air you're breathing. It's invisible. Nevertheless, it is there, even if your experience of it is somewhat indirect as your chest expands and contracts, and your breath whistles through your nose. The visible world is not all there is to the Universe. Relying solely on our eyes to learn what's out there would cause us to overlook a great deal.

Although the point I'm making might seem obvious, it is one worth bearing in mind. Just as we cannot see the air, we cannot see most of the Universe. During the past several de-cades, several lines of evidence have led to the conclusion that about 95 percent of our Universe's mass and energy exists in some form that is invisible to us. Hidden. Evading our detection almost entirely. That might seem ridiculous, but just as the act of blowing up a balloon helps us see the air we breathe,our hidden Universe does leave clues that we can decipher to confirm its existence. Galaxies are seen rotating at much greater speeds than are possible without the presence of extra matter. And the large-scale structure and evolution of our Universe, from the Big Bang to the present-day expansion and acceleration, seem to require more mass and energy than we see--some twenty times more. This picture of the invisible gets weirder. Of this mysterious and subtle majority of our world, only about a third is thought to be matter. Appropriately, it is called dark matter. The other two-thirds is stranger yet, and is called dark energy.

Thousands of physicists, astronomers, and engineers are actively working toward the goal of understanding the nature of dark matter and dark energy. Many of these scientists are skilled experimenters, designing ultra-sensitive detectors in deep underground mines, constructing new kinds of telescopes capable of detecting much more than simply light, or operating particle colliders that smash matter together at incredible speeds. Others, such as I, are theoretical physicists, struggling to understand with pencil, paper, and powerful computers how dark matter and dark energy fit into our world as we currently understand it.

Although the scope of these collective efforts is staggering, the basic motivations are nothing new. For as long as people have pondered their world, they have tried to identify what it is made of. The philosophers of ancient civilizations speculated and hypothesized endlessly on such matters, if not always very successfully. Millennia later, but still in much the same spirit, the heirs to those philosophers discovered and codified the chemical elements of the periodic table that we are all taught in school. Twentieth-century physics has further revealed an incredible world of quantum particles. These particles are part of a beautiful and elegant theory that successfully describes nearly all of the phenomena observed in our Universe. But, alas, nearly all is not nearly enough.

Long before the advent of modern chemistry and physics, the peoples of early civilizations made countless attempts at understanding the composition of the things around them. The ancient Greek philosopher Empedocles provided one of the most enduring of those ideas when he hypothesized that each type of matter in the Universe arises from a specific combination of four fundamental elements: air, earth, fire, and water. Empedocles, followed by Plato and a long list of others, thought that it would be impossible to change one pure element into another, but by melding together different quantities of these pure elements, any substance could be formed.

The healthy system of discussion and debate among learned Greeks fostered further investigation. Elementalists, such as the philosopher Democritus, conjectured that all matter was made up of a finite number of individual, indivisible particles that he called atoms. Democritus believed, as did the other elementalists, that these fundamental particles could not be destroyed or created, but only arranged in different patterns or in different quantities to make different substances. A slippery substance, for example, would be made out of round, smooth atoms. An object made up of atoms with hooks or other such shapes could stick or lock together in dense groups to form heavy substances, such as gold. This basic idea of Democritus's turned out to be, very roughly, correct.

Modern chemists know that the qualities of a substance are not so simply determined by the superficial properties of atoms themselves, but instead largely result from the interactions among atoms. But despite the failure of the ancient elementalists to build an accurate atomic theory, the concepts at the foundation of their theory represented a major step forward in scientific thought. Many of the concepts are essentially the same as those taught in nearly every chemistry classroom today. The atoms of modern chemistry, however, are not the indivisible and fundamental objects envisioned by Democritus.

During the twentieth century, as experimenters probed deeper into the nature of the atom, they found that atoms are not indivisible. Experiments by physicists such as J. J. Thomson and Ernest Rutherford showed that atoms themselves are made up of constituent parts: protons, neutrons, and electrons. And in a further refutation of Democritus, physicists found that one element could be changed into another by adding or removing those parts. Modern-day alchemy--but without the appeal of gold. In the 1960s and 1970s it was learned that protons and neutrons themselves are made up of even smaller particles. It seems that the Greek concept of the atom applies more to these smaller particles than to the objects in the periodic table that we call atoms.



Continues...

Excerpted from Dark Cosmos by Dan Hooper Copyright © 2006 by Dan Hooper. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >