Disappointing Historical Fiction
Daughter of York showed promise. The book's summary made me excited to read it. In the beginning it seemed like a well-written, intereseting novel (helped along by Anne Easter Smith's saying in the acknowledgments that the fabulous historian Ann Wroe gave it her stamp of approval). However, after the beginning it started to lag in pace and interest. I tried to hold on. But like a sinking ship, York sank, going from mediocre to boring.
The book starts out with Margaret of York becoming a princess. When her unmarried brother, Edward, claims the crown she becomes the first lady at court. As the sister to the English king, Margeret is a powerful chip in the royal marriage game and there are several powerful European rulers vying for her hand. Edward chooses Charles, Duke of Burgundy, for Margaret to marry but her heart already belongs to the married noble, Anthony Woodville.
There is no historical evidence that Anthony and Margaret had an affair or were even friends. Smith admits this in her author's note. The fabrication of this main story thread took away a substantial amount of the story's authenticity. It seemed like Smith invented a romance were there was none, perhaps because she thought it would make Margaret's life more interesting to the reader. Also, as soon as Margaret arrived at Burgundy, the book got tedious. Burgundian history, which is fascinating, was barely touched upon and the politics in that land at the time were barely skimmed over. Margaret, who was an intelligent and skilled stateswoman, would often rule in Charles' absence. Instead of focusing on Margaret's adept ruling abilities, which were well known, the novel focused on her friendship with a dwarf named Fortunata and her sex life.
Fortunata is a made up character. Margaret never had a jester type figure present at her court with this name. While I understand the need to have Margaret have a female confidante in the story, the fact that the two relationships that Smith focused on were fictional bothered me. I like to have more history in my historical fiction. The focus on Margaret's sex life also detracted from my interest in the story. We could have been spared a few descriptions of Margaret's agonizing nights with Charles. The author depicted Margaret's whole life-and all her thoughts-as being consumed by an illicit affair with Anthony. Margaret of York was an astute, highly religious woman living in the 14th century. Her life was consumed by her faith and aiding her family's rule of England, not with imaginary romances. This is part of a trend in works of historical fiction: to sexualize female characters to the exclusion of anything else of interest about them. Strong, interesting women like Margaret are reduced to the sum of their sex lives. If Daughter of York had focused more on the history of Margaret's accomplishments it could have been a good read.
If you're looking for really great dialogue in a novel about the Yorks try Sharon Kay Penman's The Sunne in Splendour, also set during the War of the Roses. If you want to learn more about Margaret of York later in life, try the history The Perfect Prince by Ann Wroe.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.