Dead Last: The Public Memory of Warren G. Harding's Scandalous Legacy

Paperback (Print)
Buy Used
Buy Used from BN.com
$17.17
(Save 36%)
Item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging.
Condition: Used – Good details
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $12.48
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 53%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (11) from $12.48   
  • New (7) from $13.40   
  • Used (4) from $12.48   

Overview

If George Washington and Abraham Lincoln are the saints in America's civil religion, then the twenty-ninth president, Warren G. Harding, is our sinner. Prior to the Nixon administration, the Harding scandals were the most infamous of the twentieth century. Harding is consistently judged a failure, ranking dead last among his peers.

By examining the public memory of Harding, Phillip G. Payne offers the first significant reinterpretation of his presidency in a generation. Rather than repeating the old stories, Payne examines the contexts and continued meaning of the Harding scandals for various constituencies. Payne explores such topics as Harding's importance as a midwestern small-town booster, his rumored black ancestry, the role of various biographers in shaping his early image, the tension between public memory and academic history, and, finally, his status as an icon of presidential failure in contemporary political debates. Harding was a popular president and was widely mourned when he died in office in 1923; but with his death began the construction of his public memory and his fall from political grace.

In Dead Last, Payne explores how Harding's name became synonymous with corruption, cronyism, and incompetence and how it is used to this day as an example of what a president should not be.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

“Payne’s reappraisal of the Harding myth is first-rank scholarship and makes an impressive contribution to the debates about the life and misfortunes of Warren Harding. Summing Up: Essential.”
Choice

“Payne gives the reader much to consider and convincingly makes the case that Harding has remained relevant until today because he has become the benchmark by which other presidential failings are assessed, concluding that ‘Harding continues to hover at the edge of our national memory, where he is rediscovered when[ever] one of our leaders fails’.”
American Historical Review

“More so than previous historians, Phillip Payne has presented a much more nuanced understanding of Harding's political legacies. His well-structured narrative leaves Harding’s memory in the same place as his monument: balancing multiple eras, designs, and interpretations, and ultimately, left to future generations to evaluate fully.”
Northwest Ohio History

“This examination, Payne’s comparisons to more recent presidents, and his examination of the use of the race card in politics help expand the scholarship in a number of fields, including history, political science, and sociology.”
The Journal of American History

“(A) fascinating exploration of the man’s reputation in his own time and of how we have continued to play upon Harding’s reputation over the years since then. Payne’s concluding chapter on the smug (my word) presidential ratings by historians, and of the continued convenience of using Harding to this day as an example of failure is a fascinating one.”
Library Journal

“Phillip Payne’s Dead Last accomplishes a task for which historians of political thought will be very grateful: his assessment of Harding’s ideology of ‘civic boosterism’ in the 1920s is truly insightful and original.”
— Clarence E. Wunderlin, Jr., editor, The Papers of Robert A. Taft

“(I)t took more than scandal to sink Harding to the bottom of the presidential pile. (Payne) says, for example, that the very qualities that got Harding elected in 1920, such as his boosterism for small-town America, turned against him after his death.”
Mansfield News Journal

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780821418192
  • Publisher: Ohio University Press
  • Publication date: 2/10/2009
  • Edition description: 1
  • Pages: 284
  • Sales rank: 822,758
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 8.90 (h) x 0.70 (d)

Meet the Author


Phillip G. Payne is an associate professor of history at St. Bonaventure University in western New York, where he teaches courses in United States and public history. He worked for the Ohio Historical Society at the Warren G. Harding Home.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

1 Questions Asked 1

2 The President's Hometown 20

3 Commemorating the Tragedy of Warren Harding 48

4 My Damned Biographers 70

5 The Shadow of William Estabrook Chancellor 95

6 He-Harlot 126

7 Harding Alley 155

8 Dead Last 192

Notes 225

Bibliography 257

Index 263

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 2
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(1)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
  • Posted February 7, 2009

    Examining history is a good thing

    I don't know if Payne's book is the best at what it does, but the author does an admirable job at going back and reexamining the often misunderstood legacy of Warren G. Harding. Harding was not the nations best President, but he was by no means the worst one either. What tarnished Harding was that in death is that the dead can't mount a defense in their own stead. That said, Payne goes to the source of who Harding was by examining the things, place and the people within his life. What Payne does not do is wallow in the urban legends that Harding fathered numerous children out of wedlock or was of mixed blood. I believe that the author avoids this topic (and he is vilified by another reviewer on B&N for bringing up these unverified rumors) because the facts simply don't exist. It is this exactly the type of "garbage" which has haunted Harding for over 80 years, and in those 80 years none of those who want so hard to believe these bits of urban legend have proven their cases. For my money, Payne does a good job.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 5, 2009

    Harding Biography is Dead Wrong

    Phillip Payne tells us, "The story of the creation and use of Harding's image illustrates the role of reputational entrepreneurs in shaping the national civic religion. "He assumes that academic historians ("entrepreneurs") purposely craft the Harding image according to their interpretation of the civic religion. This is his main thesis and he spends the books' 223 pages extolling the virtues of a man who was never fit for the office, even by his own words. Payne claims that others have "constructed Harding's image and reputation." Harding was responsible for creating his own image, reputation, and character. He didn't need help from academic historians. He takes on Presidential rating polls and takes issue with historians whose "academic judgments regarding Harding as part of a public discourse." He even claims that the CSPAN visit to the Harding home in their presidential series of visits to Presidential homes, denigrated Harding's character. Payne's "Freudian slip" occurs in the very first sentence of the section "Acknowledgements":"Two themes often emerge when authors discuss writing a book. The first is the image of the lonely historian researching and writing. The second theme is that of community, where the author thanks those folks who helped influence the thinking and research and thus made the book possible." The reader now knows that the author feels "lonely" (read: alone in his views); and second, those "folks who helped influence the thinking and research" (clue: he worked for the Harding Memorial Association and the Ohio Historical Society.... "where most of my materials came from.") In other words, what we have here is a small-college professor, who is biased in favor of Harding and seeks to rehabilitate his reputation and character without doing serious research. Payne praises author Robert Ferrell (no surprise there: another Harding devotee), for "...debunking many of the falsehoods that permeate Harding's biography..." while wrongly assuming that "Progressive writers favored the policies of Woodrow Wilson which worked against the reputation of Harding." Payne needs to do some competent Wilsonian research, and not on the internet or through library-loan (which he includes in his "Acknowledgements"), but some genuine primary-source research. Payne states that Harding was not Black. But Harding was what we know as an Octoroon, meaning a person of fourth-generation black ancestry. Genealogically, it means one-eighth black. Payne has given only cursory attention to the actual photographs and accompanying information now available in open sources, not locked away by the Ohio Historical Society and the Harding Memorial Home. He needs to take a closer look at Oliver Perry Harding. And he needs to ask the current Harding family to un-block Warren Harding's ancestry from being viewed on-line. What does Dr. Richard Harding have to hide? Payne talks about the "two women rumored to be Harding's extramarital sexual partners...Carrie Phillips...and Nan Britton...")what about Rosa Hoyle, Augusta Cole, Miss Allicott, Maize Haywood, Blossom Jones, Margaret Gorman, and Grace Cross? Harding fathered more than one child. This biography is dead wrong.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)