Gift Guide

Defending the Defenseless: A Guide to Protecting and Advocating for Pets [NOOK Book]


Do you love cats, dogs and other pets? Do you want to do more to help protect and advocate for these pets, but don't know where to start? Defending the Defenseless is for anyone who wants to join a growing crusade to bring animal protection to its rightful place in a civilized society, to protect animals from harm inflicted by humans, and allow them to live happily in an environment that appreciates their unique qualities. Regardless of career or lifestyle, anyone can become an advocate for pets in a growing ...
See more details below
Defending the Defenseless: A Guide to Protecting and Advocating for Pets

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$18.99 price
(Save 44%)$33.99 List Price


Do you love cats, dogs and other pets? Do you want to do more to help protect and advocate for these pets, but don't know where to start? Defending the Defenseless is for anyone who wants to join a growing crusade to bring animal protection to its rightful place in a civilized society, to protect animals from harm inflicted by humans, and allow them to live happily in an environment that appreciates their unique qualities. Regardless of career or lifestyle, anyone can become an advocate for pets in a growing movement to defend the defenseless. This book guides readers through the variety of ways they can help companion animals and offers practical tips to get involved, from donating money to volunteering at animal shelters, from opposing animal experimentation to raising children to protect animals. Defending the Defenseless is perfect for anyone who loves animals and is seeking guidance on how to get involved.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
In this detailed how-to book, which addresses every imaginable aspect of animal advocacy, there's no denying that attorney and animal rights advocate Phillips knows her stuff. Phillips encourages readers to become part of the solution through a variety of advocacy techniques, even breaking out activities by age group for kids, including specific activities for middle school students (building a wildlife feeder) or high school students (constructing a dog house). On the business side, Phillips identifies attorneys who are making a difference in pet advocacy as well as successful lobbyists, and provides contact names and states for individuals in each group. However, her writing style, while straightforward and well-organized, is best suited to highly educated readers, thus limiting her audience. The book would be the perfect textbook or reference for a college class or community outreach program. (Oct.)
Maya Gupta Ph.D
This book is at once a how-to manual and an inspirational piece. Drawing on her own journey to becoming an animal advocate, Allie shares her encyclopedic knowledge of the animal protection field to give us practical advice on how to get involved-and how to keep moving forward in the face of obstacles. Whether your passion is puppy mills, feral cats, legislative change, or shelter reform, Defending the Defenseless will make us all better advocates on behalf of our animal friends. For anyone ready to take the next step to speak up and speak out for animals, your guidebook has arrived.
Randall Lockwood Ph.D
Allie Phillips has crafted a thoughtful, refreshingly personal and comprehensive guide for anyone seeking to become more involved with helping the animals who share our world. Whether you are taking 'baby steps' in making humane life-style changes, getting involved with your local animal shelter, or taking the great leap into starting your own group to advocate for animals, this book provides hundreds of valuable tips to get you started, keep you focused and keep you sane while doing great things. This is a must read for all seeking to put caring into action.
Becky Robinson
In Defending the Defenseless, Allie Phillips provides a thorough and comprehensive overview and instruction of Trap-Neuter-Return, the program that benefits both cats and the community. We are a nation of animal lovers, and Phillips delivers valuable ideas for harnessing that love and putting it to work to protect animals.
Meena Alagappan Esq.
In Defending the Defenseless, Allie Phillips guides us through a vast spectrum of practical ways that all people, with varying levels of experience and involvement, can help protect companion animals. Through numerous motivating and inspiring examples, she demonstrates the power of individual action and encourages fostering a more compassionate world. Anyone who cares about animals should read this book and share it widely!
Laura Allen Esq.
As an attorney, lobbyist, advocate and rescuer, Allie Phillips is unquestionably a pioneer of the animal welfare movement. She has laid out a very frank, personal account of what it can be like to maneuver around the intransigence of the management of some shelters, the ego and self-interest of some in the movement, and the entrenched economic and political interests that seemingly stonewall efforts to improve animal welfare. As a former prosecutor, she is not afraid to call prosecutors and law enforcement to task for not taking animal cruelty seriously, for failing to prosecute fully, or at all, in many instances. But Phillips also reminds us that improving animal welfare is a journey where everyone is welcome. If you want to get involved in helping animals, this book is a must read and an easy to follow "how to".
Beatrice M. Friedlander
If you are new to animal advocacy, this book is much more than a how-to manual. It provides those yearning to make a difference for animals with both a roadmap and a call to action. It also reminds experienced advocates why they became involved in this gratifying yet emotionally demanding cause.
Foreword Reviews
Defending the Defenseless is for anyone who wants to join a growing crusade to bring animal protection to its rightful place in a civilized society. This book guides readers through the variety of ways they can help companion animals and offers practical tips to get involved, from donating money to volunteering at animal shelters, from opposing animal experimentation to raising children to protect animals. Phillips shares her own personal experiences protecting animals, which she describes as 'some involve outrageous joy, and others involve life-altering devastation.'
Bark Magazine Editors
Animals in need: with every new crisis in the animal community, the desire to bring about change can be overwhelming. But where does one start? Allie Phillips—author, attorney, advocate for animals and someone with an almost unbelievable ability to implement change on the ground—has written a highly useful guide to getting involved. Phillips begins with the basics of volunteer work, then quickly moves into more informative territory, including explanations of the essential language (e.g., do you support rights or animal welfare?), opportunities in public education, how to help feral cats, animal transport, lobbying, emergency preparedness and models of best practices around the country, among other issues. Phillips writes with confidence and conviction, and offers a steady hand to the hesitant advocate.
Midwest Book Review
Defending the Defenseless: A Guide to Protecting and Advocating for Pets is a guide for those who want to speak up for these struggling creatures who may be facing abuse by their owners or others.... Defending the Defenseless is a good guide to getting involved for those who want to make a difference.
ForeWord Reviews
Defending the Defenseless is for anyone who wants to join a growing crusade to bring animal protection to its rightful place in a civilized society. This book guides readers through the variety of ways they can help companion animals and offers practical tips to get involved, from donating money to volunteering at animal shelters, from opposing animal experimentation to raising children to protect animals. Phillips shares her own personal experiences protecting animals, which she describes as 'some involve outrageous joy, and others involve life-altering devastation.'
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781442202160
  • Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Publication date: 10/16/2011
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 312
  • File size: 866 KB

Meet the Author

Allie Phillips is an author, attorney and advocate for the protection of animals and vulnerable victims. She is a former prosecuting attorney who has worked for the National District Attorneys Association where she launched the National Center for Prosecution of Animal Abuse. She was previously employed with American Humane Association as the Vice President of Public Policy and Vice President of Human-Animal Strategic Initiatives. Allie is a nationally-recognized expert on issues involving animal protection and advocacy. She is a volunteer with King Street Cats (Alexandria, VA) and Vice President of No Paws Left Behind. She co-founded Michiganders for Shelter Pets, is a council member of the Michigan State Bar Animal Law Section, on the steering committee of the National Link Coalition, and a Practitioner Member of the Shelter Animal Reiki Association. To learn more, please visit
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Defending the Defenseless

A Guide to Protecting and Advocating for Pets
By Allie Phillips


Copyright © 2011 Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-1-4422-0214-6

Chapter One

Animal Rights and Animal Welfare: Where Do You Stand?

People sacrifice their lives to save their cats and dogs, as we saw during hurricane Katrina; yet they may engage in the sports of hunting or fishing on the weekend. There is a movement to pass laws to include family pets in domestic violence protection orders, yet more cities and states are pushing to pass breed-specific legislation that would ban certain dog breeds. There is growing opposition to using animals in research laboratories, yet people still buy and use products that are tested on animals. Americans have growing concern regarding the housing and treatment of farm animals, yet many people eat meat or animal products without checking to see if the animal was raised humanely. I am not passing judgment on any of these practices. However, it is interesting to point out the ironies in the business, beliefs, and habitual human behaviors involving animals.

Issues involving the protection of animals are emotional and controversial. it is a complex field where gaining consensus from society on how to protect animals is difficult due to widely differing opinions. Animal welfare laws date back to the 1860s, when the first animal cruelty law was passed in Massachusetts. Laws have been passed because most people abhor cruelty in any form to any living creature and want to see animals humanely cared for or allowed to live free and naturally in the wild. Yet it is humans that inflict torture and pain on animals. These acts of torture and pain have resulted in a plethora of animal welfare laws.

Americans have come a long way when we look at animal protection. in 1993, only seven states had felony animal cruelty law, yet today all states but three have felony laws. When I entered law school in 1990, the concept of a student Animal Legal defense fund chapter was nonexistent, but today there are chapters at more than 125 law schools in the United States. No animal law courses were taught at law schools in the 1990s; however, today just over one hundred law schools educate on the complexities of animal law. The first state bar animal law section was created in 1995 within the state bar of Michigan (of which I am a council member), and now there are thirty animal law sections nationwide.

Protecting animals through the law and advocacy is gaining in popularity. We now have Animal Planet, an entire cable television network dedicated to animal issues, and we see animal stories played out in mainstream media every day. Why? Are we growing more compassionate and empathetic as a society? Are animals catching up with the laws that protect humans? Do we now desire to treat all living creatures better? What we are seeing in the united states is an overall change in perception regarding animal protection, and the influence of that perception is pushing animal welfare and the law into the light.

What is ironic is that animal protection laws preexisted child protection laws and domestic protection laws. in fact, in 1874, the American society for the Prevention of cruelty to Animals was the organization that helped to save Mary Ellen Wilson from an abusive foster home, the first case of child protection. in the late 1800s, a few states had animal protection laws, but laws protecting women and children from abuse did not exist. Today the laws have shifted, and prosecutions for child abuse and domestic violence are commonplace, whereas an animal cruelty prosecution is so rare that it frequently gets significant media attention due to community outcry.

So again we have these hypocrisies about protecting animals, and many question where to draw the line. Is it okay to pass laws that protect cats and dogs (primary companion animals in American homes) from being killed, tortured, or poisoned? Yet many states allow an animal shelter to gas (poison) a cat or dog to death in a chamber filled with carbon monoxide or dioxide as the pet howls and scratches to get out. Should we permit legal protection of an animal in one context but not another? A rabbit may have protection from cruelty (killing, torture, neglect) as a companion animal, yet if found in the wild the rabbit can be shot and killed, or if found in a research lab it is not given the same protections as rabbits in a home. And while companion animals are protected under the law from intentional and negligent acts of harm by humans, farm animals and wildlife are systematically excluded. Is one species more important or socially acceptable than another?

As a society, Americans are attempting, but struggling, to decide how we want to treat animals. We witness clashes among the humane animal welfare organizations, farm bureaus, veterinary associations, and even animal care organizations over the appropriate laws to protect animals. The law is usually quite clear and gives us absolutes that we must abide by. Overall, the law tends to be black or white, with just enough gray area to allow for creative arguing. Consistency in the law is required to maintain a humane and law-abiding society. The growing area of animal law may be the movement that helps to define how Americans will treat animals and to eliminate some of the hypocrisy. However, the humane treatment of animals goes far beyond the law and treads on how we view animals.


The humane Research council (HRC) is a team of professionals that formed in 2000 to conduct research so that animal advocates would have accurate and helpful information. HRC is conducting a longitudinal study that currently encompasses three annual reports on Americans' feelings about animals with the conclusion that "the importance of animal welfare may be strengthening over time." the first report from 2008 was created as a baseline for the study and found:

• 72% of U.S. adults have a "favorable" opinion of the animal protection movement.

• 32% give animal protection groups "significant" credibility regarding information about animal welfare.

• Many people "strongly support" using anti-cruelty investigations (47%), the media (37%), and speaking in schools (33%) to advocate for animals.

• 44% think the animal protection movement has had a "moderate" or "significant" impact.

• 35% "strongly support" the specific goal to "minimize and eventually eliminate all forms of animal cruelty and suffering."

The second report was issued in 2009 and repeated six of the sixteen questions from the previous report. The third report found that "seven in ten people say they personally support the animal protection movement's goals to 'minimize and eventually eliminate all forms of animal cruelty and suffering.' Despite the fact that these types of questions often yield positive responses, it is significant to think about what this support would mean for animals if taken to its logical conclusion. The challenge for advocates is to determine how to translate this sentiment into tangible gains for animals." The third report also claimed:

• 28% strongly support and 41% somewhat support the specific goal to minimize and eventually eliminate all forms of animal cruelty and suffering.

• When asked how much of an impact the animal protection movement has had on our nation's policies (i.e., federal and state laws and regulations, corporate policies), responses were very little impact (36% in second wave, 32% in third wave), moderate impact (35%), to significant impact (10%).

• When asked how important is the protection of animals when it comes to making the following personal choices on these issues, listed is the percentage of responders indicating "very" or "somewhat" important:

* Getting a new pet (83%)

* Buying food (i.e., meat, eggs, dairy) (70%)

* Going hunting or fishing (62%)

* Buying consumer products (61%)

* Buying clothing (55%)

* Attending circuses or rodeos (54%)

* Voting for a political candidate (51%)

* Going to dog or horse races (49%)

• When asked if farm animals deserve the same protection as pets and other animals, only 53% of people agreed. And only 56% of people agreed that people have an obligation to avoid harming all animals.

Seventy-seven percent of those surveyed agreed that animals are capable of thinking and feeling emotions, and the animal protection movement ranked within the top three causes (with workers' rights and tax reform/relief ranking ahead). Advocacy tactics, such as investigations, media reports, school education, lawsuits, ballot initiatives, lobbying, and product boycotts, were supported by more than half of those surveyed, except for demonstrating and protesting. And when asked if their concern for animals caused action, the top answers included spaying-neutering their pet (58%), buying products not tested on animals (40%), adopting an animal from a shelter (35%), and signing a petition (31%). Lastly, the protection of companion animals ranked higher than all other animals (with 62% citing "very important").

It is easy, as an animal advocate, to believe that all humans share the belief that animals, regardless of species, deserve protection. The studies from the HRC are important in that they provide a compass for how Americans overall view the welfare and protection of animals. This is important to keep in mind as you advocate for animals.


When it comes to animal rights and animal welfare, where do you stand on the continuum? What really is the difference between the two? In the most basic terms, those supporting animal rights believe that all animals should be free from human exploitation. This includes not using animals for food or clothing as well as not having animals as actors in movies. Some animal rights activists go as far to say that cats and dog should not be "adopted" or "owned" by humans and should not be confined in animal shelters. On the other hand, animal welfare stands for providing the strongest protection and humane treatment of animals based on the situation of the animal. For example, if a cow is on a farm destined to be used as food, animal welfare proponents will work toward the humane raising, treatment, and slaughter of that cow. Moreover, understanding that euthanasia is a tragic reality in many animal shelters, animal welfare advocates work toward banning inhumane practices such as gassing or drowning. So let's delve into these two philosophies more.

Animal Rights: "The philosophy of animal rights rejects the idea that one can evaluate the appropriateness of some action, such as, killing an animal, by weighing the benefits of this action, such as, finding a cure to a disease, against its cost (animal death or suffering). In other words, the ends do not justify the means, especially when the means, that is, animal use, are wrong. If one were considering behavior only as it applies to humans, most would agree with this philosophy. Some people concur that we shouldn't kill another individual even if we could save many in so doing (capital punishment notwithstanding)."

According to People for the ethical treatment of Animals (PETA), an animal rights organization, "supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. we believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. Animal rights is not just a philosophy—it is a social movement that challenges society's traditional view that all nonhuman animals exist solely for human use. As PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk has said, 'When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. Each one values his or her life and fights the knife. Only prejudice allows us to deny others the rights that we expect to have for ourselves. Whether it's based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or species, prejudice is morally unacceptable. If you wouldn't eat a dog, why eat a pig? Dogs and pigs have the same capacity to feel pain, but it is prejudice based on species that allows us to think of one animal as a companion and the other as dinner.'"

As I have advocated against pound seizure (shelters providing cats and dogs for experimentation) for a decade, the primary argument from the opposition has been concern over the demise of vital medical research without the use of animals. hence, the collision of animal rights versus animal welfare. I doubt anyone would find it appropriate to take a healthy family member and subject them to numerous experimentations resulting in their death. Yet many people do not think twice when this is done to millions of animals in American laboratories. Animal rights believes that animals should not be used, period, even if it benefits humans, because there is no difference between animals and humans. Animals and humans feel pain, have an instinct to survive, and should not exploit each other. Humans do have more rights, currently, than animals; however, animal rights advocates believe animals have similar and equal rights to protection from harm and exploitation.

Toward that end, the Animal Legal defense fund has created an Animal bill of Rights16 promoting a petition to congress that says:

I, the undersigned American citizen, believe that animals, like all sentient beings, are entitled to basic legal rights in our society. Deprived of legal protection, animals are defenseless against exploitation and abuse by humans. As no such rights now exist, I urge you to pass legislation in support of the following basic rights for animals:

The Right of animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse.

The Right of laboratory animals not to be used in cruel or unnecessary experiments.

The Right of farm animals to an environment that satisfies their basic physical and psychological needs.

The Right of companion animals to a healthy diet, protective shelter, and adequate medical care.

The Right of wildlife to a natural habitat, ecologically sufficient to a normal existence and self-sustaining species population.

The Right of animals to have their interests represented in court and safeguarded by the law of the land.

The bill of Rights is an effort to recognize the voiceless and those that need humans to defend them from harm. As written, however, the bill of Rights is a combination of both animal rights and animal welfare philosophies.

Opponents of animal rights argue that animals are incapable of making moral judgments like humans and, therefore, are not entitled to the same rights as humans. Moreover, humans behave differently toward varying species. For example, we may treat a cat or chimpanzee with the kindness that we want, but we have no problem killing a cockroach that invades our home.

Animal Welfare: Animal welfare advocates understand that animals should have rights and protections from harm but are not equal to humans. the rationale and approach to protection is quite different from animal rights beliefs. According to Larry Katz, professor at Rutgers university, "because we recognize that some animals are capable of having interests or suffering, we have evolved culturally to respect those interests. One might argue that we don't strive to save endangered species, wilderness preserves, old growth forests or the coral reefs because they have rights. Rather, we place value in these rare or complex systems because our moral laws teach us to preserve and protect our environment, whether it is the physical or biological environment."

Animal welfare has typically been promoted through the passage of laws that recognize that animals are "used" in some capacity by humans but deserve humane treatment. I have always been intrigued by the phrase humane treatment and what it really means. Again, the definition depends on whether you sit on the side of animal rights or animal welfare. for example, humane treatment of shelter animals means no death at the hands of humans for animal rights advocates; on the contrary, it means a painless death (euthanasia by injection rather than gassing, drowning, or other "inhumane" methods) for animal welfare advocates. Some animal welfare advocates believe that assessing the behavior of the animal helps to achieve humane treatment for that same animal. For example, Temple Grandin has dedicated her life and career to understanding the feelings and natural behaviors of farm animals so that humane housing and slaughter facilities can be created. She is promoting humane treatment through the lens of animal welfare, whereas the no Kill Advocacy center is promoting guidelines for creating "no-kill" animal shelters. It is approaching humane treatment through the lens of animal rights.


Excerpted from Defending the Defenseless by Allie Phillips Copyright © 2011 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.. Excerpted by permission of ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC.. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Part One
Chapter 1: Animal Welfare and Animal Rights: Where do you Stand?
Chapter 2: Becoming an Animal Advocate: Where to start
Chapter 3: Staying Strong and Resilient: Overcoming Conflict and Compassion Fatigue
Part Two
Chapter 4: Humane Education: Kids helping Animals
Chapter 5: Advocating for Shelter Animals: Ending Outdated and Questionable ShelterPractices
Chapter 6: Models for Thriving Animal Organizations: Saving more Lives through Innovation
Chapter 7: Saving a Life: Transporting Shelter Animals
Chapter 8: Preventing Cruelty and Neglect of Animals
Chapter 9: Protecting Feral Cats
Chapter 10: Animal Emergency Preparedness: Disaster Response, Search and Rescue
Chapter 11: Attorneys Advocating for Animals
Chapter 12: Lobbying for Animals
Chapter 13: Using your Words to Benefit Animals
Chapter 14: Communicating with and Healing Animals
Part Three
Chapter 15: Keeping People and Pets Together: Everyone can Help
Chapter 16: Conclusion: Welcome to the Journey
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 6, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)