Democratic Dialogue in Education: Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence / Edition 1by Megan Boler
Pub. Date: 01/28/2004
Publisher: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
This collection brings into dialogue authors from a range of disciplines and perspectives to address the thorny question of how to balance the demands of «democratic dialogue» with the reality of a world in which each voice does not carry equal weight. Should rules be in place, for example, that correct for such imbalances by privileging some voices or muting others? Should separate spaces be created for traditionally disadvantaged groups to speak only among themselves? Is democratic dialogue in an inclusive sense even a possibility in a world divided by multiple dimensions of power and privilege?
Leading theorists from several countries share a concern for social justice and present radically different interpretations of what democracy means for educational practice. In a format unusual for such collections, the essays speak directly to each other about significant moral, philosophical, and practical differences regarding how to effectively engage students as critical participants in classrooms fraught with power and difference. The authors draw from philosophy, critical race theory, sociology, feminist, and poststructural studies to address topics including hate speech, freedom of expression, speech codes, the meanings of silence, conceptions of voice and agency, and «political correctness». They explore honestly and self-critically the troubling and disturbing dimensions of speech and silence that situate the classroom as a volatile microcosm of contemporary political contradictions.
Table of ContentsClick to read or download
and post it to your social network
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews >
This collection of essays is a timely work, dealing as it does during these oppressive times with teachers' responsibilities for permitting all to express themselves in the academic setting. It presents various points of view on how best to encourage the expression and awareness of students' diverse points of view. Unique feature, which exemplifies the principles of open communication being pursued here: the editor arranged that each contributor had the opportunity to read what the other contributors had to say so that all could modify their submissions if they chose in light of what the others had to say.