- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Available on NOOK devices and apps
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
With a delivery as cool and dry as a vodka martini, Tristan Layton brings numerous international locals and characters to life in Faulks' homage to Ian Fleming's greatest creation, James Bond. It's 1967 and agent 007 is on a forced rest leave, but it isn't long before a new threat to the British Empire and the world has M dragging him back into action. Evil genius Dr. Julius Gorner is out to destroy Britain by flooding England with heroin. He also has an even more diabolical plan waiting in the wings. Faulks follows Fleming's traditional framework, but it's Layton's performance that keeps the rather slow storyline moving. His reading nicely enhances Faulks's prose and his proper English intonation provides the perfect stage from which his rich, multi-accented characters can project. It is a smooth, easy performance that elevates the material. A Doubleday hardcover (reviewed online). (June)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.There was a knock at the door. Bond checked himself in the bathroom mirror. The comma of black hair, dampened by the shower, hung over his forehead. The scar on his cheek was less distinct than usual, thanks to the tanning effect of the Persian sun. His eyes were bloodshot from the salt water but retained, despite the spidery red traces, their cold, slightly cruel, sense of purpose.
A slash of hair, a scar -- the description of Bond is calligraphic: strokes upon the void. (That "comma of black hair," of course, is the Master’s own touch, repeated so often in the Bond novels that it acquires the intensity of a Homeric epithet.) As Kingsley Amis, who wrote his own Bond novel under the name Robert Markham, observed, Bond is "a depressive and a solitary." Unadorned, but faithful also to the characteristic obsessions with technology, gastronomy, pitiless lovemaking, and branded goods, Faulks’s Fleming-prose captures this emptiness perfectly. Devil May Care is set in swinging 1967, and as the action begins we find Bond enduring a strange epoch of self-doubt, lounging around Rome and wondering if he should pack it all in. M has sent him on a recuperative sabbatical, and for weeks he’s been going to bed "no later than ten o’clock with only a paperback book and a powerful barbiturate for company." But international espionage abhors a vacuum, and within a few pages 007 has been summoned back to London. "The party’s over," snaps M. Somewhere between Paris and Tehran, something nasty is brewing; informants are having their tongues pulled out; sinister shipments are on the move. To be precise, there is a new archenemy in town.
On the spectrum of Bond villainy, Dr Julius Gorner, it must be said, is at the low-voltage end of things. He has an excellent henchman (the grisly Chagrin, relieved of human sympathies by a botched brain operation) and an excellent deformity (a monkey hand or main de singe, complete with hairy wrist and non-opposable thumb.) And his vendetta against the British Empire is a nice touch -- at one point he instructs Chagrin to do to Bond "what the British did to the Kikuyu in the Mau-mau rebellion." Personally, though, despite his great "arrogance" and oft-mentioned "purity of purpose", he lacks fire. And he’s no visionary. Compared with the galactic hubris of Moonraker's Hugo Drax, for example, who wanted to restart the human race, Gorner’s evil master plan seems rather chaste: he intends merely to flood the United Kingdom with cheap heroin while jump-starting a nuclear war.
Also rather chaste in Devil May Care is Bond himself. Naturally, there is the usual lecherous banter with Moneypenny, and the woman of the hour -- Scarlett Papava, a well-travelled investment banker with notable legs -- does a lot of undressing at gunpoint (as does Bond, oddly). But consummation is long deferred, and there are no random conquests to keep us ticking over: Bond’s attention is focused monogamously, even piously, on Scarlett. "She pushed a strand of black hair behind her ear. Did she know that he was watching? Why else reveal the perfect pink shape of her ear, so delicate and exactly formed that it was all he could do not to lean across and kiss it?" One imagines the fastidious Faulks holding his nose with one hand as he types those lines with the other. Still, he’s getting the job done: such sentimentality is the flip side of the Fleming style, part of the dissociation that enables him to be so thrillingly cruel.
I’m spoiling nothing, I hope, when I tell you that Bond saves the day -- a world in which Bond did not save the day would not be our world. But the real victor here is Sebastian Faulks: moving with sinuous urgency from set piece to set piece, handling cliché like a favorite sidearm, his Fleming-prose threads its way sure-footedly between homage and pastiche. Let’s be open to the possibility that it might be -- to lift a line from U2 -- even better than the real thing. --IJames Parker
James Parker is the author of Turned On: A Biography of Henry Rollins (Cooper Square Press). He is a staff writer for the Boston Phoenix.
I was surprised but flattered to be asked by Ian Fleming Publications if I would write a one-off Bond book for the Ian Fleming centenary.
I told them that I hadn’t read the books since the age of 13, but if when I reread them, I still enjoyed them, and could see how I might be able to do something in the same vein, then I would be happy to consider it.
After almost five years researching Victorian psychology for my novel Human Traces, there was something attractive about a jeu d’esprit which, if I followed Fleming’s own prescription, I could write in about six weeks.
On re-reading, I was surprised by how well the books stood up. I put this down to three things: the sense of jeopardy Fleming creates about his solitary hero; a certain playfulness in the narrative details; and a crisp, journalistic style that hasn’t dated.
I tried to isolate the essential and most enjoyable aspects of the books. Then I took that pattern and added characters and a story of my own with as much speed and as many twists as I thought the reader could bear.
I developed a prose that is about 80 percent Fleming. I didn’t go the final distance for fear of straying into pastiche, but I strictly observed his rules of chapter and sentence construction.
My novel is meant to stand in the line of Fleming’s own books, where the story is everything.
In his house in Jamaica, Ian Fleming used to write a thousand words in the morning, then go snorkeling, have a cocktail, lunch on the terrace, more diving, another thousand words in late afternoon, then more Martinis and glamorous women. In my house in London, I followed this routine exactly, apart from the cocktails, the lunch and the snorkeling.
I found writing this light-hearted book more thrilling than I had expected. I hope people will enjoy reading it and that Ian Fleming would consider it to be in the cavalier spirit of his own novels and therefore an acceptable addition to the line.
Anonymous
Posted February 3, 2012
A great book if you are into the 007 stories
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.I've read a few of the Ian Flemming novels and fially decided to pick up this book since the original James Bond novels were not available. Overall I enjoyed the book. It did remind me of the Ian Flemming style and had all the elements of a Bond novel: egotistical bad guy, quirky henchman, beautiful babe, thrills and spills, exotic locations, techno gadgets (mostly by the bad guys) and a double cross here and there. Some folks have their complaints (i.e. Bond playing tennis, M asking for chocolates, etc). But to me that is nicpicking. Bond is Bond whatever he does he always does very well. I was quickly drawn into the whole spy adventure and thoroughly enjoyed it. If you are looking to get inot Bond again, don't miss the opportunity to read "Devil May Care"
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.slatsdawson
Posted October 19, 2009
Might be a ok book to read while traveling.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 14, 2012
I enjoyed this book very much, and was happy to see Felix and Mathis again. Felix had a very trying time here. I felt bad for James when M wanted him to meet the new 009.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Rock56
Posted September 27, 2011
Not up to the usual standards of most Bond novels. Too predictable.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.6301186
Posted December 26, 2010
a little too modern for a james bond book, read thr sample to see what i mean, some people will like it but i didnt.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.This was definitely an enjoyable read. It gave me the flavor of the original Ian Fleming series but with the style of author Faulks. There also seemed to be a hint of more of James Bond's psychology being presented but never too much. This reminds an action story and a fairly good one at that. We are taken back to a time in the early 1960's when the CIA and the British secret service are not all that trusting of each other. This is the bothersome early years of the Vietnam War in which America fights on alone with no allies. And the demon heroin and drug addiction is being used to wreck the moral and physical strength of a nation by a crazed sociopath. It is a time before 911 and Bin Laden. More a time of torturers who learned their bloody trade in the years of War War II and the post-colonial collapse of England and France.
There are fast cars and chases with interesting twists and turns in the plot that make this smooth sailing. The plot locations are excellent and the food and drink and other references are fun and send one to your foreign language dictionary. Don't forget the wild machines (really tame and realistic) and the final scenes of fighting and mayhem which always were first-rate in the James Bond books. I think you will find this story up to that standard. Give it a whirl and hope for more books in the series. Give the younger readers a taste of what we enjoyed in our youth before the fantastic excesses of the Bond movie industry.
I will admit it; I am a fan of Ian Fleming. I have all of his 007 novels and prefer them to any of the movies (the newer Casino Royale is the exception). This book is not up to the Fleming novels, for the improbable reason that it is too Ian Fleming. I think that he should include more of his own talent and it wouldn't seem quite as flat. I have the same comment for those who write Sherlock Holmes stories like AC Doyle (Laurie King is a great example of someone who doesn't attempt to write in the original style, but still writes great novels). However, this book is an order of magnitude better than some of the movie novelizations I've seen.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.May 28th, 2008 would have been Ian Fleming's 100th birthday. To celebrate, Ian Fleming Productions released a brand new James Bond novel, Devil May Care. Since Fleming's passing in 1964 several authors have carried the torch, keeping the world's most celebrated spy alive and in print. The latest penman comes in the form of Sebastian Faulks (Charlotte Gray, The Fatal Englishman). Interestingly enough the book is advertised as Sebastian Faulks writing as Ian Fleming.
Unlike the James Bond novels of the 80's written by John Gardner or of the 90's written by Raymond Benson, Devil May Care picks up where Ian Fleming left off, the 1960's during the height of the cold war. We find agent 007 on a three month ordered sabbatical to recoup after the events chronicled in 'The Man With The Golden Gun' (best cronicled by Kingsley Amis in 'Colonel Sun'. Upon completion of the three months James Bond is to make a decision on his future as a British spy. He doesn't get much of a chance to make a decision when his superior M orders him back to duty to shadow a Dr. Julius Gorner, a lord in the pharmaceutical field. Gorner's opiate derivatives have become popular in the British culture and the government believes that it is only the front to a scheme that could lead to global catastrophe.
Faulks delivers Bond with his usual creature comforts, lethal weaponry, gorgeous women, and destruction at a maximum level. The action heats up quickly in Devil May Care when an English aircraft goes missing over Iraq. These events and others lead 007 to battle for his life against a greed driven maniac who will push James Bond to his limits.
Devil May Care will satisfy spy novel aficionados with its suspense and hard boiled espionage. While the story is engaging, Faulks is often guilty of trying too hard to emulate the writing style of Ian Fleming. The, more than often, references to famous Bond villains and previous adventures come across forced and somewhat stale, while persistently reminding us that we are in the 1960's with references to The Beatles and The Rolling Stones. Also Faulks fails to capture the descriptive prowess of Fleming that made many of the character in the world of James Bond larger than life.
Devil May Care is a good addition to the James Bond canon. Sebastian Faulks is no Ian Fleming.
Anonymous
Posted July 9, 2009
The reason why I love the cover is because Dominika van Santen, former Top Model of the World is on it, she is absolutely beautiful and amazing and the photographer and designer did a great job as well. The book and the story is also excellent and I highly recommend it! Two Thumbs Up!!!! Now I see why it is a "New York Times Bestseller".
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted July 9, 2009
The reason why I love the cover is because Dominika van Santen, former Top Model of the World is on it, she is absolutely beautiful and amazing and the photographer and designer did a great job as well. The book and the story is also excellent and I highly recommend it! Two Thumbs Up!!!! Now I see why it is a New York Times Bestseller.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted January 15, 2009
It is impossible to recapture the true Fleming style; Sebastian Faulks no more writes as Fleming as Raymond Benson does (or John Gardner). That really isn't much of a criticism, given Fleming's well-deserved reputation. Unfortunately, Faulks leaves out the Fleming style altogether, giving us a semi-chaste Bond who drinks and eats more than he seduces, whines more than he shoots, and just plain lacks the elegant savagery we associate with the world's most famous spy (a post-heroic Bond is not a very engaging chap). The plot is loosely constructed and makes little sense, and both the villain (Dr. Julius Gorner) and the henchman (Chagrin) are shallow, derivative creations. Bond girl (Scarlett Papava?? Ugh.) gets too much attention for what emerges as a rather obvious reason. A drawn out conclusion and weak "twist" finally put the book to bed, something you will be ready to do the moment you pick it up.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted September 29, 2008
Being an avid lover of the movies (Connery, Brosnan, Craig only), well, it wont help you in the books. It may have inspired you to pick this particular book up - it did for me, though my only other reading experience was with Casino Royale. But, to be honest, you need more than just a Bond movie fanaticism. You need first to have read at least one of the original Fleming books, or understand that the Bond from the movies is not the Bond from the books. The fundamentals are there - he enjoys fine foods and an almost insatiable appetite for spirits. He enjoys women, gentlemen's sports, games of chance, and can be a cold, detached, and relentless conspirator and killer. There are gadgets, but of the dreadfully realistic variety - hidden knives, listening and tracking devices, modified cameras, and all of them not straining the suspension of disbelief. He has his enemies, they have their henchmen, though their methods and ambitions tend to be less extravagant than their movie counterparts. It is the attention to the book Bond that help Mr. Faulks succeed brilliantly in this latest adventure. While he clearly abides by Fleming's format, down to the smallest details, he demonstrates that he has more than an imitator's understanding. He earns the right to portray Bond on the page, helping the character retain his cool, his charm, and his passion (whether he's wooing or killing), and avoids making him just a two dimensional representation of movie Bond. The story is richly detailed if a trifle slow in spots. It can be a bit predictable, but only in the way that every Bond fan knows there's going to be a fierce chase, a beautiful woman, a battle of wills, a capture, horrible torture, daring escape, and the final showdown in which our hero wins victorious, if at great expense. One aspect of the novel which felt a trifle cliche even in the Bond universe were the deformity of the villains, Dr. Gorner and the appropriately named Chagrin. The former has an afflicted, monkey-like left hand, and the latter is a messy psychopath and brain surgery experiment. Even these can be forgiven since, if I may wax philosophical, Bond villains represent the external monstrosity where Bond himself represents the monster within. In all it was a fast, exciting read, filled with characters you know and love, whether from previous books or the movie series. Truly a worthwhile purchase.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted July 25, 2008
A travel guide with no plot. Sebastian really 'Faulks' up the Bond legacy.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted May 31, 2008
Since 1964, when Ian Fleming died, several authors have attempted to duplicate the works of Fleming by writing and publishing their own novels on Bond. Up until now Kingsley Amis was the most successful with Colonel Sun. However, Sebastian Faulks has given us a novel about James Bond that returns to the character that Ian Fleming gave us in 1953. Faulks writes a fast paced novel that is mindful of the character Fleming has given us, and does a good job staying true to that character while showing that as the world moves on, Bond stays the same.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted June 14, 2008
It's a good, brisk read! Not great but good. Perfect for summer - by the pool with a beverage
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted August 13, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted May 1, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted November 29, 2008
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted January 13, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Overview
Bond is back in this electrifying new novel of intrigue and suspense. A masterful continuation of the James Bond legacy, Devil May Care picks up right where Ian Fleming left off—at the height of the Cold War, with a story of almost unbearable tension. An Algerian drug runner is brutally executed on the desolate outskirts of Paris and Bond is assigned a new task; to shadow the mysterious Dr. Julius Gorner, a power-crazed pharmaceutical magnate. Gorner has lately taken a disquieting interest in opiate derivatives, both legal and illegal. After finding a willing accomplice in the shape of a glamorous Parisian named Scarlett Papava, Bond must stop a chain of events that could lead to global catastrophe. Charged with