Doctors' Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge

Doctors' Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge

by Kathryn Montgomery Hunter, Kathryn M. Hunter
     
 

A patient's job is to tell the physician what hurts, and the physician's job is to fix it. But how does the physician know what is wrong? What becomes of the patient's story when the patient becomes a case? Addressing readers on both sides of the patient-physician encounter, Kathryn Hunter looks at medicine as an art that relies heavily on telling and interpreting a… See more details below

Overview

A patient's job is to tell the physician what hurts, and the physician's job is to fix it. But how does the physician know what is wrong? What becomes of the patient's story when the patient becomes a case? Addressing readers on both sides of the patient-physician encounter, Kathryn Hunter looks at medicine as an art that relies heavily on telling and interpreting a story--the patient's story of illness and its symptoms.A patient's job is to tell the physician what hurts, and the physician's job is to fix it. But how does the physician know what is wrong? What becomes of the patient's story when the patient becomes a case? Addressing readers on both sides of the patient-physician encounter, Kathryn Hunter looks at medicine as an art that relies heavily on telling and interpreting a story--the patient's story of illness and its symptoms.

Editorial Reviews

New England Journal of Medicine
[An] intriguing study. . . . To patients and all nonphysicians, Hunter's work provides much-needed clarity about the goals and methods of [medical] practice. . . . For physicians, the book offers a greater degree of self-consciousness and a broader understanding of the task of medicine.
— Martha Montello
The Times Literary Supplement
[A] remarkable and important book. . . . Professor Hunter's thesis is that some of the ills of medicine itself may result from the divergence between the patient's account of illness and the medical version of that account. This thesis is compellingly argued.
— Ray Tallis
The Journal of the American Medical Association
A lucid, witty, insightful account.
— Steven H. Miles, M.D.
The Times Literary Supplement - Ray Tallis
[A] remarkable and important book. . . . Professor Hunter's thesis is that some of the ills of medicine itself may result from the divergence between the patient's account of illness and the medical version of that account. This thesis is compellingly argued.
New England Journal of Medicine - Martha Montello
[An] intriguing study. . . . To patients and all nonphysicians, Hunter's work provides much-needed clarity about the goals and methods of [medical] practice. . . . For physicians, the book offers a greater degree of self-consciousness and a broader understanding of the task of medicine.
The Journal of the American Medical Association - Steven H. Miles
A lucid, witty, insightful account.
From the Publisher
"[A] remarkable and important book. . . . Professor Hunter's thesis is that some of the ills of medicine itself may result from the divergence between the patient's account of illness and the medical version of that account. This thesis is compellingly argued."—Ray Tallis, The Times Literary Supplement

"[An] intriguing study. . . . To patients and all nonphysicians, Hunter's work provides much-needed clarity about the goals and methods of [medical] practice. . . . For physicians, the book offers a greater degree of self-consciousness and a broader understanding of the task of medicine."—Martha Montello, New England Journal of Medicine

"A lucid, witty, insightful account."—Steven H. Miles, M.D., The Journal of the American Medical Association

Read More

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780691068886
Publisher:
Princeton University Press
Publication date:
05/06/1991
Pages:
232
Product dimensions:
6.37(w) x 9.57(h) x 1.03(d)

Related Subjects

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >